[Belgrano]

How about Roosh, could he file a lawsuit against them as well?

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(06-21-2018 09:20 AM)Belgrano Wrote:  

How about Roosh, could he file a lawsuit against them as well?

As I noted initially in the thread - the SPLC was insane for calling Nawaz out. He is one of them - just not as far left. That is why he got the cash.

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/...oosh-Obama

Roosh is classified as a "male supremacist" and they keep the profile current. He is up there with Mike Cernovich.

Male "supremacy" is more or less patriarchy - sane patriarchy is how our species operates successfully. You can carry that "male supremacist" banner proudly.

They try to quote the people at their sources - most of their "extremist profiles" are written in a seemingly factual way while twisting it all through their own leftie lens.

I don't think that Roosh has much of a case unless the courts are all conservative and sane again. Male supremacist is one of the more benign titles there. It's just funny that the SPLC omits actual Muslim extremists from the list who call for the extermination of Jews and Christians and the total and complete subjugation of women - those are fine.

They have some token black groups and a miniscule number of Islamists on their list among the "General Hate" group, but it's obviously not a problem to them.

They are mostly concerned with Whitey or with pro-Western pro-patriarchy men like Roosh.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(06-21-2018 09:52 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

(06-21-2018 09:20 AM)Belgrano Wrote:  

How about Roosh, could he file a lawsuit against them as well?

As I noted initially in the thread - the SPLC was insane for calling Nawaz out. He is one of them - just not as far left. That is why he got the cash.

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/...oosh-Obama

Roosh is classified as a "male supremacist" and they keep the profile current. He is up there with Mike Cernovich.

Male "supremacy" is more or less patriarchy - sane patriarchy is how our species operates successfully. You can carry that "male supremacist" banner proudly.

They try to quote the people at their sources - most of their "extremist profiles" are written in a seemingly factual way while twisting it all through their own leftie lens.

I don't think that Roosh has much of a case unless the courts are all conservative and sane again. Male supremacist is one of the more benign titles there. It's just funny that the SPLC omits actual Muslim extremists from the list who call for the extermination of Jews and Christians and the total and complete subjugation of women - those are fine.

They have some token black groups and a miniscule number of Islamists on their list among the "General Hate" group, but it's obviously not a problem to them.

They are mostly concerned with Whitey or with pro-Western pro-patriarchy men like Roosh.

"Male Supremacist?!" That's not even a thing. They're just making stuff up.

You know, one of my friends is a doctor. Graduated Harvard. Works for Hopkins. He knows a lot of things so they call him a genius and a scholar. However, I call him a MEDICAL SUPREMACIST because he's a know-it-all.

Should I tell about my other friend who is a bank president? Yup, the MONETARY SUPREMACIST. Making stuff up can be fun. Two can play this game.

[DonnyGately]

It is more important to have the right enemies than the wrong friends.

[DJ-Matt]

[url=https://twitter.com/instapundit/status/1028986076126429184][/url]

STEALTH JEFF!

Quote:

It’s been a rough year for the Southern Poverty Law Center — deservedly so. And it just got more difficult, thanks to Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

The SPLC, formed in 1971 as an aggressive civil-rights nonprofit law firm, has become the left’s go-to arbiter of what constitutes a hate group. Its pronouncements are quoted without challenge by the news media, and it has an endowment of $300 million, enriched by major corporate donors.

Yet its overly broad definition of “hate” often goes far beyond truly vile outfits to include people and groups that simply don’t toe a politically correct line. That’s why the SPLC two months ago had to pay $3.4 million and publicly apologize to Maajid Nawaz, whom it had falsely labeled an “anti-Muslim extremist.” (He’s actually a practicing Muslim who opposes extremism.)

But that didn’t stop the Star-Ledger last week from devoting an editorial to denouncing New Jersey’s ICE spokesman, Emilio Dabul, for his “links” (as supplied by the SPLC) to “anti-Muslim fanatics.” This, even though the Star-Ledger admitted that Dabul’s own writings “showed no anti-Muslim bias.” It was all guilt by association — right from the SPLC playbook.

Now Sessions has ordered a review to ensure the Justice Department no longer partners with the SPLC and other groups that “unfairly defame Americans.”

Sessions acknowledged that the SPLC at one time “did important work in South”: As an Alabama prosecutor he worked with it to convict a Ku Klux Klan member who’d murdered a black teenager.

But nowadays, Sessions charged, it uses its hate-group designations “as a weapon” to “bully and intimidate” organizations of which it simply doesn’t approve.

