Anil Dash and the PC Anti-WhiteMale Brigade are at it at it again. This time Twitter
10-06-2013, 11:55 AM
Following last week's news that Twitter was going public with an IPO it didn't take long for the fembots to slam the fact that Twitter's Board and upper management consisted mostly of white men. The New York Time had this piece
As Tech Start-ups Surge Ahead Women Seem To Be Left Behind
The article quoted Vivek Wadhwa, a writer for TechCrunch and "academic" (possibly another anti-white male Indian?)
The board? All white men. The investors? All men. The executive officers? All men but for the general counsel, Vijaya Gadde, who has had the job for five weeks.
“This is the elite arrogance of the Silicon Valley mafia, the Twitter mafia,” said Vivek Wadhwa, a fellow at Stanford’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance who is writing a book on women in tech. “It’s the same male chauvinistic thinking. The fact that they went to the I.P.O. without a single woman on the board, how dare they?”
After this article, people were baiting for a response from Twitter CEO Dick Costello and he responded.
And guess who furthers the twitter interaction? Our favorite racist Anil Dash!
https://twitter.com/wadhwa/status/386624122127515648
Read the entire Twitter convo filled with a bunch of people jumping on slamming Twitter CEO.
'This is a perfect example of mindless, rabid feminism.
In the NYT article, the author herself, Claire Cain Miller states that "Just 5.7 percent of employed women in the United States work in the computer industry, and only about 2 percent of women have a degree in a high-tech field". So if one has to RANDOMLY pick 7 people (this is the size of Twitter's board) from a high-skilled workforce comprising only 2% women, it would come up with an ~87% chance of having an all-male board and ~12% of having one woman on the board.
If these two feminists would have known the most basic statistics, perhaps they would have had a chance to make millions being on Twitter's board. Instead, they get paid orders of magnitude less writing for the NYT and Techcrunch.'
Twitter is doing fine and is successful without caving on to these demands.
loony times folks
As Tech Start-ups Surge Ahead Women Seem To Be Left Behind
The article quoted Vivek Wadhwa, a writer for TechCrunch and "academic" (possibly another anti-white male Indian?)
The board? All white men. The investors? All men. The executive officers? All men but for the general counsel, Vijaya Gadde, who has had the job for five weeks.
“This is the elite arrogance of the Silicon Valley mafia, the Twitter mafia,” said Vivek Wadhwa, a fellow at Stanford’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance who is writing a book on women in tech. “It’s the same male chauvinistic thinking. The fact that they went to the I.P.O. without a single woman on the board, how dare they?”
After this article, people were baiting for a response from Twitter CEO Dick Costello and he responded.
And guess who furthers the twitter interaction? Our favorite racist Anil Dash!
https://twitter.com/wadhwa/status/386624122127515648
Read the entire Twitter convo filled with a bunch of people jumping on slamming Twitter CEO.
'This is a perfect example of mindless, rabid feminism.
In the NYT article, the author herself, Claire Cain Miller states that "Just 5.7 percent of employed women in the United States work in the computer industry, and only about 2 percent of women have a degree in a high-tech field". So if one has to RANDOMLY pick 7 people (this is the size of Twitter's board) from a high-skilled workforce comprising only 2% women, it would come up with an ~87% chance of having an all-male board and ~12% of having one woman on the board.
If these two feminists would have known the most basic statistics, perhaps they would have had a chance to make millions being on Twitter's board. Instead, they get paid orders of magnitude less writing for the NYT and Techcrunch.'
Twitter is doing fine and is successful without caving on to these demands.
loony times folks