[PapayaTapper]

I did comprehensive "data" sheet on yoga pants last summer here:

thread-63951...pid1811194

Enjoy

[Paracelsus]

(03-29-2019 08:53 AM)jeffreyjerpp Wrote:  

If you wanted evidence to show just how shameless, self absorbed, and vulgar Western women are, this is it. Let me count the ways...

-Total disrespect for a sacred space. Christianity urges humility and modesty, especially among young women (for obvious reasons as it turns out). These girls have neither, and feel entitled to parade their near nude bodies around in the second most inappropriate context possible, the only one worse would be a funeral.

And yet said girls will usually have a few Instagram snaps of them in the Hagia Sofia, in which they're clothed neck to knee and wearing a veil. The shot will be artfully constructed and photographed as if she's contemplating existence, and hashtagged #SoPeaceful #Beautiful

[Vladimir Poontang]

If all preachers were like this badass right here, none of this would even be an issue :

[WalterBlack]

Contrast this woman’s social media bullshit with the Muslims who protested and managed to get LGBT stuff pulled out of their schools.

Women are full of shit – I used to bang a very religious Korean Christian woman who began taking the pill because of me. I would dump a load in her and then she would go straight to church.

Could you imagine this happening at the church?:

Rihanna ordered out of UAE mosque complex over photo shoot [from 2013]

Quote:

Pop star Rihanna was asked to leave Abu Dhabi's Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque complex for posing for "inappropriate" pictures outside one of the world's largest Muslim places of worship.

Authorities said they had taken action before the Barbadian singer entered the mosque itself, which is not off-limits to non-Muslims and has become a major tourist attraction in the United Arab Emirates capital.



In one of the pictures, she is seen lying down on her back in the courtyard of the mosque, while in another she sits on the ground with her arms crossed on her chest.

In a statement posted on its website, the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque Centre said: "The singer entered on a private visit without introducing herself and without prior coordination with the adminstration.

"She was asked to leave before entering the mosque after she posed in ways that do not match the sacred status" of the complex, the statement said.

The centre said it worked to ensure that no visitor "fails to meet the standards of decency required to enter the mosque, such as by posing for inappropriate photographs or by sitting in disrespectful positions."

The pictures sparked controversy among fans on Rihanna's Instagram account.

"She thinks she's sunbathing on a beach in Miami!" said one Arabic-language comment.

"It's the fault of those who allowed her into the mosque," said another.

But others praised her.

"Thanks for your respect to our religion... you take your time to wear the traditional dress... And the pictures are beautiful not insulting," read one comment.

"I'm Muslim... and do not find it disrespectful at all. Love you Rihanna," read another.

[TheFinalEpic]

Can we talk about the phenomenon of 'born-again' church girls for a second here, because with 98% certainty, this is what's going down.

I know of 5 or 6 girls of the top of my head that used to be raging sluts, and have since the age of 23 or 24 turned to God and are now 'born again virgins'.

I know of at least 3 personally that have A) have taken at least 15 dicks, but are now 'waiting for marriage' or B) Are willing to suck dick, and even take it in the ass, but not the sacred vagina.

As for the sorry state of dress in society, it's never been easier to stand out. Girls wearing leggings to church or any professional setting is garbage. That's like me wearing sweats to work.

[Laner]

(03-29-2019 10:14 AM)Bananaman711 Wrote:  

Leggings are everywhere these days but you hardly see camel toes. I think only Brazilian and Slavic women can pull off a good camel toe

I present to you, the Asian woman.

[PapayaTapper]

(03-29-2019 11:35 AM)TheFinalEpic Wrote:  

Can we talk about the phenomenon of 'born-again' church girls for a second here, because with 98% certainty, this is what's going down.

I know of 5 or 6 girls of the top of my head that used to be raging sluts, and have since the age of 23 or 24 turned to God and are now 'born again virgins'.

I know of at least 3 personally that have A) have taken at least 15 dicks, but are now 'waiting for marriage' or B) Are willing to suck dick, and even take it in the ass, but not the sacred vagina.

As for the sorry state of dress in society, it's never been easier to stand out. Girls wearing leggings to church or any professional setting is garbage. That's like me wearing sweats to work.

Its no coincidence that western societies have moved to a more casual / less formal sensibilty across all spectra. You can even trace the evolution via architecture. Formal dining rooms where families gathered and formal living rooms where guests were entertained have been both replaced with the casual "great room" where the kitchen is part of the entertainment area.

