[Sensei Creation]

The atrocities of the Paris attacks hit me hard and in the aftermath of what happened , I really started to ponder more and more about matters concerning extremism .

Common sense led me to believe that the best thing to do was to severely tighten up borders and seriously vet anyone coming in from areas known to be terrorist hot spots . I looked around for anyone politicians that echoed my sentiments , but most of them were only concerned about speaking against " Hate " and how " We mustn't give in to Islamophobia " .

After Paris , it was Brussels and now Orlando . And each time , the same speeches. From politicians on both side of the spectrum.

I live in the UK and people here are beginning to wake up however at the risk of sounding pessimistic , I fully believe that the global elite will not allow the UK to leave the EU . And neither will Trump be allowed to become president. They'll find a way to stick to the plan.

However I have yet to understand why the elites are importing and encouraging terrorism in the west . It has more to do with progressives being afraid of being called racists or even feeling sympathy for fleeing migrants . I am sure of this . There is an underlying element in the big picture that I'm missing .

I can understand the motive in making women more masculine and making men more feminine : Confusing the gender roles has many advantages for them including increasing the divorce rates which makes it harder for a families to accumulate wealth over generations.

But I can't understand why they wish to make the west a warzone where innocent people are being murdered by individuals who hate and wish to destroy all of us and media outlets are deflecting the issue by talking about gun control or Hate towards a particular group ( Gays in Orlando ).

Tony Blair ( Ex british prime minister) said " these types of attacks would be more and more common from now on ." They are already trying to make us accept the the fact that these attacks won't just disappear overnight. As if we're going to have to get used to this and buckle up for the long haul .

I'm only in my early twenties but I've come to the conclusion that I have to get as much experience under my belt and leave the west as soon as possible. I would leave now if it wasn't for the fact that i'm in an accounting training contract that is going to open many doors for me in the future .

However I still wish to know why ? How do they gain in this ? I need to know so I can plan optimally for the future .

[Samseau]

Quote:

How do they gain in this ?

Importing millions of people so they continue to vote for your party which remains in power forever? What isn't there to gain? Some serfs get murdered and raped by dirty savages? Why would they care about something so trivial?

[JonnyOxford88]

(06-14-2016 06:02 PM)Sensei Creation Wrote:  

The atrocities of the Paris attacks hit me hard and in the aftermath of what happened , I really started to ponder more and more about matters concerning extremism .

Common sense led me to believe that the best thing to do was to severely tighten up borders and seriously vet anyone coming in from areas known to be terrorist hot spots . I looked around for anyone politicians that echoed my sentiments , but most of them were only concerned about speaking against " Hate " and how " We mustn't give in to Islamophobia " .

After Paris , it was Brussels and now Orlando . And each time , the same speeches. From politicians on both side of the spectrum.

I live in the UK and people here are beginning to wake up however at the risk of sounding pessimistic , I fully believe that the global elite will not allow the UK to leave the EU . And neither will Trump be allowed to become president. They'll find a way to stick to the plan.

However I have yet to understand why the elites are importing and encouraging terrorism in the west . It has more to do with progressives being afraid of being called racists or even feeling sympathy for fleeing migrants . I am sure of this . There is an underlying element in the big picture that I'm missing .

I can understand the motive in making women more masculine and making men more feminine : Confusing the gender roles has many advantages for them including increasing the divorce rates which makes it harder for a families to accumulate wealth over generations.

But I can't understand why they wish to make the west a warzone where innocent people are being murdered by individuals who hate and wish to destroy all of us and media outlets are deflecting the issue by talking about gun control or Hate towards a particular group ( Gays in Orlando ).

Tony Blair ( Ex british prime minister) said " these types of attacks would be more and more common from now on ." They are already trying to make us accept the the fact that these attacks won't just disappear overnight. As if we're going to have to get used to this and buckle up for the long haul .

I'm only in my early twenties but I've come to the conclusion that I have to get as much experience under my belt and leave the west as soon as possible. I would leave now if it wasn't for the fact that i'm in an accounting training contract that is going to open many doors for me in the future .

However I still wish to know why ? How do they gain in this ? I need to know so I can plan optimally for the future .

