[It_is_my_time]

(06-12-2014 03:59 PM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

It seems that quite a bit of projection goes on here. If you hold resentful racial sentiments, you start thinking everyone else is racist.

I'd like to the think the opposite, most people are not racist and actually have a lot in common with each other.

The tea party might be a really good thing in the US, they will be an integral part in keeping debt spending from ballooning. I bet they can do it without race trolling too. They don't have to pander, just not race troll. And the votes will come their way from all directions.

I've asked this already once in this thread, and I will ask again...

What policies/message does the TEA Party have that is "racist"?

Do only white people want lower taxes and more freedom and better lives? I certainly do not believe so.

[Samseau]

(06-12-2014 03:59 PM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

It seems that quite a bit of projection goes on here. If you hold resentful racial sentiments, you start thinking everyone else is racist.

I'd like to the think the opposite, most people are not racist and actually have a lot in common with each other.

The tea party might be a really good thing in the US, they will be an integral part in keeping debt spending from ballooning. I bet they can do it without race trolling too. They don't have to pander, just not race troll. And the votes will come their way from all directions.

Not holding my breath.

[DjembaDjemba]

They don't have any policies that are racist, that's the interesting part.

The tea party is not a white thing, but many who are ardent supporters and opponents of it have attempted to paint it in that brush. Let's say, it's a grass roots misunderstanding. This stems from the past history of the country. Americans of different stripes still like to pick opposite teams for the fuck of it.

The tea party of America could easily be the new conservative party of the nation just as Canada's more right wing version of the reform party became the nation's leading political entity, with the full support of minorities. All they had to do was talk about the economy. Keep culture out of it.

Maybe it's even better if they didn't discuss immigration if it's that divisive.

[Hyperion]

(06-12-2014 04:00 PM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(06-12-2014 03:58 PM)Hyperion Wrote:  

(06-11-2014 02:26 PM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(06-11-2014 01:36 PM)MidWest Wrote:  

(06-11-2014 06:39 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

It is also depressing to read. Because if the USA does turn into another 3rd world socialist hellhole,

Without a strong USA, the entire world will become violent.

See! This is what I'm trying to say! It's rhetoric like this that makes Hispanics vote Democrat or vote for who in their eyes is perceived as less racist.

So as a Hispanic American myself, how am I contributing to the US becoming a 3rd world socialist hellhole???? I really want to hear this.

But if you vote for the Democrat Party, or the real name... Socialist Feminist Party, then you are most definitely contributing to the US becoming a 3rd world socialist hellhole.

We cannot afford this spending. I'm not saying the Republicans have it all right, or they are even all that much better. But we simply cannot afford all this spending and waste of a giant federal govt. We are heading 100 MPH off the cliff to where Greece is today. The only way to stop it is to stop the spending and reduce the govt., the opposite of what the Democrats want.

The GOP will get us off the cliff at 25 mph. The Democrats have a brick stuck on the pedal. Unfortunately there are way too many people and special interest groups invested in the big government paradigm. Both parties are socialist but the GOP at least has some good members. The Democrats are mini-Lenins and Trotskys

If you vote for the Democrats, you're essentially voting for making your country into a feminist/hard left/anti-man/anti civilization hell-hole.

I agree 100%. I disagree with a lot of things the Republicans do, they are just better for the country than Democrats.

But like I said earlier in this thread, Gary Johnson was the best Presidential candidate for us red pill males. He wasn't perfect, but he was pretty damn red pill and pretty damn good.

I like Johnson but he's too much of a politically correct cultural Marxist for my taste.

[GenghisKhan]

Quote:

Actually the economy is in serious bad shape. This is one thing I follow closely, it just interests me...

#1) The unemployment numbers are a false representation of nothing. They have been manipulated by our govt. to win political agendas. The true number to look at is work force participation rate, and we are the lowest we have been since women started to work outside the house.

#2) The economy contracted a full 1% for 1st quarter 2014. This is terrible news and no good way to spend it. We have spent this much money, and now we have nothing in return.

#3) 47,000,000 Americans right now have to get food stamps to feed themselves.

#4) We can't borrow money forever, ask Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and soon the rest of Europe. Don't believe me, go to youtube and type in "Greece Austerity" and see how they are living over there now. Our debt to GDP is not far off from where they are, and we will be cut off from borrowing as well.

#5) This is without amnesty, which will introduce 10,000,000 to 15,000,000 new food stamp recipients and medicaid recipients.

#6) The debt is not stabilizing. We are still borrowing hundreds of billions a year to stay float and with no end in sight. Eventually this will be cut off by the bankers.

One thing for certain, the economy is in very bad shape and it is getting worse by the year. At this point in time the USA is basically unemployed and living off of credit cards.

1 The economy shrunk in the first quarter because of the weather. Wait for the second quarter numbers to come out, it will confirm it.
2 Debt is still a problem, but it is really stabilizing. The budget deficit of approx. $500B is the smallest since 2007. It will continue to shrink until a surplus is reached. You can’t fix the US debt problem by cutting the budget deficit to 0 overnight. It will send the whole country into chaos.
3 US unemployment rate is back to 6.3%. US economy has recovered all 8.7 million jobs lost in recession.
4 US employment of 138.5 people exceeds pre-recession levels.
5 US jobless claims have continued to fall to pre-recession levels.
6 US job force participation rate is still at 62.8% vs 66% in 2007. However, a lot of this is attributed to more college students, aging baby boomers and social welfare dependency. Not in the lack of jobs. As a matter of fact, the downtrend of the participation rate began in year 2000. This is really not a good predictor in employment rate anymore.
7 Minimum wage should be raised higher for retailers like Walmart, Target, etc. These corporations rake billions of profits and they send their low level employees to Uncle Sam to feed them. It has no fiscal sense to keep it this low.
8 Immigrants should not be allowed to be on welfare.

My bottom line is, the United States economy is in a lot better shape after going through the great recession. It isn’t in great shape, but it’s recovering pretty well. Five years ago if you read the economic forecasts, the situation today would be one of the good scenarios.

[KorbenDallas]

Uh...All the Tea Party did was talk about taxes. Immigration really wasn't a hot topic when it started. The reason it was smeared as racist was because the media would call it racist day after day after day after day.


Edit: Genghis...gl with that.

[Hyperion]

Don't kid yourself, the US economy is in terrible shape for the long term barring some kind of great oil discovery.

The entitlements of the baby boomers are just starting, an in ability to seriously address financial problems due to democracy, out of control military industrial complex, millennials who aren't entrepreneurial and loaded with student debt. The rest of the world itching to get off dollar hegemony.

If there is reason for long-term optimism I'd love to read it.

[TonySandos]

(06-12-2014 04:21 PM)KorbenDallas Wrote:  

Uh...All the Tea Party did was talk about taxes. Immigration really wasn't a hot topic when it started. The reason it was smeared as racist was because the media would call it racist day after day after day after day.

And that's why Midwest is getting no respect in these streets

[scorpion]

The Tea Party is most certainly a white party, but on a de facto rather than a de jure basis. This is simply because whites are prohibited from organizing along ethnic lines the way that every other racial group can and does.

Instead, whites in the Tea Party are adopting a strategy of implicit whiteness. This means they are promoting an ideology that is not explicitly pro-white, and instead focusing on issues that only appeal to whites for the most part. Second Amendment. Small government. Christianity. Traditionalist. Constitutional. There are not a lot of minorities running around clamoring for any of those issues. Why? Because they don't care about them. They are focused on their own collective needs.

Multiculturalism inevitably produces racialization in politics as ethnic groups compete for resources. It's what we're seeing in the U.S. today, with the Democrats forming a coalition of non-whites while the GOP gets whiter and whiter. The Republican Party, however, has absolutely no interest in recognizing the fact that it is primarily a white party. It certainly has no interest in doing what is best for the white population, which is why so many Republican politicians are kowtowing to the left on amnesty and immigration.

This is causing a schism on the right as more and more white Republicans are beginning to realize that the GOP is no longer a conservative American party (that is, a party that seeks to conserve a uniquely American way of life) but is rather the controlled opposition to the Marxist destruction of a once-great nation. And so the Tea Party emerged a few years ago as a response to this, and was promptly neutered as establishment Republicans did their best to infiltrate and take over the Tea Party faction of the party.

