[CynicalContrarian]

FFS.
Why can't reality simply abide by soycialism?
Is reality sexist or something...?


First woman to join infantry regiment since defence chiefs lifted ban on females serving in combat units quits after two weeks admitting she underestimated the 18-week course

- The first woman to join an infantry regiment has quit after two weeks of training
- The recruit dropped out of an 18-week course this month after falling behind
- When she resigned, she admitted underestimating physical requirements
- Her resignation is a huge blow to officials who are determined to integrate women

The first woman to join an infantry regiment since defence chiefs lifted a ban on females serving in combat units has quit after just two weeks of training, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.
The recruit dropped out of an 18-week course this month after falling behind her male counterparts on endurance marches and failing other physical tests at a training base in Suffolk.
It is understood that when the woman resigned, she admitted having underestimated the physical requirements of being an infantry recruit. She also told officers that living in female-only accommodation made her feel ‘like an outsider’ and weakened her resolve. Her resignation is a huge blow to officials who are determined to integrate women into fighting units in the Army, Royal Marines and Royal Air Force.Last night, the Ministry of Defence refused to name the recruit, but it is understood she was a steward in the RAF who wanted to transfer into the RAF Regiment, an infantry unit that fought with distinction in Afghanistan and Iraq. Its primary roles are to guard air bases and provide troops to support Special Forces operations.
The recruit dropped out of an 18-week course this month after falling behind her male counterparts on endurance marches and failing other physical tests at a training base in Suffolk
...
She is understood to have been one of just three women who applied to join the RAF Regiment and the only one considered fit enough to start the course at RAF Honington alongside 44 men.
A source at the base said: ‘Even though she was way off the pace of most of the men, she gained a lot of people’s respect. She tried her best and was honest enough to admit the course was too tough for her.
‘She was a bit isolated outside training hours because she lived apart from everyone else.
‘There was a lot of secrecy surrounding her participation. The guys were surprised to see her. There was pressure on her instructors to help her to pass the course. I think the RAF wanted good PR out of it.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z5GlIKboCx


So...
She wasn't even training for a normal infantry unit.
Merely an Airforce security guard unit...?

I know the "Air Defence" boys like to consider themselves "special forces", yet at end of the day, they're neither commandos nor SAS types...

[godfather dust]

Obviously, the problem was her isolation (as she and the source said.) The solution is to bring in a dozen women and put them in the men's barracks.

Hell, they need to shower together also (actually we'll only bring that element in if these 10 fail. Then the problem will clearly be the isolated shower.)

[N°6]

Let them join their own military units.

The control system is feminists giving men white feathers to shame them to go to fight other men they have no quarrel with so that they can take their jobs and inheritances.

When men make comrades out of enemies as what happened on Christmas Eve 1914, the whole control system faces collapse.

This is why male groups which risk fostering camaraderie that would exclude feral female behaviour such as hypergamy are being phased out.

[remarkable vigour]

(05-27-2018 10:05 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

FFS.
Why can't reality simply abide by soycialism?
Is reality sexist or something...?


First woman to join infantry regiment since defence chiefs lifted ban on females serving in combat units quits after two weeks admitting she underestimated the 18-week course

- The first woman to join an infantry regiment has quit after two weeks of training
- The recruit dropped out of an 18-week course this month after falling behind
- When she resigned, she admitted underestimating physical requirements
- Her resignation is a huge blow to officials who are determined to integrate women

