[EDantes]

(12-29-2016 07:51 AM)torid Wrote:  

The new movie Passengers is one of the best movies I have seen this year, I warmly recommend it.

It is very pro-masculine, pro-red pill, and it has no feminist and no social justice bullshit.

It was very refreshing, and I enjoyed it very much.

Of course, it didn't take long for all the liberal media to slash
the movie with terrible reviews, to universally cry that it is very "sexist",
"mysoginistic" and so on... you know the drill:

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/chris-pra...assengers/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lj-quirk/l...76948.html

Also, Jeniffer Lawrence has some nude scenes in the movie,
one more reason for all the feminists to be triggered hard.

Thanks for letting me know about this, I haven't been to the movies in awhile but I'll be sure to watch this.

Can't wait till it outbeats the new Ghostbusters film by millions at the box office.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

It will certainly make the money back.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?pag...rs2016.htm

Also a good indicator is the rising sales after Christmas. Word of mouth spreads that the fat ageing feminists did not ruin another flic, so more people will see it. They put only a pittance of marketing into it, but it should reach 300 mio. $ worldwide.

[Steve McQueen]

Watched it on the OPs recommendation that it was red pill, I think OP needs to go look up what red pill is, cause this aint, its blue pill to its core.

Its a mash up of Titanic / 2001 A Space Odyssey / The Shining, with the emphasis on Titanic - Cause thats what your boner will resemble once your done watching it, feckin useless lads, avoid it like the plague!

[Roardog]

I watched this the other day with my brother and thought it was pretty good. Not blown away good but definitely entertaining and worth seeing at the movies.

Don't think I'd classify it as red pill per se but it's certainly not some feminist fantasy about women who can do it better than than the blokes.

[RichardCranium]

Coincidentally I happened to see this the other day and I agree it isn't the red pill example it's made out to be. Where it goes sideways is the male character just happens to see the female in the pod while in a drunken stupor and looks her up in the database. He gets a serious case of oneitus and falls in love with her just based on her writings and videos in her bio. He struggles mightily with the decision to wake her up because of the fantasy he's created of them being a perfect couple. It does work for a while until the robot bartender spills the beans of the truth. She of course then hates him and blames him for "ruining her life."

Fast-forward to when they need to make repairs to the spaceship or else all perish he is logical and concise and she's an emotional mess. However she does save him in the end and they supposedly live "happily ever after."

Also another thing to take away is Jennifer Lawrence just really need to shut her face. Only in America can a basic bitch like her feel she's oppressed being paid millions of dollars to play Hollywood make-believe.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

< Of course he did not play the picture of Red Pill masculinity, because such a movie would be the greatest shock for the current year snowflakes.

Today's standards of masculinity have been lowered already significantly. However his choice pick for waking up would have been the one who had passed the best boner test. Likely most of us would have perused the 2500 females and chosen the one with the best all around message. The movie of course did not show us how he viewed 2499 women in order to select her, because that would not fit the message of "THE ONE".

Besides - it is all a movie. No one will colonize interstellar space without some kind of Warp-drive. We could colonize our solar system that way, but certainly not distant planets. The globalists plan hundreds of years ahead, but they would not control such an area with that technology, so this will never be reality in our current system. And even if Interstellar Aliens landed on Earth, then the big boys would try to kill them, because no one is giving their Earth slaves some kind of superior technology that makes their shitty combustion engine system and Global Warming scam obsolete.

[spokepoker]

Where did all the animals come from in the end? I'm pretty sure that huge tree fucked a lot of electronics and wiring up.

[torid]

(01-03-2017 04:40 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Also a good indicator is the rising sales after Christmas. Word of mouth spreads that the fat ageing feminists did not ruin another flic, so more people will see it. They put only a pittance of marketing into it, but it should reach 300 mio. $ worldwide.

Feminists are furious and obsessed with the movie:

They slam it angrily as:

- "misogynistic"
- "creepy"
- "horrifying"
- "poor"
- "scathing"
- "disaster"


http://ew.com/movies/2017/01/05/passenge...g-reviews/

However the commenters say that it was a good movie, despite the feminists army of furious whales

[Lucky]

I knew RVF would have some interesting things to say about this movie.

I watched the trailer and thought "Hmm this looks pretty good." I'm also a fan of Chris Pratt, because he is unashamed of his faith and patriotism.

Then I went to Rotten Tomatoes and saw it had 31% or something. But the audience gave it 70%. Suspicious.

So I saw the film and observed Pratt's moral dilemma, courtship of Lawrence, and heroic acts to save her. Of course feminists and modern leftists would hate it.

My antennae for entertainment has become quite acute lately. If entertainment doesn't support leftist ideology, the brainwashed critics will trash it.

In short, it's a decent movie. Maybe even good-- worth your money just to piss off the feminists.

[Menace]

Saw it too. Decent is the correct description for this movie. Not amazing, not awful, but decent entertainment.

My only complaint was the ridiculous glass (?) window on one side of what appeared to be the fusion reactor. I realize it was made for visual effects purposes, but still.

Have to remember that Pratt was in solitary confinement for a year (although in luxurious accommodations), so the fact that he effectively sentenced Aurora to an early death should be seen in context of someone who's going crazy. I dare say none of the critics of the film could do even 1 month in solitary before going ape shit.

