Quote: (12-20-2017 03:12 AM)Number one bummer Wrote:
After further review this whole thing is a clusterfuck. BLM is supporting the bill because stop and go's are harmful to inner city neighborhoods. The dems supported the bill fully and the opposition came from republicans.
To be honest most of these stores are in fact, big net negative on communities, a lot are just fronts for crime with welfare scamming leading the charge. The stores launder food stamp money in exchange for cigs, drugs and booze. They then cook the books to show they are selling food which they then sell at a much larger profit margin.
BLM is right for wanting to shut down these stores but again they have the wrong solution, the solution is building a community where these stores don't thrive by making cultural changes. Of course BLM just wants big government to harm the stores by removing their right to self-defense.
I can confirm all the above. Being from a shitty American city, I've seen plenty of decent corner stores (that's what we call the small stores that sell cigarettes, snacks, booze, etc.) run by honest Asian-Americans...and there were plenty that were just fronts for various illegal activities. Those activities ranged from food stamp fraud to drug selling.
If you're going to call it out, call it out. Pass a law saying any business owner caught doing that shit on his property gets their business permit revoked.
See below for more.
http://www.phillyvoice.com/philadelphia-...e-measure/
Quote:Quote:
(Cindy) Bass, who represents the 8th Councilmanic District, had been the target of much criticism when shopkeepers – primarily Asian Americans – pushed back against the measure that she said came after years of research.
She said that much disinformation had been spread to undercut her argument and rallied against “unacceptable business practices that have been going on for far too long.”
“Owners of ‘stop and gos’ are now calling themselves ‘beer delis,’ which is laughable,” she said. “You can’t get a pastrami on rye at any of these places.”
What you can get, she said, are beer, shots, “cold medicine that can be converted” into drugs, crack pipes and fruit-flavored cigarillos in neighborhoods where “self-medication happens frequently.”
She likened stop and go's to “indoor open-air drug markets masquerading as restaurants.”
“How can anybody defend this?” she asked. “If they were selling hypodermic needles to heroin users, there would be an immediate call to shut them down. Let’s just admit it: It’s a different kind of addict so it’s a different kind of response.
“I’ve never heard so many people defending the continuance of addiction under the guise of ‘safety first.’ You’ve been had.”
She also chided the Asian American Licensed Beverage Association of Philadelphia for not living up to the terms of an agreement from December 2004 in which they agreed to hire security guards for protection, and to stop selling drug paraphernalia, at such establishments in high-crime areas.
“How much of this have you done? Some of it? Any of it?” she asked, noting that such businesses have “blood on your hands” for enabling the cycle of addiction. “I think I have the answer: None of it, because you found out you didn’t legally have to.”
Uh, then why don't you pass *that* law? Like Number One Bummer said, go after what you're aiming for. Be specific and direct. Make the paraphernalia illegal, or do regular inspections for food stamp fraud and then punish those who commit it. Doing so avoids punishing innocent people--legit stores in dangerous neighborhoods where bulletproof glass is a vital safety measure--AND avoids public relations nightmares of headlines saying you're blocking blatant necessities for some businesses (bulletproof glass).