[Samseau]

Now imagine if Hillary had won and you saw all of this degeneracy taking over American cities.

You'd be prepping for WW3, no joke. Hitting the gun ranges, buying ammo, stocking food and emergency plans.

You can never be too thankful for Trump's victory.

[Gmac]

(01-23-2017 02:26 PM)IronShark Wrote:  

MAN punches WOMAN at Edmonton Women's March Against Trump! And the feminists who witnessed it, blame the woman!!

The guy who punched knew that the women around him (at a WOMEN's MARCH!) would back him up if he hit a woman with the "wrong" politics.

Check it out.

[url=https://twitter.com/Truth_Bombers/status/823337648613949441][/url]

This is the New Right in action.

[Dusty]

(01-23-2017 04:07 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Now imagine if Hillary had won and you saw all of this degeneracy taking over American cities.

You'd be prepping for WW3, no joke. Hitting the gun ranges, buying ammo, stocking food and emergency plans.

You can never be too thankful for Trump's victory.

[Serious Sam]

[Ocelot]

(01-23-2017 01:16 PM)Lothario Wrote:  

(01-22-2017 08:01 PM)TheOllam Wrote:  

(01-22-2017 07:36 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(01-22-2017 07:18 PM)TheOllam Wrote:  

This Dude was at the LA Women's March. They asked his opinion and he went HAM, Red Pilled HARD.

BASED dude - holy shit.

That was amazing, share that shit far and wide !

So Based.......Alright which one of you guys is this????????

That's the beauty of the whole thing, He is probably just a regular Joe, he could be your neighbor, coworker etc. President Trump has given him the voice and large number of people are getting red pilled as we move forward.

No longer are the corners of Internet and RVF the only red pill communities. Great to see a Red Pill America.

Absolutely, and something that makes it impressive which many people forget when watching these things from behind a computer screen sitting comfy is how he managed to stay not just completely coherent, but basically delivered a flawless victory while surrounded by people who hated him. He was fucking relentless.

Humans are social animals, and fear of ostracism is wired deeply into our brains, hell a lot of people would choke and become a mess just trying to debate someone in front of a university audience on a non-controversial topic. Very few people have the character to focus on processing their opponents' arguments and saying what they have to say when surrounded by people who despise them, and even fewer when there's a risk of physical harm—your brain's just focusing on too many things and your delivery will fall to pieces. Big Joe's size might have been the only reason nobody tried to sucker punch him, but the way he dominated the space (after about halfway, they didn't even try to shout him down, he basically managed to monologue a bunch of naturally-screeching harpies) was impeccable. This dude probably is just a regular Joe, but he's alpha as fuck and that crowd control was next level. I wouldn't be surprised if he banged one of the protestors later that day.

Clips like this are like are like an oasis in a desert of insanity, that fucking made my day.
___________________

On another note: the left's coalition is going to fracture soon. Note how a leftist man punches a women, and other leftists quickly shuffle him out the way to try and stop people from catching his face or any form of retaliation against unprovoked violence. They then proceed to blame the woman who got punched for her opinions.

Then we have the handing out hijabs to women at the marches and the pro-Islam agitprop. Contrary to orthodox propaganda, most people in the West DO NOT LIKE ISLAM whether they are on the left, or the right. Everyone says what they're supposed to in public, but only the ultra-progressive left wants to promote Islam, because most people are not quislings, and also like things like music, dogs, alcohol, bacon, free speech, sunlight on their skin, vitamin D, rape and honour killings being illegal, and clitorises. This shit is disenfranchising regular folk FAST.

And then there's racial politics. I say 'race politics', but that really seems to boil down to stoking black resentment of whites, emasculating whites (to ensure asymmetry, which is necessary for divide and conquer tactics), and trying to cow every other racial minority into a convenient voting block. Of course, the inevitable result is a corresponding increase in white resentment of blacks as well.

This is not a sustainable formula for success. It requires non-white demographics to grow fast enough to overwhelm the white majority, and maintain their political affiliation while doing so, before any pushback can gather momentum. Trump, the internet, and numerous other developments have made this unlikely now. Everybody except university activists and ghetto trash is sick of identity politics. And the result is this:



Their coalition is going to break.

Now is the time to act—divide them further, and persuade those who can still be reached: identity politics is not in their interests. It hasn't made women happier, or blacks more prosperous, and if they want to keep on poking the sleeping bear of "white identity", the latter will be even less prosperous in the future. In fact, it probably won't even exist, because if there is a civil war in America, it's highly likely to be along race lines first, followed by a political purge. And nobody except the most hardened white supremacists can possibly want this to happen.

It may be possible to absorb large numbers of women, as despite these pathetic marches, they go with the herd. Hopefully more blacks and hispanics will leave the Cathedral in time, but it will be a harder sell.
___________________

Final note: it's pretty impressive how we have had marches of so many groups who feel personally threatened by Trump's 'hatred', when he has never even said anything negative about their demographic.

