[LINUX]

Behold.

The MAGA noose acid carrying white supremacist.

i.e -- possibly two black guys.

[url=https://twitter.com/AJGuglielmi/status/1090787128030781441][/url]

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(01-30-2019 09:04 PM)LINUX Wrote:  

Behold.

The MAGA noose acid carrying white supremacist.

i.e -- possibly two black guys.

[url=https://twitter.com/AJGuglielmi/status/1090787128030781441][/url]

From the body shapes, this actually looks more like a black couple. I downloaded the pic, blew it up and brightened it, and that's what I saw.

If you pull up that Twitter feed, close to 100 percent of the comments are calling this a hoax. Some are pretty hilarious.

[Dusty]

I know exactly who did this. His name is Haven Monahan. Graduate of UVA.

[Disco_Volante]

Baggy sweats in the hood at 2am. Your typical white supremacist enforcers looking for unsuspecting blacks to hang and douse with bleach.
They have a cheat sheet with the entire cast of rent listed so they can focus the search on gay blacks too.

[Kid Twist]

He got pissed late night after they didn't speak nicely to him, being gay, at the Weiners Circle

Snowflakes should know better than to go to the Weiners Circle (where most of the workers are black, lol)

[Leonard D Neubache]

(01-30-2019 06:17 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

I predict Smollett will admit it was a hoax within 24 hours and the story will be forgotten about immediately.

The narrative, such as liberal mental gymnastics will contort it, is that "while these events might not have happened exactly as (minority) indicated, it was entirely believable because this is the climate of fear and danger that minorities suffer under in Trump's America."

[Thot Leader]

(01-31-2019 12:11 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(01-30-2019 06:17 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

I predict Smollett will admit it was a hoax within 24 hours and the story will be forgotten about immediately.

The narrative, such as liberal mental gymnastics will contort it, is that "while these events might not have happened exactly as (minority) indicated, it was entirely believable because this is the climate of fear and danger that minorities suffer under in Trump's America."

Sort of like with all the high profile rapes that have been proven to be hoaxes. "It doesn't matter that this one woman was lying, because there are literally trillions of rapes that go unreported every day." This crazy train has no brakes.

[Leonard D Neubache]

Narrative creates reality rather than vice versa.

It's a feminine imperative born of wild emotion, imagination and not enough intelligence to separate it from the real world. Our societies have been reduced to the state of a frantic female caught in a panic attack desperately in need to a man to slap her back to reality.

50 shades of grey and the handmaids tale are not feminist horror stories. They are female cries for help.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(01-31-2019 12:33 AM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

(01-31-2019 12:11 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(01-30-2019 06:17 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

I predict Smollett will admit it was a hoax within 24 hours and the story will be forgotten about immediately.

The narrative, such as liberal mental gymnastics will contort it, is that "while these events might not have happened exactly as (minority) indicated, it was entirely believable because this is the climate of fear and danger that minorities suffer under in Trump's America."

Sort of like with all the high profile rapes that have been proven to be hoaxes. "It doesn't matter that this one woman was lying, because there are literally trillions of rapes that go unreported every day." This crazy train has no brakes.

LOL! Very true.

Also: "The fact that someone lied about a hate crime really serves to illuminate the unsafe conditions in which intersectional people live every day. They're out there fighting for their lives every minute, so it's not right to judge them. Maybe the crime wasn't real, but their distress is definitely real."

[Scoundrel]

From GQ:

Quote:

A still-disputed aspect of the attack on Smollett is a line shouted after his attackers fled the scene: "This is MAGA country." While its veracity isn't confirmed, its sentiment needs no fact-check.

[Sam Malone]

[Scoundrel]

From CNN:

Quote:

"A dozen police detectives, with the assistance of the FBI, are working the case, the spokesperson said."

There are homicides in Chicago that don't have a fraction of that kind of manpower working on them.

