[Leonard D Neubache]

(11-15-2017 07:10 PM)Jvramerys Wrote:  

...

[bgbusiness]

Wow.

This thread is awesome.

[MaceTyrell]

Leonard,

What’s interesting about the photo you just posted...the girl still looks bangable without makeup.

[MaceTyrell]

IG’s up (username can always change). Pro version purchased.!

Gents - DM me links to IG thots we’d like to unmask.

2018’s version of Tag The Sponsor - Mask On? Fuck it, Mask Off.

[Vladimir Poontang]

   

[realologist]

The best and most interesting part of this is you can see what girls actually have life naturally glowing off their face and skin. It just shows how lifeless women are in general past 25.

[Vladimir Poontang]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...akeup.html

[Super_Fire]

^^^
Scarlett Johansson in that link...the humanity...

[Sooth]

Ahahaha!

Absolutely brilliant.

What happens if you run a girl through it a few times? Is it a good approximation of what she'll look like at 60?

[MaceTyrell]

Two of the three thots have already blocked me from the account.

DM for the username!

[Cumlluminates]

This app is the bomb! 10/10

The most awaited app since like forever...

[YoungBlade]

Oh no

[CJ_W]

(11-15-2017 10:35 PM)YoungBlade Wrote:  

Oh no

Honestly, I kinda think she looks better without the makeup. Some women are just good looking.

[Disco_Volante]

My guess is his algorithm reads the pixel values then picks ones above a threshold (bright red for the lipstick, black for mascara) and removed, then filled in and blended to compliment nearest pixel values. Removing the makeup colors was probably the easy part, filling the image in with natural-looking colors is the genius part. It identifies the facial area first that's how it ignores the clothes and background.
You know the 'dropper' tool in paint, where it gives you whatever color you clicked on the image? Same thing then it uses that as an average to fill in the removed makeup areas probably.


This is a hilarious blow to western sluts.

[torridon747]

That's one way to do it, but I think it's a little more complicated than you're giving it credit for. There's probably some machine learning and a lot of sample data involved.

Fucking hilarious though, I hope this stays relevant for a while. Anything that even takes western hoes down .1 smv on a large scale is pure gold

[Super_Fire]

(11-15-2017 10:59 PM)CJ_W Wrote:  

(11-15-2017 10:35 PM)YoungBlade Wrote:  

Oh no

Honestly, I kinda think she looks better without the makeup. Some women are just good looking.

There are already photos of her without makeup:

[Transsimian]

(11-15-2017 10:35 PM)YoungBlade Wrote:  

Oh no

For reference, here is a genuine picture of her without makeup



Still would destroy with or without.

[Suits]

Now all we need is an application that accurately detects that severity of the thousand cock stare and correctly determines a woman's notch count.

[MMM]

Days of Broken Arrow, if only I could only rep you again on that bra wokeness you dropped.

As to this app, it must be banned since it is a devilish tool of the patriarchy to unmask, without consent, a woman's true sexual market value. Rapey indeed.

Intrestingly enough, the app does not work on photos of truly young, beautiful women.

[Fuckyea]

(11-15-2017 07:10 PM)Jvramerys Wrote:  

Come on, she looks way better without makeup

[Tex Cruise]

(11-16-2017 12:41 AM)Super_Fire Wrote:  

Some women are just good looking.

(11-16-2017 12:51 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  

Still would destroy with or without.

[Jvramerys]

(11-16-2017 02:50 AM)Fuckyea Wrote:  

(11-15-2017 07:10 PM)Jvramerys Wrote:  

Come on, she looks way better without makeup

Can't even trust them when they claim no makeup brah

[Jvramerys]

[WalterBlack]

(11-15-2017 06:09 PM)Praetor Lupus Wrote:  

[url=https://twitter.com/shoe0nhead/status/930929382096605184][/url]

There's already a culture where you can only view a woman's face with her consent:

[WalterBlack]

I think the difference between with and without makeup is even higher for East Asian women: