Quote: (06-26-2017 06:42 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:
Quote: (06-25-2017 09:58 PM)Blaster Wrote:
I'd say you're making uncharitable generalizations and don't really care which one you're thinking about.
Given how much time I've spent genuinely-researching everyone involved - I started again this week due to a private request and really wish I hadn't - and how, like my previous research into Kek, even 10 minutes of the simplest investigation reveals obvious false narratives and leads me to ask even more questions, I'd say labeling my investigative instincts as being 'uncharitable' is Pure Soy.
Ok, let's take one of them at random: Cernovich.
The narrative is that he went on 60 Minutes, they ran an attack piece, and he 'won'.
Yeah Cernovich always spins things to favor himself. He's always done that. There's a huge difference between Cernovich telling a biased story about himself versus mainstream "narratives," which all-too-often involve manufacturing truth by way of repetition in the massive echo-chamber of the media establishment.
Quote:Quote:
Given that the media combed hours of footage of Milo to string together some quotes to make it sounding like he was supporting sex with children, I find it very-interesting that, given all the very damning information that could be selectively-used to paint him in a negative light to viewers - particularly his own bizarre podcasts that ran during the original TRS drama back in January, let alone all the stuff the Left dug up on him during the Gamergate days - 60 Minutes went very, very easy on him.
Almost as if they were told to pretend they were condemning him, when the intention was to validate him all along.
Maybe, but it sure looks to me as if 60 Minutes marching orders were to contribute to the "Fake News" narrative. Their goal isn't to sink Cernovich as political opposition. Their goal is to sink the competitive new media, all of it. Whether that's a winning strategy, I don't know, but that's what they're doing. It's the consistent narrative that shows up everywhere in the mainstream media. The narrative is: "There's an epidemic of fake news out there-- cowboy journalists that can't be trusted." 60 Minutes goal is to contribute selective facts and help weave that narrative for the normal viewing public (which is increasingly coming to mean aging boomers). It doesn't matter what the story is, just make sure you throw in a dig at fake news and if you don't, the editors will add it for you.
In this case, Cernovich is now listed in the IMDB credits as "Conspiracy Theorist." However Cernovich may have appeared on 60 minutes? Doesn't matter. The narrative is still "watch out for Fake News like Mike Cernovich."
Article on CBS about the 60 Minutes with Cernovich
Quote:Quote:
Cernovich is a southern California lawyer who runs the website Danger & Play. He describes himself as “right of center politically,” and 60 Minutes reported that Cernovich has become “a magnet for readers with a taste for stories with no basis in fact.” Cernovich’s online articles include a bogus report that Hillary Clinton has Parkinson’s disease and a fake sex cult story about Hillary Clinton’s “inner circle.”
That whole paragraph is full of shit except for the reference to pizzagate which was not one of Cernovich's brighter moments. Note how it's phrased in broad terms like "magnet for readers" who don't care about a "basis in fact." And then adds on a blatant lie that the report about Hillary's Parkinson's disease was bogus. That report was manifestly not bogus and in fact it was not even a "report that Clinton has Parksinson's disease."
Again their goal is not to bury Cernovich individually, their goal is to control the perception of reality as completely as they can and inoculate their viewers against competition. What Cernovich did with pizzagate is what CBS and their ilk do with everything.
Quote:Quote:
Which makes me suspect Cernovich is willing to play ball with the left, when it offers him personal power, and his rise has less to do with 'the people' than 'the people with money'. Note for all of Follower Hype, see how few turned out to see him in person.
Suspect all you want, but the 60 minutes thing isn't evidence of anything other than Cernovich doing what he's always done, which is take bold risks and make the most of whatever happens.
Quote:Quote:
Another one of my little nagging suspicions:
If the Alt-Lite is fighting the mainstream media and the progressive powers that be, then why do Milo and Cernovich constantly-brag about their books ratings on Amazon, where their fans sales on that site goes towards making Jeff Bezos richer and allowing him to keep funding 'The Washington Post', even at a loss?
