[Sherman]

It's time to start unloading all this electronic crap and return to old technology. The new technology is what makes monitoring every person feasible. They can record every keystroke you make in large data banks and organize a profile on you by using Artificial Intelligence to explore every possible connection. They can't do this with old technology. When they turn to the cashless society, it will be even more difficult to escape being monitored.

[budoslavic]

(03-07-2017 02:31 PM)Fightersword Wrote:  

Budo, they don't care so much for the common man as they do for control. If they let a few terrorist acts slip through, that encourages others to make attempts or be more brazen, effectively finding them more targets more easily. Either that or they're incompetent, or a combination of both (I presume it's a combination, especially with how much they lose control of). They couldn't care less about civilian casualties so long as they think a certain path will best serve them. This is why they happily would frame other countries for their wrongdoings by using their malware/spyware: they don't care if they're hurting an ally with this, they just want to further their own goal of control.

Like what happened to this one reporter, Michael Hastings.

Quote:

Wikileaks: CIA Explored Car Hacking to Carry Out “Undetectable Assassinations”
Leak revives mystery behind strange death of Michael Hastings

Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com - March 7, 2017

Newly released documents by Wikileaks reveal that the Central Intelligence Agency explored hacking the control systems of modern vehicles, potentially to carry out “undetectable assassinations”.

Thanks to a new whistleblower who some are dubbing Snowden 2.0, the whistleblower outfit has leaked 8,761 files “from an isolated, high-security network situated inside the CIA’s Center for Cyber Intelligence in Langley, Virginia.”

One of the documents released as part of the ‘Vault 7’ dump relates to the CIA’s interest in hijacking computerized control systems that are used in modern cars and trucks.

“As of October 2014 the CIA was also looking at infecting the vehicle control systems used by modern cars and trucks. The purpose of such control is not specified, but it would permit the CIA to engage in nearly undetectable assassinations,” writes Wikileaks.

After the death of journalist Michael Hastings in 2013, who contacted Wikileaks just hours before his death to inform them that he was under FBI investigation, speculation swirled as to whether his apparent high speed car crash in the Hancock Park neighborhood of Los Angeles was actually a targeted assassination.

Hastings sent an email hours before his death stating he was “onto a big story” and needed “to go off the rada[r] for a bit.” It later emerged that the story was likely to have been an exposé of the CIA.

Friends and colleagues confirmed that the journalist was “very paranoid” about being under government surveillance and had received death threats. A separate close friend of Hastings also told Infowars that the journalist’s home was visited by agents from an unnamed federal agency the day before his death.

Former counter-terror czar Richard Clarke subsequently went on record to remark that the crash involving Hastings was “consistent with a car cyber attack.”

The fact that the CIA was exploring car hacking techniques in October 2014 obviously suggests that the technology has been an area of interest for the agency.

Elsewhere, the documents released by Wikileaks also reveal that the CIA has been active in hacking microphones on computers, smart phones and TVs in order to listen in on the conversations of the user.

Infowars alerted its readers to this vulnerability eleven years ago and we were labeled “conspiracy theorists” by the media at the time for doing so.

[TigerMandingo]

Official anthem of Wikileaks and Assange:

[[email protected]]

The most disturbing aspect of this to me was not that this hacking tech exists (since many have suspected as much) but that it has fallen into the hands of every high bidder.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

In the light of these revelations, would it be feasible to immediately dissolve the CIA and arrest most of its employees? What would it take to perform such an act in the legal and political sense?

Given that they're mostly anti-Trump cucks who have actually attempted a coup against him, it's not like there's no reason to do so or that its "national security" (LOL) functions couldn't be picked up by a gazillion other alphabet-soup agencies.

[DamienCasanova]

(03-07-2017 03:26 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

Official anthem of Wikileaks and Assange:

How about this one

Alex Jones is going on some epic rants today too

The infowars show has been cut off several times today by youtube it seems like.

[AnonymousBosch]

(03-07-2017 02:26 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

The sheer scope and malevolence of this spying operation is absolutely staggering.

It was exactly what I expected.

My IT Nerd mate didn't understand 18 months ago why I told him to keep the television he was setting up for me unconnected from the Internet.

He thought I was even crazier for going back to a non-smart phone over a year back, because I didn't trust Apple or Google.

It's why I don't have gmail.

It's why I don't Skype, except with close family members, and even then, I'd rather not.

It's why I have tape over my camera and a non-working mic in the computer.

Quintus: remember ages back how I said I didn't want to download and use Whatsapp, Instagram or Facebook, and didn't want to use Patreon or Kickstarter?

Silicon Valley has always been our enemy, and the gradual detechification of my life has been only positive. Most of the people I know have been zombified into uselessness by their constant reliance on it.

