Warning this is a drunk thread, I entirely expect this thread to be voted 1 star when I wake up in the afternoon, (most likely by Houston )... It's 4 AM which is out of character for me, but I write this before passing the fuck out.
It may be stating the obvious, but looks play such a huge factor in game, that I feel like a handsome man's game will not be equal to a less attractive man's game. In other words a less attractive man is going to need to compensate that much more by having good game. Whereas your typical tall handsome bro, will not need much game if any at all, and will still pull lot's of tail.
This is why I respect the game and advice of the shorter and less "genetically gifted" players out there. There is often talk of "naturals" and I will agree there is such thing as "natural game" and there are guys who are naturally extroverted and have the proper social skills to be successful in the game. However, I feel that most "naturals" are just guys who are considerably above average in terms of looks and heights. They are "natural" because women are naturally attracted to them and they are confident because they have had the proper experience to back them up.
There experiences reinforce their confidence, their confidence is reinforced by their successes, but their successes are largely due to their looks. They don't need to use game to build attraction, *they already have attraction from the get go.* Now I know you guys will say that handsome guys need game too, but how many handsome guys out there are just complete bubbling idiots that can't put together more than two sentences? Handsome guys aren't starting from a place of being socially awkward, of being an outcast, etc. Beyond that, the level of game they need pales in comparison to the level that a less attractive man will need.
I may be stating the obvious, but my point is, I'm not impressed if a guy is 6 ft. 4 in. and looks like Brad Pitt, when he consistently smashes 8+ caliber women. I am impressed when your typical average bro pulls this off.
I have a friend I have referred to before on the forum, who is 6 ft. 4 in. and "classically handsome", dude gets approached by chicks who are basically throwing themselves at him. Now I am not a hater, but it irks the fuck out of me when dude wants to brag about how tight his game is, when in fact I know that game has nothing to do with his success. Dude doesn't even really have decent game, and a guy who was under 6 ft. and average looking would not pull anywhere close to my homie
It does piss me off though when he talks shit about other guys being on dry spells and when he hates when I pull a chick who is a 6, that I actually approach and run game on, while he just posts up at the bar and a fine 8 basically throws herself at him.
Also, hearing my bro give out game advice or discuss game tactics is fucking hilarious. He has repeatedly said that it's "best not to approach chicks" and just chill back and act mysterious and aloof and let women come to you. Now this works for him, but it's just about the worst advice you can give the average guy. I try to make the point to him, that I've been the wallflower who chilled at the end of the bar and didn't open his mouth the whole night, but that cute girl never stumbled up to me and started a conversation with me, that led to sex. I litterally went months upon months, reaching into years without sex, before I discovered game.
So to end this drunken rant, when learning and studying game, the game you get from a more average man, will me more potent than game you receive from a more attractive man. Game is game and can come from any source, but I got more respect for the men who come up in the trenches and learn game the hard way, the insight, knowledge, and just fire game they will bring, will be beyond anything that your typical handsome bro will bring to the table.
It may be stating the obvious, but looks play such a huge factor in game, that I feel like a handsome man's game will not be equal to a less attractive man's game. In other words a less attractive man is going to need to compensate that much more by having good game. Whereas your typical tall handsome bro, will not need much game if any at all, and will still pull lot's of tail.
This is why I respect the game and advice of the shorter and less "genetically gifted" players out there. There is often talk of "naturals" and I will agree there is such thing as "natural game" and there are guys who are naturally extroverted and have the proper social skills to be successful in the game. However, I feel that most "naturals" are just guys who are considerably above average in terms of looks and heights. They are "natural" because women are naturally attracted to them and they are confident because they have had the proper experience to back them up.
There experiences reinforce their confidence, their confidence is reinforced by their successes, but their successes are largely due to their looks. They don't need to use game to build attraction, *they already have attraction from the get go.* Now I know you guys will say that handsome guys need game too, but how many handsome guys out there are just complete bubbling idiots that can't put together more than two sentences? Handsome guys aren't starting from a place of being socially awkward, of being an outcast, etc. Beyond that, the level of game they need pales in comparison to the level that a less attractive man will need.
I may be stating the obvious, but my point is, I'm not impressed if a guy is 6 ft. 4 in. and looks like Brad Pitt, when he consistently smashes 8+ caliber women. I am impressed when your typical average bro pulls this off.
I have a friend I have referred to before on the forum, who is 6 ft. 4 in. and "classically handsome", dude gets approached by chicks who are basically throwing themselves at him. Now I am not a hater, but it irks the fuck out of me when dude wants to brag about how tight his game is, when in fact I know that game has nothing to do with his success. Dude doesn't even really have decent game, and a guy who was under 6 ft. and average looking would not pull anywhere close to my homie
It does piss me off though when he talks shit about other guys being on dry spells and when he hates when I pull a chick who is a 6, that I actually approach and run game on, while he just posts up at the bar and a fine 8 basically throws herself at him.
Also, hearing my bro give out game advice or discuss game tactics is fucking hilarious. He has repeatedly said that it's "best not to approach chicks" and just chill back and act mysterious and aloof and let women come to you. Now this works for him, but it's just about the worst advice you can give the average guy. I try to make the point to him, that I've been the wallflower who chilled at the end of the bar and didn't open his mouth the whole night, but that cute girl never stumbled up to me and started a conversation with me, that led to sex. I litterally went months upon months, reaching into years without sex, before I discovered game.
So to end this drunken rant, when learning and studying game, the game you get from a more average man, will me more potent than game you receive from a more attractive man. Game is game and can come from any source, but I got more respect for the men who come up in the trenches and learn game the hard way, the insight, knowledge, and just fire game they will bring, will be beyond anything that your typical handsome bro will bring to the table.