It's almost as if they're opportunists who lack the courage of their convictions.
Maybe it's because they aren't communists and boycotts aren't always the best tool for the job. WTF would be the point of not using Amazon? There's a difference between taking bold risks and engaging in pointless and foolhardy behavior. Good luck trying to take consumer action against Amazon on the basis of what the Washington Post publishes. That is an unwinnable battle and even if you could bring down Amazon with consumer action how would that actually benefit anyone?
Quote:Quote:
I stopped using Amazon. I stopped using Paypal. I stopped using Google. I cancelled Netflix. I don't have a smart phone.
It makes things harder, sure, but I'm willing to put up with discomfort due to my beliefs. Hell, I was working on a musical project sabotaged by Gamma Dysfunction, and was so sick of throwing my own money down that hole that I considered, for the first time in my life, getting a Public Arts Grant.
Guess what I found on their website?
The two key considerations for getting an Australian Arts Grant are not talent, artistic merit, or even popular acclaim but these, listed first and foremost:
The work must promote Diversity.
The work must promote Globalism.
With that, I realised that it would be very Easy to take their money, but, since I'd be dealing with the Career Bureaucrat class that I despise and promoting Socialism, it wouldn't be Right.
You realize that Amazon and Netflix are very capitalist free market businesses, right? One of the big problems right now, especially with progressive media, is that that's what kids are buying. Or at least, that's what market research is telling media companies that's what kids are buying. Tim Pool explained this recently on Dave Rubin though it should surprise no one here. He worked for a media company who explicitly wrote progressive stories because market research told them that's where the audience was. Withdrawing from the market doesn't help much.
Quote:Quote:
As such, I didn't ignore my convictions for my own personal benefit, something the Alt-Lite refuses to do. I mean, they're really talking about Hate Speech now and shutting down plays?
They disrupted one event to make a point. This hate speech thing is new I am not sure what to think about that. But Cernovich is openly committed to winning, not playing the game by the most noble rules possible. A noble loser is still a loser. No one cares about your convictions if you merely fade away into obscurity. SJWs have not let up their shenanigans, I'm sure you heard about the recent demonetization rules on Youtube. Contents need to be "advertiser friendly." SJWs have weaponized advertisers, and advertisers have allowed themselves to be weaponized. So the alt-lite fights back with the same weapons.
Quote:Quote:
Why agree to any of the Left's talking points? In the coming culture war, why try to be France, given the Current State of France?
Maybe because deciding to disagree with all of the left's talking points no matter what they are means they are in control of your platform not you. Though again, I disagree with the "no hate speech thing." But this is the first I've seen of it.
Quote:Quote:
And why should we continue to keep listening to any self-professed 'Thought Leaders', regardless of political persuasion, when it's the class of people whom obviously never worked with their hands for a day in their life whom have gotten our countries into such a dysfunctional state to begin with?
I don't consider Cernovich a thought leader, unless you're talking about his Gorilla Mindset stuff. I listen to him because he has a good track record of reporting things that turn out to be true and because his impulsive off-the-cuff style can be entertaining.
Quote:Quote:
And if a group's 'Appeal to Normies' breakaway division includes a host who graphically-rammed a buttplug up his own arse on his webshow; another man whose 'Manosphere' writings include bizarre articles about Gay Hustling in the Bodybuilding Circuit, and 'What is sex with a tranny like?';
So now you're cherry-picking like 2 articles out of context from the hundreds that have appeared on D&P?
Quote:Quote:
and a Gay Attention Whore whose contribution to Trump's campaign was inviting Major Right Figures to speak in front of a wall of photos of shirtless, underage-looking boys indistinguishable from the art of Leftist Creeps like Larry Clark and Michael Stipe, then I have to seriously-reconsider the information processing skills of the average person, Right or Left.
I don't blame you for not liking Milo but that doesn't change the fact that he is incredibly popular. He is the 'appeal to normies' guy by simple virtue of the empirical evidence suggesting he actually does appeal to normies.