[Leonard D Neubache]

I can't imagine that I'm the only person on the forum that thinks faking hate crimes should carry a penalty equal to being convicted of a hatecrime, just as false rape allegations should be punishable by the same metric.

Arguably falsifying hate crimes should actually be punished even more harshly still, because while a fake rape allegation can destroy a single life a fake hate-crime allegation tears at the fabric of the entire nation.

[CynicalContrarian]

(01-31-2019 02:13 AM)Sam Malone Wrote:  

Essentially the sentiment I was going to posit.
Is all this drama a thing cause it's actually important? Or merely cause the fop is from Hollowood?

[Jetset]

(01-29-2019 08:31 PM)Dr Mantis Toboggan Wrote:  

Pretty clearly, it's either completely fake or the guy was beaten up by a drug dealer or someone he was hooking up with. My bet is he had been fucking a "straight" guy on the down low who needed to protect his secret.

Why can't he just trip and fall while chasing a scam artist after walking his dog through a park known for late night gay trysts like everybody else?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar...gging.html

[Mr. Wolf]

Now he's refusing to let the police see what's on his phone. I wouldn't do that either, but then I try to avoid interacting with the police whenever possible.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/01...ng-normal/

[Jetset]

(01-31-2019 06:18 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

I can't imagine that I'm the only person on the forum that thinks faking hate crimes should carry a penalty equal to being convicted of a hatecrime, just as false rape allegations should be punishable by the same metric.

Years ago, we had a news story in the American northeast where a police officer stabbed himself. He claimed he had been attacked by two black males, but it quickly became apparent that his life was falling apart and that he was trying to collect his retirement benefits.

He was acquitted in local court, but convicted of numerous counts of postal fraud at the federal level for sending the paperwork through the mail. He got a few years in federal prison and was slapped for $90,000 in restitution, the value of the benefits he received.

In the United States, criminal restitution can't be cleared in bankruptcy. It seems to me that if prosecutors started could make proven false accusers repay the costs of the investigations they demanded, quite a bit of this would dry up.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(01-31-2019 09:59 AM)Mr. Wolf Wrote:  

Now he's refusing to let the police see what's on his phone. I wouldn't do that either, but then I try to avoid interacting with the police whenever possible.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/01...ng-normal/

This link is a great find. But you left out the best part. The second half of the headline says: "Was Filmed in Lobby After ‘Attack” Appearing Normal."

The story goes on to say:
Jessie Smollett said he was assaulted and suffered a cracked rib but condo surveillance video shows Smollett walking past security to the elevator. Without telling them he had just been attacked by thugs who “beat the hell out of him” and “broke his ribs.”

He then said he was "talking to his manager" during the assault but won't turn over his phone. His manager is saying he overheard the assault and this is why cops want the phone -- to see if he was really talking to his manager.

I agree that you avoid cops whenever possible. "Getting involved" = asking for trouble, since the job of cops and prosecutors seems to be to put as many men behind bars as possible, whatever the reason.

But...if you're the one that goes to the police to begin with and they spend days doing a manhunt, perhaps it's then incumbent upon you to help them out. You already got involved by that point.

[Leonard D Neubache]

(01-31-2019 10:03 AM)Jetset Wrote:  

(01-31-2019 06:18 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

I can't imagine that I'm the only person on the forum that thinks faking hate crimes should carry a penalty equal to being convicted of a hatecrime, just as false rape allegations should be punishable by the same metric.

Years ago, we had a news story in the American northeast where a police officer stabbed himself. He claimed he had been attacked by two black males, but it quickly became apparent that his life was falling apart and that he was trying to collect his retirement benefits.

He was acquitted in local court, but convicted of numerous counts of postal fraud at the federal level for sending the paperwork through the mail. He got a few years in federal prison and was slapped for $90,000 in restitution, the value of the benefits he received.

In the United States, criminal restitution can't be cleared in bankruptcy. It seems to me that if prosecutors started could make proven false accusers repay the costs of the investigations they demanded, quite a bit of this would dry up.

