rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Ashley Madison Data Sheet
#1

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

I don't want this thread to turn into a discussion of morality here. Know this going in: fucking a married woman is risky business. People get killed over this shit. If you're married, you've got a lot to lose if you get caught. Why sign up for divorce rape? If you're married and thinking about screwing around, ESPECIALLY online, think hard about the consequences. Nobody thinks they'll get caught. Trust me, no matter how tech stupid your wife is, the law of large numbers says that if you do this long enough, you'll get busted. You'll forget to delete a text, leave a browser window open, forget to use private mode browsing or clear history, she'll see a credit card bill; there's a hundred ways to fuck up.

The first rule of infidelity is Don't leave a paper trail

It's also the 2nd rule. Still interested? Now onto the rest:

Ashley Madison, if you didn't know, is a site for married people looking for an affair. There's a fair number of singles on there, though most of the single women are looking for a sugar daddy. I'm writing this with the assumption that it's a married guy thinking about a little side action, but most of it still applies. If her husband finds out, you don't want to take the chance that he's the vengeful type.

The basics:
Get a burner email and a burner phone, or even better Google Voice or similar. For the love of god, do not give any traceable information, to AM or to a potential date. You think I'm paranoid? I've read stories of guys wives finding a credit card charge to ADL Media and doing a little googling, and then they're busted. The guy tries to claim he didn't do it, and Ashley Madison delivers a certified letter to the dude's house with printouts of his profile, credit card numbers, every picture he put on the site. NEVER use your real credit card, real name, real email, or real phone number.

Maybe you're single and chasing married tail. Why the paranoia? Because she has a husband. Let me tell you, you haven't lived until you've got a pissed off husband calling you up, or showing up at your door. It's better to be safe than sorry.

Background:
AM claims 7:1 male to woman ratio. Add in fake profiles (men who create female profiles to scope the competition, escorts, webcam models, etc), the infamous AM "Online Hosts", and the chicks who just want attention, and you're likely at 20:1 or 25:1. The level of thirst is high. I see mid-40s 4's complaining of being overwhelmed by the amount of email. You can imagine what a 20-something girl who's HWP and reasonably cute would get in terms of email.

There's 3 types of women on AM
1. Seeking Arrangement types - fairly easy to spot. There's a checkbox on preferences where she can say "Seeking a Sugar Daddy", and if she mentions she wants a generous guy or "I want to be spoiled", that's a strong indication that's what she is. Most of these girls are single, but not all.
2. Attention Whores, or "email queens". All they want is some positive attention. They may say explicitly on their profile that they're only open to cyber/chat, or they may not. Either way, these girls suck because you can invest a lot of time going nowhere.
3. Actual DTF girls. The married ones are bored at home, obviously. There are singles on AM. Most of these girls, if they aren't after a sugar daddy, are in a career and just want actual NSA sex, and the thinking is that married guys don't get attached.

Signing up:
Use your fake email. Standard dating site advice applies: don't sign up as bigdick69. First of all, some other chode already took it, second of all, these women get 30 emails a day even if they're a 53 yo 5. Write something in your profile. The checkboxes are silly, everybody knows that. My advice is that you will need some kind of pictures, but you should NEVER show your face.

Your Profile:

Exactly like every other dating site. You want to be fun, exciting, a guy that a woman would want to be around. You should have some pictures, because it improves your interest rate dramatically. It's up to you if you show your face. I wouldn't advise it personally. The whole site is built on discretion, so I've found women to be forgiving about the lack of a face pic. Plus it gives you a reason to exchange contact info quickly and take the conversation off the site.

I recommend being somewhat vague in your profile. You can pick a few checkboxes, but most of what you say will be in words. Make her use her imagination.

Paying for it:

AM is most definitely not free. As a free member you have practically no options. On top of that, any woman with half a brain realizes that unless you have the Premium Member badge, you can't contact her, so she's not going to waste any time on you. So you'll have to buy some credits to get anything done.

