Since when did rich, famous, successful, and good-looking become "game"?

OP may do well to read up on game, especially before starting a thread on something called ROOSH V forum.

This thread was merely created to have an open dialogue discussion based on something I saw on my Facebook news feed. I didn't know I wasn't allowed to do that? Especially when there's another thread titled "Pictures of Alphas with Girls". I have read many varying opinions about this all of which I have found interesting and educational except for yours.

Don't be fooled by my low post count, I have been a long time lurker here from 2014 and even when I was approved I wasn't quick to jump the trigger to post on the forums. I'm just having fun, but please tell me more on how I should be reading up on game.

Quote: (03-14-2017 03:44 PM)Hoser Wrote:  

Since when did rich, famous, successful, and good-looking become "game"?

OP may do well to read up on game, especially before starting a thread on something called ROOSH V forum.

Quote: (03-14-2017 03:44 PM)Hoser Wrote:  

Since when did rich, famous, successful, and good-looking become "game"?

OP may do well to read up on game, especially before starting a thread on something called ROOSH V forum.

Thank God somebody said this. It's just as pathetic to worship the wealthy as it is to despite them.

Pro sports should be included in no fap. They undermine masculinity.

Ronoldoa is either the smartest young rich man alive who has hacked the system...

or...

he is a flaming closet faggot.

I can't tell, to be honest.

He seems natural enough around women, you don't get the 'Ricky Martin vibes' where the dude is disgusted at being around women, he looks very natural when he is with them.

For him using this strategy he gets to be a father with no BS. I can't knock the guy for wanting to be a father as many dudes share that idea as well, it is natural. The only odd thing is how he went about it which either show very deep red pill thinking or other 'closet' motives.

Quote: (03-14-2017 12:32 PM)porscheguy Wrote:  

Zelcorpion, there is no such thing as a bisexual. A bisexual is just another faggot who tries to spread AIDS to women.

I agree.. and disagree.

There is a large catchment of bisexuals in society, the fact is there are more bisexual men than there are gay men. They are sleeper cells and infiltrate groups to cockblock and spread disease.

They exist solely to spread AIDS to hetro people, but also to player hate and cock block. They serve no other purpose.

"Bisexual" "men" are merely dudes who cant consistently plow pussy, so they start looking for other outlets. End of story.

Unless, of course, they really are fags who haven't yet come out of the closet.

Neither is to be applauded or abided.

No.

They are attention whores in the literal sense.

I believe bisexuality to have deep identity crisis roots & these people simply can't stand the idea of having to only receive validation from one gender & hence only 50% of the population. They are consistently narcissistic (as all fence sitters are) & we see a level of self avoidance that is on par with trannys.

At least fags pick a side.

Yeah, you're probably right. So-called "pansexuals" are the ultimate attention whores, so bisexuals are only a small step behind.

I wonder how many of them also identify as vegan.

His kids can never be taken away from him during a divorce, if he were to get married that is. Though once you do have kids you're probably less likely to see the need to marry as is likely the case with Ronaldo.

So it's trading raising your own kids in a non-ideal scenario compared to an ideal scenario of the nuclear family - but you could possibly lose your kids and have to pay a significant amount of your income to fund their primarily your ex-wife for many years to come.

Can't say I blame the guy for wanting to make that trade, it would be a horrible thing losing your kids and we already know the courts are slanted in the woman's favour for custody.

I think Ronaldo made a smart move to protect himself from the system. Obviously he wants kids like any other man. But having them from a girlfriend/wife means he would get raped by the courts in the future. He avoided that danger by using a surrogate mother.

Also I don't think he's gay. He fucked many models and generally seems comfortable around women. As for his Morroccan friend I don't think that has to mean something. Before gay culture went mainstream (like 40-50 years ago), it was normal for men to have close male friends and hang out with them. It wasn't considered suspicious in any way.

Raise your hand if you wish you could grow up motherless like these boys will, having as your only parent a father who you likely will never be as good as.

Quote: (03-15-2017 01:32 PM)Hoser Wrote:  

Raise your hand if you wish you could grow up motherless like these boys will, having as your only parent a father who you likely will never be as good as.

Growing up with millions in a trust fund? In exchange for some mommy issues...? That's a no brainer, most men would take it.

You may not ever surpass your father Ronaldo in sports, but with that kind of starting capital you could easily turn into the next Donald Trump.

Quote: (03-15-2017 01:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote: (03-15-2017 01:32 PM)Hoser Wrote:  

Raise your hand if you wish you could grow up motherless like these boys will, having as your only parent a father who you likely will never be as good as.