If the Democrats win the White House in 2016 (which they most likely will) I would not be surprised to see the Republican Party begin to break apart entirely. The big business/war faction will quietly align themselves with the Democrats, and the rest of the party will probably divide into a Christian Nationalist/Traditionalist party (which might be regional in nature, and possibly even explicitly pro-white) and a Libertarian faction (which will wither on the vine as such a party offers no real practical, unifying principles to sustain itself in the face of the Marxist onslaught).

I agree with Samseau that eventually some type of armed conflict, if not outright civil war, is likely to occur. As Vox likes to write, Diversity + Proximity = War. It's really that simple. Tribalism is an innate reality of humanity, and ignoring that fact is producing catastrophic consequences for the West, effects which will only get worse in time.

[TonySandos]

I believe in intellect overcoming the primitive habits of tribalism to avoid any perceived race war. It would definitely take more than the current political and economic projection of the country before that's a viable possibility. Let's hold off on the 'end is nigh' talk until people start making overt racial statements

[It_is_my_time]

(06-12-2014 04:19 PM)GenghisKhan Wrote:  

Quote:

Actually the economy is in serious bad shape. This is one thing I follow closely, it just interests me...

#1) The unemployment numbers are a false representation of nothing. They have been manipulated by our govt. to win political agendas. The true number to look at is work force participation rate, and we are the lowest we have been since women started to work outside the house.

#2) The economy contracted a full 1% for 1st quarter 2014. This is terrible news and no good way to spend it. We have spent this much money, and now we have nothing in return.

#3) 47,000,000 Americans right now have to get food stamps to feed themselves.

#4) We can't borrow money forever, ask Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and soon the rest of Europe. Don't believe me, go to youtube and type in "Greece Austerity" and see how they are living over there now. Our debt to GDP is not far off from where they are, and we will be cut off from borrowing as well.

#5) This is without amnesty, which will introduce 10,000,000 to 15,000,000 new food stamp recipients and medicaid recipients.

#6) The debt is not stabilizing. We are still borrowing hundreds of billions a year to stay float and with no end in sight. Eventually this will be cut off by the bankers.

One thing for certain, the economy is in very bad shape and it is getting worse by the year. At this point in time the USA is basically unemployed and living off of credit cards.

1 The economy shrunk in the first quarter because of the weather. Wait for the second quarter numbers to come out, it will confirm it.
2 Debt is still a problem, but it is really stabilizing. The budget deficit of approx. $500B is the smallest since 2007. It will continue to shrink until a surplus is reached. You can’t fix the US debt problem by cutting the budget deficit to 0 overnight. It will send the whole country into chaos.
3 US unemployment rate is back to 6.3%. US economy has recovered all 8.7 million jobs lost in recession.
4 US employment of 138.5 people exceeds pre-recession levels.
5 US jobless claims have continued to fall to pre-recession levels.
6 US job force participation rate is still at 62.8% vs 66% in 2007. However, a lot of this is attributed to more college students, aging baby boomers and social welfare dependency. Not in the lack of jobs. As a matter of fact, the downtrend of the participation rate began in year 2000. This is really not a good predictor in employment rate anymore.
7 Minimum wage should be raised higher for retailers like Walmart, Target, etc. These corporations rake billions of profits and they send their low level employees to Uncle Sam to feed them. It has no fiscal sense to keep it this low.
8 Immigrants should not be allowed to be on welfare.

My bottom line is, the United States economy is in a lot better shape after going through the great recession. It isn’t in great shape, but it’s recovering pretty well. Five years ago if you read the economic forecasts, the situation today would be one of the good scenarios.

I appreciate your well thought out response. To counter...

#1) The economy shrunk in the first quarter, and it is most likely a result of Obamacare. But some have said the weather, so you are correct, some economists have said this. So far in the 2nd quarter the numbers have not made expectations. So things are not looking good so far this quarter.

#2) True, the budget deficit is less than in 2009 and 2010 when the Democrats were 100% in control and Obama literally just threw money away on paying off rich friends, union donors and political allies. Now the budget deficit is around $500 billion as you said. This is only because the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have come to an end and thank goodness for the Republicans there to tell him "no". $500 billion is still far too much and not sustainable.

#3) Like I said above, the unemployment rate is just a political tool. The constantly change how it is calculated and don't count the millions of Americans who want to work but have given up. The true measure is the work participation rate, and it is beyond pathetic right now.

#4) Yes, we have more employed and more people. The problem is the average house hold income has decreased even back to 7 years because good full time jobs with benefits are being replaced with part time jobs thanks to Obamacare.

#5) US jobless claims have fallen because people have run out of unemployment insurance and many are going to disability. So more living off the govt, less being productive.

#6) It is a great measure. What is the best measure is average household income, and it is a disaster as well. Full time jobs out, part time jobs in, yah Obamacare.

#7) Simple economics. If you raise minimum wage they will just raise prices on goods and services. So in the end those making minimum wage will still end up in poverty. The middle class will get poorer as they will get no raise at all but the costs of goods and services will go up. Small businesses will shut down (more destruction of the middle class). And the rich will get richer. Which is why the elites want this so badly.

#8) Agreed, but with the Democrats buying votes with your's and mine tax dollars, it will continue.

[Feisbook Control]

1. Glad to see you back Scorpion. Your contributions have been missed.

2. Race & Intelligence
Though people do not want to acknowledge it, there is a hierarchy on this issue. PISA and other international tests, plus IQ tests in particular bear this out. Whilst I am sure that I'm very much above the mean IQ of whites, if an East Asian or an Ashkenazi Jew were to say that East Asians or Ashkenazi Jews were smarter than whites, I wouldn't cry racism because it's true. Liberals are supposedly so in love with science, but they miss this again and again. Deal with the hierarchy of intelligence and race.

3. Immigration policies
Here's a novel approach: Have a points system like Canada or Australia, or other tightly controlled immigration policies like in East Asia. Whilst the U.S. or Europe gleefully let the dregs of the third world pour into their countries, Canada and Australia cherry pick the world's smartest, as does Singapore.

Is it really that hard to figure out that:

Illiterate peasants = national decline
STEM graduates = winning formula

Interestingly enough, after the U.K. and New Zealand, guess which countries have the highest immigration rates to Australia?

Have a look here: How do different continents compare?

Australia's immigration policy is actually a de facto race policy because the smartest people in the world (other than Ashkenazi Jews) come from Asia.

4. Why I don't want more white immigration in East Asia
Firstly, I like living in a monocultural society. This may sound strange to some, but I know that if there were suddenly large numbers of non-Taiwanese living in Taiwan, the country would become more divided. Many of the things I like most about living in Taiwan come from social cohesion. There are times when the way they do things here baffle me, but you take the good with the bad. The point is though, that in general, they move collectively forwards, rather than getting into tribalism and fighting over a fixed or diminishing pie.

More than all of that though, the average white person in Taiwan is a fully-fledged raging liberal who wants to turn Taiwan into the same place he left. How does that make sense? I know many are here because they've married locals, or because they've been here so long that they've burnt their bridges back home, but still, why turn this place into the place they left? Why not just go back there? So whilst, in one sense, it's bad for me to essentially be a voiceless member of society, on the other hand, I know that if white people were allowed to vote en masse here, it would be contrary to my own ideas and would rapidly turn this place into a complete shithole. I can look beyond my own tribalism to know that the average white person here (because he is a liberal -- not sure why that is) would actually work against not only my own best interests, but those of the country also.

I find these discussions interesting, because when minorities in the West join right wing parties or support their policies, they're called Uncle Tom (which is a racist term used by the left) or something similar. I guess I'm an Uncle Tom in Asia.

[El Chinito loco]

(06-12-2014 08:21 PM)Feisbook Control Wrote:  

4. Why I don't want more white immigration in East Asia
Firstly, I like living in a monocultural society. This may sound strange to some, but I know that if there were suddenly large numbers of non-Taiwanese living in Taiwan, the country would become more divided. Many of the things I like most about living in Taiwan come from social cohesion. There are times when the way they do things here baffle me, but you take the good with the bad. The point is though, that in general, they move collectively forwards, rather than getting into tribalism and fighting over a fixed or diminishing pie.

That's an interesting point of view and is kind of close to my own as a minority born and raised in the U.S. Honestly, if I were given the choice at birth I would not have chosen to be born in the U.S. From a career point of view I would have been just as if not more successful in Asia. Socially I feel that growing up in a monocultural society is just a better experience. "Multiculturalism" has done me no favors.

I also don't feel insulted when I hear some whites talk about wanting a mostly white America. I understand some of it is knee jerk racism but the more reasoned arguments behind it i've heard tend to be very rational.

I already made the choice to become financially independent and live abroad for this reason too. When I am visiting the U.S. I look at it as a nice place to have some investments and own a self sufficient business but not a good place to live at all.

Skilled educated immigrants can theoretically contribute to a country but the trade off is fracticious social politics and tension in a lot of cases. Liberals tend to whitewash these things or enact laughable policies like affirmative action/EE hiring which just play favorites with race politics.

I don't think any society has created a flawless method of assimilation.

[DjembaDjemba]

(06-12-2014 05:47 PM)scorpion Wrote:  

...

What happens when minorities start voting tea party?

Will nativists just run to another movement, and another, and another...?

What happens as people tend to form more mixed families? Will we return to 1950s American and South African style forced government separation?

That certainly isn't liberty the Tea Party and the Libertarians must be talking of.

The Republicans will indeed most likely break up, but the reformation of an opposition may be much less stark. It's very possible that democrats themselves implode long before due to the fact that no party can rule for prolonged periods of time without some sort of continuos economic growth to justify their electoral gains.

America's worst case scenario is absolutely not some kind of armed conflict, but slow latinization like Brazil, or more closely an Argentina type decline.

The rich and influential Americans, like the their Brazilians and Argentine cohorts, have far too much to at stake to risk letting the country devolve into armed conflict.

[Feisbook Control]

(06-12-2014 09:06 PM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

(06-12-2014 05:47 PM)scorpion Wrote:  

...

What happens when minorities start voting tea party?

Will nativists just run to another movement, and another, and another...?

What happens as people tend to form more mixed families? Will we return to 1950s American and South African style forced government separation?

That certainly isn't liberty the Tea Party and the Libertarians must be talking of.

The Republicans will indeed most likely break up, but the reformation of an opposition may be much less stark. It's very possible that democrats themselves implode long before due to the fact that no party can rule for prolonged periods of time without some sort of continuos economic growth to justify their electoral gains.

America's worst case scenario is absolutely not some kind of armed conflict, but slow latinization like Brazil, or more closely an Argentina type decline.

The rich and influential Americans, like the their Brazilians and Argentine cohorts, have far too much to at stake to risk letting the country devolve into armed conflict.

So what if minorities joined or voted for the tea party? Is it explicitly an ethnocentric party? I suspect that they'd be welcomed into the party because the percentage of people who are hardcore ethno-nationalists is probably pretty small, and would be even smaller if people on the other side of politics weren't hardcore pushing their own ethno-politics (thus necessitating white consciousness as a kind of defence mechanism). As far as I know, there are quite a lot of pretty right wing social commentators who have married outside their race. Fred Reed and John Derbyshire come to mind. Quite a few of the more prominent reactosphere bloggers live in Asia and have Asian wives, I think. What many of us on the "far right" object to is the cultural destruction of the West, not racial destruction. My own children will almost certainly be non/semi-white. I come from a country with the highest rate of residents born outside the country and also one of, if not the highest, rates of racial intermarriage on the planet. So what?

I am anti-anti-civilisational. I am not entirely opposed to immigration. The kind of immigration (and social policy) I am opposed to is that that is dysgenic and that is anti-civilisational. As I wrote above, STEM graduates for the win. It just so happens that those STEM graduates (or Nobel Laureates, etc.) disproportionately come from very select parts of the world (the West, East Asia). Whether that is nature, nurture or both, I don't know. Some of us are just sick of seeing a massive politically correct social experiment being run, and despite all the evidence to the contrary (either in the West or the countries of origin) being told everything is A-okay. It's not and there are very real consequences for all of this social buffoonery liberals are pushing on us coming right down the pipe.