First, get down to the supermarket and buy a Visa gift card. Minimum buy in is $50, which gets you 100 credits (20 messages). In my experience, it takes more like 40-50 messages to get a decent number of real leads, so you might want to spend $100 on it. Regardless, it's like going to Vegas: decide on how much you're willing to lose and set the limit there. AM is very, very good at getting you to spend money accidentally. So if you use a gift card, you won't be surprised by charges on your card. In addition, it adds a level of anonymity.

Finally, make sure you uncheck the mobile option. It's $19/month, and you don't need to be leaving evidence on your phone.

Finding Women:

The goal: you want to find the best available woman. As we all know, women's desire comes in cycles, and when she's not available (not in the mood, already has a partner, too busy), she's probably not logging in. So don't bother sending initial messages to women who haven't logged in within the last 24 hours.

Most women won't write anything in their profile, don't upload a picture, and maybe just check a few checkboxes. I've had some good results meeting the empty profile girls, so it's not necessarily a red flag. This type could be displaying an abundance of caution. In general, you'll be lucky to get a single pic in a private showcase and a few lines of text in the profile.

The advanced search feature is your friend. First of all, the site asks women to put in their height & weight. Surprisingly, women don't seem to lie too badly here. If you're not sure what you'll end up with, mybodygallery.com is a good way to get an idea. For instance, if she's claiming 120 lbs / 5'4", plug those numbers into mybodygallery along with her age and that'll give you an idea of what you're working with. If you browse through 10 pictures on MyBodyGallery and maybe 1 chick stirs your interest, then it's likely a bad idea to contact her.

Communicating:

This is where it gets complicated. First of all, instant messaging is a complete ripoff (30 credits for 30 minutes of IM!). Ignore all incoming messages. There's a profile option where you can shut off IM entirely, and that's helpful. Mail messages cost 5 credits each. Once you've contacted a girl, you can exchange all the mails you want for free. Girls can also send you "collect messages" where you pay 5 credits to read the message, but that's not considered "contact". You'll have to pay 5 to reply and initiate contact. In my experience, I've never received a collect message worth paying to read.

Women have the option to quickreply to men (If men have the option, I can't find it). If you ever get a response from a woman to a wink or hotlist, it's almost always either "Send a real message if you're interested" or "I'm too busy to answer winks". Those are pre-written responses. I'd say that if she actually shows up in your recently viewed list, it's a positive sign. Some women will just reply to everyone like that, so it's hard to tell.

Messaging is going to be the same as on a site like AFF. Women are there for casual (extramarital) sex, and it doesn't get much sluttier than that. So the ASD is high and coming on strong is not going to be a winning strategy. It's your money, your credits, spend them as you see fit, but I'm just saying, you'll do better feeding the hamster than shaming it. So put some work into a message.

Also, the way the display works is the first few words are shown in the inbox, just like OKCupid, so it's better not to waste time saying "hello" - better to gave an opening sentence that grabs attention.

Once you have the first email, you can always re-email her. I've had women respond months after the 1st email. Women get a lot of email. Getting her to read yours is sometimes a matter of luck. She may have been not in the mood that day, in the middle of a hot lead with another guy, or maybe you've rewritten your profile or changed pictures. It's likely she won't remember you unless you had an extended conversation.

Getting her to email you:
Short story: not likely. Unless you've got a killer picture and profile, she's probably got too much incoming mail to spend time hunting on her own. AM does have a "user initiated contact" feature which is something that you get the 1st month free and then autorenews at $19 a month and you have to explicitly opt out (another reason to use a prepaid card!). Here's what AM told me about this feature

Quote:Quote:

The way that this works is that if a member contacts you in any way (wink, message, photo key, etc.) without your having contacted her in the past, you will not have to spend credits to correspond with that member. This ONLY works if the member in question is the one initiating the contact. If she is replying to a wink or a photo request (etc.) that you have sent, this is not considered member initiated contact and you will have to pay the standard credit costs to initiate mail contact and correspond.

So the only option for getting her attention is to hotlist her, send a private key, or hope she sees you in her "recently viewed" screen. Don't send winks or private key requests, they count as initial contact.

