The specifics about what the average black/hispanic American costs the average white/asian/indian American is irrelevant. I've seen various numbers bandied around and each have their sources but you could simply sum it up by saying "it's a fucking LOT".

And that's just pure dollar signs, not speculating on broader costs related to crime.

More the fool, whites. Abolish welfare and tell America to brace itself. You'll have 6 months of bloodshed and another 100 years of prosperity.

Is this what passes for an argument here? Ad hominem and empty rhetoric?

You can compare the AIDS rates of African Americans to the AIDS rates of African blacks but what are you really proving? One is a group of people living within a country and the other is several groups of people with different cultures living in several countries across an entire continent. It's like comparing Polish people living in America to Europeans living in Europe. I mean we can play with the data endlessly to make any sort of claim. The combined GDP of the continent of Africa is higher than the GDP of the city of Shanghai. Yeah. And? Generally you want to reduce the amount of variables in any statistical study to get a better handle on what you're testing for.

"The specific behavior he was discussing was Black people complaining that they're "put upon", so that they can extract extra resources from White people."

What does this mean? His claim that blacks have not changed since slavery in the final 10 seconds of the video, is patently false. Whether they were "put upon" to fleece whites or whatever is beside the point.

Are you a lawyer? If not, you should be. Or sell cars.

As for the 300 billion a year claim, well why not take a full thirty seconds and link the article? But I suspect, as you've already alluded to, the data may be a bit dubious so rather than admit that, your ego compels you to double down and sidetrack the conversation with ad hominems and my misuse of the word "legitimacy" (a multi-tasking mistake)

But you know what? You got this man. I don't have the patience or time to argue in circles about this stuff.

Quote: (01-24-2018 03:59 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

The specifics about what the average black/hispanic American costs the average white/asian/indian American is irrelevant. I've seen various numbers bandied around and each have their sources but you could simply sum it up by saying "it's a fucking LOT".

And that's just pure dollar signs, not speculating on broader costs related to crime.

More the fool, whites. Abolish welfare and tell America to brace itself. You'll have 6 months of bloodshed and another 100 years of prosperity.

I'm curious to see this data.

Quote: (01-23-2018 06:03 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

Interesting views in the vid.

Do not agree with some of course - regarding this sort of justification that rape of black girls by White owners was not a problem because most of them were not attracted to black girls. This is frankly an irrelevant redundant argument.

His other ones - well - he makes some interesting ones:

+ Atlantic slave trade was a constant flow of slaves being mostly captured by black tribes who sold their unfortunate brothers either to the Muslim world (where they were castrated and thus died out) or elsewhere across the world
+ the Atlantic trade by the US was according to his sources 10% of the entire trade, while the rest went to others within Africa, the Muslim world or elsewhere
+ he makes the assertion that in comparison to other slaves the American slaves had the far better life - if they had not been abducted to the US, then they would have been either castrated by Islam (dying childless) or been having a worse life elsewhere

It reminds me of Cassius Clay after his visit in Africa later sort of thanking fate that brought his ancestors to North America - despite the hardships endured he rather preferred being blessed with the options of living in the West instead of suffering in Africa as he saw the poverty and squalor in the 1970s.

I would not go as far as to demand thanks for this "service" - injustice is injustice no matter if other slavers would have treated you worse. But his arguments as stated above are correct on paper.

The Ottomans and other Muslim tribes should pay mor reparations than any other group to the black continent - be it not for the fact that almost all men were castrated and died not having any children. The black influence there stems probably more from the pretty black women they had and the Muslim blacks who settled there.

-----
He also speaks about Martin L King.

There are other black men out there who do not like this veneration:






The concerns about BLK:

1. Plagiarism

Irrelevant simply because while doing research on plagiarism I found that up until the mid 1960s copying entire swaths of books and even previously attained works was standard practice in academia and even science. Pasteur for example copied his work from Bechamp who also by the way had a far superior model explaining health (but it was less profitable). Back then copying texts without reference was not looked upon as plagiarism. That only happened later as Western academia and society began to frown upon such things. MLK copying 30% of his dissertation is absolutely irrelevant at least from the view of his time.

2. Orgies with whores

He traveled 50 weeks a week and said on public record to the FBI that this is how he relieves stress as he invited often multiple prostitutes into his hotel rooms.
I say irrelevant - leave the man alone - he could have just as well fucked his countless groupies and besmirched the honor of the young women (as seen from that time's view). He hired hookers. Also an irrelevant point.