The first woman to join an infantry regiment since defence chiefs lifted a ban on females serving in combat units has quit after just two weeks of training, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.
The recruit dropped out of an 18-week course this month after falling behind her male counterparts on endurance marches and failing other physical tests at a training base in Suffolk.
It is understood that when the woman resigned, she admitted having underestimated the physical requirements of being an infantry recruit. She also told officers that living in female-only accommodation made her feel ‘like an outsider’ and weakened her resolve. Her resignation is a huge blow to officials who are determined to integrate women into fighting units in the Army, Royal Marines and Royal Air Force.Last night, the Ministry of Defence refused to name the recruit, but it is understood she was a steward in the RAF who wanted to transfer into the RAF Regiment, an infantry unit that fought with distinction in Afghanistan and Iraq. Its primary roles are to guard air bases and provide troops to support Special Forces operations.
The recruit dropped out of an 18-week course this month after falling behind her male counterparts on endurance marches and failing other physical tests at a training base in Suffolk
...
She is understood to have been one of just three women who applied to join the RAF Regiment and the only one considered fit enough to start the course at RAF Honington alongside 44 men.
A source at the base said: ‘Even though she was way off the pace of most of the men, she gained a lot of people’s respect. She tried her best and was honest enough to admit the course was too tough for her.
‘She was a bit isolated outside training hours because she lived apart from everyone else.
‘There was a lot of secrecy surrounding her participation. The guys were surprised to see her. There was pressure on her instructors to help her to pass the course. I think the RAF wanted good PR out of it.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z5GlIKboCx


So...
She wasn't even training for a normal infantry unit.
Merely an Airforce security guard unit...?

I know the "Air Defence" boys like to consider themselves "special forces", yet at end of the day, they're neither commandos nor SAS types...

Let me tell you something about the RAF Regiment.

They do airfield security. Thats it. They are not a proper infantry regiment and the only connection they have with special forces is to wave them goodbye as the proper soldiers fly out of an airfield.

Now let me tell you a story, are you sitting comfortably? Good, then I'll begin.

Many years ago I was in the Metropolitan police in London and was based in Uxbridge, right on the western edge of London. RAF Uxbridge is nearby, its a proper RAF base and therefore has a contingent of RAF Regiment on guard at all times.

Anyway I was the duty officer at Ruislip police station on a night shift, nothing was happening, no one was around and I was bored out of my skull. So I read the force major incident plan for that area of London. One thing I remember reading was that during any major incident in Uxbridge was that we ordinary coppers would be armed before the local RAF Regiment was issued with live ammo.

Just think about that for a moment.

RAF Regiment are a bunch of wankers.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

I see a simple solution - replace all male soldiers with women and Muslim and Somali immigrants - just stuff the barracks full with gender-neutral Arabs and women, give them the same showers, same bunk beds and see the full glory of the LGBTQQQQERWERWERT unfold. Of course - recruit trannies as well at great cost - even if you have to pay them 200.000$/year just so that they show up. Put them all together and remove the men and officers entirely - what happens in their barracks is in their own little SJW-utopia.

[Teedub]

This shit is all a product of Western nations having too much wealth, and basically nothing to moan about. "Let's create a female fighting force and put women as our head of defence!" Why? "Erm...because it's fun and different". OK.

If any of these places actually had the prospect of being invaded, men would immediately take charge and the women would allow them to. When shit gets real, like the Paris ISIS attacks, was there a single female police officer involved? Nope.

But all that aside, it's no wonder Muslims come to our countries and laugh at us. Despite white Europeans being the best at taking over countries — like Brits in almost everywhere, and Spain/Portugal in South America, and France in Africa etc, improving infrastructure and running countries/colonies very efficiently, killing people efficiently (Nazis, Brits in Africa/India, Spanish in SA), slavery (we did it the best... which is why we're targeted more than arabs) ... these days we must come across as incredibly weak and pathetic. I'm not saying killing people or taking slaves is a good thing, but it's the only thing these Pakistanis etc understand — strength and power.

This is a good example of a post written by someone on a British bank holiday, with alcohol still in their system from the party the night before.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

< Pretty random generalizations there.

Muslim countries had slaves until the 1980s and the Saudis came to the Queen's coronation in the 1960s. The Arabic slave trade was 10 times the number and far more brutal than the Atlantic one. The Atlantic was even less than the South American one.

The Zulus slaughtered more African tribes before the advent of the Whites than all the colonialist countries combined.