When I was a kid we ate steaks every single night. Thats because my dad took pride in "providing". To the point where he would sneer at other dads when he saw their kids eat anything else for dinner. "My kids eat steaks...loser"

It used to be that meals were a celebration of life. Food meant something.

Our society is so successful that food doesn't mean survival or success anymore. ITs a given .Its just another form of entertainment available at the click of an app.

Comfort is everything.

Yoga pants in church?.... It was inevitable

[Vincent Chase]

Waiting for a catholic mom to tell women that they shouldn't degrade themselves doing ass to mouth and getting pissed on on a first date and those twitter sluts coming out and saying they can do what they want and show pics of doing ass to mouth and getting pissed on.

[Rorogue]

What kind of miserable, attention seeing loser wears yoga pants to a religious event?

Some women's need for validation and attention is pathalogical

[CynicalContrarian]

Different take.

If you genuinely attend a religious service. Part of the premise is to be a better version of oneself.
To live above one's base instincts.

If these chicks are resorting to leggings cause of mere comfort & more-so convenience.
Then they've largely missed the point of attending a religious service before they've even left their homes.

Which I can readily imagine are replete with messy bedrooms & the like...

[dfw1]

I have been here in Pereria Colombia for 5 weeks now and none of the chicas here have any idea of the nonsence that is taking place in the USA.

Leggings WTF??

I don't want to go back but I have to soon.

[kaotic]

(03-29-2019 11:35 AM)TheFinalEpic Wrote:  

Can we talk about the phenomenon of 'born-again' church girls for a second here, because with 98% certainty, this is what's going down.

I know of 5 or 6 girls of the top of my head that used to be raging sluts, and have since the age of 23 or 24 turned to God and are now 'born again virgins'.

I know of at least 3 personally that have A) have taken at least 15 dicks, but are now 'waiting for marriage' or B) Are willing to suck dick, and even take it in the ass, but not the sacred vagina.

As for the sorry state of dress in society, it's never been easier to stand out. Girls wearing leggings to church or any professional setting is garbage. That's like me wearing sweats to work.

100% Factual about born agains

[Captainstabbin]

(03-29-2019 03:11 PM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

Its no coincidence that western societies have moved to a more casual / less formal sensibilty across all spectra. You can even trace the evolution via architecture.
...
Yoga pants in church?.... It was inevitable

In the Church, you can trace it to the Vatican II council. Perhaps the reason the modern mass doesn't command the respect it once did is because it's been changed so much that it's no longer valid.

[Grodin]

I recall a recent article about a man who stripped down to his boxers on a flight. It was presented as a borderline sexual assault.

This double standard is a bubble that will pop. Soon there will be young men in speedos demanding that women stop looking or criticizing. Maybe black-knighting, but maybe entirely sincere and confused about the difference between Male and Female attraction. Men are no longer learning through mistakes in their younger years.

If you think Milo calling Trump daddy is weird, like I do, brace yourself. Things are going to get a lot weirder. The trolls and the troubled will not be easy to discern.

[Design Engineer]

We have to ask ourselves. Why is it men are always inventing, designing, and creating things of value to society. Men invented Facebook, Instagram, and all these other things these modern liberal whores enjoy--yet they don't recognize the superiority of men. Yet in the West, white men have allowed women virtually unchecked to promote this bs "women's empowerment" movement where they get preferential hiring in the workplace, admission for schools/colleges, and there are so many bs support groups both online and in real life all to support women.

There is "girls can code", we need more women in STEM. Ironically enough it was a man who invented spandex used in today's leggings, Joseph Shivers in 1958. I hear women complain online and in real life 'why are there so many male executives' 'why are there so many male CEOs" well maybe because it was men who founded the company? What great companies have women founded? And if there a few, that's good, but given the fact they are 51% of the population that is proportionately low.

My point is western women really need to be put in their place as second to men. This is one thing I like about Islamic societies, is they are rooted in patriarchy.

[scorpion]

When women wear yoga pants and other provocative clothing in public, they're essentially lording their sexual power over any man who sees them. There is a very real aspect of taunting and humiliation taking place at a subconscious level: the provocatively-dressed woman knows she is exciting the sexual urges of the men around her, but feels protected from the consequences of that excitement by the laws and customs of society. She gets to enjoy the thrill of being seen and desired as a sexual being while being insulated from the sexuality of the men around her. In other words, she's get to have her cake and eat it, too.