3. Communist history and entanglement, speeches written by globalist writers



That is the only contention that might be raised against him. But Obama and his real dad are communists, communism is a globalist creation.

Fact is that they killed him - maybe he started to oppose them. Who knows... His communist past and influence is the worst part about him, but it's hard to detach yourself from the current day true rulers.

I personally think that he wasn't a bad guy and maybe even tried to oppose them just JFK and his brother Bobby. All 3 were likely killed by that same group - as far as I am concerned he deserves the statue and a good portion of the veneration.


--------------

Though - The David Carroll guy I linked above - he actually claims that the black segregation too destructive for black community. The reason he gives is that suddenly blacks were having to compete with Whites on everything, while before they had their own infrastructure of doctors, lawyers, blue - and white collar workers and police officers.

I personally don't think that segregation was such a great thing, but there would have been necessary a wide-ranging long-term plan on how to improve the state of the black community to better compete with the White population (IQ gap being one point, but there are others - and yes - over time it can be breached). I think that the globalists did the complete opposite and came up with plans on how to field-test the destruction of black community - implementing for example social systems that even checked for fathers when they applied for welfare. That in combination with the usual unchecked female nature lowered the 90% marriage rates of blacks in the 1950s to the the now abysmal 30%.

So in a way both the "racists" who claim eternal difference between races based on genes as well as the brainwashed left who claim total equality are wrong.

Solutions should in my opinion encompass an honest appraisal of current state and then steps on how to make it better. Otherwise you cannot even speak of costs or other things.

As for Martin Luther King - leave him alone. He is probably very similar to JFK - choosing to oppose the status quo. Sure - I may like other black intellectuals better like Booker T Washington, but it is as it is.

MLK was a massive hypocrite preaching virtue while smashing whores, cheating on his wife, and preaching policies that lead Blacks to their current enslavement on the Dem welfare plantation.

thread-65599.html

Quote: (01-24-2018 02:18 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

MLK was a massive hypocrite preaching virtue while smashing whores, cheating on his wife, and preaching policies that lead Blacks to their current enslavement on the Dem welfare plantation.

thread-65599.html

Jeez leave MLK alone, I mean I'd agree with you if you said the same about Nelson Mandela. Unlike Mandela MLK has no blood in his hands, he did not organize a guerilla warfare against the government. He tried to achieve everything via diplomacy..

So what if he was cheating on his wife? That is such a blue pill argument.

Mandela however is a communist thug who received the Nobel Peace Prize

+1 for the Globalists.

Quote: (01-24-2018 02:49 PM)Blancpain Wrote:  

Quote: (01-24-2018 02:18 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

MLK was a massive hypocrite preaching virtue while smashing whores, cheating on his wife, and preaching policies that lead Blacks to their current enslavement on the Dem welfare plantation.

thread-65599.html

Jeez leave MLK alone, I mean I'd agree with you if you said the same about Nelson Mandela. Unlike Mandela MLK has no blood in his hands, he did not organize a guerilla warfare against the government. He tried to achieve everything via diplomacy..

So what if he was cheating on his wife? That is such a blue pill argument.

Mandela however is a communist thug who received the Nobel Peace Prize

+1 for the Globalists.

A pastor cheating on his wife is a false prophet. Look at how much worse Blacks are today after MLK.

"Ye shall know them by their fruits." What are MLK's fruits, other than a 70% illegitimacy rate for Blacks? Massive crime and poverty as a result? The welfare plantation sure worked out great!

Quote: (01-24-2018 02:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote: (01-24-2018 02:49 PM)Blancpain Wrote:  

Quote: (01-24-2018 02:18 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

MLK was a massive hypocrite preaching virtue while smashing whores, cheating on his wife, and preaching policies that lead Blacks to their current enslavement on the Dem welfare plantation.

thread-65599.html

Jeez leave MLK alone, I mean I'd agree with you if you said the same about Nelson Mandela. Unlike Mandela MLK has no blood in his hands, he did not organize a guerilla warfare against the government. He tried to achieve everything via diplomacy..

So what if he was cheating on his wife? That is such a blue pill argument.