Also, Aurora's character from one perspective was incredibly selfish. She left her family and friends behind to die while effectively projecting herself into the future to write some kind of frontier tale? Also, she came from an obviously highly privileged background given her status on the ship. Has she been asked to check her white privilege? It's pretty crazy, but par for the course for today's typists and their "interesting" experiences.

[torid]

(01-09-2017 07:30 AM)Lucky Wrote:  

I knew RVF would have some interesting things to say about this movie.

I watched the trailer and thought "Hmm this looks pretty good." I'm also a fan of Chris Pratt, because he is unashamed of his faith and patriotism.

Then I went to Rotten Tomatoes and saw it had 31% or something. But the audience gave it 70%. Suspicious.

So I saw the film and observed Pratt's moral dilemma, courtship of Lawrence, and heroic acts to save her. Of course feminists and modern leftists would hate it.

My antennae for entertainment has become quite acute lately. If entertainment doesn't support leftist ideology, the brainwashed critics will trash it.

In short, it's a decent movie. Maybe even good-- worth your money just to piss off the feminists.

The feminists and social justice warriors can't sleep at night because of this movie.

They claim it's "space rape" and the ultimate proof of "rape culture":

[debeguiled]

[torid]

(01-04-2017 01:50 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Of course he did not play the picture of Red Pill masculinity, because such a movie would be the greatest shock for the current year snowflakes.

Today's standards of masculinity have been lowered already significantly.

However his choice pick for waking up would have been the one who had passed the best boner test.

More feminists and SJWs are literally shaking nowadays because of this movie:

[CynicalContrarian]

Space rape aye?

You'd think they'd have enough to worry about here on earth after 2016, without freaking out about fictional premises.

Also, if one was to commit a crime in space. Who's exact earthly jurisdiction would one fall under?

Edit.
Heh. This constitutes post no. 2001.

Remake - 3001. A SafeSpace Odyssey.

[torid]

(01-12-2017 09:04 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Space rape aye?

You'd think they'd have enough to worry about here on earth after 2016, without freaking out about fictional premises.

Also, if one was to commit a crime in space. Who's exact earthly jurisdiction would one fall under?

Edit.
Heh. This constitutes post no. 2001.

Remake - 3001. A SafeSpace Odyssey.

It's actually more than just "space rape".

Chris Pratt and the movie "Passengers" is according to the furious blue haired feminists, the ultimate proof that we live in a "white men supremacist misogynistic rape culture":

[torid]

(12-31-2016 02:26 AM)Spaniard88 Wrote:  

Just finished watching it, good movie, it's worth a watch. Chris Pratt keeps showing up in movies that are fun to watch. It seems like he's carved a space for himself similar to The Rock, as a family friendly, fun, athletic, masculine lead.

Yes indeed. Until this movie, I thought that Hollywood is lost forever.

Now I still have a ray of hope.

[CynicalContrarian]

(01-13-2017 10:31 AM)torid Wrote:  

It's actually more than just "space rape".

Chris Pratt and the movie "Passengers" is according to the furious blue haired feminists, the ultimate proof that we live in a "white men supremacist misogynistic rape culture":

You should keep an eye on those account after valentine's day.
See if they're equally as vocal about the 50 Shades sequel.

[cascadecombo]

did they even see the movie?

I just watched it and I can not see what they see. And I'm usually rather good with my empathetic capabilities.

[LeeEnfield303]

(12-30-2016 03:14 AM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  

Even if the film is pro-masculinity, I refuse to give it one dime due to it having J-Law in it. She's such a feminist shrew, and she gets a percentage of every ticket sale and DVD. If you have to watch it, rent it from your local library.

Wellll....true, but I loved JLaw in American Hustle. Still got a boner from that, actually.

[HermeticAlly]

Saw this today. I really enjoyed it, thought this was a solid flick. And the fact that it pisses off SJWs just made me even happier to pay for it.

[catoblepa]

I thought it was good, and most importantly it had a decent pace unlike many contemporary sci-fi movies which are overstuffed with CGI sequences assaulting your senses and leaving you with no real substance storytellingwise.

[Belgrano]

If the snowflakes think this movie is already about "space rape", they better not watch "Alien" or one of its sequels.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

Alien is a movie that is forgotten everywhere when the snowflakes complain that there were no movies made about strong female protagonists. The male patriarchy made the SJWs forget Ripley and the female marines in the sequels. It simply did not exist - sexism rules everything.

[spokepoker]

I think the feminists hate Ripley character because she had to work hard to survive, to think things through and prepare, she was weak and had to learn to be tough. She did not survive through all the movies due to the powerful magic of vagina, and that is something they cannot accept. Besides, she was not weighing 90lbs throwing 240lbs linebackers around like scarlet spider in the avengers movies. Cause vagina and yoga.

[Splord]

(01-15-2017 07:34 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Alien is a movie that is forgotten everywhere when the snowflakes complain that there were no movies made about strong female protagonists. The male patriarchy made the SJWs forget Ripley and the female marines in the sequels. It simply did not exist - sexism rules everything.

It is called "SJW goldfish memory phenomenon" , anything older that last year is near ancient history.