Because male and female social/sexual power are complementary rather than identical, the equivalent for men would not be walking around in yoga pants or with their balls hanging out or any such ridiculousness. No, the male equivalent of the widespread female practice of wearing provocative clothing at inappropriate times is actually shocking to our sensibilities: the legalization/social acceptance of groping and fondling. Male social/sexual power is, at heart, rooted in our physical power. We are bigger and stronger than women and, because of this fact, can ultimately make them do what we want them to do. If men decided to start flaunting this power the way that women flaunt their sexual power with provocative clothing, then they would simply start groping every attractive woman they saw.

The fact that this sounds so offensive (rightfully, because it is - none of us would want our mothers or sisters groped by random men) serves to highlight how destructive the practice of women dressing provocatively in public is for society. Women who dress like this are doing the equivalent of fondling every man they see: they are shamelessly exerting their sexual power over strangers for their own selfish benefit.

[Design Engineer]

(03-31-2019 09:06 AM)scorpion Wrote:  

When women wear yoga pants and other provocative clothing in public, they're essentially lording their sexual power over any man who sees them. There is a very real aspect of taunting and humiliation taking place at a subconscious level: the provocatively-dressed woman knows she is exciting the sexual urges of the men around her, but feels protected from the consequences of that excitement by the laws and customs of society. She gets to enjoy the thrill of being seen and desired as a sexual being while being insulated from the sexuality of the men around her. In other words, she's get to have her cake and eat it, too.

Because male and female social/sexual power are complementary rather than identical, the equivalent for men would not be walking around in yoga pants or with their balls hanging out or any such ridiculousness. No, the male equivalent of the widespread female practice of wearing provocative clothing at inappropriate times is actually shocking to our sensibilities: the legalization/social acceptance of groping and fondling. Male social/sexual power is, at heart, rooted in our physical power. We are bigger and stronger than women and, because of this fact, can ultimately make them do what we want them to do. If men decided to start flaunting this power the way that women flaunt their sexual power with provocative clothing, then they would simply start groping every attractive woman they saw.

The fact that this sounds so offensive (rightfully, because it is - none of us would want our mothers or sisters groped by random men) serves to highlight how destructive the practice of women dressing provocatively in public is for society. Women who dress like this are doing the equivalent of fondling every man they see: they are shamelessly exerting their sexual power over strangers for their own selfish benefit.

"but I just wear it because its comfortable".

To counter women wearing leggings, sometimes I'll wear Adidas soccer pants which kind of show the bulge of your junk if you tighten the waist band. I've walked into cafes and have seen girls look down, so I kind of tease them right back and get a kick out of it. It's the only real counter I've found that men can use. But no joke, I also wear the soccer pants due to comfort.

[ilostabet]

(03-31-2019 09:06 AM)scorpion Wrote:  

When women wear yoga pants and other provocative clothing in public, they're essentially lording their sexual power over any man who sees them. There is a very real aspect of taunting and humiliation taking place at a subconscious level: the provocatively-dressed woman knows she is exciting the sexual urges of the men around her, but feels protected from the consequences of that excitement by the laws and customs of society. She gets to enjoy the thrill of being seen and desired as a sexual being while being insulated from the sexuality of the men around her. In other words, she's get to have her cake and eat it, too.

Because male and female social/sexual power are complementary rather than identical, the equivalent for men would not be walking around in yoga pants or with their balls hanging out or any such ridiculousness. No, the male equivalent of the widespread female practice of wearing provocative clothing at inappropriate times is actually shocking to our sensibilities: the legalization/social acceptance of groping and fondling. Male social/sexual power is, at heart, rooted in our physical power. We are bigger and stronger than women and, because of this fact, can ultimately make them do what we want them to do. If men decided to start flaunting this power the way that women flaunt their sexual power with provocative clothing, then they would simply start groping every attractive woman they saw.

The fact that this sounds so offensive (rightfully, because it is - none of us would want our mothers or sisters groped by random men) serves to highlight how destructive the practice of women dressing provocatively in public is for society. Women who dress like this are doing the equivalent of fondling every man they see: they are shamelessly exerting their sexual power over strangers for their own selfish benefit.

