[Roosh]

I deeply considered everyone's feedback in this thread and narrowed it down to the two options you see above. I believe these two accomplish the goals I'm looking for:

1. Creating interest from reading the title alone
2. Long-term relevance

I'm split 50/50. I would be happy with either title.

[CleanSlate]

I feel "Free Speech Isn't Free" will get more people's attention and achieve a wider reach than "The Battle of Canada". My $0.02.

[Valentine]

Agreed. With "The Battle of Canada" people will think it's just hyperbole.

[Suits]

I'm really disappointed that "Maaaaaaaaaa TRrrrrigggaaaaass: The Story of Trigglypuffs" wasn't included as a final option.

[The Beast1]

This was a hard one. I went with free speech. I get the impression this era we live in will be remembered for the efforts of liberals trying to stifle dissenting free speech.

[Comte De St. Germain]

Same deal Free Speech is much more relevant for the title as that is the principle freedom being attacked in our era(gun control being a strictly an American phenomena at the moment).

[kaotic]

Free Speech won me over and is a more direct straight to the point title of what happened in Canada.

[Saweeep]

The Battle of Atlanta is both a historical battle and a huge martial arts tournament. To most people it means nothing.

So I may be biased due to this association but the former is a million times better.

[General Stalin]

Freedom isn't free!

[DrCotard]

I voted the second title. It reflects a blunt truth that many people can't or don't wanna acknowledge.

[ChickenLover9T9]

(05-06-2016 12:05 PM)CleanSlate Wrote:  

I feel "Free Speech Isn't Free" will get more people's attention and achieve a wider reach than "The Battle of Canada". My $0.02.

Pretty much this. Voted for the second.

[pharao]

"Free Speech Isn't Free" does not resonate too much with most men, who are not in Roosh's position of being attacked and their free speech being limited.

"The Battle of Canada" sounds more powerful and masculine

[John Michael Kane]

The Battle of Canada sounds more like a history textbook, whereas Free Speech Isn't Free is very descriptive. I voted the second option for sure.

[Delta]

"The Battle of Canada" sounds a bit too sensationalized and clickbait-ish, plus it doesn't convey that the book is about speech suppression, an issue which most are on our side. I strongly prefer the second option.

[AnonymousBosch]

If I suggested 'The Speechcombers' would anyone under 30 get the reference?

[Latan]

"Free speech isn't free" doesn't pick my curiosity.

If I put myself in the shoes of someone who never heard about Roosh, and just read the title :
Is this book about the fees linked to making conferences?
Is it a way to lower my expenses?
What is exactly te theme of "free speech" this man is talking about? (In France, this term hasn't the weight it seems to have in th US, so I'm surely biased)

From my point of view, this title should be remodeled to be more 'click-baitable'.
Hm...quick thinking...
"Free Speech will get you fired"
"Free Speech doesn't exist anymore"
"Free Speech...NOT for you"
"Free Speech or die trying"

[RedPillUK]

I picked Free Speech isn't Free, but the subtitle for that one is a bit of an oxymoron: 'Canada's Globalist Establishment'. I think either 'Canada's Establishment' or 'The globalist establishment' makes more sense.

[Rush87]

The Battle of Canada is somewhat ambiguous to people who aren't in the know, and it evokes less emotion. Free speech isn't free is a bold political and social statement that will grab everyones attention.