The good part:

If she's willing to give up her contact info, AM does nothing (that I can tell) to block that, so it's easy to take the conversation onto email or text. From there, you should know what to do. There are other threads on dealing with married chicks, but a few basics bear repeating. Logistics are going to be hard, she's likely not going to be able to have you over, and her time is probably constrained. Also, this kind of thing is highly subject to mood & horniness. Either she'll be DTF right away or you'll have to bide your time for the moment to appear and then be ready to take the opportunity.

Avoiding bullshit:

Don't let your credits go to 0, because once you do, you can't even read your own emails. So actually, if you buy 100 credits, you get only 19 email contacts, because when you spend that last one, you won't be able to read her email if she does respond.
Make sure you uncheck the "priority email" option in your profile. By default, they'll charge you an extra 5 credits per message and mark the message "priority", which has some kind of highlight and I think goes to the top of their inbox. Women I've talked to hate the option because if they're in a conversation with a guy they like, they have to page through the priority mail to get to the messages they want. Plus, messages cost 2x as much. So don't do it.
Shouldn't need saying, but the gifts are bullshit. Don't give a woman a "gift". Nothing screams loser like buying a woman virtual flowers.
If you get a message from a woman who lives a long way from you, delete it. It's spam.
There used to be an option "I don't want to be contacted by online hosts" but I can't find it anymore. Online hosts come on like the spammers, usually from someone far away.
The usual online profile rules apply. If something looks off, something doesn't add up, don't message her.
Be very careful of reading between the lines. If she mentions anything about generous, being spoiled, or looking for a sugar daddy, assume she's a whore and proceed accordingly.
Last, always remember this: If it's too good to be true, it is.

Leaving the site:

When you delete your profile, you'll get an offer to delete your entire profile, with the implicit threat that if you don't, your data will remain on the site. They charge $19 for this and the option is checked by default. Another reason to use a gift card for the site, so if you delete and miss the checkbox, they can't get you for a parting charge.

A few other tips:

Profiles are assigned a number. The numbers are ascending in the order people join the site, so if you find a chick with a profile number much lower than yours, she's been on the site way longer and has probably gotten around. Your profile number is displayed in the upper left of the screen. Her profile number is harder to see, but it's in the URL used in the favorites list, for one.
Be careful of "Claire" profiles. The slang comes from a now-defunct blog Ashley & Me, where the author tried an experiment with creating a fake female profile to see what the competition was up to, he named his fake girl "Claire" (and used a picture of Ann Coulter on the profile at one point). It's a technique some guys will use. You're bound to run into these fake profiles. Mostly it's harmless, but be aware.
Hotlists can be very useful. Her last login date shows up on the hotlist, so if you don't want to keep showing up in her "recently viewed" list, the hotlist will show her online activity, in case you're wondering if she's still shopping around, or if she's ignoring you.

A cautionary tale: a couple years ago, a couple high profile infidelity bloggers were exposed by some anonymous person. If you're going to do this, have your fun, but don't fucking go online and tell about it. There was no idea who did the expose - a lover who didn't like her portrayal online, a vengeful spouse, who knows, but the whole idea is to not make yourself a target. Fucking another man's wife is enough risk, no sense doubling down.

That's about all I've got. Hope this helps someone, even if it's to come to the realization that your $50 is probably better spent elsewhere.
Reply
#2

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Have you gotten laid from this? How often? If so, can you give some field reports of how it happened?

To be honest, this sounds like a lot of trouble and expense for not much result, but maybe you've had some success.

For married women, I can say for a fact that Craigslist works, it just takes some work and sifting. So does POF if you hit up profiles using a "no image" search.

"If anything's gonna happen, it's gonna happen out there!- Captain Ron
Reply
#3

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

I have tried AM and rock hard seems pretty spot on. It is not a great way to go. Lots of 3-5's and they are not young. And of course sugar babies. And to make it worse they are very entitled. It was a waste of time and money. I met two that were willing to meet up in two months and they were nasty looking. Ugh!