[Brother Abdul Majeed]

I really don't understand why this is a problem. The whole point of going to mass is to humble yourself in front of God. That is why I make an effort to dress well and to make sure my wife, my daughters and sons also dress appropriately (I'm a man with 5 kids ranging in age from 25 to 2). It is such a small sacrifice to make. I'm very proud of the way my brood turns itself out for weekly mass. Like ducks in a row, I'm sure other men are a bit jealous of the way my family behaves. I think my wife takes a secret pride in it also, and appreciates my leadership when I insist upon me, her, and our children turning out the way we do. Not only is it a point of pride (allowable pride in this circumstance), but it signals leadership to other men, a rare example these days. I'm not really sure whether I believe in God or not, I wish I did more wholeheartedly, but I'm very attracted to the proposition where families get together and believe in something bigger than themselves. I have always kept my doubts about God secret from my wife and children, and on the outside I give them no reason to believe that I may have doubts. We just go to mass, and my middle daughter always comes with me to a weekday mass, usually on Wednesday before school. She just couldn't imagine me going alone, and now I struggle to imagine going without her. She's 9. Great companionship, and a great basis for a relationship. We talk in the car on the way and on the way back. Great one on one time to have with a child, especially when she asks me what the readings really meant, and I struggle to interpret them in a way that would be meaningful to her life (my Spanish is childish, and she doesn't speak English as well as I'd like).


Any man who lets his daughters wear leggings like that to mass doesn't understand what the point of mass is. It's not about displays of "individuality" or pride. It's almost the exact opposite of that. The rich man and the poor man can get together this one time a week in solidarity, forget about our circumstances, and for one glorious hour just give praise for being here, whatever our position in life is.


The mother who wrote this is right. She's foolish for having expressed an unpopular opinion in public (never do that), but she had the best interests of her sons in mind. 4 teenage boys? Of course they will be looking at girl's asses in church. I still sometimes catch myself doing that and I'm almost 53. I live in a Caribbean community, there's a ton of nice asses for me to look at. It's just not the right place for it.


Western women today are Satan's creatures. They insist upon wielding their "right" to get between men and God. They are playing with a fire that they will not understand until they are bitter, old and lonely. Hey, their body, their choice.

[PharaohRa]

Western women can wear provocative clothing and men can call them out for being the whores that they are. That and implement White Sharia!

[Vladimir Poontang]

(03-31-2019 09:06 AM)scorpion Wrote:  

male and female social/sexual power are complementary rather than identical

A woman's sexuality is very powerful. But what is never discussed is the fact that a man's sexuality is very powerful too. Just as powerful.

When a man becomes thirsty for a woman, in a sense he's giving himself to her, putting himself at her mercy. He could easily be rejected or manipulated, but his horniness for her puts him at her mercy. She has a hold over him.

But when a woman is under the spell of a man, it's also extremely potent. She has to give herself to him. She has to submit to him and trust him and depend on him. Women know that men are pursuers, so if a man gets a woman, he will most probably treat her well, otherwise he'll have to put in a lot of effort into pursuing another one. A woman are far less likely to be merciful to a man who is under her spell. Whereas to a man, a woman is a dependent child. The love occurs naturally because the one who gives the most loves the most.

Ultimately, men are the true selectors. They have all the time in the world to find a woman, and they have the means (sex drive) to pursue. And a man can walk away, and he can also take as much time as needed to improve himself. A man can become a very valuable asset to a woman, an asset that can last decades. Women can't (don't, won't) pursue men, and their superficial value erodes over time. The only way a woman's true deep value can last is if she cultivates it, which she has less of a compulsion to do because it's just so easy to wave your tits and get lots of superficial attention.

Men have the true advantage ultimately (if only they would recognize this) and this in itself gives them even more power.

The problem is that women have become very scared of men's potency. God is both wonderful / amazing / beautiful, and fucking terrifying. If I met God / Jesus I'd run away. I'd say get away from me, don't talk to me don't look at me, I'm not worthy to be in your presence.

Men can also very easily have that kind of power in relation to a female, and females these days are the equivalent of loser men, yet ironically they can at the same time act like they're anything but weak, arrogant losers. Weak because they can't handle a man's power, and arrogant because they're like unruly children disrespecting / testing the teacher. I look back at the times when I was rude to an adult when I was younger and it embarrasses me. Do women ever feel the same or do they enjoy the cheeky feeling?

