rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists
#26

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

Quote: (07-04-2016 12:52 AM)Horus Wrote:  

Yet there is no separate post for Carina Willow who replies by calling him an "ugly chink ass," a "faggot" and tells him to "choke on rice." Woman privilege? Asian discrimination? White woman privilege? I can't decide.

EDIT: WB though, judging by her Facebook photos.

I guess it's up to you or any of us to simply add Carina Willow
to the list. Only when SJWs will also be publicly named and shamed,
then their power will diminish considerably
Reply
#27

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

Quote: (07-04-2016 10:26 AM)seniol Wrote:  

Quote: (07-04-2016 12:52 AM)Horus Wrote:  

Yet there is no separate post for Carina Willow who replies by calling him an "ugly chink ass," a "faggot" and tells him to "choke on rice." Woman privilege? Asian discrimination? White woman privilege? I can't decide.

EDIT: WB though, judging by her Facebook photos.

I guess it's up to you or any of us to simply add Carina Willow
to the list. Only when SJWs will also be publicly named and shamed,
then their power will diminish considerably
Asians don't seem to get as much attention from SJWs.

I think it might boil down to the 'darkness' level of their skin compared to blacks and Hipsanics, or some combination of factors like average income and education.

From what I can tell, "Muslim" or "brown-skinned" ranks the highest on their "heirarchy", "gays/transgenders" comes in second, and "women" third.
Reply
#28

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

Quote: (07-04-2016 11:20 AM)EDantes Wrote:  

Asians don't seem to get as much attention from SJWs.

I think it might boil down to the 'darkness' level of their skin compared to blacks and Hipsanics, or some combination of factors like average income and education.

From what I can tell, "Muslim" or "brown-skinned" ranks the highest on their "heirarchy", "gays/transgenders" comes in second, and "women" third.

And yet nobody ever talks about Asian privilege. Judging by most statistics, East Asians are kind of a master race. When looking at life outcomes such as income, education, health, crime rates, life spans, and many others, Asians seem to be simply better than everyone else. And yet they are never the victims of rabid accusations of racism.

And I think the reason for this is simple. Asian people are not an easy target. They are not pussies like most white people. They refuse to wear the shackles of "Asian guilt," while white people will eagerly attach the chains of "white guilt" themselves. Try berating a Japanese man for the many private bars and nightclubs which refuse to admit foreign patrons - his unashamed response will be something like "This is our country. If you don't like it you can leave." Try to berate a Chinese man for the occupation of Tibet - his unashamed response will be something like "So what? We conquered them because we are better than them." Try to berate an Asian American for his "privileged" position in society - he might be a little more guarded in his response, but his response will be something like "My parents worked extremely hard to provide me with the best opportunities. And I continue to work hard so that my children will be successful. Maybe if you worked hard you would have better outcomes."

Basically, it's not easy to bully someone who refuses to be bullied.
Reply
#29

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

Quote: (07-04-2016 11:57 AM)Horus Wrote:  

Quote: (07-04-2016 11:20 AM)EDantes Wrote:  

Asians don't seem to get as much attention from SJWs.

I think it might boil down to the 'darkness' level of their skin compared to blacks and Hipsanics, or some combination of factors like average income and education.

From what I can tell, "Muslim" or "brown-skinned" ranks the highest on their "heirarchy", "gays/transgenders" comes in second, and "women" third.

And yet nobody ever talks about Asian privilege. Judging by most statistics, East Asians are kind of a master race. When looking at life outcomes such as income, education, health, crime rates, life spans, and many others, Asians seem to be simply better than everyone else. And yet they are never the victims of rabid accusations of racism.