Mandela however is a communist thug who received the Nobel Peace Prize

+1 for the Globalists.

A pastor cheating on his wife is a false prophet. Look at how much worse Blacks are today after MLK.

"Ye shall know them by their fruits." What are MLK's fruits, other than a 70% illegitimacy rate for Blacks? Massive crime and poverty as a result? The welfare plantation sure worked out great!

I don't think he made an extra effort to cheat on his wife, he was a charismatic opinion leader, pussy was thrown at him left and right, what was he supposed to do? : )
We all have our little sins.

Quote: (01-24-2018 02:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote: (01-24-2018 02:49 PM)Blancpain Wrote:  

Quote: (01-24-2018 02:18 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

MLK was a massive hypocrite preaching virtue while smashing whores, cheating on his wife, and preaching policies that lead Blacks to their current enslavement on the Dem welfare plantation.

thread-65599.html

Jeez leave MLK alone, I mean I'd agree with you if you said the same about Nelson Mandela. Unlike Mandela MLK has no blood in his hands, he did not organize a guerilla warfare against the government. He tried to achieve everything via diplomacy..

So what if he was cheating on his wife? That is such a blue pill argument.

Mandela however is a communist thug who received the Nobel Peace Prize

+1 for the Globalists.

A pastor cheating on his wife is a false prophet. Look at how much worse Blacks are today after MLK.

"Ye shall know them by their fruits." What are MLK's fruits, other than a 70% illegitimacy rate for Blacks? Massive crime and poverty as a result? The welfare plantation sure worked out great!

Maybe he realized some of that and tried to amend it later. JFK was also a normal mutligenerational stooge of the globalists as his entire family was. He and his brother only later tried to actually change things. Also they were meeting up with MLK quite often back then.

New in the Netherlands: state funded broadcaster NOS decided to replace the original word for white people 'Blank' by 'Wit' (coming from English 'white', obviously), because the word 'white' is supposed to be more neutral than the word 'Blank'.

So what was previously a 'blanke man' on the NOS news is now a 'witte man'. It just sounds quite stupid in Dutch.

More work from the NOS language commission:

.

Some of them, you will understand as a non-Dutch speaker.

^^^ Thaat sjuucks.

Aloha!

Ich bin eine Islamafoob.

That's right. I'm mixing it up. And I'm also taking my best guess at what a foobia is.

Quote: (01-24-2018 02:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

...
A pastor cheating on his wife is a false prophet. Look at how much worse Blacks are today after MLK.
...

A pastor can't be a false prophet because he's not actually a prophet.

You could call him a hypocrite but that's a far cry from lying about directly delivering God's will.

I tested it out - "white women with children" - in Google will get you those results:



It's funny how it works out for the big boys exactly as they have planned even 100 years in advance.

Solid plan - still working well for them:

First I thought Zels theory was BS and how google adjusts search results according to your user profile, but I got similar images too.



Notice how me and zel got completely different images, but the black & white theme is the same

< I did not make the meme - it was shared by a Jewish born writer named Henry Makow. It's still funny that you get such slanted results - they will vary slightly, but the propaganda is clearly visible.

Image search?

I didn't even get that far!

Is this a joke?

Edit... Never mind.. Just did the Google search for myself. Wow. I just don't get it. What is the fucking deal here?

I do remember a time around the Iraq war when you could google "weapons of mass destruction" and it would give you an error page saying "sorry we could not find any weapons of mass destruction."

Or another time when you could Google "French Military Victories" and it would redirect saying, "Did you mean French military defeats?"

Google's a bunch of pranksters.

Quote: (01-25-2018 10:02 AM)Blancpain Wrote:  

...
Is this a joke?

Not even slightly.

Here's a search for "white couple" I just did personally using Startpage, which essentially runs a "clean" search through Google without any history attached.

Apologies in advance. I normally resize images smaller but obviously in this case it's not suitable to do so.



So what do we have.

Of 47 pictures you get:

White couple
Interracial couple
Interracial couple
Non white couple
Interracial couple
Search collage
Search collage
Gay couple with black child
Two African men (gay?)
White couple
White couple
Search Collage
White couple
Interracial couple
Interracial couple
WC
WC
WC
WC with black triplets
WC
WC
IRC
White mug shots
White court shot
IRC(?)
WC
WC
WC
Fat white lesbians
Asian couple
IRC
Non-white couple
IRC
WC
White felons
Search collage
Hitler meme
WC
WC with black kid
Black couple with white kid
WC with black kid
WC
IRC
Trump/Clinton
IRgayC
IRC
IRC
Asian couple.