Groups like the Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian legal foundation that specializes in religious liberty — and quite effectively: It has prevailed in the US Supreme Court nine times in the last seven years. Yet the SPLC has defamed ADF as a “hate group,” a label Sessions rejected by appearing before the group.

As Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who’s also been smeared by the SPLC as an “anti-Muslim extremist,” has noted, the group these days is invested more in “profiting off the anxieties and white guilt of Northern liberals” than in actually upholding civil rights.

Sessions’ review is long overdue, and follows other government agencies that have backed away from the SPLC. It’s time for those who still merely parrot its smears to start taking a closer look.

[Off The Reservation]

^

Getting tired of winning!!

[RexImperator]

http://newobserveronline.com/jewish-hate...-programs/

Why voting and politics is important:

Quote:

The Jewish extremist Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) hate group has been given the boot from all formal partner programs with the US Government, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has announced.

Speaking before the Alliance Defending Freedom’s annual Summit on Religious Liberty, Sessions announced that the Justice Department would not partner with groups that discriminate against or defame others, singling out the Southern Poverty Law Center for its “hate group” campaign.

Sessions accused the SPLC of wielding the “hate” designation as a “weapon . . . against conservative organizations that refuse to accept their orthodoxy and choose instead to speak their conscience.”

“I have ordered a review at the Department of Justice to make sure that we do not partner with any groups that discriminate,” Sessions said.

“We will not partner with groups that unfairly defame Americans for standing up for the Constitution or their faith.”

Nor will the department associate with “hate groups,” he said, insisting, “At the Justice Department, we will not partner with hate groups. Not on my watch.”

The SPLC, under its president, Richard Cohen, has, along with the Jewish extremist hate group the ADL, been one of the fiercest critics of the Trump administration, and used Trump’s face on the front page of one of its “Year in Hate” review.

[RVF400]

Just like Rev Al Sharpton and the other race hustlers the SPLC is simply a racket to get money. Fuck them, glad they had to pay out to that guy I saw on JRE with Sam Harris.

[Truth Tiger]

Speaking of SPLC and sickness... Morris Dees, co-founder of the Southern Poverty Law Center, is alleged to be an adulterer, wife-beater, peeping Tom, and pedophile. Documents admitted into the court record of his wife's divorce filing show testimony to this effect. How's that for a one-man HATE GROUP!?

https://web.archive.org/web/201808031118...-daughter/

The original website has been taken down for 'terms of use' violations, or (((hate))) speech. This site has a fuller exposition:

http://www.zianet.com/web/dees1.htm

Some quotes from that article with testimony from the court record / deposition of the wife and step-daughter:

Quote:

In two reports for Big League Politics (here and here), Peter D’Abrosca writes that Maureene Dees filed for divorce on March 8, 1979 after a decade-long marriage marred by difficulties. According to the appellant brief filed by her attorneys (Maury Smith, Julia S. Waters and Charles M. Crook) in the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals:

(1) While still married to Maureene, Morris had an adulterous “permanent relationship” with a woman named Vicki Booker McGaha. Morris paid for Vicki’s abortion of their 5-months-old child.

(2) Morris Dees physically assaulted Maureene

In March 1979, Maureene finally left Morris for good. She had leverage to obtain a favorable divorce settlement because of Morris’ open adultery. By that time, Maureene herself had acquired a lover named Brian O’Daugherty.

One night, Morris set a trap for Maureen. He and a private detective hid in the bathroom of Maureen’s D.C. hotel room, jumped out and took photographs of Maureen and O’Daugherty in bed to use against her in divorce court.

According to the court brief, Morris said: “Alright sister, you wanted a divorce. Now I want one, because I’ve got you where I want you.” Then he hit Maureene and gave her a busted jaw. He wrote something on paper which he gave her to sign. This document, entered unto evidence as Plaintiff’s Exhibit 43, was a separation agreement.

(3) Morris Dees, peeping Tom, tried to molest step-daughter with vibrator

According to court testimony, among other perverted sexual behavior, Morris Dees attempted to molest his 18-year-old step-daughter with a sex toy. Holly Buck was Maureene Dees’ daughter from a previous marriage.

The brief says:

“Holly testified that, in the summer of 1977, Morris attempted to molest her in the following incident: One night Maureene and Morris were sitting drinking wine and discussing a case Morris was trying. [Holly] was with them. Around eleven or twelve o’clock, Maureene went to bed and Holly stayed up with Morris discussing the case. Morris kept offering Holly wine, some of which she accepted.”