And I think the reason for this is simple. Asian people are not an easy target. They are not pussies like most white people. They refuse to wear the shackles of "Asian guilt," while white people will eagerly attach the chains of "white guilt" themselves. Try berating a Japanese man for the many private bars and nightclubs which refuse to admit foreign patrons - his unashamed response will be something like "This is our country. If you don't like it you can leave." Try to berate a Chinese man for the occupation of Tibet - his unashamed response will be something like "So what? We conquered them because we are better than them." Try to berate an Asian American for his "privileged" position in society - he might be a little more guarded in his response, but his response will be something like "My parents worked extremely hard to provide me with the best opportunities. And I continue to work hard so that my children will be successful. Maybe if you worked hard you would have better outcomes."

Basically, it's not easy to bully someone who refuses to be bullied.

I've had some similar thoughts. Consider what the Japanese did. They have no collective guilt.

What about the mongols? They killed around 50 million people - ranging from Asia to Europe and the Middle East. Modern day mongols don't feel any guilt. Neither do Asians in general.

In fact, they dont think of themselves as all "Asian." However, when SJWs attack whites and demand they feel guilt, they throw those of Swiss, Polish, Hungarian, Italian, Greek, etc descent in with those of the Spanish, English, and French over "colonization"

When are Asians all going to feel collective guilt for setting parts of the world back hundreds of years because of destroying entire cities? You know, I can't remember the last time any European power slaughtered an entire city of a million people in under 2 weeks....

Nope, no guilt.

They aren't pussies about it at all. They don't care about feeling guilt about what Ghengis and the other Khans did centuries ago. Neither should they. IF only "whites" could understand this.
Reply
#30

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

Quote: (07-04-2016 11:57 AM)Horus Wrote:  

Basically, it's not easy to bully someone who refuses to be bullied.

It's amazing how much people can accomplish when they take responsibility for their actions and refuse to blame others for their failures. At the individual level and the civilizational.

Data Sheet Maps | On Musical Chicks | Rep Point Changes | Au Pairs on a Boat
Captainstabbin: "girls get more attractive with your dick in their mouth. It's science."
Spaniard88: "The "believe anything" crew contributes: "She's probably a good girl, maybe she lost her virginity to someone with AIDS and only had sex once before you met her...give her a chance.""
Reply
#31

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

Quote: (07-04-2016 11:57 AM)Horus Wrote:  

And I think the reason for this is simple. Asian people are not an easy target. They are not pussies like most white people. They refuse to wear the shackles of "Asian guilt," while white people will eagerly attach the chains of "white guilt" themselves. Try berating a Japanese man for the many private bars and nightclubs which refuse to admit foreign patrons - his unashamed response will be something like "This is our country. If you don't like it you can leave." Try to berate a Chinese man for the occupation of Tibet - his unashamed response will be something like "So what? We conquered them because we are better than them." Try to berate an Asian American for his "privileged" position in society - he might be a little more guarded in his response, but his response will be something like "My parents worked extremely hard to provide me with the best opportunities. And I continue to work hard so that my children will be successful. Maybe if you worked hard you would have better outcomes."

Basically, it's not easy to bully someone who refuses to be bullied.

The New York Times or Huffington post will occasionally come out with an editorial or article blasting asian culture (usually the focus is on Japan) for its xenophobia, patriarchy, etc..

NYT caters almost exclusively to limousine liberal group think with the biggest demographic of contributors and readers being of the Jewish variety. So make of that what you will. They are all about globalization for other people but not for the tribe.

The left penalizes asians in other ways though. Higher bar for admission both professionally and academically. While the bar is lowered more and more for others.

On a personal level I could tell you that going the entrepeneurial route was the best career decision I ever made. Grinding it up the corporate ladder while watching affirmative action/quota shitbags get hand held up the ladder for "multicultural" reasons would have been a hard pill to swallow. We all know "diversity" doesn't really involve selecting the most qualified people it just means mashing everyone down to the lowest common denominator.
Reply
#32

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

Questions:
-Are Jewish-Americans currently facing the same treatment as Asian-Americans in America, especially regarding admission into Ivy League Universities?
-Is there any notable campus false rape case when the falsely accused is a Jewish male student?