We've had a women's march when he has never denigrated women (unless you consider getting laid regularly to be "misogynistic"). He also hired women into influential positions long before it was standard practice.

We've had the LGBT movement marching against Trump, despite the fact he has never said anything negative about gays. He doesn't even fucking CARE about their bullshit, it's a non-issue to him. He's for reducing the number of Achmeds looking to turn them into LGBTBBQs, though, but I guess survival instinct isn't as strong in a community rife with bug-chasing.

We've had blacks marching against Trump, pulling white people out of cars and beating them up for voting for him, burning neighbourhoods. He has never said anything negative about black people. His policies are likely to bring back jobs to working class blacks in areas that have been completely decimated by off-shoring.

A large portion of the population is living in a world made entirely of illusions. This is pure collective hysteria. And despite my optimism that the left's coalition is about to fall to pieces, I am no longer convinced the greater situation can or will be rectified peacefully. There are far too many people whose entire reality is built around a pressing urge to demolish their own civilisation for political in-fighting to present any opportunity to fix things now. Some heads are going to crack—I can feel it.

[John Michael Kane]

(01-23-2017 09:25 AM)kbell Wrote:  

I'm amazed by the amount of support and friends I knew growing up who went to this march. Very disappointed to see tons of pictures of this on my facebook feed.

Most people are not Red Pill. We are fighting insurgent warfare. Trump won using these tactics. To push his agenda, we'll continue to need to use memes, have private talks with those on the fence, slowly expose people to another way of thinking. This war will be fought over time, as it was prior to Trump's win.

(01-23-2017 02:13 PM)GlobalMan Wrote:  

Gmac brother, it's called ramble for a reason, it's meant to just fill the space while maintaining at least minimal attention with somewhat related talking points.

Trump could ramble for hours straight if need be, his skill in this is unmatched by anyone.

Trump is a master rambler. His chit chat is almost hypnotic. Suffice it to say, Trump has gone way beyond the The Pet Shop Opener.

[CynicalContrarian]

[CynicalContrarian]

All I can do is laugh :

[budoslavic]

[CynicalContrarian]

For fun. We should give all the feminists & their limp-wristed, low-T lackey's a whole developed island to themselves to rule over.
See how long their 'Matriarchy' lasts.

While we get to point & laugh.

[CynicalContrarian]

Ok..., I'm starting to get worried about ol' Crowder.

[Roosh]

(01-23-2017 09:33 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Ok..., I'm starting to get worried about ol' Crowder.

The "new right" today looks like normal liberals from just 10 years ago.

[username]

(01-23-2017 09:51 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

The "new right" today looks like normal liberals from just 10 years ago.

Right winger dressed as a women/transexual who later on kisses another dude in drag. The right is getting gayer by the day.

[Sombro]

(01-23-2017 09:51 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

The "new right" today looks like normal liberals from just 10 years ago.

"If you have always believed that everyone should play by the same rules and be judged by the same standards, that would have gotten you labeled a radical 50 years ago, a liberal 25 years ago and a racist today." –– Thomas Sowell

[CynicalContrarian]

[John Michael Kane]

(01-23-2017 09:51 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

(01-23-2017 09:33 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Ok..., I'm starting to get worried about ol' Crowder.

The "new right" today looks like normal liberals from just 10 years ago.

Crowder knows that the way to get pageviews and money is through doing the outrageous. Dressing up as a tranny is comedic humor that people get because most normal people think trannies are mentally ill. Not my thing, but I can see how this is effective for his brand in destroying the narrative that conservatives can't have fun, especially when you take a sacred cow of the left and mock it ruthlessly.

[Enoch]

(01-23-2017 09:56 PM)username Wrote:  

(01-23-2017 09:51 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

The "new right" today looks like normal liberals from just 10 years ago.

Right winger dressed as a women/transexual who later on kisses another dude in drag. The right is getting gayer by the day.

I'm sure Gavin McInnes would let Crowder borrow his butt plug.

[CynicalContrarian]

@TrumpUntamed 16m

Quote:

After the #WomensMarch I'm going to put M.D. after my name. I've seen so many vaginas, I feel like an OB/GYN.

[Leonard D Neubache]

(01-23-2017 09:33 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Ok..., I'm starting to get worried about ol' Crowder.

I was starting to like Crowder but I hit that point when you dig into their work that you start to realise that the occasional pretend-to-be-gay-joke and cross-dressing-gag appears so frequently that it points to something a little sad.

In this case I don't think it marks Crowder and Not-gay-Jared as closet homos. It flags them as being not entirely proud of themselves and their political stances. When I was a teenager I used to make politically incorrect jokes while using a gay lisp because I was trying to deflect repercussions for being politically incorrect by doing self-depreciating things. The sense was that nobody was allowed to criticise politically correct causes but if you did it better not be because you had pride in your image or who you were.

You had to make yourself the equivalent of a court jester, the only man in the kingdom allowed to mock the crown because he was himself a fool without honour.