In the U.S. I see one of two outcomes. The first is that the U.S. descends into Latin American style oligarchy with a very small elite and a massive barrio culture beneath. The second is a huge right wing reaction, possibly involving civil war or secession. In Europe, there's a third way involving Islamism and how that will clash with nativism (I actually believe that's likely, and that in the long term, nativists will win, but at huge cost). My great concern in all of this though, is that as much as I dislike the current state of affairs, the fallout from civil war/secession, and probably the rise of extreme racial politics could actually further damage and distort Western civilisation to the point of making it unrecognisable and undesirable. I don't want pogroms or book burnings, but that's where we're heading. It's like pushing a balloon under water. The harder you push it down, the harder it pops up. I believe the window for the West to solve a lot of these issues in a peaceful way is rapidly shrinking. Things will be solved one way or another though. Part of this extreme pessimism on my part is why I am trying to disassociate myself with the West right now. If I were American or British, I'd be getting as far away from those places as I possibly could.

[tpiddy]

Maybe I'm an optimist but I really think the idea that another civil war is possible in america without some alien attack or some super bizarre event is just tinfoil hat crazy.

For almost all americans their identity is nation first. The federalists won. People from Maine have almost the same culture as people from Nevada. There's no ideological divide the way slavery was that lines up along geographic lines. The big divide is way more along the lines of city/country or rich/poor.

Race relations aren't amazing in america but it could be argued america is the least racist country on earth. Multiculturalism has won and any current resurgence against it is a last desperate push before most of these paleo-conservative ideas are marginalized completely because of demographic and ideological shifts in the american population.

And you know what? Multicultural america is not going to be that horrible. I live in a very multicultural city and there's amazing food to eat and all types of women to hit on.

Depending upon how the question is asked in polls, most americans don't believe in affirmative action. California, arguably the most liberal state, outlawed affirmative action almost 20 years ago. According to a poll last year, most democrats and most women in the US don't even self identify as feminists. America is still a surprisingly conservative country in some ways.

Are there economic and societal problems that need to be addressed? Of course. I just don't buy the doom and gloom civilization collapse scenario.

[TonySandos]

You do realize that the "if only the conservatives weren't holding us back" line is handbook democrat propaganda right?

Resurgence against multiculturalism isn't due solely to conservatism. There are conflicting studies and polls out that point to geographic proximity of different groups as a correlation between prejudices or claim it as the a deterrent to prejudice. The verdict isn't finished on that.

Look into the history of the democratic party up into the current times if you want to talk about racism. To really be redpill about it, you can't solidly align yourself with a particular party.

[It_is_my_time]

(06-13-2014 02:01 AM)TonySandos Wrote:  

You do realize that the "if only the conservatives weren't holding us back" line is handbook democrat propaganda right?

Resurgence against multiculturalism isn't due solely to conservatism. There are conflicting studies and polls out that point to geographic proximity of different groups as a correlation between prejudices or claim it as the a deterrent to prejudice. The verdict isn't finished on that.

Look into the history of the democratic party up into the current times if you want to talk about racism. To really be redpill about it, you can't solidly align yourself with a particular party.

Not to mention there are plenty of racists who support the Democratic party as well. And not minority racists, there are plenty of white racists in the Democratic party who support the Democratic party because they either depend on the govt, or they believe in big govt. policies and are in unions.

There are even some white racists that support the Democratic party who see what a mess the Democratic party has made of places like Oakland, Detroit, DC, south side Chicago, and they believe that the easiest way to hurt minorities is to use and oppressive big brother govt.

There are racists who support the Tea party and the Republican party and there are racists who support the Democratic party. Both sides have plenty of crappy people.

The question for us red pill men is, do we want more anti-male, anti-family feminism in our lives like the Democratic Party demands or not. I certainly do not want more of it here.

[TonySandos]

Black Tea party members and supporters that I can name off the top of my head Deneen Borelli, Chrystal Wright, Buddy Sostham, Lloyd Marcus, Mia Love.

According to this article, the party is gathering approximately 15% of the African American base. http://newpittsburghcourieronline.com/20...tea-party/

You make yourself look dumb when you take news anchors or article headlines as fact without researching deeper on what you're repeating.

This is why we can't have nice things

[It_is_my_time]

(06-13-2014 02:43 AM)TonySandos Wrote:  

Black Tea party members and supporters that I can name off the top of my head Deneen Borelli, Chrystal Wright, Buddy Sostham, Lloyd Marcus, Mia Love.