"Go get yourself some"
Reply
#4

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Quote: (10-03-2014 02:07 PM)MrXY Wrote:  

Have you gotten laid from this? How often? If so, can you give some field reports of how it happened?

Nothing worth a field report. In fact, this is my bottom line:

Quote:Quote:

To be honest, this sounds like a lot of trouble and expense for not much result

The reason I published the datasheet is exactly that. AM is an expensive proposition, but a lot of guys google "married woman dating" and AM seems like a good option. We've had other threads and people have claimed AM is a flat-out scam. It's not a scam, but it's a sleazy operation and the deck is definitely stacked. I wanted to give an idea of what guys were up against before they started thinking that pussy was going to start falling from the sky after they signed up. If I saved someone $50, awesome. If not, at least guys are going in with their eyes open.

Like reco said, the level of entitlement is high. Women go on here for validation first and foremost, and guess what? The men are paying for the privilege of validating them.

Quote:Quote:

For married women, I can say for a fact that Craigslist works, it just takes some work and sifting. So does POF if you hit up profiles using a "no image" search.

I've honestly had better luck on Craigslist for this kind of thing, but the reaction I've gotten from people who use AM is that CL seems like a lot of work. Shrug. Personally, I think that online game is a lot of work for not much result, particularly if you're over 35 or not single.

PoF seems like a terrible venue to me. They actively discourage both hookups and married people. Searching my area for "no image" profiles yields 3-4 pages of profiles online today but the quality looks really low. How does PoF work for this?
Reply
#5

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Quote: (10-03-2014 03:19 PM)reco2100 Wrote:  

I have tried AM and rock hard seems pretty spot on. It is not a great way to go. Lots of 3-5's and they are not young. And of course sugar babies. And to make it worse they are very entitled. It was a waste of time and money. I met two that were willing to meet up in two months and they were nasty looking. Ugh!

Ok let's lock the thread. Never thought about AM, but definitely never now.

Fate whispers to the warrior, "You cannot withstand the storm." And the warrior whispers back, "I am the storm."

Women and children can be careless, but not men - Don Corleone

Great RVF Comments | Where Evil Resides | How to upload, etc. | New Members Read This 1 | New Members Read This 2
Reply
#6

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

I hooked up with a married chick I met at a bar a few months ago (didn't know she was married until the post coital discussion).

She told me she regularly used AM and had hooked with a few guys over it including her current boyfriend. Competition is tough - she had her pick of the litter and ended up with hotshot executive at a well known Fortune 500. He spends money on her and she tells him she's meeting up with girlfriends while she spends the night with random dudes she meets at bars (e.g. me).

Seems like a waste of money to me.
Reply
#7

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Quote: (10-03-2014 03:42 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

Quote: (10-03-2014 03:19 PM)reco2100 Wrote:  

I have tried AM and rock hard seems pretty spot on. It is not a great way to go. Lots of 3-5's and they are not young. And of course sugar babies. And to make it worse they are very entitled. It was a waste of time and money. I met two that were willing to meet up in two months and they were nasty looking. Ugh!

Ok let's lock the thread. Never thought about AM, but definitely never now.

Lock the thread because you didn't like it?

Okay......

Cattle 5000 Rustlings #RustleHouseRecords #5000Posts
Houston (Montrose), Texas

"May get ugly at times. But we get by. Real Niggas never die." - cdr

Follow the Rustler on Twitter | Telegram: CattleRustler

Game is the difference between a broke average looking dude in a 2nd tier city turning bad bitch feminists into maids and fucktoys and a well to do lawyer with 50x the dough taking 3 dates to bang broads in philly.
Reply
#8

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Wow, lots of good data. So the bottom line for this is: Stay Away! You just saved me fifty bucks since that was on my to do list of things to research. Guess I will stick with Cherry blossoms. Thanks
Reply
#9

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

It can be viable IMO if you play the game accordingly. If you're going to put some pictures, no matter where (Skype profiles, AM, etc.), put them in Photoshop and do a horizontal mirror, then put a layer of a slight color above the picture. This will prevent intelligent bitches from putting your pic in Google Images and finding your real profiles like FB, etc.
Reply
#10

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Quote: (10-03-2014 03:24 PM)RockHard Wrote:  

PoF seems like a terrible venue to me. They actively discourage both hookups and married people. Searching my area for "no image" profiles yields 3-4 pages of profiles online today but the quality looks really low. How does PoF work for this?

Guys assume that a woman who doesn't have pics on her profile must be gross looking but in my experience they are no different in the range of attractiveness than the ones with pics.

They don't have pics because they want to be anonymous. Often this is because they have some semi-public job and they don't want people who might come into contact with them to see them on a dating site. School teachers are an example. Some don't want their students or the parents to see them online dating because it could cause them embarrassment.

The other reason is that the woman has a husband or boyfriend and is looking to cheat.

From time to time I hit up the "no image" ones. I just spam out openers. If they answer, after a couple of exchanges I ask for a pic. If they don't send it, I drop them. They almost always will send you pics though. If I don't like their looks, I just say thanks and drop them.
If I do, game as usual.

You will notice that the no pic girls usually have much skimpier profiles than the ones with pics. Don't be deterred by this; it's a sign they are just looking for a casual hookup.

"If anything's gonna happen, it's gonna happen out there!- Captain Ron
Reply
#11

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

The hottest girl I banged this summer, messaged *me* on OKCupid, from a profile with no pic and no info... it happens.

That said, I kinda wonder what the "sugar babies" need to see before they put out. What does it really take to pose as a guy with unlimited money who'd buy some hot girl anything she wants (if you actually do have a pretty high income, but aren't willing to buy her anything)? I mean if you're "married", you obviously can't show her your house, so of course that can look like anything you want... you're gonna have to meet up somewhere (a high end bar maybe), possibly pull up in a sharp looking car, and then game your way back to a hotel room as you normally would. Anybody pull something like this off? Gold diggers are the poster children for everything that's wrong with American women, and I think the lol factor of "scamming" one of them out of some pussy would be worth a certain amount of effort and expense [Image: smile.gif]
Reply
#12

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Quote: (10-05-2014 10:14 PM)44delta Wrote:  

The hottest girl I banged this summer, messaged *me* on OKCupid, from a profile with no pic and no info... it happens.

That said, I kinda wonder what the "sugar babies" need to see before they put out. What does it really take to pose as a guy with unlimited money who'd buy some hot girl anything she wants (if you actually do have a pretty high income, but aren't willing to buy her anything)? I mean if you're "married", you obviously can't show her your house, so of course that can look like anything you want... you're gonna have to meet up somewhere (a high end bar maybe), possibly pull up in a sharp looking car, and then game your way back to a hotel room as you normally would. Anybody pull something like this off? Gold diggers are the poster children for everything that's wrong with American women, and I think the lol factor of "scamming" one of them out of some pussy would be worth a certain amount of effort and expense [Image: smile.gif]

Check out the seeking arrangement thread: http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-21493.html

I'm not interested in that game, but bottom line is, there are dudes on here working that angle.
Reply
#13

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

i've heard a lot of mostly negative stuff about am. having a roosh v forum'er confirm the vast majority of it pretty much solidifies my decision to stay off that particular site.

will stick to the "old fashioned" way of getting some on the side (i.e. approaches).

thanks rockhard.
Reply
#14

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

What do you mean "never use a real credit card"
Reply
#15

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Quote: (10-06-2014 07:09 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

What do you mean "never use a real credit card"

It means do not use your own cards. You never know when your gf will see a paper statement, browser window you might have left open, etc. so get a prepaid card from the supermarket.
Reply
#16

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Quote:Quote:

Megan has picked Coppelia, a Latin American diner at the border of Chelsea and the West Village in Manhattan, and she's waiting in a booth when I arrive. She recognizes me from my profile photo, and I slide in across from her. She's around 40, wearing casual, loose-fitting clothes and a pleasant smile. In short, she doesn't fit the portrait of the promiscuous, inconstant woman cast as the adulteress in Hollywood dramas.