Growing up with millions in a trust fund? In exchange for some mommy issues...? That's a no brainer, most men would take it.

You may not ever surpass your father Ronaldo in sports, but with that kind of starting capital you could easily turn into the next Donald Trump.

Could you put a price on a Mother's love though? I would not trade my lifetime with BOTH of my parents for any amount of money, some things in life money just can't buy.

Trust fund kids typically end up blowing all their parents money on drugs, hookers and therapy anyway.

I lost my mother when I was 6 years old, and my father never dated or remarried. I would gladly give up a fortune in exchange for the unconditional love and support of a mother who believed in me, as well as to have the opportunity to see healthy male/female interaction modeled daily.

It took me until I was almost 40 before I realized how many of my personal problems stem from having only one parent's voice in my head.

Honest psychologists will tell you the same thing: to become healthy adults, children need two parents of opposite sex.

This is not an option between having a millionaire father or having none.

This is an option between having Ronaldo as a father and NO MOTHER - which by the way likely won't work since the kid very likely will want to meet his/her mother anyway later on.

AND

Having as a second option a father like him and a mother who is not living with them. There is no way in hell that the courts can take away his kid unless he becomes a violent coke-head like Charlie Sheen - and in that case it is for the kid's wellfare anyway.

Either way - this MGTOW-family planning a la single mother/single father is just bullshit.

This is not an option of whether the kid would decide to be born or not to be born. Of course it is great to have him as a father, but it would be better to have a mother - however the future relationship would look like. Ronaldo could even pay her to abdicate her parental rights before birth - he managed that with the other woman, so why not with the next?

This is the guy who I want to be in my next life, Leo DiCaprio as well

He cheated on every girlfriend he had, including Irina Shayk and then dumped her. He doesnt really take shit from girls and basically next them. The other day, Italian sports channel showed his girlfriends where he publicly made appearences for events, list was like Victoria Secret runway.

This guy totally nailed but it's easy once you make $100 millions a year.

Supposedly, Real Madrid want to renew his contract again and he wants $50 millions net + image rights.

Justin Trudeau has the makings of a super alpha too. Does he drown in as much pussy as C Ronaldo?

hahah based on looks maybe for Trudeau but the guys a pansy fgt.

Quote: (03-15-2017 01:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote: (03-15-2017 01:32 PM)Hoser Wrote:  

Raise your hand if you wish you could grow up motherless like these boys will, having as your only parent a father who you likely will never be as good as.

Growing up with millions in a trust fund? In exchange for some mommy issues...? That's a no brainer, most men would take it.

You may not ever surpass your father Ronaldo in sports, but with that kind of starting capital you could easily turn into the next Donald Trump.

Serious question:

How would you rate the health of your relationship with your mother?

I don't think having kids with a surrogate mother is some super alpha move.

It shows a big ego of reproducing for the hell of it, not even giving the kids a shot at a nuclear family.

I think the ideal with someone with his status would be to attempt to find a woman who will be a good mother and have kids outside of wedlock, to at least reduce the incentive for the woman to end the relationship.

Quote: (03-14-2017 09:09 PM)churros Wrote:  

Quote: (03-14-2017 03:44 PM)Hoser Wrote:  

Since when did rich, famous, successful, and good-looking become "game"?

OP may do well to read up on game, especially before starting a thread on something called ROOSH V forum.

Thank God somebody said this. It's just as pathetic to worship the wealthy as it is to despite them.

Pro sports should be included in no fap. They undermine masculinity.

Holy shit, there is no end to the "hyper alpha male" mentality that people on this forum are striving to project. "Pro sports undermine masculinity." "It's just as pathetic to worship the wealthy as it is to despise them." Very deep platitudes.

This on a forum that has over 2300 pages dedicated to blind worship and idolatry of Donald Trump...

Pro-sports spectatorship is quite often the male equivalent of female gossip shows & reality TV excess. There's not much more pathetic than bitching about how women spend their time & money when you wasting the same amount following other men who are good at a largely inconsequential activity.

And it's far from blind worship. In fact, over 2300 pages lends me to think a lot of rational discussion might have taken place. How much of that thread have you actually gotten through?

Quote: (03-16-2017 02:11 PM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  

Pro-sports spectatorship is quite often the male equivalent of female gossip shows & reality TV excess. There's not much more pathetic than bitching about how women spend their time & money when you wasting the same amount following other men who are good at a largely inconsequential activity.

And it's far from blind worship. In fact, over 2300 pages lends me to think a lot of rational discussion might have taken place. How much of that thread have you actually gotten through?