If they did it occasionally then it wouldn't bother me, but the gags with not-gay-Jared crossdressing or being in bed with Crowder or being in the bath with Crowder or being Crowder's latex-wearing torture toy pop up with regular monotony.

And this is from the guy that keeps telling his audience "the left is never going to like you, so stop trying to appease them".

It smacks of "safe" conservatism and it didn't take long for it to wear thin with me.

[John Michael Kane]

(01-23-2017 11:00 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(01-23-2017 09:33 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Ok..., I'm starting to get worried about ol' Crowder.

I was starting to like Crowder but I hit that point when you dig into their work that you start to realise that the occasional pretend-to-be-gay-joke and cross-dressing-gag appears so frequently that it points to something a little sad.

I think the joke is being overplayed a bit, for what its worth.

Quote:

In this case I don't think it marks Crowder and Not-gay-Jared as closet homos. It flags them as being not entirely proud of themselves and their political stances. When I was a teenager I used to make politically incorrect jokes while using a gay lisp because I was trying to deflect repercussions for being politically incorrect by doing self-depreciating things. The sense was that nobody was allowed to criticise politically correct causes but if you did it better not be because you had pride in your image or who you were.

Crowder is married. He doesn't strike me as a closet homo. I think you make a valid point of saying that using this schtick is his way of deflecting criticism of being homophobic, sexist, etc. Its the "its just a joke" defense. That's part of the reason why it actually works. Kids these days are so sensitive to political correctness, considering all the marxist programing they've received in school. The best way to reach those who haven't swallowed the red pill is to be comically subversive. That's where I think this whole act is actually beneficial. He's going to reach an audience of people will won't take him as someone who has murderous intent on women, trannies, gays, etc, which the likes of Ted Cruz who is super uptight all the time, make it too easy to be painted as an Angry Conservative.

Quote:

And this is from the guy that keeps telling his audience "the left is never going to like you, so stop trying to appease them".

It smacks of "safe" conservatism and it didn't take long for it to wear thin with me.

You've already swallowed the red pill. I find it overplayed and don't watch him for the same reason. It gets boring. That being said, it has its place, and mocking them does major damage against SJW's. As red pill men, we have no problem calling the manlets fags, cucks or scum. We use ultra-masculine language with can be tinged with disgust and is often foul or offensive. We strive to make strong points. That works when you're preaching to the choir, but only if the culture is ready to hear your message.

Too many people still have it good enough that radicalism (including being radically masculine) is a bit threatening. Crowder is also a Canadian, which always pride themselves on niceness uber alles. As Americans, I'd say we are more rough and tumble, as a group. Yes, we have our cucks and fags, but red-blooded American men like Roosh and others here aren't going to black down from a verbal fight. In a larger culture war, I see the likes of Crowder as being an alternative division to the Roosh army, which is an alternative division to Breitbart, Pepe, etc. Many forces, combined, attacking from different angles have their place.

[Thrill Jackson]

(01-23-2017 09:51 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

(01-23-2017 09:33 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Ok..., I'm starting to get worried about ol' Crowder. :laugh:

The "new right" today looks like normal liberals from just 10 years ago.

Took the words right out of my mouth. It's funny people always ask me why I switched sides. I'm like hell, I haven't changed. The left has lost its mind and the right is where home is now.

[eskimobobseal]

It was funny how the stupid indoctrinated communists at the Soros march couldn't even articulate one single "women's right" they were "fighting" for. They're only there to virtue signal to their Starbucks friends and pretend to be part of a "revolution" against an imaginary caricature of Trump created for them by the corporate old media and a bunch of other imaginary enemies like evil white males.

Men built Western civilization from the ground up and gave these disgusting hags the freedom to incessantly bitch and whine about discredited feminist false narratives, yet they show zero gratitude.

The 19th Amendment was a mistake.

[John Michael Kane]

Women's sufferage was a shit test from back in the day. Our male ancestors failed that test. You know what happened right after womens' emotions were allowed to run amuck?



Women banned alcohol. All of it. Women, love restriction on men, because they desperately crave men giving them a "no". The weak men of the Prohibition era failed the shit test, and the women punished those weak men by taking away their drink.

Bottom line is, respect women, but don't ever appease them. They belong in the home, not in the voting booth or in civic life. That's a man's arena for a reason.

Weak men giving into women back in the day:



After screwing up and failing the shit test, men had to push back, and the women broke down.

Men getting pissed off enough to realized they made a mistake:



Bottom line is gentleman, don't ever fail a woman's shit test, be it in your relationship with her, or on a civic level.

[Latinopan]

The moment the man walked in to office

[url=https://twitter.com/DeptofDefense/status/822894691259707394][/url]

[eskimobobseal]

@John Michael Kane

I've never thought about it like that before, it really was a failed shit test. We're seeing the aftermath of it today.

These women out marching would be a lot happier at home serving a masculine man. There's a reason so many of them are addicted to anti-depressants, you can only rebel against God and nature for so long before breaking down.