0 day water-only fast completed
06-07-2018, 09:41 AM
Quote: (06-07-2018 06:10 AM)asdfk Wrote:
TG, I agree that people dealing with hard to treat diseases may experiment when there are no real cures. But the risk of those experiments should be clearly laid out so one can make an educated decision.
In times when people considered the earth flat, the right thing to do was to warn explorers they might fall off if they go too far. In hindsight this was wrong but at the time this was assumed to be true and it would be dangerous to let someone go on without informing them of the potential risk.
People can make decisions for themselves when they have enough intelligence and enough data. Witholding data on risks or persuading someone the risk is minimal (in absence of real data) is actively minimising someone's chances to succeed. Anyone who does that is not doing any favours to this community, just as someone who calls experimenters "retarded" is not helping. The need for experimentation in lack of alternatives is real but it should be done as thoughtful as possible, will it have the chance to give the most benefit to anybody involved (including the experimentee, including the people watching).
I do not disagree with most of what you said, but that is not what happened here (which I explain below). I also strongly disagree with your original premise:
Quote:Quote:
TG, I agree that people dealing with hard to treat diseases may experiment when there are no real cures.
The majority of modern diseases, including almost all autoimmune diseases, have cures. The cure is exactly the same as the prevention: proper diet, moderate exercise, reduction of stress, proper sleep, and limiting the number of toxins entering the body. I know, because not only have I experienced it first-hand, but I also follow much of the cutting edge science. Has anyone else on this thread actually stayed at the best fasting clinic in the world and had daily access to doctors who work at such a clinic? The problem, for most people, is that the cure is slow (it takes years to reverse decades of abuse) or too radical for them (giving up junk food).
The problem occurs in these threads when naysayers pop up out of nowhere, crap all over everyone, and make dogmatic pronouncements based upon nothing more than old suppositions and stale failed "science" to hijack threads and to thwart thinking men from bettering themselves. For all we know, Bain has discovered how to prevent cancer when eating the Standard American Diet (SAD), i.e., dry fasting for one day a week over the course of decades. We will never know, however, because of our rigid scientific and medical establishments that forgo big bold studies that help mankind if it cannot produce a profit.
Our education system is also to blame. In most classrooms, there is little room for curiosity and experimentation. An authority figure steps up to the podium to feed us “the truth.” Textbooks magically reveal the “right answers” to questions. We learn about Newton’s “laws” -- as if they arrived by a divine visitation or by a stroke of genius -- but not the years he spent exploring and revising them (not to mention his experiments in alchemy, which failed spectacularly).
In a typical chemistry class, the outcome of each experiment is predetermined. There was no room for curiosity or unexpected insights. If you didn’t get the “right result,” you are stuck in the lab repeating the same experiment over and over again. Proper methodology is prized far above the actual learning experience, much less questioning the status quo.
As a result, we are taught to believe there is one right answer to each question. We believe that this right answer has already been discovered by someone far smarter than us. We believe the answer can therefore be found in a moldy text book or a Google search of the so-called mainstream experts. I see exactly this type of thinking displayed on this forum on a regular basis by a particular type of closed-minded disruptive troll who would rather proclaim outside-the-box thinkers idiots rather than engage in a constructive dialogue. Said rather simply: these classic blue-pill men are rigidly incapable of independent thought and they demand the same from everyone else, under pain of mocking derision. There should be a no tolerance policy for such shallow disruptive trolls, meaning that they must be directly confronted with their ignorant blue-pill conduct.
Thomas Jefferson said it best:
Quote:Quote:
I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.