[Slim Shady]

I've really started to like Chris Pratt. He started lifting and got in shape, and he made that satirical post on Facebook "preemptively apologizing" for saying something fake-offensive to the SJWs.

https://www.facebook.com/PrattPrattPratt...9152096914

[philosophical_recovery]

(06-14-2015 01:23 PM)Slim Shady Wrote:  

I've really started to like Chris Pratt. He started lifting and got in shape, and he made that satirical post on Facebook "preemptively apologizing" for saying something fake-offensive to the SJWs.

Have a link? I'm curious.

[Quintus Curtius]

(06-14-2015 08:11 AM)rpg Wrote:  

The huge asshole military guy trying to get his hands on the raptors was great. Everybody knows a dork like that. He just needed a bottle of beer in his hand to make it complete.

I'll say it again...every comment from rpg has me laughing my ass off.

It's like he's channeling the ghost of Sam Kinison and Bobcat Goldthwaite.

Keep it coming, man.

[Fast Eddie]

BTW, if you haven't read Jurassic Park, you should. The movie version does not do the book justice at all. It's one of Crichton's better novels, and that's saying a lot.

[TheSlayer]

Just watched it. I went in expecting a bad movie with cheesy CSI and dumb plot lines but it was actually a decent movie. I enjoyed it and would recommend it to anyone looking for a chill summer movie here which isn't full of dumb SJW-isms. Being on the forum here makes me evaluate all TV shows and movies I watch with a third eye for SJW themes but honestly this movie had none of it surprisingly.

[bacan]

Too bad we can't change the title to "Jurassic world discussion." I'm excited to see it after some of the non-OP posts in the thread.

[Foolsgo1d]

Michael Crichton did a book or two on Jurassic Park and I read them as a child. They are really good and gory. He had a cmeo in JPII and was eaten by the T-rex in the city.

As for the CGI, in Jurassic Park they were out to make the CGI and animatronics world class and not just to make it acceptable to some exec when it came to budget restraints.

There are CGI effects and technicians which can do realistic CGI but the studio's are too cheap and placing humans in the midst of it makes it even more costly.

It is simply too costly for any studio to take seriously.

[Cattle Rustler]

(06-14-2015 11:53 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  

(06-14-2015 08:41 AM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  

^^Then why post on this thread?

I think this was directed at the poster above me, but i'll reply.

I like movies and I really enjoy the Jurassic Park series. I wouldn't mind all of these sequels and re-releases if the price of a ticket was in line with its actual value. 17$ for a movie ticket on a weekend is obscene.

I went to a theater on the outskirts of town where they do 1st run movies for super cheap. Like 8$ a ticket. I saw Anchorman 2 and ended up loving it. Why? Because of how cheap the ticket was.

When something is more expensive I expect to be wowed. At 17$ I better walk out expecting the best movie ever. Never really lives up to it.

At 8$ i'm more likely to enjoy it.

Like I said in my post, i'm looking forward to when it comes out on HBO.

Yeah homie, it was directed at Max.

By the time I hit submit you had posted and when I wanted to edit the time frame had passed.

[Alpharius]

(06-14-2015 08:36 AM)Maximummax Wrote:  

Stopped watching Hollywood movies long time ago

This post. What can I say?



Highly relevant and necessary for the continuation of our conversation.



Just saw it a second time. Didn't notice Jeff Goldblum's cameo before. And the T-Rex is the one from the first movie, Dino-Damage scars and all!

[Legendver2]

Enjoyed the hell outta the movie. Still can't believe this made over half a billion in just one weekend worldwide!

[ManVsMachine]

The only thing that actually disappointed me was the dinosaur fight in the end. Found it cheesy. I was expecting the worst and was pleasantly surprised.

[DavidTheGnome]

Turning the icy cold execu-bimbo into a warmer version of herself for the extremely likable alpha adventurer type character played by Chris Pratt, and dumping on the effete hipster goon who feigns a self sacrifice for his oneitis who couldn't care less and "has a boyfriend", were hilarious and refreshing moments. But come on, the movie was still total shit.

The acting was bad, the plot was terrible, the lines, good god, the whole thing a disaster. Dumbing down movies for the new American audience is clearly here to stay. Exec's want returns on their formulaic CG laden investments. This movie however still managed to under perform even in that arena.

In fact, I don't even think the new American audience is really completely to blame, as now foreign markets are hugely important as well (of course what it modern America if not a mixed up microcosm of the global population united for ummm....consumerism?). What is the median IQ of humans on planet earth? Find it and you will understand why movies like Fast and the Furious 7 exist, and will continue to exist.

[RexImperator]

These kinds of movies have dumbed-down dialogue on purpose as they are designed to be consumed by audiences worldwide.

[Beyond Borders]

C'mon, it was sequel #3 of a movie that was destined to have bad sequels.