I don't know any.

As far as I know, Ivy League Universities are increasingly open to Jews while restricting the admission of Asians. Jews are only 1.73% of the US population in 2012, while Asians are 5.6 percent; but there are as much Jews in ILUs as there are Asians. It seems to me that Affirmative-Action benefits Jews far more than it does Blacks and Hispanics. I may get the statistics wrong though, so it'd be great if anyone can help.

There was a lawsuit against Havard for discrimination bias against admission of Asians, but it failed.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-americ...ed-n388576
(According to this there are 20% of the Harvard student body are Asian. While in one estimate 25% of it are Jewish.)
Reply
#33

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

Quote: (07-03-2016 02:14 PM)Cobra Wrote:  

Do not ever post anything about work on social media. It could have been an amazing day and the receptionist could have blown you. Just DON'T... EVER... DO..IT.

This alone makes me cherish the real life the most.
Reply
#34

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

Despite being less than 2% of the population, any "white" Ivy League student or graduate in the last several decades has a greater than fifty percent chance of being Jewish.

The WASP power structure has been gone for decades. OWS and BLM were and have been railing at a group that barely touches the upper echelons of power anymore.
Reply
#35

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

Quote: (07-04-2016 07:48 PM)JacksonRev Wrote:  

Despite being less than 2% of the population, any "white" Ivy League student or graduate in the last several decades has a greater than fifty percent chance of being Jewish.

The WASP power structure has been gone for decades. OWS and BLM were and have been railing at a group that barely touches the upper echelons of power anymore.

This is true. Asians and Jews each comprise about 25% of the student body at elite universities, while blacks and hispanics together make up another 25%. This leaves the 65% of American college age population that is non-Jewish white with only 25% of the seats. That is the reality of "white privilege."

Whites are the most disenfranchised group in the United States, and if you bring it up you are a "racist" at best or an "anti-semite" at worst. They are a conquered people but demographics being what they are, care is still being taken to mask it with accusations of privilege and other highly ironic brainwashing. Once the demographics tip the masking will come off and they will be made to know it full well though.
Reply
#36

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

I submitted the bureau of justice statistics to that site as racist with some of their worst stats. Doubt it'll take though
Reply
#37

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

Roosh called it!

It was always going to happen though (easy to say now), what with SJWism becoming the new religion of the West (before it spreads its tentacles further afield).

There is one small little problem with sites like this though, apart from the political and moral aspects. That problem is a purely technical one.

(I'll leave it to you to work out what the pretty obvious political and moral aspects are)

Ultimately, all sites that try this little trick, fail, because it becomes a wild-west free-for-all, and descends into full on trolling faster than you can say "White Knights of the club, GO HOME! Go home to your Mothers, your Fathers, your children, those in need of your help that you can save, but do not mess with the Dark One!".

It really is as preposterous as that. Now, I'm a really useless computer programmer, but in my trying to learn the trade, I've picked up a few tricks that made the whole experience worthwhile. One of them is the viewing of source code on websites. You can learn a lot. It seems to me, that there is no way in hell of actually stopping anyone from taking the source code of, say, facebook, or whatever, and then manipulating that for your own ends. It would be a mere case of replacing the text, then re-rendering it out on the page to check it worked. I see no reason why it would not work for the majority of sites. I haven't done this, but it seems plausible.

So, when, say, oooh, Lena Dunham makes a, say, facebook post about how 'ALL GAY PEOPLE ARE GREAT!', it would be relatively trivial to change that to 'ALL GAY PEOPLE ARE SCUM!' - just re-render the page, screen shot it, tell people it was taken down if they question the veracity of it, or just tell them that Lena changed it later on out of 'gay guilt' or something. I don't know. Use your imagination. The trolling possibilities are endless. Which is why it didn't work before and won't work again.

Apart from the political/moral aspects of the thing in the first place.