The only difference is that the West is the only one which is beating the self-guilt or has any ideology that puts them on to the worst race in history. We forget the modern civilization, the active banning of all slavery by the West, we forget it all - just pile on and exacerbate the sins.

The issue is not too much wealth. Kuwaitis are more well-off, but not a peep about this feminist madness. It's just manipulated from above abusing the Christian altruistic nature of Whites. The rest is just postmodernist crap ant anti-unifying propaganda hammering in the remaining vestiges of the Westerners.

And no average Brit thought that he was going to have some fun slaughtering Africans or Indians for the Queen. Most of those blokes would have been fine with getting over there and sipping beer with the natives. The option was either back-breaking mines and factories operated by the robber barons or the military and at least slightly better conditions than a suicidal 80-hour-work-week for a pittance. And the same robber barons of a higher sort ordered them to do the conquering for them.

Would anyone honestly be happy living in bushes while the West was on the moon? Even if no one had come to Africa, would Africans be so much happier in constant warfare by more successful more aggressive tribes like the Zulus and their own inherent slavery which was standard practice everywhere. They just sold off their slaves because they had too many - sold them to Arabs and Westerners. No - you were not kangz. The local kangz made you slaves and you had the option of slaves in the West, castrated slaves in Arabia or the slaves in Africa (the majority).

But whatever - this goes too far.

It's purely feminism-based in the West which is financed by the same robber barons and usurers who sent out the underfed British boys over to some remote parts in India and Africa to slaughter for the robber-baron-glory.

And to bring it back to the thread:

Bringing all-female super-units into the military is not due to anything logical or "too much wealth". It is based on globalist financed feminism, globalist funded politicians and globalist funded media and academia. It took them decades of indoctrination to reach that level. And it's ultimately something that will fail anyway as you have correctly put it - when shit hits the fan, then women will run back to the kitchen and take care of their children screaming that men need to deal with it. They can larp in their uniforms for now and get the male attention while shouting girl-power-slogans. And without the globalist constant funding they would not even do that. Our culture without that funding would quickly assess psychological and biological imperatives of why women should not be serving in those units.

[Syberpunk]

Will they charge into battle carrying a rainbow flag with a multi coloured dildo primed for Russian arses, because they're too afraid to hold a gun?

[LEMONed IScream]

Once I saw one of these on a dating site, saying she could do anything a man does!

I asked her if she can pee standing but mysteriously did not get a reply!

[budoslavic]

This Part 1 video is kind of boring to watch. But it is very telling to see why the physical strengths and characteristics of men and women are so different (i.e., pushups, pullups, carrying heavy backpacks, etc.).

Part 2 video is more interesting (and laughable) to watch. Specifically:
4:30 mark - self-defense moves against the knife, gun, etc.
5:45 mark - one woman against two men (sparring).
17:50 mark - fighting in water (swimming pool) - each woman had to take on a much bigger and stronger Norwegian. He picked them up like a piece of doll and threw them around.

Unrelated, but still related to Norway's obsession with gender equality - "Norway Pioneers Unisex Patrols Of Russia Border".
Description: "Gender Mission: How the Norwegian military is breaking down gender divisions in the quest for a better force."

This gender equality bullshit is getting out of hand in Norway.

Edit.

[url=https://twitter.com/_PFOA_/status/938460361564487680][/url]

[Leonard D Neubache]

Chin up.

At least all those bitches will be pregnant by month one.

[nola]

Christ with all that fucking high pitched screaming the enemy won't even need acoustic location to lay out some artillery spreads.

At least Norway is not heavily invested in participating in any real wars. So far I think only about 20 Norwegians have died in the Middle East during this conflict.

This could result in the death of other male special operations and special forces teams having to exfil them if they placed them in a actual combat operation. It's completely unnecessary volunteer or not.

There is a very well defined reason the adage exist that you're only as strong as your weakest people.

[AceP]

Viking Special Forces codename: "Eye Candy" on duty.

Well, I hope they can inspire fear into those terrorists like the Russian Night Witches have in WW2