Re Donald Trump: There are very few post on that thread, especially within the past year or so, that are in any way receptive to anything but nuclear orange-glowing praise for DT. Most of the posts seem to be reposting tweets or Pepe memes.

The "watching pro sports is the same as female gossip shows and reality TV" argument is odd. Not being into sports is fine--people have a variety of different interests. Being militantly anti-sports fan--to the point where it is "pathetic" to watch sports--is pretty overboard and reeks of insecurity. People watch sports because they are passionate about the sport--and many of them actually played the sport at least in their youth.

Also, who is bitching about how women spend their time and money? That red herring came out quickly.

The only sport I watch every game is football (Patriots fan, once Brady is gone maybe relax when/if they start sucking.) Catch a Celtics game or two a week, occasionally watch baseball and hockey. Keep updated on trades etc.

Calling enjoying sports feminine is non-sensical. A room full of women is not watching sports, they may claim to be fans to get men and watch when with men only.

Sports is an easy topic of conversation with other men. If I have nothing in common with a man I work with, for example, sports can be talked about.

Also, acting like it's some giant time sink is absurd. Many forms of entertainment are a waste of time, it's all in balancing it.

Personally, I watch no TV except 2 games a week and maybe a movie. This is far better than many, especially video gamers and most women.

I don't understand the need to take a condescending view on sports, strikes me as a long-term hatred of the jocks bullying you in school.

(Edit: the last sentence was not directed at you conscious pirate, you don't strike me as seething with beta/Omega resentment, just a general observation.)

Quote: (03-16-2017 02:25 PM)LockeAndLoad Wrote:  

Quote: (03-16-2017 02:11 PM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  

Pro-sports spectatorship is quite often the male equivalent of female gossip shows & reality TV excess. There's not much more pathetic than bitching about how women spend their time & money when you wasting the same amount following other men who are good at a largely inconsequential activity.

And it's far from blind worship. In fact, over 2300 pages lends me to think a lot of rational discussion might have taken place. How much of that thread have you actually gotten through?

Re Donald Trump: There are very few post on that thread, especially within the past year or so, that are in any way receptive to anything but nuclear orange-glowing praise for DT. Most of the posts seem to be reposting tweets or Pepe memes.

The "watching pro sports is the same as female gossip shows and reality TV" argument is odd. Not being into sports is fine--people have a variety of different interests. Being militantly anti-sports fan--to the point where it is "pathetic" to watch sports--is pretty overboard and reeks of insecurity. People watch sports because they are passionate about the sport--and many of them actually played the sport at least in their youth.

Also, who is bitching about how women spend their time and money? That red herring came out quickly.

What red herring? You do realise you are posting on RooshV Forum, where we regularly bitch about how women spend their time & money? It's kind of the point here champ. So, first of all let me call you out on your introduction...

Quote: (02-08-2017 01:27 PM)LockeAndLoad Wrote:  

I probably won't agree with everything said on the forum, but certainly won't antagonize.

You can disagree all you like, but your passive aggressive tone won't do well here or in the courtroom Mr Attorney!

Secondly, you have decided to attack me after I offered a comment on Churros reply to Hosers post.

So again, I offer up your own choice of wording...

Quote: (03-16-2017 12:37 PM)LockeAndLoad Wrote:  

Holy shit, there is no end to the "hyper alpha male" mentality that people on this forum are striving to project. "Pro sports undermine masculinity." "It's just as pathetic to worship the wealthy as it is to despise them." Very deep platitudes.

This on a forum that has over 2300 pages dedicated to blind worship and idolatry of Donald Trump...

You do realise again, that this is the Roosh V Forum where we discuss & champion masculinity. And have little time for trolls.

And then this...

Quote: (03-16-2017 02:25 PM)LockeAndLoad Wrote:  

Being militantly anti-sports fan--to the point where it is "pathetic" to watch sports--is pretty overboard and reeks of insecurity. People watch sports because they are passionate about the sport--and many of them actually played the sport at least in their youth.

I'd like to know where I was militant about anything I said in regards to sports spectatorship? That DOES sound like a red herring, Mr Attorney.

People PLAY sports because they are passionate about that sport. I can think of plenty of "pathetic" reasons to watch or spectate sports.

Lots of projection in your post big guy. I hope you're better in the court room than you are on the internet.


Oh, and I can understand that you have not been able to get through all 2300 pages of the Donald Trump Thread. Highly understandable given the amount of sports you are watching & need to defend. It does not escape me that you chose not to answer the only question I posed to you.