Boy catches baseball and gives it to girl - male instinct to give without reward?
11-04-2015, 10:22 AM
Roosh tweeted this little video
http://imgur.com/7VHHzvZ
I responded at first glance:
Roosh:
Now I was criticized for being too jaded and maybe I am - be the judge:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...ocess.html
Here a longer video - this time it actually paid off to the boy since he got more signed balls in return:
Now - I want to make it clear. I am all for charity and spreading the happiness around.
But was it really instinct - an automatic instinct to serve women without reward?
My take on it:
1. He saw it on TV and wanted to replicate that deed since it was often praised on TV.
2. The girl likely won't appreciate it as much as him when he is older, because let's face it, she is not going to be so much into baseball.
3. Was it really such a pure act of love or was it rather something learned or even a sexual undertone.
4. He is 12 and doesn't look like the brightest light on the block, but of course we can't be all super-smart.
5. At 02:30 as the girl was about to pick her nose, the little guy continues to give her gifts, but you can see that she was ever less impressed by that. If that had been an approach - this would be the moment he would have lost her.
Now that said - I am not denying that this is something of the form of "spreading happiness", but somehow I loathe those public pre-learned displays of charity. Also it is clear that he did not give it to his younger brother who would have cherished the gift much more. He gave it to a girl out of the erronous belief that future sex and blessings will be showered upon him.
I foresee a grim future for the young man as he tries his giving and nice Game-strategy. Unless he grows up to be very good-looking which I doubt, then I think that there are some very dry years ahead of that little fellow.
Here is a smarter way of doing it in an equally pre-meditated way (saw it on TV), but with way more cunning:
Well done champ - that guy will go far - heh.
I believe that we all have this giving instinct within us, where we like to see everyone happy. But somehow I doubt it was pure selfless charity that motivated him and maybe that is not what Roosh had in mind. It is pure male charity that compells us to do stupid things for women no matter whether we get any reward or they even hate us for it.
http://imgur.com/7VHHzvZ
Quote:Quote:
It's almost as if males were genetically programmed to please/impress females without any expectation of return
I responded at first glance:
Quote:Quote:
White Knight indoctrination starts early. She will throw the ball into trash before she is 18. He would have kept it forever.
Roosh:
Quote:Quote:
I'm not convinced that 100% of his behavior here is from environment. He's young and the speed of his behavior suggests instinct.
Now I was criticized for being too jaded and maybe I am - be the judge:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...ocess.html
Here a longer video - this time it actually paid off to the boy since he got more signed balls in return:
Now - I want to make it clear. I am all for charity and spreading the happiness around.
But was it really instinct - an automatic instinct to serve women without reward?
My take on it:
1. He saw it on TV and wanted to replicate that deed since it was often praised on TV.
2. The girl likely won't appreciate it as much as him when he is older, because let's face it, she is not going to be so much into baseball.
3. Was it really such a pure act of love or was it rather something learned or even a sexual undertone.
4. He is 12 and doesn't look like the brightest light on the block, but of course we can't be all super-smart.
5. At 02:30 as the girl was about to pick her nose, the little guy continues to give her gifts, but you can see that she was ever less impressed by that. If that had been an approach - this would be the moment he would have lost her.
Now that said - I am not denying that this is something of the form of "spreading happiness", but somehow I loathe those public pre-learned displays of charity. Also it is clear that he did not give it to his younger brother who would have cherished the gift much more. He gave it to a girl out of the erronous belief that future sex and blessings will be showered upon him.
I foresee a grim future for the young man as he tries his giving and nice Game-strategy. Unless he grows up to be very good-looking which I doubt, then I think that there are some very dry years ahead of that little fellow.
Here is a smarter way of doing it in an equally pre-meditated way (saw it on TV), but with way more cunning:
Well done champ - that guy will go far - heh.
I believe that we all have this giving instinct within us, where we like to see everyone happy. But somehow I doubt it was pure selfless charity that motivated him and maybe that is not what Roosh had in mind. It is pure male charity that compells us to do stupid things for women no matter whether we get any reward or they even hate us for it.