Before this thread gets closed. Let's hear what WestIndianArchie says

Quote: (07-14-2016 10:47 AM)Clemmo Wrote:  

Before this thread gets closed. Let's hear what WestIndianArchie says

I honestly think most people on this board have personal issues they need to work out. I did and said nothing wrong.

Quote: (07-14-2016 10:11 AM)noseyneighbor Wrote:  

Then by your definition, everyone is mixed.

Not everyone (there are plenty out there with very little admixture), but in the USA the bulk of non-whites who aren't recent arrivals to the continent (African-Americans, Latinos, most Caribbean migrants, etc) would qualify as mixed, yes.

Quote:Quote:

West Africans can look like anything. To say they don't come out like that is asinine. Africans has the largest genetic variation of any group









All women straight from West Africa with no admixture.

The first woman is Sahelian, likely Malian. The odds of her having Caucasian admixture (courtesy of the Caucasian North Africans who live in close proximity to that region, and actually occupy much of it i.e. Northern Mali) are very high.

The second and third photos don't make your point at all. I've seen some very dark Afro-Latinos and Afro-Caribbeans who have significant admixture, but that's somewhat unusual. The appearance of the women in those two photos is typical of a pure west african with zero (or at most very limited) admixture. They don't look like the girl in your photo.

The final photo shows Nigerian actress Genevieve Nnaji. I can see why you thought that photo made a point: the lighting and the makeup definitely make her look lighter, but this is a better approximation of her actual appearance, which is also distinctly more typical of a less-admixed sub-saharan African than the girl in your photo:












In short, none of those photos help your case.

Quote:Quote:

So please leave me alone

Quote: (07-14-2016 10:51 AM)noseyneighbor Wrote:  

I honestly think most people on this board have personal issues they need to work out. I did and said nothing wrong.

Quote: (07-14-2016 10:41 AM)noseyneighbor Wrote:  

I'd say none of you aren't getting enough sex.

Clearly that mixed girl is the result of ancestral cucking. Just ask Anabasis!

Quote: (07-14-2016 10:55 AM)Excelsior Wrote:  

Quote: (07-14-2016 10:11 AM)noseyneighbor Wrote:  

Then by your definition, everyone is mixed.

Not everyone (there are plenty out there with very little admixture), but in the USA the bulk of non-whites who aren't recent arrivals to the continent (African-Americans, Latinos, most Caribbean migrants, etc) would qualify as mixed, yes.

Quote:Quote:

West Africans can look like anything. To say they don't come out like that is asinine. Africans has the largest genetic variation of any group









All women straight from West Africa with no admixture.

The first woman is Sahelian, likely Malian. The odds of her having Caucasian admixture (courtesy of the Caucasian North Africans who live in close proximity to that region, and actually occupy much of it i.e. Northern Mali) are very high.

The second and third photos don't make your point at all. I've seen some very dark Afro-Latinos and Afro-Caribbeans who have significant admixture, but that's somewhat unusual. The appearance of the women in those two photos is typical of a pure west african with zero (or at most very limited) admixture. They don't look like the girl in your photo.

The final photo shows Nigerian actress Genevieve Nnaji. I can see why you thought that photo made a point: the lighting and the makeup definitely make her look lighter, but this is a better approximation of her actual appearance, which is also distinctly more typical of a less-admixed sub-saharan African than the girl in your photo:

In short, none of those photos help your case.

Quote:Quote:

So please leave me alone

You still missed the point. YOUR definition of mixed IS NOT MY definition of mixed. I already explained what mine was. The girl in my photo has on make-up, dark brown skin, weave broad nose, full lips, and almond shaped eyes, just like the rest of the women posted.

Of course they don't look all alike they're all different people, yet they all share the same features. You made absolutely no point in this long ass post.

Banhammer has been executed.

I'm pretty sure this guy has been banned several times before.

Quote: (07-14-2016 11:21 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

Banhammer has been executed.

Fuck.

I get on an airplane for a few hours and I miss half the fun.

Talking about race in any contrxt = trolling?

Quote: (07-14-2016 05:03 PM)I DIDNT KILL MY WIFE Wrote:  

Talking about race in any contrxt = trolling?

Apparently. I was planning on sticking up for the now banned OP before he went full retard. The fact of the matter is the OP did create a thread that contained legitimate discussion on the proposed topic

I mean I get why noobs are not allowed to broach the topic of race but there is a lot of knee jerk "HES TROLLING"! reactions from people on RVF. It's a snowball effect, once a newbie has been called a troll, he predictably responds by lashing out, further cementing his status as a "troll". Add to that the fact that once a highly repped member calls someone a troll many others tend to join in the hooting and hollering like a pack of baboons.

Look, I'm all for calling out trolls, but if you're going to make the claim, then make the case. Posting meh-meh's isn't selling the argument.

Quote:noseyneighbor Wrote:

God. Damn.

Quote: (07-14-2016 05:22 PM)Red_Pillage Wrote:  

Quote: (07-14-2016 05:03 PM)I DIDNT KILL MY WIFE Wrote:  

Talking about race in any contrxt = trolling?