I can severely empathise with you coming from the UK as well, as I feel this way every day. You mentioned that we're beginning to wake up to it. Among friends, family, work colleagues, and people I speak to day to day I see no sign of this. When I talk about these sort of views among friends they think I'm part of a cult or brainwashed as opposed to just thinking objectively. I think that's a key factor, with a politically correct society, rational thinking is becoming less and less. I'm closely following the race to the White House, and hoping that if Donald Trump wins it may have some sort of worldwide impact on the faggy liberal society I am a part of. If I didn't have so many ties in England and a job I really enjoy, I'd definitely consider leaving.

[Liberty Sea]

-Leftist politicians who want more voters.
-Corporate plutocrats who want cheap labor
-Liberal leftists ridden with white guilt and afraid of being accused of Islamophobia
-Out of touch academics and egalitarian doctrinaires who dogmatically promote equality and diversity at all cost.
-Pathological altruism
-Roosh's hypothesis: elites want to depopulate smart whites and replace them with dumb non-whites to gain more control and prolong their rule.


There are quite a lot of reasons, but I don't think existential angst is one of them (FYI, the theory goes like this: white elites deeply feel that life is meaningless; therefore they hate whites who strive for progress in the face of meaninglessness and worship non-whites who are not aware of meaninglessness; they secretly wish for occasional senseless violence like terrorist attack to confront ordinary whites with the truth of meaninglessness because those whites dare to ignore the truth and go on enjoying simple life and pursuing progress)

[Perfectionist]

Personally, and I know many will laugh... this is all part of the the End Of Days.

The fact that Islam seems to be the driving force just confirms this in my opinion - however not due to Muslims being the followers of an Anti-Christ Prophet... actually quite the opposite.

The West is becoming secular and liberal, to the extreme - and the "East" is becoming fundamentalist and conservative, to the extreme... neither is right, and both will lead to our ruin.

The only hope is that this "clash" brings forth a new era of balance and moderation - but I think thats unlikely at this stage...

[MMX2010]

There's an excellent, but difficult to understand, blog called anonymousconservative.com/blog which postulates that this is all genetically determined.

A small part of everyone's brain called the amygdala is responsible for sensing what is wrong. In conservatives, the amygdala is normal sized or larger; in liberals, the amygdala is much smaller. So liberals are much more quickly overwhelmed in distressing situations, (hence the need for trigger warnings), but much of what they call "stressful" is not at all stressful to us.

Because a liberal gets triggered so easily, his or her brain builds pathways that circumvent the amygdala, so that they can avoid being hurt by the really stressful realities. But this causes them to develop those phony explanations that cause them to violently attack those who are NOT responsible for problems in the world.

Liberals are also highly triggered by differences in social status, which is why you can trigger them by making them feel inferior. And a simple solution is to deliberately import many losers, so that they can blend in with the losers, and not be triggered by the winners. It is also convenient when those losers attack winners, like what happened in San Jose.

------

If you decide to browse AC's blog, YOU MUST read all of the five part series entitled "Touching the Raw Amygdala" (located in the right sidebar). Part of this series features a video of a soldier triggering Mike Wallace that you should burn into your brain.

And of you browse his blog long enough, you'll understand why I tell everyone who calls me "homophobic" that I'm really "homopitious". I have pity for what homosexuals go through, but I'm wise enough to never put bitter, bullied people in powerful political positions. Said bluntly, just like the "my hilltop" speech in the video mentioned earlier, the name and the explanation are highly triggering.

[Liberty Sea]

Genetics is certainly a factor but not the only one. Genetics has always been there, but people weren't such guilt-ridden cuckold pathological altruists before.

Plus we are talking about elites, not their useful idiotic foot soldiers. There might have been a streak of pathological altruism and white guilt among the elites. but whether it is a major determinant is highly suspect.

In short, to fully understand this phenomenon, the specific historical characteristics of our age must be taken into account. It is not all determined by fixed trans-historical genetics.

[T and A Man]

The elites foster this to preserve what is best for elites.

They have been attacked by the middle class twice.

Once in the industrial revolution in protestant countries, the other after WWII with Keynesian economics.

The first had a massive increase in productivity that the workers want to retire labour. In protestant countries, they sent the some home to raise kids and build social capital.

