Quote: (01-15-2017 11:18 AM)spokepoker Wrote:
I think the feminists hate Ripley character because she had to work hard to survive, to think things through and prepare, she was weak and had to learn to be tough. She did not survive through all the movies due to the powerful magic of vagina, and that is something they cannot accept. Besides, she was not weighing 90lbs throwing 240lbs linebackers around like scarlet spider in the avengers movies. Cause vagina and yoga.
My take on it is that feminists hate the Ripley character because she reflects pretty accurately the apotheosis of all feminists: she's an irritable, fairly sexless, masculine asshole. Rewatch the movie again, see how she treats her fellow crewmembers, and tell me you'd seriously be willing to spend more than about two days in close quarters with her -- regardless of whether or not you get to fuck her. The most masculine guys on the ship -- the ship's two engineers -- can't fucking stand her. Maybe it's just my personal aesthetics, but I have yet to see any film -- and yes, that includes
Heartbreakers and
Working Girl -- in which Sigourney Weaver has ever looked remotely sexual or appealing on the eye.
The interesting part is that when you go looking for Ridley Scott's thoughts on the subject of the original
Alien, it turns out the decision to make Ripley a woman was a bit later in the process. Ripley was originally male in the script. But Scott had the idea that it would make the film less predictable to have Ripley a female and the final survivor when the movies he believed formed
Alien's genre mainly had male protagonists. His justification for doing this, as he put it, was because he respected strong women and grew up around strong women. In short: it was an Oedipal thing because he was the child of a domineering, authoritarian mother in the Army, where presumably his father was absent for long stretches. What he gives us, then, is a male hero with a vagina.
In short, Scott was not setting out to make a groundbreaking hero. He was in essence using the audiences's expectations of a standard male protagonist against them to keep suspense in the movie. Feminists hate Ripley's character because she's basically a man in a woman's body. It's the logical endpoint of feminism, and they don't like being confronted with that.
It gets even more hilarious when
Aliens comes along.
Allow me a short digression to explain the hilarity. People cheer James Cameron on because he supposedly creates "powerful" or "feminist" characters, but such people are seeing only the surface of his films. Take
Terminator 2, for example, and Linda Hamilton's nice biceps:
Notice that she's in an insane asylum when we first meet her? That she behaves like a complete violent fruitloop, has lost all real feeling for her own son, even tries to murder a father right in front of his own wife and son? Her character arc in the movie is to move
away from the tough, you-go-grrl image to actually care about her kid, and to even develop a certain respect for the machine father sent back to protect the boy. She's
utterly fucking crazy, first cousin to a machine herself. That's James Cameron's ideas about girls with guns.
Similar holds for
Aliens. Cameron takes feminism and pushes it subtly back to patriarchal norms: Ripley is only permitted by the plot to intervene when there aren't enough men left standing to do anything else, Hicks basically becomes Newt's father figure, and the only you-go-grrl in the film is Vasquez the smartgun operator, who looks a hell of a lot like a man, is overly masculine compared with a lot of the men around her, and who is implied as pretty unhinged herself.
Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm