[Libertas]

They're getting far more brazen with it on commercials now. Tylenol just released a massive SJW commercial that has little to do with what the product actually does. Then there are two other brands that feature two gay men with an adopted Asian daughter. Looks like they got the idea from Modern Family.

My mom said to me that with all the gays you see now you'd think they were 50% of the population. Since the SJW's want to preach diversity and have things "representing the actual population" in everything, it's interesting how none of them over talk about the gross overrepresentation of LGBT in the media. We all know why.

[Double Salad]

Speaking of money, the world's highest paid 'female' executive is a transexual.


In other words, the world's highest paying female executive is a man...
Mart(ine) Rothblatt


Even the son of rumored homosexual couple of Will & Jada Smith is being pushed forward with his scripts.

Jaden Smith #Carefreeblackboy movement

This could be its own thread.
#Carefreeblackboy

[Easy_C]

(06-24-2015 10:03 PM)The_e_man Wrote:  

(06-24-2015 03:38 AM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

What the fuck is Neptune?

Hopefully this fad dies down. I have nothing against gays, but I adamantly hate feminists and I can't help but feel these two groups feed off each other.

It's an understatement. My understanding is that lesbians were one of the groups behind(to discount the billionaires who funded it, for a moment) the rise of the militant, man-hating brand of feminism. I have heard currently that there's a lot of aggressive lesbians that like to hang out at feminists events looking for new prey.

Hell, you can't understimate how aggressive the lesbians are. I had a friend's ex who went through one of the battered woman assistance program and she said that there were a huge number of lesbians prowling in those programs who would make sexual advances on the women coming into the program.

[Socrates]

(06-25-2015 07:22 AM)Libertas Wrote:  

They're getting far more brazen with it on commercials now. Tylenol just released a massive SJW commercial that has little to do with what the product actually does. Then there are two other brands that feature two gay men with an adopted Asian daughter. Looks like they got the idea from Modern Family.

My mom said to me that with all the gays you see now you'd think they were 50% of the population. Since the SJW's want to preach diversity and have things "representing the actual population" in everything, it's interesting how none of them over talk about the gross overrepresentation of LGBT in the media. We all know why.

I keep seeing this commercial, I think it is running on Hulu a lot:

I mean, they are really going out of their way to tug at the heartstrings and check all the emotional boxes. Adoption! Learning sign language! So brave! So beautiful! How could anyone be against this?

Also, the new season of Big Brother is going to feature it's first trans-gendered contestant. Society is making so much progress! If anyone actually watches that garbage show, I'd suggest tuning out at this point.

[Wreckingball]

(06-24-2015 01:14 AM)Bacchus Wrote:  

The language of the LGTBQ movement is so easy to mock because each constituent group has developed further distinctions in order to have its aggrieved status recognized (which is their worth within the SJW-sphere). And these distinctions, of course, require a new vocabulary. The degeneracy of the human species supplies the only limit on how the terms proliferate.

Here's a fine send-up of the meaningless symbols and phrases that the neon blob of tumblr has invented in the past few years.

Can I be a Genderfluid Nazi Stargate Zion Assassin?

I guess when people ask my gender online i will start replying: Macho, Rambo or Terminator.

[Socrates]

(06-25-2015 10:19 AM)Wreckingball Wrote:  

Can I be a Genderfluid Nazi Stargate Zion Assassin?

The fact that you are asking the question means that no, you cannot. Be or be not, there is no can.

[Goldin Boy]

Quote:

These aren't just wealthy people, these are really smart people too. So, why are they backing this?

Is it just going with the flow? A tax right off? I guess if you are a billionaire then dropping a couple hundred thousand or even a few million isn't that big of a deal, especially if you get political brownie points or greater connections or to attention whore or all of the above.

I do really wonder if these wealthy guys don't have some ulterior motive though.

Based on the snippet your posted, sounds like it's mostly for personal reasons, they're gay or have gay relatives so the personal is political for them as feminists used to say in the 70's.

Otherwise I'm not sure. Population control doesn't make sense. Fewer babies today means Starbucks sells fewer venti lattes in 10-15 yrs.



Also WB that Forbes typist Clare O'Connor

[amity]

(06-25-2015 10:27 AM)Goldin Boy Wrote:  

Quote:

These aren't just wealthy people, these are really smart people too. So, why are they backing this?

Is it just going with the flow? A tax right off? I guess if you are a billionaire then dropping a couple hundred thousand or even a few million isn't that big of a deal, especially if you get political brownie points or greater connections or to attention whore or all of the above.

I do really wonder if these wealthy guys don't have some ulterior motive though.

