It's unfathomable to me that multiple posters in this thread (including speakeasy, who I know is a very intelligent guy) are apparently blind to the fact that this is clearly a piece of pro-miscegenation/race mixing propaganda. I didn't think it could be any more obvious. I will quote the article and highlight phrases that clearly show this.
Quote:Quote:
It's no secret that interracial relationships are trending upward, and in a matter of years we'll have Tindered, OKCupid-ed and otherwise sexed ourselves into one giant amalgamated mega-race.
But what will we look like? National Geographic built its 125th anniversary issue around this very question last October, commissioning Martin Schoeller, a renowned photographer and portrait artist, to capture the lovely faces of our nation's multiracial future.
Here's how the "average American" will look by the year 2050:
[pics]
Wow. These are obviously not Photoshopped projections, but real people, meaning tomorrow's America lives among us now in every "Blackanese," "Filatino," "Chicanese" and "Korgentinian" you meet at the DMV, grocery store or wherever it is you hang out.
Their numbers will only grow. The U.S. Census Bureau let respondents check more than one race for the first time in 2000, and 6.8 million people did so. By 2010 that figure had increased to nearly 9 million, a spike of about 32%.
This is certainly encouraging, but there are obvious flaws with tracking racial population growth through a survey that lets people self-identify, especially since so many familial, cultural and even geographical factors influence your decision to claim one or multiple races. Complicating things further is the definition of race itself: It has no basis in biology, yet its constructions, functions and mythologies irrevocably shape the world as we know it.
So is an end approaching? Will increased racial mixing finally and permanently redefine how we imagine our racial identities? The latest figures suggest we're getting more comfortable with the idea, or perhaps that we simply give fewer shits than ever before. Either would be a step in the right direction.
The Wall Street Journal reported a few years back that 15% of new marriages in 2010 were between individuals of different races. It's unclear whether they've included same-sex unions in the count, but as currently stated, this number is more than double what it was 25 years ago. The proportion of intermarriages also varied by race, with "9% of whites, 17% of blacks, 26% of Hispanics and 28% of Asians [marrying] outside their ethnic or racial group." Interracial unions now account for 8.4% of all marriages in the U.S.
In addition, more than 7% of the 3.5 million children born in 2009, the year before the 2010 census, were of two or more races.
The future: As for how this looks moving forward, studies have repeatedly shown that young people, especially those under 30, are significantly more amenable to interracial relationships than older adults, while college grads are more likely to have positive attitudes toward them than those with only a high school diploma. What does this mean for Millennials? As a population composed largely of over-educated 20-somethings, our generation is primed and expected to play a major role in populating this projected future America. That goes double if you live in a Western state, where people intermarry at higher rates; Hawaii is winning at the moment, with 4 of 10 new marriages identifying as interracial.
This doesn't mean it's all sunshine, rainbows and butterflies, however. Stark segregation still plagues many parts of the country. Poverty remains a barrier to social mobility and its consequent opportunities to interact with a diverse range of people. Sadly, the inequalities that shape American society as a whole are equally present in interracial relationship patterns. Time will tell if this holds for the long term.
But in the meantime, let us applaud these growing rates of intermixing for what they are: An encouraging symbol of a rapidly changing America. 2050 remains decades away, but if these images are any preview, it's definitely a year worth waiting for.
I mean, unless the author wrote, "You there, young reader, get out of your chair and go fuck someone of another race right now!" he could have been any more clear. The message is that miscegenation/race mixing is the new coolest thing and the wave of the future, and that young Millenials should jump on board because they're sooo enlightened and educated.
Imagine a future where social pressure is such that to date or marry a person from your own race is seen as bigotry (if you are white, at least). Sound crazy? But is it? I bet a lot of people reading this right now think I'm bigoted just because I'm voicing my disagreement with the idea of race mixing.
I'm simply supporting the continued existence of distinct races and I guarantee you that half the people reading this think I'm a bigot. Among the SWPL crowd we're already at the point where saying, "I would not date or marry anyone outside my own race," is liable to get you dirty looks and social ostracization. Give it another 30 years, and the line for being looked at as bigot will have moved from voicing your displeasure to refusing to partake. We're already seeing that shift with homosexual marriage: toleration is no longer enough, you must be an active cheerleader for the crusade or face persecution. And that shift has occurred in under a decade.
With an equally strong media push and propaganda campaign behind a pro-miscegenation agenda I could easily see mono-racial couples being stigmatized as bigots within a generation. Normal people can get away with voicing support for homosexuals without being one themselves, but if the social winds shift sharply in favor of mixed race couplings, there's really no excuse. "Not being attracted" to people of other races won't cut it anymore than "Not wanting to be around homosexuals" does today. Nope. You'll be a bigot. I mean, if you weren't a racist you would be dating someone outside your own race, right? You wouldn't want to continue the oppressive existence of white privilege by having white children, right? Of course not!
The progressive agenda rolls on unabated, one article like this at a time, most effective when people don't even realize they are consuming propaganda at all.
And by the way, anyone who thinks I'm a racist for objecting to this can go fuck themselves. This article is basically celebrating the fact that white people will be on the way to extinction (which is a good thing in the author's estimation) by the year 2050. I won't apologize for refusing to cheerlead for the demographic genocide of my people.