I thank her for meeting me. She says it's no big deal. It is, though—if her identity were somehow unmasked, it could torpedo her high-powered career: She's worked for one of the most prominent political figures in the country and nearly ended up in Obama's administration.

Over cold Cusqueña beers on a hot July afternoon, Megan drops the professional mien. "I'm a dirty old man trapped in a woman's body," she says. "I lust after younger men the way dirty old men lust after younger girls. I get dirty old men. I'm looking for eye candy. I'm very shallow."

She tells me that she's been corporeally disloyal in relationships since she started having sex at 16 and has don't-ask, don't-tell permission to frolic with other lovers from her "nerd" husband of nearly two decades, with whom she has several children.

"He can barely handle me, and he's super-vanilla," Megan says. "But he's also a fantastic guy and father. We have a really happy and functional house."

She hoped marriage would change her cheating ways, but two years later found herself straying—as much out of a lust for life as for flesh. "I find myself living my life in the third person and deciding whether it'd be a good story." She takes a sip of beer. "I want it to be dramatic."

Since then, she's averaged one or two new men per year, with a few women sprinkled in, and in the digital age has supplemented her search with Ashley Madison, Craigslist, and CougarLife. As is customary for women on Ashley Madison, she gets bombarded by suitors, then rejects about 90 percent of those she meets. To her, the main contrast in the libidos of the genders is not their size but their pickiness.

"Women want their affairs to have sexual attraction," she opines. "Men just want their affairs to have a vagina."

For some reason, a professional photographer sets up a tripod and camera at the entrance and walks past us several times. Megan seems discomfited. I assure her the photographer is not with me.

Her friends (granted, a self-selecting cohort) are just as randy as she is, though not all seek out external solutions—to their detriment, she believes. "They're all unhappy with the amount of sex they're getting—the ones who are still married," she says. "I feel like I'm the healthiest one out there. The ones who've started playing around are much happier."

But what about the guilt? "I really consider it a favor to my husband. My marriage would be in shambles if I wasn't playing outside the marriage."

Quote:Quote:

There's also a keeping-up-with-the-Mrs.-Robinsons pressure, especially among wives who have at least as much power as their spouses, says Kate Bolick, author of The Atlantic's much discussed "All the Single Ladies" cover article. "When I've watched women cheat in their thirties, they're not necessarily unhappy with their husbands, but they're all alpha women, and they feel entitled to what they want," she says. "If you're a 34-year-old woman successful in your career and you've got a great husband but you're bored sexually, and you watch all your single friends run around town having sex, you think you should be able to have that, too."

I ask Bolick to scroll through her phone and count the number of women she knows of who have had affairs. "Fifteen!" she announces.

http://www.gq.com/news-politics/mens-liv...ating-site
Reply
#17

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Quote: (10-03-2014 03:24 PM)RockHard Wrote:  

Quote: (10-03-2014 02:07 PM)MrXY Wrote:  

Have you gotten laid from this? How often? If so, can you give some field reports of how it happened?

Nothing worth a field report. In fact, this is my bottom line:

Quote:Quote:

To be honest, this sounds like a lot of trouble and expense for not much result

[Image: giphy.gif]
Reply
#18

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Some typist and supposed former pickup guru wrote an article on AM. I'm not sure how much of it to believe (other than the bit about the ratio being 70% dudes to 30% females), but the part about the women being old was his experience too.

Quote:Quote:

I got to work writing something unique, confident, and (hopefully) mysterious and seductive. I set up three profiles to see which would resonate the fastest and which would hit with the most success. "Scottie" was unsure, shy, and a bit weak ("I'm not sure why I'm here."), "Greg" was the quintessential Alpha Male ("You know you want me…"), and the aforementioned "Cameron" was closer to the middle ("Too many men get comfortable—even complacent—and forget that foreplay starts outside the bedroom... that kisses can start soft with cheek strokes, but end with the back of her hair being pulled in wild passion.").