Based on the snippet your posted, sounds like it's mostly for personal reasons, they're gay or have gay relatives so the personal is political for them as feminists used to say in the 70's.

Otherwise I'm not sure. Population control doesn't make sense. Fewer babies today means Starbucks sells fewer venti lattes in 10-15 yrs.

Although that's a factor, I think it's significantly more than just personal reasons.
It's simply the latest trendy liberal 'right on' cause in Western culture and for big business to not jump on that train as well, could well be perceived by the media as appearing "intolerant".
Also, it's an excuse to get their names out there in the public consciousness, spinning their "positive" message to the masses, who lap it up unquestioningly.

[Avon Barksdale]

Immortal Technique dropping knowledge

[Easy_C]

(06-25-2015 10:40 AM)amity Wrote:  

(06-25-2015 10:27 AM)Goldin Boy Wrote:  

Quote:

These aren't just wealthy people, these are really smart people too. So, why are they backing this?

Is it just going with the flow? A tax right off? I guess if you are a billionaire then dropping a couple hundred thousand or even a few million isn't that big of a deal, especially if you get political brownie points or greater connections or to attention whore or all of the above.

I do really wonder if these wealthy guys don't have some ulterior motive though.

Based on the snippet your posted, sounds like it's mostly for personal reasons, they're gay or have gay relatives so the personal is political for them as feminists used to say in the 70's.

Otherwise I'm not sure. Population control doesn't make sense. Fewer babies today means Starbucks sells fewer venti lattes in 10-15 yrs.

Although that's a factor, I think it's significantly more than just personal reasons.
It's simply the latest trendy liberal 'right on' cause in Western culture and for big business to not jump on that train as well, could well be perceived by the media as appearing "intolerant".
Also, it's an excuse to get their names out there in the public consciousness, spinning their "positive" message to the masses, who lap it up unquestioningly.

First off: That snippet is only a small fraction of the billionares who've been pumping money into the cause. There's a lot of big names on that list who historically have shied away from public attention.

Second it's entirely deliberate. It's not about jumping on a bandwagon, because they created said bandwagon. If you dig into the donations a little bit you notice that the donations started a few years before LGBT "rights" became a mainstream issue.

The end goal is to destroy the connections between biological parents and their offspring, so that offspring can be raised entirely by the state. They're literally trying to bring back the Spartan education system.

[Captainstabbin]

Anyone notice that a lot of websites have a rainbow theme after today's court ruling? All of this for 2%.

[samsamsam]

http://www.rferl.org/contentinfographics...62736.html

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

Yep. Croatia at the fucking top, just behind Sweden!!!

[whoishe]

(07-26-2015 01:38 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

Yep. Croatia at the fucking top, just behind Sweden!!!

Didn't Croatians vote "no" for gay marriages a while ago? List wouldn't have much sense if they did it and yet they are so high on the list.

[Paracelsus]

(07-26-2015 03:58 PM)whoishe Wrote:  

(07-26-2015 01:38 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

Yep. Croatia at the fucking top, just behind Sweden!!!

Didn't Croatians vote "no" for gay marriages a while ago? List wouldn't have much sense if they did it and yet they are so high on the list.

Better question: who publishes this list? What exactly does it measure, and how does it propose to do so?

When you ask those questions it becomes apparent what this document is. It has nothing to do with objectivity, and the percentage point assignments are entirely arbitrary. It's trying to give a scientific patina to what is a subjective and political statement.

[bigrich]

From a lesbian mother's parenting memoir

Quote:

I don’t know what it’s like to be a boy — what it’s like to be raised in a culture that shames you for feeling vulnerable, alienates you for not excelling in certain activities, or presumes you are a violent species. . . .
But sometimes the learning curve is steep, like when my son was being bullied by a girl . . . at school. . . . I knew she said mean things to him. I knew she had shoved him a couple times. But it wasn’t until I saw tears in my son’s eyes that I really got it: she was bullying him, he was asking teachers and playground supervisors for help, and no one was stepping up for him.
Why? Gender.

This woman also wrote articles on why children don't need fathers.

http://theothermccain.com/2016/08/02/les...r-tragedy/

[odesseus]

Quote:

I mean, they are really going out of their way to tug at the heartstrings and check all the emotional boxes. Adoption! Learning sign language! So brave! So beautiful! How could anyone be against this?

Barf...I knew it was coming but I hate watched to the end.

[Truck'n]

I will don the tin foil hat since there is always blowback in every forum where you make these types of assertions, but the promotion of the queer agenda is all about population control and fracturing the normal social fabric. The sad part is that the majority of people are falling for it, or, not actively standing up against it.