Quote: (10-08-2017 06:55 PM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote:
This thread was started 1 day before Trump announced his candadicy, and all but today's posts were within a week after the thread started.
Many of the issues discussed in the thread are still factors, but Trump's election has greatly improved America's chances. The question is whether Trump will merely delay the collapse, or make America great enough to make a change that lasts long after his second term is over. I think the latter is quite possible, far from certain.
At best, Trump has given us more time on the clock. As AnonymousBosch has pointed out in other threads, Candidate Trump may have wanted to Make America Great Again, but President Trump cares more about Making Israel Safe Again.
Trump has failed to clamp down on an increasingly violent left in any substantive way, which is bad because his very entrance onto the political scene caused the left to lurch towards open Marxism. We now live in a country where the news media and entertainment industries are openly warring with America's founding stock, where West Point graduates can openly signal their communist beliefs and only get a slap on the wrist, and where three trustafarian bugmen can make $90,000 a month shilling Trotskyism under the guise of hosting an "ironybro" podcast. Oh, and if you try to organize a pro-Trump, pro-white rally under anything other than cover of darkness, you'll be shut down by city/state governments and/or devoured by mace-wielding antifas.
Deportations and action on illegal aliens has increased, which is a good thing. But it needs to ramp up, and the demographic issue still needs to be dealt with. Even if every illegal was deported tomorrow, America would still be on track to become majority non-white before the century is up. The next Democratic presidential candidate will be a mashup of Bernie Sanders and DeRay Mckesson: open socialism and open anti-white race-baiting. They get in power again, they will show no mercy to Trump, his supporters, or the right in general.
Kosovo used to be majority Serbian, and the Albanians who now form a majority there emigrated and had children legally. That's our future unless action is taken now. I'm not pessimistic that Trump will help turn things around, but I'm not optimistic either.
Quote: (10-08-2017 03:57 PM)RexImperator Wrote:
I don't know if it will Soviet-style or Austria-Hungary-style but I do believe the dissolution of the United States is more likely than not to occur in the 21st century, and I agree with Vox Day that it will probably happen within the next twenty years, due to demographics. The question is where will the borders be, and how peaceful will the breakup be? (That most of California except for the most northern portion will go is already a given...)
A likely parallel would be Europe around the time of the World Wars. World War I was caused by nationalist irredentism on the part of Serbia; World War II was fueled by irredentism on the part of every country that had its borders rearranged by the Treaties of Versailles and Trianon, leaving ethnic populations stranded outside of their host countries. Everyone knows the obvious case of Germans in Czechoslovakia and Poland, but there was also the issue of Lithuanians, Ukrainians, and Belarusians in Poland, Hungarians in Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, and Romania, Greeks in Turkey, Turks in Greece etc.
World War II solved the problem through the misleading euphemism of "population transfers" (read: rape, ethnic cleansing, and genocide carried out by the Soviet Red Army, on top of the Holocaust). As a result, there are basically no Poles left in Ukraine, no Lithuanians in Poland, no Germans in Poland or the Czech Republic, no Hungarians in Slovakia or the former Yugoslavia, and no Jews anywhere. Pre-WWII Poland was only about 65 percent Polish; now it's 98 percent Polish.
I'm not advocating violence. I'm just saying that it was how post-World War I Europe ended up "solving" the problem of ethnic tension. It's also a possible future for the U.S.