Holly testified that she declined, choosing to go to bed instead. The brief continues:

“She went to her room and then went into the bathroom. Looking out the window, she saw Morris in the bushes beside the bathroom window looking in. She said ‘Morris, is that you’, but he said nothing and ran away.”

Two months later, things got worse:

“[M]orris entered [Holly’s] room…. He was in his [bikini] underwear and he sat on the bed where Holly was lying on her stomach facing away from the door. He touched her on the back and woke her up. He told her that he had brough [sic] her a present, and he presented her with a vibrator. He plugged it in and said he had brought it to her. He proceeded to rub it on her back and said ‘Let me show you how to use it.’ [H]e started to place it between her legs when she raised her voice and said no loudly.

About two hours later, she had fallen back asleep and he came back in. He brought the vibrator with him, plugged it in and said again, ‘Let me show you how to use it.’ He tried to show her again by putting it between her legs, but she raised her voice again and he stopped. He took it and left.”

[MajorStyles]

(08-17-2018 04:18 PM)RexImperator Wrote:  

Sessions accused the SPLC of wielding the “hate” designation as a “weapon . . . against conservative organizations that refuse to accept their orthodoxy and choose instead to speak their conscience.”

“I have ordered a review at the Department of Justice to make sure that we do not partner with any groups that discriminate,” Sessions said.

“We will not partner with groups that unfairly defame Americans for standing up for the Constitution or their faith.”

[Shrodax]

The Southern Poverty Law Cucks are at it again:

Why is Barnes & Noble helping antisemitic male supremacist Roosh make money?

Quote:

In recent months, PayPal and Amazon took actions to boot virulent misogynist Barack Obama (also known as “Roosh V”) from their platforms for breaching their hate guidelines.

But Barnes & Noble still sells his new book, despite not only his sexism, but also his increasing antisemitic and racist rhetoric. On Wednesday afternoon, it ranked 22nd on their bestseller list. (Thursday it was 59th.)

After PayPal deplatformed him and Amazon took down nine of his books — including first the hardcover and subsequently the paperback of his most recent book, Game — Roosh had to shut down his website, Return Of Kings (ROK), in October for lack of funds. Roosh wrote:

The first factor for this hiatus is that site revenues are too low. We’ve been banned from Paypal and countless ad partners, which forced me to lay off the site editor last year and also lower payments to regular contributors.”

ROK is designated as a male supremacist hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). A cornerstone of the so-called “manosphere,” ROK gave men advice on how to seduce women, often regardless of their consent. It was rife with misogynistic content and occasionally embraced the talking points of the racist “alt-right.”

Through ROK and his own personal blog, Roosh gained notoriety for his violent misogyny. Notably, in 2015 he proposed to make rape legal on private property (in a hyperbolic post he later claimed was “satire”). In his writings, Roosh has condoned rape, advocating that “no mean no — until it means yes” and disparaging women as “cum buckets.”

In his books, he shares anecdotes about his sexual encounters he claims are true. Sometimes, these encounters escalate to outright assault. “In America, having sex with her would have been rape, since she couldn’t legally give her consent,” he wrote in Bang Iceland. “It didn’t help matters that I was relatively sober, but I can’t say I cared or even hesitated.” In Iceland, having sex with someone too drunk to consent still legally constitutes rape.

In the aftermath of ROK’s collapse, Roosh was resentful. He wrote:

I played nice after the 2016 meetup outrage. I was careful with my word choices, tried not to go viral, and did not accept interview requests from alt right sources. And yet they banned me from multiple platforms anyway. I got no reward for being a “good boy,” so now my attitude is… fuck them. I’ll do exactly what I want, and when they come from me (sic), I’ll make them earn it.”

Soon, he delivered.

After the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, which took the lives of eleven people and wounded seven others in October, Roosh tweeted:

“It's okay if you happen to miss the details of today’s synagogue shooting: you’ll be reminded of it daily for the next 70 years.”

He then delved into a bizarre conspiracy theory on the shooting, hinting that it was both an FBI inside job and staged by Democrats for political gain. He also called the series of pipe bombs sent to Democratic opponents of Donald Trump a “false flag operation.”

In tweets, Roosh seemed to embrace the racist alt-right narrative that Jews are deliberately attempting to promote multiculturalism, the arrival of refugees and minority voter turnout to replace whites, and has previously written that he believed there was a “war against white people.” This conspiracy theory of “white genocide” reflects the same fixations synagogue shooter Robert Bowers shared on Gab in the days before his attack.