Some great opportunities to get some new material though before the site crashes and burns. I doubt the people who set it up were not aware of this, but the publicity will look good on their SJW portfolio at least. Even they know it won't be around for long, legal implications aside. Who knows, maybe it will take off a bit and they'll go ye olde pump and dump and sell it to Microsoft for 30 Billion. Doubtful.

This is not about equality. This is about a witchhunt from those too impotent not only to fight face-to-face, but those that can not formulate a decent argument and engage in dialectic. And that sickens me, because in their little wet-panty dreams, they envision snagging a racist, xenophobic, misogynistic shitlord, par excellence, then ruining his life, perhaps breaking up his family, perhaps other people losing their jobs and falling on hard times. The warm glow of satisfaction would be immense to them. All because, 'someone disagreed with me on the internet'. Pathetic, weak, childish, impotent, rage-filled little bastards and bitches they are.

There will be some more attempts at something like this. Perhaps something without this site's fatal flaw. I don't know. If it's possible they will think of a way. I personally don't see sites like this ever taking off for the 'technical' reason I have outlined. If it was just down to the political/moral aspect, these sites would be ten a penny and you'd be getting your tickets for the local lynching from the corner shop, every week.

But don't underestimate these impotent fools. They are on the look out for 'words' and to hang those people who don't use the right 'words' or that might use proscribed 'words'.

Sometimes those words have to be said - they are unavoidable. But without wishing to be patronising, just remember this is a public space, we are being watched, and judged. An innocuous slip-up now might cost you dear when they retro-actively change the laws in a few years time to mean that we are committing a prison-worthy offence, simply by being a member of this forum, let alone hoisting us by our poorly thought out or quick-tempered outbursts. That would have got you a smack in the chops in the pub in the olden days, today, you just have yours and your family's life ruined.

But the left's desire (whether intentional or not) to reduce all language to hyperbole and bluster, so that no words mean anything any more, shall be their downfall. Not ours. By the time that happens, words won't count for jack-shit, and it will be a new game and a new day with new rules, bit like the old rules from way back when...

They don't see that. They think that this little 'WAR' they are waging on the internetz is some kind of substitute for bloody battle. That they will somehow escape the ensuing mele. Life and history don't work like that. The fools.

And what I particularly like the most about this deliciously impotent tomfoolery, is the fact that not only are the left trying to corale us in, with how we think and what words we are allowed to use, but that they are then trying to use the words we DO use against us, for having any dissenting opinion. Perfect! I see the game afoot. I see the MO. "You will only use words we approve of", "You will only use those approved words in approved ways", "If you use non-approved words, or if you use them in non-approved ways, we will destroy you and your family, perhaps resulting in real physical harm, and don't forget, we are watching, screenshotting, disseminating all over the webz, and you are just one ill-voiced opinion away from having your life turned upside down".

It's a nice thought, isn't it SJWs? It won't work, and it exposes the true weakness you feel inside, just because, because, ooh, I can't even, no idea why you are so weak to be honest, or what the fuck you are so riled up about when you have food to eat and medical care, entertainment on tap, basically everything our forefathers fought for. But go on, keep on using them there words to fight whatever it is you are so bitter against. That'll work.

These people need to be stopped. By legal and fair means of course. No breaking the law. 'Tap, tap, this mic is on right?' Yes, legal means. That's what I said.

The left devalue language. They use it in their impotent outbursts. They can be identified by it. They want to keep it as THEIR weapon, and deny it to everyone else. Then when it is stolen from THEM, they want severe penalties doled out for the sheer temerity of having an opinion, contrary to others, as a lesson to others, that only approved words will be used in approved ways. YOU SHALL NOT USE OUR WORDS. OR ELSE.

I really could write an essay about how the left use language and how they are trying to misappropriate it for their own ends. I've almost reached a point where I can tell someone's life outlook and political leanings just by the words they use and how they structure their sentences (and not just the obvious).

