[jctennis123]

Very enjoyable manifesto.

"Those of us on this forum did not invent this world. Like you, we are merely unfortunate pawns in a broader game. We are all grasping at life until death makes heroes of us all. The meaning of the game is not abundantly clear. What exactly are the rules? It appears as if there are at least fifty shades of grey."

Love it. It's nice to see some passioned writing once in a while.

[Purple Urkle]

(04-26-2013 08:56 AM)Hades Wrote:  

(04-26-2013 08:46 AM)Purple Urkle Wrote:  

(04-13-2013 01:00 AM)Hades Wrote:  

I don't get the purpose of this manifesto.
Feminists are the last people to admit that they're similar to RVFers. We want a world full of slim women worth fucking and they want a world where women have significantly more power than men - i.e, a woman's word can put a man in jail, an accusation of rape can be retroactively announced, women are legally entitled to a man's money and children without his company, being masculine is considered harassment, they are entitled to welfare, fat shaming and slut shaming are hate crimes, and that sort of shit. The problem here is that the feminists require a lot of heavy handed government intervention to sway these policies and change public opinion while RVFers need less government if anything. Feminists could give a shit less about "sex on [our] own terms", they tend to use everything including sex as political weapons.

The goals of RVFers and feminists are completely different and often contradictory. I don't even know why you'd attempt or want to bridge the gap between us. You're in cloud cuckooland, man.

I know you are but what am I? Why does everything have to have a purpose? Read it again. Your interpretation is wrong. Come on you can do it, the truth shall set you free.

I don't believe in God and never did. Probably 80% of the op is not of interest because of this. I'm with Thomas on this one, definitely drunk lounge fodder.

Look Mr. "Hades," your femenized political conspiracy theories, lack of direct line for line rebuttals, generalizing, giving me "neutral" feedback when you really wanted to push the negative button for "low quality/ad hominem" posts, coupled with your girly need to explain your non-belief in God demonstrates your deep need to be liked and to be right no matter how wrong you are. So, quit hijacking threads via the personal attack and drunk lounge threats and provide something relevant to the discussion at hand. Thank you.

Women don't care about sex and having it exactly the way they want it when they want it? Give me a fuckin' break, women are just as sex crazed as men. Duh? They are human after all. Jesus, the lengths people will go to just to be "right."

[2Wycked]

This is one of the more underrated Purple "Uncle Roosh" Urkle political gibberish/meltdown threads.

The Purps had some bizarrely hilarious rants over the years -- this is one of them.

[polar]

The post you're trying to reach is not available.

[Paracelsus]

[getdownonit]

(04-12-2013 09:48 PM)Purple Urkle Wrote:  

I apologize to all forumers for my use of the N-word. Won't happen again.

Peace,

Da' Purps

How considerate

[Matsufubu]

This is insidious and subversive. Was this guy confirmed as a man? It reads like a semi-clever feminist wrote it, and the random supportive comments and likes look like sleeper fembots to me.