This is hardly the first antisemitic outburst from Roosh. ROK previously published a positive review of a book by career antisemite Kevin MacDonald. And after SPLC listed Return of Kings as a male supremacist hate group, Roosh tweeted, “The Jews are coming after me again.”

Roosh has also had a relationship with white nationalist Richard Spencer, who was recently accused of physical abuse by his ex-wife. Spencer even invited Roosh to address his white nationalist “think tank,” the National Policy Institute, in 2015. His presence sparked racist backlash from the alt-right who objected to what they considered his non-white heritage. (Roosh is Iranian American.)

On November 14, Roosh and Spencer both appeared on a joint livestream, where they praised one another. Roosh told Spencer, “Richard, we come from opposite sides but we’re being attacked by the same spider.” The video was deleted, but has since been loaded back onto YouTube.

Roosh also traffics in anti-LGBT rhetoric. On social media, he calls LGBT people “sodomites.”

Alex DiBranco, a Ph.D. candidate in sociology at Yale University who wrote on male supremacy for Political Research Associates, told Hatewatch:

[Pick-up artist] advice not only borders on instructions for committing sexual assault, but frequently crosses that line. Obama himself has admitted to actions defined as rape—though, he defends himself, only under the “feminist” definition.

So why is Barnes & Noble selling the supposed “dating advice” of an infamous pro-rape misogynist and anti-LGBT antisemite with ties to the alt-right? By the time of publication, Barnes & Noble had not responded to a request for comment.

[John Michael Kane]

(((They))) are always out for blood when you disagree with them, and won't be happy until Roosh is totally destroyed. That's why alternative platforms are so important.

[godfather dust]

"Alternative platforms" is proving to be a fantasy, when (((they))) immediately attack infrastructure (web hosting, payment processing.)

[John Michael Kane]

(11-16-2018 03:23 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  

"Alternative platforms" is proving to be a fantasy, when (((they))) immediately attack infrastructure (web hosting, payment processing.)

It isn't a fantasy, it is still in an infancy stage. Part of alternative platforms will include payment processing and web hosting via distributed networks. It can be done, but there will be growing pains. The best thing that we can do is stop supporting Big Tech with our dollars. Buy directly from Roosh and others and cut out the middle man.

[Belgrano]

(11-16-2018 06:59 AM)SPLC Wrote:  

Roosh also traffics in anti-LGBT rhetoric.

He traffics in rhetoric?

Is that really proper English?

Quote:

the racist alt-right narrative that Jews are deliberately attempting to promote multiculturalism, the arrival of refugees and minority voter turnout to replace whites

So true, in reality they are definitely the last group I would suspect of doing that.
Clearly these ideas and initiatives are actually financed and promoted by these ghastly Nepalese Buddhists.

Quote:

Roosh is Iranian-American.

Maybe that's the real reason why these warmongering cosmopolitan patriots hate him.

Quote:

infamous pro-rape misogynist and anti-LGBT antisemite with ties to the alt-right

Looks like it was written by Deepdiver's evil SJW twin.

[spokepoker]

Is this libel and defamation? Actionable?

[Aurini]

(11-16-2018 03:47 PM)Belgrano Wrote:  

(11-16-2018 06:59 AM)SPLC Wrote:  

Roosh also traffics in anti-LGBT rhetoric.

He traffics in rhetoric?

Is that really proper English?

That brings to mind the mental image of Roosh standing on a street corner, with a dark trenchcoat. "Hey, kid! You want some rhetoric? I've got all the good stuff. Anti-gay, anti-jew... I've even got some leftover anti-communist from 1991!"

[Buddydowrongright2]

(11-16-2018 06:19 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

(11-16-2018 03:47 PM)Belgrano Wrote:  

(11-16-2018 06:59 AM)SPLC Wrote:  

Roosh also traffics in anti-LGBT rhetoric.

He traffics in rhetoric?

Is that really proper English?

That brings to mind the mental image of Roosh standing on a street corner, with a dark trenchcoat. "Hey, kid! You want some rhetoric? I've got all the good stuff. Anti-gay, anti-jew... I've even got some leftover anti-communist from 1991!"

I want some of that c. 2013 shitting on Lindy West. Not cut with some Jim Norton bullshit. I want pure. To read the words "fat" and "ugly." Gut rolls photoshopped like the curves of a Halloween pumpkin. Pictures of her gay husband at their wedding. I want to remember what it feels like to think this was only one possible dystopian future. I want to remember

[Roosh]

A Baltimore lawyer is suing the SPLC for $6.5 million. They caused him to lose his job after they labeled him a "neo Nazi lawyer."