Number of yarmulkes: Zero

Is this not simply a case of a search for "white women with children" disproportionately returning images from articles with a racial slant, such as articles about biracial relationships?

Edit: If you do a search for "black women with children," there are also a lot of photos of biracial couples. Not nearly as many, but that would be a reflection of the lower of number of articles written about this subject.

Quote: (01-25-2018 03:23 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Ich bin eine Islamafoob.

That's right. I'm mixing it up. And I'm also taking my best guess at what a foobia is.

Quote: (01-24-2018 02:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

...
A pastor cheating on his wife is a false prophet. Look at how much worse Blacks are today after MLK.
...

A pastor can't be a false prophet because he's not actually a prophet.

You could call him a hypocrite but that's a far cry from lying about directly delivering God's will.

Being pedantic does not detract from the main point.

The principles use to recognize a false prophet are the same to recognize a false pastor, false teacher, false evangelizer, etc.

Quote: (01-25-2018 10:25 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Quote: (01-25-2018 10:02 AM)Blancpain Wrote:  

...
Is this a joke?

Not even slightly.

Here's a search for "white couple" I just did personally using Startpage, which essentially runs a "clean" search through Google without any history attached.

Apologies in advance. I normally resize images smaller but obviously in this case it's not suitable to do so.
...
So what do we have.

Of 47 pictures you get:

White couple
Interracial couple
Interracial couple
Non white couple
Interracial couple
Search collage
Search collage
Gay couple with black child
Two African men (gay?)
White couple
White couple
Search Collage
White couple
Interracial couple
Interracial couple
WC
WC
WC
WC with black triplets
WC
WC
IRC
White mug shots
White court shot
IRC(?)
WC
WC
WC
Fat white lesbians
Asian couple
IRC
Non-white couple
IRC
WC
White felons
Search collage
Hitler meme
WC
WC with black kid
Black couple with white kid
WC with black kid
WC
IRC
Trump/Clinton
IRgayC
IRC
IRC
Asian couple.

Number of yarmulkes: Zero

I'm not surprised by this. Ironically, /pol/ News Network tweeted this out, "Google is racist. https://whiteprivilegeisntreal.com/is-google-racist/". The URL to that website page (quite long) contained a lot of analysis, research and screenshots of what they found.

(Images from /pol/)

^^^^Holy smokes this stuff is the truth.

I wanted to know when a TV show is coming out today so I google "Time in London."

Of course I get the little box, but then I get all kinds of shit about women getting groped and articles about Islamic delis making sandwiches.

I'm not deep like you guys, so I don't know how to make the screenshots, so just tryit.

Time in London gets you women groped stories, not time zone information or something practical, that's hilarious.

Aloha!

Quote: (01-25-2018 03:51 PM)Kona Wrote:  

^^^^Holy smokes this stuff is the truth.

I wanted to know when a TV show is coming out today so I google "Time in London."

This was picture number 8 according to that search result:



Also - the google search results are no way only based on bare numbers - the company does the utmost to suppress certain results while exalt others - if you don't fit the global agenda, then it does not matter if the article had 50 mio. more hits - it simply won't appear in the top results on certain topics. I hope this should be ever more clear after the James Dalmore affair.

By the way - London is funny:



Recently I watched some British TV series from 1985. It was amazing to see London filled predominantly with British people - the difference was so stark.






Only when you watch those old documents you see how far things have changed - and not for the better....

Quote: (01-25-2018 03:51 PM)Kona Wrote:  

^^^^Holy smokes this stuff is the truth.

I wanted to know when a TV show is coming out today so I google "Time in London."

Of course I get the little box, but then I get all kinds of shit about women getting groped and articles about Islamic delis making sandwiches.

I'm not deep like you guys, so I don't know how to make the screenshots, so just tryit.

Time in London gets you women groped stories, not time zone information or something practical, that's hilarious.

Aloha!

You can write "Time in London +xxpm/am" to get the local time for that time.

So you can say on google Time in london +5pm and it will tell you what the local time for you is when it's 5pm in london. I found you can do this with all cities and also time zones.