It's all a big, steaming pile of "FWIW" these days.

I'm trying to remove the word "should" from my vocabulary and replace it in sentences with "will" or "will not", the latter of those two being far more applicable than the former. All the better to cut through the bullshit and stop trying to polish this turd that we still have the audacity to call Western Civilization.



Is it Western Civilization simply by virtue of being a civilization in the west? At what point does it cease to be a continuation of what came before it? I honestly don't know how to approach this basic and fundamental question any more. If aliens dropped their mother ship directly on top of our parts of the planet and allowed us to live within their insectoid tunnels would it still be Western Civilisation just because the ruins of it laid underneath us in rubble?

[Enoch]

This guy's hoax is keeping police from working real crimes and bringing actual real criminals to justice. Let that sink in.

[911]

As far as hoaxes go, this is a pretty low IQ, very dumb one.

Colin Flaherty has done a remarkable job documenting the culture of victimhood and violence that has plagued urban Black America since the 1970s, including white on black hate crime hoaxes.

very extensive playlist:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL...kM5ihXilw3

An introduction to his work with his recent interview by the excellent Tim Kelly:

[Jetset]

(01-31-2019 10:27 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

He then said he was "talking to his manager" during the assault but won't turn over his phone. His manager is saying he overheard the assault and this is why cops want the phone -- to see if he was really talking to his manager.

Prediction: his manager came up with this as a publicity stunt, and is the dumbest manager of all time.

[Waqqle]

Crazy Conspiracy Theory

He could be the real anti-black racist.

Perhaps this guy was given a rough time by other black people for being gay while he was growing up and he now hates black people so he is using this hoax to exhaust police resources and distract away from the real crimes perpetrated against black people in Chicago by other black people every day. The more populous and black the city is, the greater the impact of his actions. So Chicago would be a natural choice, especially given the daily frequency of crime, if he wanted to inflict the maximum amount of damage on the largest number of people in the least amount of time.

Every day that he can keep the police and the public focused on him is a day that a dozen murders go unsolved and maybe even that a few crimes which would not have been committed are because the police are being distracted by him. Maybe his goal is to endanger and deprive of justice as many black people as he can, which is why he chose Chicago, one of the blackest and most populous cities in the country, for the staging of his fake hate crime. Maybe he is even using his manager, who thinks it is just a publicity stunt to promote Empire and is unaware of the true motive behind it.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(01-31-2019 11:17 AM)Jetset Wrote:  

(01-31-2019 10:27 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

He then said he was "talking to his manager" during the assault but won't turn over his phone. His manager is saying he overheard the assault and this is why cops want the phone -- to see if he was really talking to his manager.

Prediction: his manager came up with this as a publicity stunt, and is the dumbest manager of all time.

There is actually a precedent for this kind of "publicity." It didn't work, but there is a precedent.

Back in 1989, a New York-based talk show host named Morton Downey, Jr. claimed he was attacked by "skinheads" in an airport bathroom. Downey was a confrontational show host who constantly got in his guests' faces, so this seemed believable. At first. When cops looked into it, it fell apart.

Eventually the consensus was that Downey faked the attack so he'd have an excuse to get dentures, because his teeth were gross from all the chain smoking he did on the show (he later died of lung cancer).

Here is a link, for anyone who wants to explore this odd rabbit hole. Along with Trump, Howard Stern, and the Beastie Boys, Downey was one of the quintessential New York characters of the '80s.

[Jetset]

(01-31-2019 11:45 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

There is actually a precedent for this kind of "publicity." It didn't work, but there is a precedent.

Oh, totally.

I'm just picturing some old guy smoking a cigar thinking about things that happened in the '80s.

"Yeah, that's the ticket. You got your ass kicked, tell 'em Trump supporters did it. Everybody'll love that. I'll be a witness. THIS IS GENIUS."

Police ask to see the phone.

"Huh. I did not plan ahead for that."