Quote:

In December 2018, a Baltimore lawyer filed a devastating lawsuit against the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and two of its employees. The SPLC targeted Glen Keith Allen over his former ties to the National Alliance (NA), a white nationalist group. In doing so, the liberal group allegedly violated laws and legal codes of conduct by receiving and then paying for stolen documents in violation of confidentiality agreements. The group went after Allen with the intent of getting him fired by the city of Baltimore and permanently destroying his future prospects.

Allen's suit claims that the SPLC should have its 501c3 tax-exempt status revoked, that it owes him restitution for racketeering, and that it should pay $6.5 million in damages. It also references Allen's pro bono work on behalf of African-Americans and his mentorship of an African-American teen, powerfully rebutting claims that he is a racist. Allen told PJ Media he now regrets his NA support, and an African-American friend of his laughed at the idea of this lawyer being branded a racist.

Perhaps most importantly, the suit attacks the liberal group for undermining America's tradition of free expression. In an August 2016 interview with The Washington Post cited in the lawsuit, SPLC Intelligence Project Director Heidi Beirich (a defendant in the case) claimed to have watched Allen "like a hawk" because he had "the worst ideas ever created."

"This East Europe Communist thought-crime surveillance mentality is antithetical to fundamental American cultural and Constitutional principles protecting freedom of expression and association," Allen wrote in the suit, which can be found on his website. His lawsuit uses concrete claims of lawbreaking and defamation to expose the SPLC's Orwellian strategy of branding its opponents "hate groups" and orchestrating campaigns against them.

In August 2016, the SPLC published an article branding Allen a "neo-Nazi lawyer" and insinuating that this lawyer's work for the city of Baltimore was racist. Beirich, the article's author, smeared a small political party as racist and then published allegedly stolen documents protected by confidentiality agreements connecting Allen to the National Alliance.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/lawsuit-cla...ght-crime/

Heidi Beirich is also named as a defendant. She has been heavily involved in attacking me all these years.

[rotekz]

This is the kind of case where the defendants could get access to almost limitless legal funds and buy their way out. I hope they get destroyed but am very concerned that they will be protected from upon high.

[The Beast1]

How can we be a hate group with so many proud members of Israel?

[Roosh]

Another lawsuit against the SPLC:

Quote:

One of the most prominent groups advocating for stricter immigration went to court Wednesday to demand a judge order the Southern Poverty Law Center to stop labeling it a “hate group,” accusing the self-described watchdog of running an illegal racket to silence political opponents.

The Center for Immigration Studies says the SPLC’s accusations that it is racist and anti-immigrant are wrong and have cost the nonprofit support and financial backing by scaring people away from doing business with the center.

The center brought its challenge to U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by filing a civil complaint under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act against SPLC President Richard Cohen and Heidi Beirich, who runs the group’s Hatewatch blog.

Mark Krikorian, the Center for Immigration Studies executive director, says his organization doesn’t meet the SPLC’s definition of a hate group and the Alabama-based watchdog knows it but persists anyway — which he said was evidence of the racket.

“SPLC and its leaders have every right to oppose our work on immigration, but they do not have the right to label us a hate group and suggest we are racists,” he said. “The Center for Immigration Studies is fighting back against the SPLC smear campaign and its attempt to stifle debate through intimidation and name-calling.”

The Center for Immigration Studies is not the only group to protest the SPLC’s profligate use of the hate tag, but it appears to be the first to mount a challenge under RICO, a law that is usually associated with the FBI’s anti-mob efforts.

The center says the SPLC defines hate groups as organizations whose official statements or activities “attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics.”

Mr. Krikorian said that doesn’t define his group, whose motto is “pro immigrant, low immigration.” In practice, he said, that means the center makes the case for “fewer immigrants but a warmer welcome for those admitted.”

The center says it doesn’t think its work amounts to attacks on people but rather attempts to raise policy questions.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201...suit-splc/

[ed pluribus unum]

(01-03-2019 04:03 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Heidi Beirich is also named as a defendant. She has been heavily involved in attacking me all these years.

"heavily"

[eradicator]

I’d be a little worried that the splc is so connected to the deep state, that they will have unlimited funds, already paid off judges, and are too well protected to lose such cases. Time will tell I suppose.

[la bodhisattva]

Mooris Dees effectively destroyed the KKK through numerous court filings. How poetic would it be for his meal ticket to see the same end.