^Money vs game argument.
Dollars don't always talk, that why I love game.
Dollars don't always talk, that why I love game.
Quote: (03-23-2017 08:47 AM)rudebwoy Wrote:
^Money vs game argument.
Dollars don't always talk, that why I love game.
Quote: (03-23-2017 08:47 AM)rudebwoy Wrote:
^Money vs game argument.
Dollars don't always talk, that why I love game.
Quote: (03-23-2017 09:13 AM)rockoman Wrote:
Quote: (03-23-2017 08:47 AM)rudebwoy Wrote:
^Money vs game argument.
Dollars don't always talk, that why I love game.
I love game too and it is indispensable, but if you don't think money always talks, then you live in a different world to me. It's always better to be able to punch with both fists.
@ Rocha
It is of course much easier to look like you have money if you actually have it. You didn't tell your slut that the penthouse wasn't yours because you know wealth talks.
Quote: (03-23-2017 09:20 AM)Rocha Wrote:
Quote: (03-23-2017 09:13 AM)rockoman Wrote:
Quote: (03-23-2017 08:47 AM)rudebwoy Wrote:
^Money vs game argument.
Dollars don't always talk, that why I love game.
I love game too and it is indispensable, but if you don't think money always talks, then you live in a different world to me. It's always better to be able to punch with both fists.
@ Rocha
It is of course much easier to look like you have money if you actually have it. You didn't tell your slut that the penthouse wasn't yours because you know wealth talks.
Rockoman, looking like you have money when you actually don't have it is a part of having game )))
Quote: (03-23-2017 02:37 AM)Rawmeo Wrote:I agree with this. The other mans children are your future job.
SMV includes 4 elements: Looks, Money, Personality, Fitness.
Very hard to determine which one is the most important because some people can balance them well to make a perfect recipe even when lacking one of them.
Quote:Quote:
What do you guys think of the concept that a single mother actually has negative smv, regardless of looks. I heard this concept on a Stefan Molyneaux interview recently. My initial analysis is that I agree. Have experience with the desperation and immediate putting out of such women.
Negative SMV. No matter how pretty she might be, if she has kids, it's a big no no.
Quote: (03-23-2017 09:38 AM)rudebwoy Wrote:
So you are saying without money, you cannot get girls.
How do you explain the loads of guys I see with money and no girls?
Obviously their game isn't up to par.
Quote: (06-01-2017 07:59 AM)Savemham Lincoln Wrote:
Of these two, if they both wanted one girl and used what was available to them (game vs money), who would get her?
Quote: (06-01-2017 09:13 AM)rudebwoy Wrote:
^Comparisons like that are dumb, you don't know Bill Gates.
Quote: (06-01-2017 10:54 AM)crdr Wrote:
Money and Game works too.
When you get good at both. They are one in the same.
I find the dudes who hold bias for game. Have no money.
The dudes who have money, have no game.
Having both wins.
Quote: (06-01-2017 07:59 AM)Savemham Lincoln Wrote:
The challenge with this argument is that everybody is arguing degrees, no real absolutes. In order to determine which is more effective of money and game you must take end-members i.e. a person with all the money and no game and then one with no money and all the game.
Here's a relative comparison to help:
Bill gates looks like a square with no real desire for chasing tail so lets say he has no game. And let's state that compared to Bill Gates Roosh has no money.
Of these two, if they both wanted one girl and used what was available to them (game vs money), who would get her?
Quote: (06-01-2017 11:09 AM)crdr Wrote:
Quote: (06-01-2017 07:59 AM)Savemham Lincoln Wrote:
The challenge with this argument is that everybody is arguing degrees, no real absolutes. In order to determine which is more effective of money and game you must take end-members i.e. a person with all the money and no game and then one with no money and all the game.
Here's a relative comparison to help:
Bill gates looks like a square with no real desire for chasing tail so lets say he has no game. And let's state that compared to Bill Gates Roosh has no money.
Of these two, if they both wanted one girl and used what was available to them (game vs money), who would get her?
I'm a technologist who loves Technology history. I have read extensively into Young Bill Gates' "dirty" past. He may be the only nerd on the planet who had some type of game. Although, he liked older women. But he owned, raced and went to jail with Porche 911s, did drugs, fucked women and ran the Most Successful Software company ever for PCs...
Money and Game Never Loses.
Quote: (06-01-2017 12:42 PM)lonewolf1992 Wrote:
Where I live is 65% American game 35% World game, and Resources are very important. You have a bike?, girls will notice and your SMV will increase a point. You have a car?, add 2 points there. You have a good job, and have actual availability to spend it on with your girl, Add 1 point more. I'm 6ft, decently looking, and girls barely care about that. I have improved with my game but as Roosh stated about EE, they don't give a crap about your looks.
"One step into an eastern country like Ukraine will tell you that aesthetics plays very little part in attracting women. You will see the fattest, baldest men with beautiful women, and the reason is because stability and comfort are valued more than attraction and excitement. " Roosh V.
Quote: (06-01-2017 01:54 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:
Where I live girls have nice jobs, condo's, nice cars and money.
So you having money isn't going to impress them alone, it will tick a box for them.
If you don't have the right look or right attitude, no amount of money can help you. Certain groups of guys are suffering big time here, despite having nice jobs, condo's, nice cars and money. I know many personal trainers who get more ass than high earning professionals.
Many forum guys have come here, raved about Tinder and the quality. Getting these girls out on a date is another matter.