Working men bonded collectively to resist the elites and they had to fold.

The elite's response has been to undermine the family unit, make a family something that is both expensive and something men either avoid, or tread on eggshells over.

The second was post WWII, the genesis of Keynesian economics had been a long time coming, even before Keynes. But at its essence was, a living wage was guaranteed as the expression of valuing exertion, and a guarantee of a job.

The latter was important because it changed the labour dynamic. With guaranteed work a worker can say "give me a job and conditions I want, or I will find someone else who will"

Not a boss saying "Accept my pay and conditions, or I will find someone else who will", as we do under NAIRU.

Most men had come back from WWII and they outright refused to accept anything else. In this era, "all boats rose". Humanity was most productive, and profit share was diverted away to wage share, wages were high and asset prices were low. That's why a single wage could buy assets, such as a house, for living.

The elites response has been to flood the labour market, erode labour rights, demonise Keynesian economics. Wage share peaked in the 1970's, roughly when Nixon killed Keynesian economics in 1971.

The psyop response has been quite clever, tell women to consume, tell men they're all budding millionaires 'if only'...

Followed up by thing like the lunacyof Austrian economics, passive incomes, four hour working weeks, all while the elutes capture all the increases in productivity, seeing profit share balloon and workers getting no real pay rise for two to four decades, depending on which country you talk about.

Ultimately elites want us socially atomised, alone so we cant resist them.

[captain_shane]

1. Divide and conquer.

2. Slowly take away your 2nd amendment rights.

3. Get the white populations angry enough to stand up and start slaughtering muslims.

4. Eventually start WW3



These things are easy to see if you open your eyes. Zelcorpion has talked about this quite a bit on here. The elites fucking despise you and I, and they would be thrilled if we all killed each other off. Muslims and groups like ISIS are being used to facilitate this. I highly doubt they care about votes at all since they can just promote bullshit topics on FB and Google to manipulate the public into voting how they want.

[justforfun19713]

Sensei, I’ve probably got a book noodling around in my head on your questions as I have spent a lot of time thinking about and reading on the topics you bring up. Here is my take.

(1)The ‘Why’ is control (in the form of a single world government, or something close to it).
(2)The ‘How do they gain’ has to do with getting sheeple (yep, an animal who is easy to manipulate into following the wrong thing + people) to stop paying attention as elites formulate and execute on their plan.
(3)The ‘How do you profit,’ is go find one of these one-world government entities or related institutes, which will never run out of money and go to work for it in some way. I’ve built my business around consulting for a few of them and I plan on riding this wave until I exit to either a much smaller US town at least 2 hours away from any major city, or a developing country.

I agree with you Sensei, that it is highly unlikely that the Brexit will occur. I hate to write this here, but Trump will not likely be President. He stands for too much of what the Global Elites do not want. Ugh, hurts to even write that here and I’ll take whatever comes of it on the chin. OK, maybe there is an outside chance that Trump is actually elected, but he either enters into a system of government too broken to be fixed in a meaningful way, or there is so much civil unrest over it that the UN is called-in to quell things.

I really hope I am 100% wrong about Trump and I will be voting for him, but hope is not a plan (I'll touch on mine below). Granted, I may have just lost my audience completely with the preceding statements, but before I am dismissed follow my reasoning on this one world government thing.

At a very high-level, observe that much of the rest of the world population already has a form of government led by a very small number of incredibly rich elites who lord it over the masses and control them by dolling out basic needs. Sure there are nicer places than others, but the overwhelming majority of people live at what anyone would consider poverty level. Most countries already have leaders propped-up and supported (economically or militarily) by the US, China, or Russia.

Next, look at the organizations that wield influence in the world. Look at the origins of The United Nations, The World Bank, and their rules of engagement when it comes to engaging in conflict. Keep in mind that conflict is not just through weaponry; It can be waged just as effectively (sometimes more!) through economic manipulation and debt management. These Non-Governmental Organizations receive a great deal of support (monetarily and socially) from Groups like the Tri-Lateral Commission, The Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, the Tavistock Institute, NATO, and the EU. Consider the foundations and think tanks that are off-shoots of them. Names like The Cato Institute, The American Legislative Exchange Council, RAND Corporation and others. Next time you listen to (or watch) mainstream media, take note of how many times you hear phrases like, ‘A study released today by The Brookings Institution showed that…’ or ‘Today The Aspen Institute declared its support for…’

Go down another level. Consider who sits on the boards of directors of the major entertainment and media companies (of which there are fewer and fewer every year). This is all public information (through annual reports and similar regulatory reporting). Follow the money that individuals and corporations donate (many times back up to the institutes and foundations mentioned above).

