Quote: (02-26-2018 07:47 PM)RexImperator Wrote:
We already have a thread devoted to his former game/socio-sexual hierarchy blog (Alpha Game), which he has since handed off to another writer, but given that political discussions about him have nearly derailed several threads, we could use a thread on his political and cultural writings, Vox Popoli:
https://voxday.blogspot.com/
I noticed that he has a first video out today from his "Voxiversity" series, and it looks good:
I would say he is certainly one of the smarter writers associated with the "alternative right" movement.
Sorry but he comes across as a lightweight here, his take on this subject is high on bells and whistles in terms of graphics and pageantry, but a pretty superficial take as far as overall depth and his treatment of the subject of the 1965 Immigration Act.
16 minutes of talk, and instead of telling you who is behind this open border policy, for what motives, and what are its challenges and consequences - journalism 101 Who, What, When, Where, Why & How - instead of this, it's about Romans and Gauls, cool WW2 footage and snappy graphics. Great production values, I'll give him that, but not much substance.
Some glaring factual errors too, like his saying that the WW2 German invasion of France was bloodless, when 600,000 French people actually died.
And no mention of the people behind the open border '65 act (Senator Jacob Javits (NY), Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY), President of American Jewish Congress (AJC) Leo Pfeffer, Norman Podhoretz etc). How can you address that problem if you don't even care to investigate the nature and motive of its proponents?
He's wrong about his conclusion too, the thesis that there will be war when the immigrant population reaches 1/3. In Canada it's already close to 1/4, and will reach 1/3 in less that 20 years. And of course in the major cities we're already way above that in Vancouver or Toronto, where immigrants are well over 50%. No war today in Canada, or in decades to come, when immigrants will be the majority, just a gradual erosion and change in the national character (see Trudeau in India).
In the US as well you have the same dynamics, except immigration is more Hispanic and the population base is larger, but the process is well on track:
The real problem with Vox and many other popular alti-sh pundits like him is that they will withhold the main pieces of the puzzle on crucial subjects like this, either as a misread, or as a misdirection.
Contrast with Kevin MacDonald's take on the same issue. No fancy graphics, but penetrating analysis dissecting the heart of the problem in just 10 minutes, analysis that seems out of reach for Vox: