Posts: 1,264
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation:
16
Holy Hypergamy: Ancient Reproduction.
12-06-2016, 10:18 PM
17 women reproduced for every one man 8,000 years ago.
So in reference to the
Why women believe men have it easy thread, here's a good basis for the counter argument. As if the 80/20 rule wasn't bad enough, back then it was the 94/6 rule.
Civilize the mind but make savage the body.
Posts: 2,276
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
24
Holy Hypergamy: Ancient Reproduction.
12-06-2016, 10:46 PM
I've read that in the pre-Columbian Inca civilization, the ruler had 1000's of women, his direct underlings had 100's and even leaders of 100 men would have something like 20 women. With so many of the women concentrated to around the top 1% of men, a huge percentage of men were permanently left without female companionship. I don't know about the Incas, but it's easy to imagine a society with high levels of slavery, with the same result.
At a certain level, it seems almost inevitable that the very first hierarchical civilizations to be formed after the development of agriculture would lead to a concentration of all the best women for a very small number of elite men. In time, the lower class men would find a way to balance things out somewhat, but the first true rulers with military forces would naturally draw all the best resources to themselves and their right hand men.
I'm the tower of power, too sweet to be sour. I'm funky like a monkey. Sky's the limit and space is the place!
-Randy Savage
Posts: 1,530
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
10
Holy Hypergamy: Ancient Reproduction.
12-07-2016, 03:18 AM
There's a reason why civilizations like these never conquer anywhere and always get destroyed in the end- the men have no motivation to fight if there is no reward (women).
This is in a time before the nation-state as well, so there was no patriotism in fighting for your leader. It is often glossed over by historians that after winning battles, the victors would usually rape the loser's women and either keep them as sex slaves or kill them. Then when they returned home they would be rewarded with a wife in a monogamous marriage.
Posts: 2,521
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
53
Holy Hypergamy: Ancient Reproduction.
12-07-2016, 03:35 AM
I wonder what the most balanced percenage of reproduction between men and women was. What was the high water mark? Lets say in the heyday of the beta provider, maybe early 20th century....70/30? 60/40? I doubt it's even been even money.
So as we slip further into sexual chaos, that number will drift ever closer back to 94/6.
...feel like slipping that rock on her finger now, romeo?
"Does PUA say that I just need to get to f-close base first here and some weird chemicals will be released in her brain to make her a better person?"
-Wonitis
Posts: 1,530
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
10
Holy Hypergamy: Ancient Reproduction.
12-07-2016, 01:24 PM
It will never get as low as 94/6. Most blue pill guys would actually get annoyed if they knew 80/20 or whatever was the truth, it's just that they either deny that it happens or aren't aware about it. Society would have to meet the demands of the average man.
The other option is that a more stable family culture (such as Islam) takes over as the men in the West simply have no motivation to fight.