Now look at what the vast number of people here in the West are concerned with; Entertainment in all of its forms (food, porn, drugs, sensationalized ‘news,’ the latest reality tv). By capitalizing on every event (whether terrorism, SARS, or the Ebola scare), getting everyone to be scared and searching for a quick answer keeps the populace off-balance, numbed, and dumb. All this while the elites march the masses towards their end-game; that of a very small number controlling the whole world.

The United States presents an interesting problem for those desirous of a single world government (or at least a considerable consolation of power). How do you control this bastion of independent thinking, founded by people who rose up and through brutal armed conflict overthrew a tyrannical world power? This home of a lessoning number of ‘The Greatest Generation that Ever Lived,’ bound together with the common identities of ‘We are Americans, we got kicked out of some of the best countries on earth,’ and ‘We just want it worse than anyone else does, so we got our families out of wherever we came from and worked our ass off to get a better future for ourselves and them…’ How do the elites seize control of the minds and hearts of such men and women? You don’t. You dismantle the country from the inside out over a few short generations. Destroy the traditional family, distract through entertainment and capitalize on every real and orchestrated crisis. No, I am not saying things like the Oklahoma bombing, 9/11, or the Florida massacre were planned by anyone other than terrorists. But the lowering of interest rates and fighting of three wars on credit leading to financial turmoil, just as one of the greatest transfers of wealth was about to begin (from Baby Boomers to the next generation)? Not much doubt in my mind that this was orchestrated and heavily exploited. Take advantage of every violent event to make it more difficult for you as an individual to protect yourself from tyranny? Absolutely.

(continued below)

[justforfun19713]

So what is an aware man to do? Choosing not to pay attention to these things is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, ignoring allows men to focus on a better purpose than the one promulgated upon us by the world’s elite. On the other hand, closing ones’ eyes to the reality of what is taking place is short-sighted. I offer that it is better to keep a wary eye on what is going on and use the system as you can. The tools are all there for our use too and the formula is the same that the elites use. Build income, protect it by forming a trust or similar entity that facilitates the multi-generational transfer of assets with a patriarchal structure, ensure (and insure) its continued existence upon your demise, and quietly work to maintain and grow a social network of like-minded individuals.

Some of us may eventually choose to do things like run for public office, will be appointed to roles of significant influence and responsibility, or go on to create the next Google or Facebook. Others (Like Roosh, or Mike C.), choose to take the battle to the elites now. By crossing that Rubicon, they are blazing a trail for us. Those of us who choose to quietly bide our time would do well to support them with our time, monetarily, and socially.

So yes, it starts with the purchase of a book titled, ‘Bang’ written by a man who lives in his mother’s basement (I’m kidding, of course), successfully making 100 cold approaches, internalizing how to be more comfortable with women, and getting a finer piece(s) of ass… Or maybe getting over that oneitis you have from the girl or wife you thought was ‘the one,’ and learning the true nature of women. As more and more men come around to this way of thinking though, some will ask themselves, ‘Now what? I’m confident that I can get laid when I want, or that I can Game the hell ‘outta my wife so I get my needs met.’ What do I do with this power?’ You build a plan that works for you and your goals and you execute every single day, adjusting as needed. For some, they will enjoy and carouse in the decline. These successful men are a lot of fun to spend time with, share stories with, drink with, and get on the train to Brooklyn and Game women with. Not all will be roll-models but you know who you are! For others, the daily act of executing a well thought out plan for a future where you can look back and revel in how you parlayed Game into keeping the world elite from fucking over you and your family is what they want.

Personally, I pick both paths because there is nothing that says that I can’t. That entire stream of consciousness drives me, gives me a mission in life, and when I so desire, frees me to do next-level, decadent and fun things with the beautiful women I allow to adorn my life.