I don't know how that could be done without running into a lot of situations where women checked out two or more of the profiles. Anyway,

Quote:Quote:

Early Success

Online dating is a complicated arena much like ordering fast food, in that what you get is never really what the picture and description promise. And given the demographical split on the site, I was prepared to be searching and waiting for a number of days for interest or responses. To my surprise, Cameron's profile had 20 messages on his first night.

Not buying it - not with that kind of ratio and the sheer volume of email the average woman gets on any dating site, never mind one so skewed towards female choice. I bet he was paid by AM to write that article. Another post showed where AM had a worker suing them because she got carpal tunnel from writing so many fake profiles, so I wouldn't put it past the founder.
Reply
#19

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

I had some luck on AM a couple years ago - actually had decent luck - met some attractive willing women - mostly low 30s' to early 40's. I mostly messaged no-image users or discreetly imaged. A lot of fakes posting hot pics. Plus every guys is messaging them- more competition. But I used up my credits last summer/fall with no intention of re-filling. Lots women who fit my [narrow] search profile magically disappeared a few days after I sent them a message. Fishy.

If you would have asked me 2 or 3 year ago I would say yeah give it a try - spend the money on some credits. But not now...
Reply
#20

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Quote: (10-04-2014 10:46 PM)Rawmeo Wrote:  

It can be viable IMO if you play the game accordingly. If you're going to put some pictures, no matter where (Skype profiles, AM, etc.), put them in Photoshop and do a horizontal mirror, then put a layer of a slight color above the picture. This will prevent intelligent bitches from putting your pic in Google Images and finding your real profiles like FB, etc.

I would not use any pictures that are publicly available elsewhere online. Take unique pictures for your side game and don't use them in your normal life.

Appreciate this data sheet. I was considering AM but after your report it really seems not worth it.
Reply
#21

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

I'm still tempted to try this. I might invest a $100 and give it a shot-that's no more than I would spend in a week on a couple of dates or cold approach evenings. I'm curious to see what's out there in my area. If I can get laid off CL I should have some success on AM.

"If anything's gonna happen, it's gonna happen out there!- Captain Ron
Reply
#22

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Quote: (10-06-2014 07:49 PM)Rawmeo Wrote:  

Quote: (10-06-2014 07:09 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

What do you mean "never use a real credit card"

It means do not use your own cards. You never know when your gf will see a paper statement, browser window you might have left open, etc. so get a prepaid card from the supermarket.

That. Also, one time a long time ago I used a real credit card for AM and got a phone call from the fraud department at my bank claiming someone had tried to use the card for "escort services". Would've been awkward if the SO had picked up the phone on that one.

Also, I've read somewhere online that a guy's wife figured out what "ADL Media" was and confronted him. He tried to claim it was ID theft and went to contest the charge so AM sent him a registered letter with printouts of his profile, pictures, plus every email he'd sent & received on the site. They don't fuck around when it comes to getting paid.
Reply
#23

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Thanks for your analysis, and conclusions.

I'm in the UK, so I stumped up approx £50 ($80) for 100 credits. It doesn't cost anything to 'wink' or to send a private key (where the recipient sees your private profile pics). But, it's costing me 5 credits to just message them (I add my email address, to avoid using credits), and it really adds up!

As mentioned, be aware of the fake profiles that seem to message you out of the blue, and are usually in another country (I delete them all, and don't respond).
Reply
#24

Ashley Madison Data Sheet

Total bust.

Kept wasting credits on incoming msgs from: spammers, cam girls, and the usual assortment of attention whores. Quite a few fake profiles, and bots. I also suspect there's a small number of people working for AM, who just reply a few times to keep you on there (and gives you some kinda false hope).

Could only find approx 40 profiles within a 50-mile radius (100 mile is too much agro in terms of travelling, and possible flakes). Also kept getting tons of incoming msgs from the USA (I'm in the UK), so that's a bit f*cked up!
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)