If a woman senses that a man is gay, he can get away with a lot, because he's not seen as a threat. She can get male attention without the actual approach. She knows it's not real interest, but it will do as it's not hard to rationalize and delude oneself that it somehow is. But if the man is straight, it's considered some kind of assault if he pursues her. Again this is because they can't handle the potency of a man's attention. They also can't reject a man respectfully because to do so would be an acknowledgment that he did nothing wrong.

The only way a lot of women will submit is if the male truly doesn't give a fuck. In other words a psychopath. Normal isn't good enough, normal is bad. Gay is good, psycho is good. Anything to avoid handling real potency or normality. Women always have the instinct to submit, but that includes the instinct to follow whatever sounds like the sweetest deal, no matter what the consequences are. Women are the weaker sex, the most malleable. Game recognized, Satan.

Women should be strong enough to be humble, but they're so stupid they think the two are mutually exclusive. When you combine a strong, humble female with a strong male who leads the way, you get lightning. You get a pot of water boiled by fire. Water puts out fire. Someone has to submit, and it must be women.

Men waste their power by ejaculating too often. Women waste theirs by flashing their tits and limbs to everyone and then complaining.

I'm off the Philippines. Later.

[Heuristics]

(03-31-2019 08:23 AM)Design Engineer Wrote:  

We have to ask ourselves. Why is it men are always inventing, designing, and creating things of value to society. Men invented Facebook, Instagram, and all these other things these modern liberal whores enjoy--yet they don't recognize the superiority of men. Yet in the West, white men have allowed women virtually unchecked to promote this bs "women's empowerment" movement where they get preferential hiring in the workplace, admission for schools/colleges, and there are so many bs support groups both online and in real life all to support women.

....

We have to ask ourselves who invented/ yoga pants, or more likely popularized them. That would be the Lulemon guy who was ousted out of his own company after making remarks that fat women shouldn't wear them.

(03-31-2019 09:48 AM)Brother Abdul Majeed Wrote:  

I really don't understand why this is a problem. The whole point of going to mass is to humble yourself in front of God. That is why I make an effort to dress well and to make sure my wife, my daughters and sons also dress appropriately (I'm a man with 5 kids ranging in age from 25 to 2). It is such a small sacrifice to make. I'm very proud of the way my brood turns itself out for weekly mass. ...

Any man who lets his daughters wear leggings like that to mass doesn't understand what the point of mass is. It's not about displays of "individuality" or pride. It's almost the exact opposite of that. ....

Western women today are Satan's creatures. They insist upon wielding their "right" to get between men and God. They are playing with a fire that they will not understand until they are bitter, old and lonely. Hey, their body, their choice.

We're hitting peak individualism in the west, or, getting dangerous close to it. In modern (read: western) culture, there is no sacred anymore. It is just normalized profanity, which is interpreted as individualism, uniqueness, or edginess. In non western culture, there remains the sacred, and sacred spaces.

There is no more formal sphere anymore either. Enter, workplace casual, flip flops, "nice" t-shirts, yoga pants in the workplace, hipster weddings, and so forth. Take a look at photos from the 50's and 60's and the level of decorum people exhibited.

Women are only as good as their containers, or in this case, societies. Reward attention-whoring, and watch it be spread across the whole of society.

Also, most churches are cucked these days, and facing declining attendance, so they probably won't say anything at all about these profane displays.

[Easy_C]

The irony is that taking a firm stand and offering some non-cucked vision and leadership would be the best way to generate a lot of attendance. There’s a massive thirst for order, vision, and leadership in the young generations and the churches have failed entirely to step up to the plate

[Easy_C]

For “learning to code”

Sure. That’s a great, beta desk job that’s perfect for a submissive person who follows orders. It’s just too bad that it requires a “guardian” personality type which few women are.

[Sooth]

(03-31-2019 09:06 AM)scorpion Wrote:  

No, the male equivalent of the widespread female practice of wearing provocative clothing at inappropriate times is actually shocking to our sensibilities: the legalization/social acceptance of groping and fondling.

In a patriarchal society today this is common. The female doesn't have to even be dressed provocatively - just be uncovered.

I have heard of African missionary girls (especially blonds) being inappropriately touched, (hair pulled, ass fondled etc) by men on the street as if it were normal and they were entitled. Look at what young Swedish girls have to deal with.

The idea that the west is a patriarchy is yet another blatant lie.