This isn't just a war on words, and a war on language, and therefore a war on how to think. It's a war on every man's right to use those words, that language, and ultimately, to just be able to express an opinion about how he truly thinks. It's when they get so lost on their own rhetoric and become giddy with the false notion of some kind of political success, is when the truly nasty stuff happens. And just like with Brexit, they will say 'We didn't know, we weren't informed, why did you not try to at least warn us?'.

I'm aware that we have no right to free speech in the UK. Though I have seen 'hate-preachers' (muslims) openly calling for the killing of homosexual people, on the street surrounded by hundreds of people (children and the Police as well) - but that is different. Yah.

It's true, the Saxon is slow to hate. Very very slow. Once arisen?

But this is not about colour, creed or race. It will be a truly multicultural party when tshtf. It will be between ALL right thinking people, and ALL wrong thinking people. On either side of that line you will find every colour, creed and race known to man. In varying proportions. The battle lines are being drawn.


But I'm going off track now as usual. Pretty sure you all got the point.
Reply
#38

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

Quote: (07-04-2016 07:48 PM)JacksonRev Wrote:  

The WASP power structure has been gone for decades. OWS and BLM were and have been railing at a group that barely touches the upper echelons of power anymore.

But WASPs still make up a significant portion of the middle class, which holds the last remaining reservoir of western wealth outside of the hands of the elite; the ongoing seizure of that wealth by the elite (continuing apace with the new free trade deals on the horizon) is precisely why movements that demonize that demographic are given carte blanche to do so. Economic offensives have so very often been carried out along the lines of cultural conflict: not only does it distract from the basic cynical objective, it provides a veritable horde of useful idiots ready to zealously yet unwittingly pursue it.
Reply
#39

SJW creates web site where random people are denounced as racists

Quote: (07-05-2016 10:37 AM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  

Quote: (07-04-2016 07:48 PM)JacksonRev Wrote:  

Despite being less than 2% of the population, any "white" Ivy League student or graduate in the last several decades has a greater than fifty percent chance of being Jewish.

The WASP power structure has been gone for decades. OWS and BLM were and have been railing at a group that barely touches the upper echelons of power anymore.

This is true. Asians and Jews each comprise about 25% of the student body at elite universities, while blacks and hispanics together make up another 25%. This leaves the 65% of American college age population that is non-Jewish white with only 25% of the seats. That is the reality of "white privilege."

Whites are the most disenfranchised group in the United States, and if you bring it up you are a "racist" at best or an "anti-semite" at worst. They are a conquered people but demographics being what they are, care is still being taken to mask it with accusations of privilege and other highly ironic brainwashing. Once the demographics tip the masking will come off and they will be made to know it full well though.

Ron Unz wrote a tremendous (and long) article on this a few years ago. Worth reading for anyone interested: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/a...ritocracy/

An excerpt:

Quote:Quote:

Once we begin separating out the Jewish portion of Ivy League enrollment, our picture of the overall demographics of the student bodies is completely transformed. Indeed, Karabel opens the final chapter of his book by performing exactly this calculation and noting the extreme irony that the WASP demographic group which had once so completely dominated America’s elite universities and “virtually all the major institutions of American life” had by 2000 become “a small and beleaguered minority at Harvard,” being actually fewer in number than the Jews whose presence they had once sought to restrict.50 Very similar results seem to apply all across the Ivy League, with the disproportion often being even greater than the particular example emphasized by Karabel.

In fact, Harvard reported that 45.0 percent of its undergraduates in 2011 were white Americans, but since Jews were 25 percent of the student body, the enrollment of non-Jewish whites might have been as low as 20 percent, though the true figure was probably somewhat higher.51 The Jewish levels for Yale and Columbia were also around 25 percent, while white Gentiles were 22 percent at the former and just 15 percent at the latter. The remainder of the Ivy League followed this same general pattern.

[size=8pt]"For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.”[/size] [size=7pt] - Romans 8:18[/size]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)