This goes back to what I've said about not wanting to use the tools of the enemy.

I find it interesting all this is now being allowed to come out, because its an attack on Silicon Valley and the Technology community, most of whom are viciously anti-Trump. Ages back in a thread on Gamergate, I spoke how Jonathon McIntosh struck me as an Anti-Authoritarian Marxist (in San Fran Speak, a 'Mental Environmentalist'), where his goal was to make people question their relationship to technology so that they unplug from the relationship completely.

In the Globo-Socialism vs Nationalism War I suspect is happening, I theorised the Nationalist Side could have lasting control over a populace by offering them Freedom, Prosperity, Safety, Family and Faith. They're anti-authoritarian - Trump wants Small Government - and, as such, connections between humans can only be strengthened by them discouraging the use of Silicon Valley style technology. I expect an 'unplug' message to be part of the change.

Things are really accelerating. Not long now.

Obligatory:

[Roosh]

Was the killing of Vladimir Putin's driver a failed CIA operation?

Quote:

Vladimir Putin’s favorite driver was killed while behind the wheel of an official state vehicle — a suspicious crash that has been called an “audacious threat” to the Russian president.

The driver had more than 40 years of experience. Putin was not in the black BMW when it was struck head-on in Moscow by a car that swerved into its lane from the opposite direction, according to surveillance video of the incident.

The unidentified chauffeur, who had more than 40 years of experience, died and the driver of the other car was in critical condition, according to reports.

The smash-up occurred Tuesday as Putin was in China for the G20 summit.

No blame has been placed for the crash, but one pro-Putin Web site was quick to theorize it was possibly an assassination attempt by foreign agents.

http://nypost.com/2016/09/07/vladimir-pu...car-crash/

[Captainstabbin]

[url=https://twitter.com/BanTheBBC/status/839190275251650561][/url]

[Foolsgo1d]

Its telling how this is currently under the radar and isn't being given oxygen, like the Hillary emails.

If you head over to Reddit, outside of The_Donald they are treating it as nothing, a joke and how itll blow over. Meanwhile The_Donald, /pol, 4chan is going ape shit.

When Trump tweets about this it will go nuclear.

[BortimusPrime]

At this rate I wouldn't be surprised if they've secretly got quantum computers that crack RSA. It's always struck me as odd that quantum computers of just a handful of qbits have existed for years now, yet oddly no one's publicly expanded it to the number necessary to run Shor's algorithm and crack RSA.

[zigZag]

(03-07-2017 06:26 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

Its telling how this is currently under the radar and isn't being given oxygen, like the Hillary emails.

If you head over to Reddit, outside of The_Donald they are treating it as nothing, a joke and how itll blow over. Meanwhile The_Donald, /pol, 4chan is going ape shit.

When Trump tweets about this it will go nuclear.

Haven't you gotten the memo? The left HATES wikileaks now.

[uncledick]

When will Trump dissolve the CIA? It's clearly an enemy to the American people and its already been an enemy to the world for six decades. They are the promoters of a one world government, globalism, western degeneracy and just general evil.

[Fast Eddie]

This shouldn't really change anything for any of us. If you're doing anything remotely compromising that you don't want to be easily pinned on you, go to a retailer, buy a cheap laptop with cash, and never turn it on or connect it to the network outside of a public location. This is the only way to be sure that what you're doing cannot be tracked back to you without a "boots on the ground" operation.

For your everyday activities on your regular computer/cell phone, just assume it's all going straight to the deep state servers and will be readily accessible to a reincarnated NKVD and/or freelancing Antifas in 10 to 15 years to be used against you, so make sure those everyday activities are not compromising you in any way if you are planning to still be in the West in those future days.

[Roosh]

[url=https://twitter.com/28ShermanSOBL1/status/839259737158008833][/url]

[LeoneVolpe]

(03-07-2017 03:20 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  

Fightersword Wrote:

Budo, they don't care so much for the common man as they do for control. If they let a few terrorist acts slip through, that encourages others to make attempts or be more brazen, effectively finding them more targets more easily. Either that or they're incompetent, or a combination of both (I presume it's a combination, especially with how much they lose control of). They couldn't care less about civilian casualties so long as they think a certain path will best serve them. This is why they happily would frame other countries for their wrongdoings by using their malware/spyware: they don't care if they're hurting an ally with this, they just want to further their own goal of control.

Like what happened to this one reporter, Michael Hastings.

Quote:

Wikileaks: CIA Explored Car Hacking to Carry Out “Undetectable Assassinations”
Leak revives mystery behind strange death of Michael Hastings

Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com - March 7, 2017

Newly released documents by Wikileaks reveal that the Central Intelligence Agency explored hacking the control systems of modern vehicles, potentially to carry out “undetectable assassinations”

I suggest all us RVF'ers start practicing "chickie run" jumps now before our cars start mysteriously heading for trees, cliffs, oncoming cars, etc.