It was worth a watch for what it was, but you can't expect Oscars out of these kinds of movies.

[CactusCat589]

^This isn't just a sequel to any franchise, it's Jurassic Park. If they're going to make a continuation of it after more than a decade, I actually do expect it to be Oscar-worthy.

I mean, I didn't, because the trailers killed that expectation, but in some alternate universe, there's a RVF thread full of guys jizzing all over the place because Jurassic World was that good.

[Swooper]

Okay, I'm gonna say it again. This movie was excellent and one of the best I've seen all year. The red-pill concepts were self-evident in the plot and the dinosaurs were entertaining.

To the above poster, I AM 'jizzing myself' over how good this movie was. For something made by Hollywood it was refreshingly anti-feminist and clever.

[Alpharius]

You guys got to see dinosaurs eating people. What more do you people want?

You guys are what half the damn movie was about! Everyone wants bigger, flashier, and more hi-tech. No one is content with seeing just dinosaurs!

[Teddykgb]

I was more interested in the bad ass triumph scrambler Chris Pratt was riding. That matte military green paint was on point.

[Moma]

I think some of you lot are overanalysing stuff that doesn't need to be overanalysed. I also saw Jurassic World on Sat with a lizard and it met everything I wanted. Great CGI effects, decent acting and the scene where the nerd gets rejected by the geek lizard who says she has a boyfriend was a nice little twist.

Expecting more from a dinosaur film is like going to a stripclub and expecting to hear a strip ho quote Chaucer. No, you want some ass and a dirty hag with no gag reflex willing to swallow your kids for 20 dollars.

I personally thought it did what it needed to do. Thumbs up.

[Rutting Elephant]

(06-14-2015 03:17 PM)bacan Wrote:  

Too bad we can't change the title to "Jurassic world discussion." I'm excited to see it after some of the non-OP posts in the thread.

"Jurassic World officially the shit"

[Cattle Rustler]

(06-15-2015 12:16 AM)Moma Wrote:  

No, you want some ass and a dirty hag with no gag reflex willing to swallow your kids for 20 dollars.

This part made my fucking laugh so hard I spat my cider across my monitors!

[Spectrumwalker]

Spoilers.

Just saw the movie last night. Great flick, I highly recommend it. Finally a movie where a strong masculine figure rises over the female role and becomes the hero of the movie. And it's a story about brotherhood and loyalty too. The two brothers sticking together, and the raptors remaining loyal to Pratt I thought were actually pretty touching themes. I left the theater with my chest a little more puffed out.

There was one scene where some cunty woman character gets eaten, and I almost wanted to stand up and shout for joy. The closing words by Chris Pratt to the female character after she becomes enlightened to the fact that she may want a family was like a huge slap in the face for feminists. She submissively looks at him and says "what do we do now?" Pratt says, "we stick together, for survival". As if to say, let's cut this gender war bullshit out. You know your role and place, I know mine, let's make family work. At least that's how I saw it, maybe it's just wishful thinking. To bad the movie also didn't show how she would be probably be held accountable for everything as the CEO, hah.

These are the kind of movies we need more of. Movies that tell boys its ok to boys. To encourage loyalty, strength and leadership in men, and tell women that there's more to their lives than their lattes, profits, and investor meetings.

[CodyB]

(06-14-2015 11:07 AM)Soothesayer Wrote:  

Even Jeff Goldblum's acting skill was far better in Lost World, and most guys I've talked to (a few actors themselves) agree that Goldblum called it in.

[WalterBlack]

(06-14-2015 02:38 PM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  

I haven't seen Jurassic World, but from what I'm reading here it seems it portrays Chris Pratt's character as an alpha badass. That's good. All the Asian girls watching this around the world will subconsciously add this movie into their neural heuristics of how they view white guys. It may sound ridiculous, but I may end end up getting an extra notch somewhere down the line thanks to Jurassic World. Whether the movie sucks as a cinematic experience or not is almost besides the point, because ease of getting laid>>>>>>popcorn and a movie.

BTW, if you haven't read Jurassic Park, you should. The movie version does not do the book justice at all. It's one of Crichton's better novels, and that's saying a lot.

I dunno man, I don’t look upon the media to inspire women I’m looking to bang. If you look a bit similar to Chris Pratt, you might get the bang, but I don’t know how else the movie would work in your favour. You probably would have got the bangs anyway.

In regards to the film, I thought it was great (8/10), but it’s not as good as the original (10/10).

[The Beast1]

(06-14-2015 09:12 PM)Beyond Borders Wrote:  

C'mon, it was sequel #3 of a movie that was destined to have bad sequels.

It was worth a watch for what it was, but you can't expect Oscars out of these kinds of movies.

It's actually sequel number 4. The 3rd sequel had Grant back in it. Download it from the pirate bay. Jurassic Park 3 is so bad I wouldn't bother paying anything for it.