For further reading:

Almost any book by Noam Chomski; Any book by Daniel Estulin; ‘The Media Monopoly,’ by Ben Bagdikian; ‘Confessions of an Economic Hit Man,’ by John Perkins; ‘Planet Rothchild,’ by MS King; ‘The Influencing Machine,’ by Brooke Gladstone; ‘Manufacturing Consent,’ by Edward Herman; ‘The Information Revolution and World Politics,’ Elizabeth Hansen; ‘Challenges and Opportunities in International Law,’ M. Carpenter and S. Dunung

[hydrogonian]

Chaos provides the opportunity to: redraw lines, rewrite legal systems, destroy or move populations, put populations under differing control, and build a new order.

Chaos provides the opportunity to fulfill biblical narratives that will bring tens of millions of people on-board with a new order.

Chaos divides and provides for new cohesion.

Chaos de-legitimizes governments and systems of government.

Chaos encourages support for war.

[DannyAlberta]

Some really good stuff above. I prefer to keep it to a simple formula, though.

The terrorist is the ally of fear.

Fear is the ally of the statist.

The statist is the ally of the cronyist.

The cronyist is typically very elite.

[LeoneVolpe]

(06-14-2016 07:25 PM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  

-Leftist politicians who want more voters.
-Corporate plutocrats who want cheap labor
-Liberal leftists ridden with white guilt and afraid of being accused of Islamophobia
-Out of touch academics and egalitarian doctrinaires who dogmatically promote equality and diversity at all cost.
-Pathological altruism
-Roosh's hypothesis: elites want to depopulate smart whites and replace them with dumb non-whites to gain more control and prolong their rule.

The elite's plan seems so shortsighted.

We know the left wants to import immigrants from Muslim countries. It would seem the aim is to expand their voter base to help keep themselves in power. The problem is, they're truly playing with fire. If they think they'll be able to keep these guys under their control once there's enough of them to form a Muslim majority within the United States, they're out of their fucking minds. Muslims aren't going to want to obey our laws, they're going to want to implement Sharia Law. Once this happens, the left can kiss all of their favorite groups/pet projects goodbye. The feminists, gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgenders will be among the first to go.

As for the corporate plutocrats, what good does it do to outsource all our jobs to foreign countries? Sure, the corporations will benefit from cheap slave labor, allowing them to turn a much bigger profit. But that only works as long as there are still enough Americans with jobs to make enough money to buy their shit in the first place. It's not fucking rocket science.

Presumably, the goal of the elite is to not only maintain the power/money they already have, but also to expand it. How is turning America and Europe into third-world hellholes going to increase profits? How is importing mass amounts of Muslims into our country going to help the elite maintain their stronghold? They're setting themselves up to be overthrown, at least that's how I see it. I would love to read someone else's interpretation on all this. From my view, they're inviting in not only our destruction but ultimately theirs as well.

[Comte De St. Germain]

I really feel that even the forum itself is being left out of some crucial information. As much as it doesn't seem like it, these guys at the top are intelligent and more than likely been holding power for 30-40 years minimum or in some cases centuries(e.g. Rothschild).


There's more to it and the more I hear the more the sick feeling in my stomach gets worse. The only plausible goal that I can see is increasing the gap between rich and poor so much that we're back to the age of feudalism in how hard it would be to become upper class.

I don't know my tinfoil hat is going bonkers thinking of the possibilities.

[AboveAverageJoe]

A scared society is an easy to control society. The elites use the Hegelian dialectic to maintain control. Basically, cause the appearance of a huge seemingly insurmountable problem or catastrophe, allow things to detiorate until the public clamors for boots on the ground in their own neighborhoods and homes, government moves in and locks everything down, problem solved. Basically what you saw happen after the Boston Bombing. That was a practice run. 9/11 was the largest previous example. Civil rights over. Martial Law enacted. The chances of being a victim of terrorism, while exaggerated by the media greatly, are still less than the odds of you simultaneously-scratching the winning powerball lottery ticket, while being struck by lightning, in the center of a whirling Jurassic sharknado as you are blown by one Hadidi sister and the other one sits on your face.