Apparently. I was planning on sticking up for the now banned OP before he went full retard. The fact of the matter is the OP did create a thread that contained legitimate discussion on the proposed topic

I mean I get why noobs are not allowed to broach the topic of race but there is a lot of knee jerk "HES TROLLING"! reactions from people on RVF. It's a snowball effect, once a newbie has been called a troll, he predictably responds by lashing out, further cementing his status as a "troll". Add to that the fact that once a highly repped member calls someone a troll many others tend to join in the hooting and hollering like a pack of baboons.

Look, I'm all for calling out trolls, but if you're going to make the claim, then make the case. Posting meh-meh's isn't selling the argument.

I'll simplify this. When a poster with no posting history immediately starts a thread which contains something racial in the title, it screams troll and the overwhelming odds are that he is a troll. When is the last time that someone started out immediately on race issues, then posted amazing travel information and killed it in the lifestyle section?

Race may have been a factor, but the point being addressed was tightness of vaj's, not which race is better or any sort of sociopolitical point.

Quote: (07-14-2016 05:48 PM)Red_Pillage Wrote:  

Race may have been a factor, but the point being addressed was tightness of vaj's, not which race is better or any sort of sociopolitical point.

If OP had made a poll thread, stating that he'd done some significant research on the matter and compiled all the studies which he'd reference once the poll was complete in order to, you know, stick with his subject line of "Guess which race of women scientifically have the smallest, strongest & tightest vag?" then it would make some sense.

Instead he came in here guns blazing trying to push his definitions on us and questioning senior forum members on whether they've seen any vag. The initial idea may have been tightness of vaginas, but he quickly diluted it with his trolling.

Most definitely a troll by all indications, very warranted for people to jump on him.

OP stated, I'm paraphrasing, "black women have smaller pussies because their kids have smaller heads. It's scientifically proven!"

Sure, we could overlook that...

Quote: (07-14-2016 05:24 AM)Perfectionist Wrote:  

As I said, quite fascinating...

Quote: (07-14-2016 02:24 AM)Tex Cruise Wrote:  

*It's* has an apostrophe "Perfectionist".

Does a lack of apostrophes threaten you as well?

Quote: (07-14-2016 02:28 AM)Merenguero Wrote:  

I disagree. If a new guy comes on here and immediately starts posting bollocks, existing members obviously make him feel unwelcome. If a new member immediately starts posting things of value, existing members for the most part show their appreciation.

He could have given it a better title... but why do you think the thread has no value?

Quote: (07-14-2016 02:40 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  

There has been an uptick in subtle and not so subtle trolls lately. If a guys first post is silly or low value, it will rightfully get scrutiny. Actually new guys have it easy these days- a lot more low value stuff is let slide when it wouldn't be if Tuth was more active these days. Miss that guy.

The vast majority of new guys do not get hassled unless they start out with suspect stuff.

Seems clear that many of you suspect way too much... why is that?

Quote: (07-14-2016 02:53 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  

At this point, I'm not convinced that the OP is not a female with vag envy.

Or perhaps it could be a dude who wants to talk about tight pussies... why do you think otherwise?


Is there a specific reason why people are so suspicious around here?

Yes. Quite a few good reasons. Not to mention that you have obviously not taken the newbie forum rules to heart. But I'm not surprised, given your equally suspect forum handle and avatar. You are either a female or a raging narcissist, neither of which do well around here long term.

Tally ho champ.

Wouldn't shoulder width have a bigger effect than head size?

The size of a womens vagina is somewhat similar to their mouths.

The depth of their vaginas is similar to the length of their nose.

Also women with wider faces have higher sex drives then skinnier faces.

Quote: (07-14-2016 05:43 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Quote: (07-14-2016 04:18 AM)The Black Knight Wrote:  

...
However, the tightest pussy of them all has been a tall and broad (not fat) American libtard white chick who had done some international cock traveling; the LAST chick on the planet I expected to have a tight pussy let alone a death grip pussy.
...

Interesting. I suppose a genuine women's libber would be doing Schwarzenegger level kegels in order to make back alley rape a virtual impossibility.

Meet Tatyana Kozhevnikova from Russia. She supposedly has the world strongest vagina.

Quote: (07-14-2016 09:41 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  

Meet Tatyana Kozhevnikova from Russia. She supposedly has the world strongest vagina.

WB

Quote: (07-14-2016 09:32 PM)Kinko Wrote:  

The size of a womens vagina is somewhat similar to their mouths.

The depth of their vaginas is similar to the length of their nose.

Also women with wider faces have higher sex drives then skinnier faces.

I can't speculate on depth or drive, but I've long believed that the size of their mouth correlates to the size of the vagina.

And as a rule, a woman who gets stretch marks from pregnancy, will have her vagina blown the fuck out from child birth.

Quote: (07-14-2016 09:41 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  

Quote: (07-14-2016 05:43 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Quote: (07-14-2016 04:18 AM)The Black Knight Wrote:  

...
However, the tightest pussy of them all has been a tall and broad (not fat) American libtard white chick who had done some international cock traveling; the LAST chick on the planet I expected to have a tight pussy let alone a death grip pussy.
...

Interesting. I suppose a genuine women's libber would be doing Schwarzenegger level kegels in order to make back alley rape a virtual impossibility.

Meet Tatyana Kozhevnikova from Russia. She supposedly has the world strongest vagina.

In capitalist America you pop cherry.

In communist Russia, cherry pops you.