According to this article, the party is gathering approximately 15% of the African American base. http://newpittsburghcourieronline.com/20...tea-party/

You make yourself look dumb when you take news anchors or article headlines as fact without researching deeper on what you're repeating.

This is why we can't have nice things

Wow, being the USA African American population % is less than 15% that is pretty impressive.

It just blows my mind that this entire forum is built due to trying to avoid feminism. The reason all of us are here is to avoid the pitfalls and disaster feminism has left us with...

#1) Game - because being a good hard working man is no longer good enough thanks to liberal feminism stealing money from beta males and giving it to women. So we have to learn how to behave in a certain manner today to meet women.

#2) Traveling overseas - To escape this liberal feminist madness just to meet decent women.

#3) The discussions of legal implications and how to protect ourselves from liberal feminist laws.

And yet some posters here appear to want to support adding more liberal feminism making life here even worse for all of us, including themselves. If we go full out Democratic party, you will not be able to afford to travel near as often as you can now and the women will become even worse and the police state will grow.

[MongolianAbroad]

Why worry about things you can't control? All you'll do is get grey hairs.

The world we live in is the world we live in.

You could sit there and bitch about it.

Or you could make it your bitch.

It's up to you.

[TonySandos]

I'm not anti-liberal or even a supporter of a particular party, it's just disappointing that one of the members here resorted to shaming language.

[It_is_my_time]

(06-13-2014 02:59 AM)Spaniard88 Wrote:  

Why worry about things you can't control? All you'll do is get grey hairs.

The world we live in is the world we live in.

You could sit there and bitch about it.

Or you could make it your bitch.

It's up to you.

You can control it. You can get out there and help educate the voters to stop voting in liberal feminism, that as well all know, is a disaster.

And being informed and spreading knowledge to other men is far from sitting there and bitching about it. I was lucky, I was able to get into the work field before liberal feminism took hold. I was able to get a little above the fray. I want to help other younger men in anyway I can, because it is getting tougher and tougher for them out there.

[bacon]

Here are some excerts from a article by Ann Coulter:

Quote:

This marks the first time a U.S. House majority leader has ever lost a primary election.

His crushing defeat reinforces a central point: Whenever the voters know an election is about immigration, they will always vote against more immigration -- especially amnesty.

Quote:

Brat's triumph was touted as simply a victory for the "tea party."


Of course, these are the same people who also try to persuade us that amnesty isn't "amnesty," illegal aliens aren't "illegal aliens" (they're "undocumented workers"!), and that there are 30 million jobs Americans won't do at any price.


In fact, however, the tea party had nothing to do with Brat's victory. Only the small, local tea party groups stand for anything anymore, but they're as different from the media-recognized "tea party" as lay Catholics are from the Catholic bishops.


National tea party groups did not contribute dime one to Brat. Not Freedom Works, not Club for Growth, not the Tea Party Express, not Tea Party Patriots.

Quote:

Liberals apparently want Brat's victory to be seen as a win for the tea party, and not a defeat for amnesty.


At least acknowledging the obvious -- Brat's victory was about amnesty -- New York's Sen. Chuck Schumer said: "Cantor's defeat does not change the fundamental fact that Republicans will become a minority party if they don't address our broken immigration system."


And if anyone has the Republican Party's best interests at heart, it's gotta be Chuck Schumer!

Quote:

Brat didn't just win; he walloped Cantor, 55.5 percent to 44.5 percent.


Still not convinced Brat's victory was about amnesty? Then tell me why The New York Times ran this headline on Wednesday: "Why Did Cantor Lose? Not Easy to Explain."

[Renzy]

(06-13-2014 01:44 AM)tpiddy Wrote:  

And you know what? Multicultural america is not going to be that horrible. I live in a very multicultural city and there's amazing food to eat and all types of women to hit on.

Whether or not multicultural America is horrible or not likely depends a lot on where you are on the socio-economic ladder.

For your average upper middle class SWPL-type, multi-cultural America means fun new ethnic restaurants, and a chance to experience new cultures right in your own country, while still being able to retreat to the safety of your low-crime, not-so-diverse top-tier school district neighborhood.

For your average blue-collar working class person, multicultural America means depressed wages, increased competition for jobs, strained public schools, and atomized neighborhoods where nobody has anything common other than geography.