[Tactician]

Kind of related:

Weaponized robots scare the hell out of me.

On the forum, we talk A LOT about the effects of out sourcing and how technology displaces jobs, for better or worse, and how humans can't compete with robots in terms of pay $ per hour. The thread about Wendy's kiosks, for example.

It sounds sci-fi, but it's not that far off that humans will have to compete against weaponized robots. We're seeing a lot of advancements in robot locomotion and computer vision and machine learning (say, Haar cascades). It could easily happen within a decade or two. Take a look at that Boston Dynamics robot.

Right now, the army and the agents in the CIA are just people. If these groups were ordered to carry out some sick shit (say, round up all of X group), they could always rebel. Human conscience could win out and the people who would be enforcers could disobey.

Anyway, weaponized robots are coming and I hope humanity will soundly reject that shit. A huge reason the USA's founding fathers wanted the right for citizens to bear arms is to act as a check against a tyrannical government, but you can't compete against an armed robot. It just concentrates power too directly into a tiny group of individuals and uses a method that doesn't allow for the conscience of enforcers to get in the way.

[911]

That's why the next decade or two are crucial, you have on one hand unprecedented tools that can be used to build a technocratic all-powerful police state, and on the other hand unprecedented tools for the people to understand and share what's going on.

The latter can be removed, we're already starting to see this being done with the PTB using technology to "nudge" people back into the straight and narrow (see Cass Sunstein's policy whitepaper). So we have a narrow window to overcome this. The problem is that most liberals (who used to worry about those things) have gone full libtard lost in deep Trump psychosis, they're totally consumed with their two minute hate session with Trump as their Emmanuel Goldstein, while they worship Big Brother (the deep state is awesome, RUSSIA is the enemy, Trump is Hitler etc).

Back to the Hastings accid-assassination: Corbett has the full rundown as usual.

[CaptainChardonnay]

(03-07-2017 06:04 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Was the killing of Vladimir Putin's driver a failed CIA operation?

Quote:

Vladimir Putin’s favorite driver was killed while behind the wheel of an official state vehicle — a suspicious crash that has been called an “audacious threat” to the Russian president.

The driver had more than 40 years of experience. Putin was not in the black BMW when it was struck head-on in Moscow by a car that swerved into its lane from the opposite direction, according to surveillance video of the incident.

The unidentified chauffeur, who had more than 40 years of experience, died and the driver of the other car was in critical condition, according to reports.

The smash-up occurred Tuesday as Putin was in China for the G20 summit.

No blame has been placed for the crash, but one pro-Putin Web site was quick to theorize it was possibly an assassination attempt by foreign agents.

http://nypost.com/2016/09/07/vladimir-pu...car-crash/

I was planning on posting about this sometime today. Couldn't find the article though.

[Turnus]

This Michael Hastings death is very concerning. Looks like lots of red flags point to foul play.

[MOVSM]

[url=https://twitter.com/Zanting/status/839258860804136960][/url]

[Paracelsus]

[Mercenary]

I do not like this dude at all, but it's worth noting what he said today.

[/url]

[url=https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/839159736977227777]

[polar]

(03-07-2017 06:04 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Was the killing of Vladimir Putin's driver a failed CIA operation?

Quote:

Vladimir Putin’s favorite driver was killed while behind the wheel of an official state vehicle — a suspicious crash that has been called an “audacious threat” to the Russian president.

The driver had more than 40 years of experience. Putin was not in the black BMW when it was struck head-on in Moscow by a car that swerved into its lane from the opposite direction, according to surveillance video of the incident.

The unidentified chauffeur, who had more than 40 years of experience, died and the driver of the other car was in critical condition, according to reports.

The smash-up occurred Tuesday as Putin was in China for the G20 summit.

No blame has been placed for the crash, but one pro-Putin Web site was quick to theorize it was possibly an assassination attempt by foreign agents.

http://nypost.com/2016/09/07/vladimir-pu...car-crash/

Zero chance it was an attempt to assassinate Putin as there's no way he'd be riding without an entourage of security.

When Putin rolls through, traffic is stopped well in advance and security would swiss cheese anyone within 100 yards if they were a threat.

No different from POTUS rolling through DC.

[[email protected]]

I neglected to mention that none of these hackings are traceable. According to the vault 7 info anybody can hack your car/plane and crash it and put someone elses fingerprints on them. For ex, NSA can kill someone and blame it on CIA. China can murder someone and pin it on Russia. It's seems like a moral hazard for a hacking free-for-all.