Quote: (08-20-2013 02:15 AM)RioNomad Wrote:
Previously I was 100% for gay marriage, for quite a long time actually. I have no problem with gay people at all. However, lately I think I've changed my mind. So much pro-gay bullshit being shoved down our throats, LGBT faggots "demanding" apologies for the most minor bullshit, like they really have any kind of real power anyway, gay dudes in assless chaps and other flamboyantly gay outfits acting a fool to draw attention st gay pride parades, etc. has pretty much made me change my mind. Now they just annoy the crap out of me. It is too bad for regular gay folk who don't act like fucking clowns, because I bet they end up taking a lot of shit due to the extremely demanding and obnoxious homosexuals out there constantly running their mouths and acting like dipshits.
In many ways, gay people are the ultimate expression of our narcissistic society.
A brief, non-response from an aggrieved gay man
here.
Recall my very first thread on the forum about the
gay male hamster.
In their quest for "equality" - which has been 100% an attention-seeking affair - they have exposed their communities for being absolute hotbeds of narcissism, often expressed through incessant attention-whoring.
The problem for less political gay people encounter - i.e. the gay man or woman who seems straight because of masculine/feminine behavior - is that they shunted into the negative stereotypes of the worst gay behavior. Too bad for them, as gay people who aren't caricatures of the sex they are trying to embody are sometimes pretty cool. Many are vaguely red-pill just because they can't not notice differences between men and women - especially bisexual women.
I once approved of gay marriage, but once I realized the concept of government approving relationships is fucked up, I withdrew my support. Plus, once I learned about psychology and parenting I realized that gay parenting is inherently narcissistic, as any relationships involving one sex (single mother or same sex) is inherently deficient.
As I have noted before on the forum, this obsession with everything gay in the media is meant to put you 100% on the defensive if you question it. The media wants to be and IS the decider of social comportment in society and, as such, you have to kowtow to mindlessly worshipful attention slathered on gay people.
If you, reasonably, question whether X, Y or Z is healthy/newsworthy/or anything, odds are, you will be subject to intense questioning about your homophobia.
I once posted an opinion on Facebook questioning why the government sanctions relationships at all. I got a litany of butthurt pro-gays (all white heterosexuals) condemning my rampant and vitriolic homophobia. One comment pointed out that I stated that government has no business regulating relationships. Further comments asserted I only thought that because I hated gays (notice the irrationality here - I hate gays but they also bandy about the term homophobia?) and was looking to shore up by heterosexual privilege.
I responded, what heterosexual privilege are you talking about? Having my relationship cosigned by the ultimate authority figure - the government? At the time, I didn't realize the ultimate authority was media, not government. The license from the government means nothing if you can't share it on Facebook or Pininterest and have people chattering approvingly on HuffPo on how fucking progressive society is for "allowing" gays to get married. Yeah, remind how much you question society when you think getting "allowed" to get married is progress. Fucking morons.
Part of the narcissism is that gay people really aren't all that relevant in society because they are such a small minority. As such, their egos get fucking bloated and we see this in the more androgynous gays. The gayer they present, the worse their narcissism is. I can't imagine a dyke or flaming gay man EVER having a positive relationship with anybody - including themselves.
The issue for the forum is that gay women have polluted the psyches of heterosexual women and turned them far more androgynous than men desire. Part of this is narcissism, as lesbians often start with themselves and multiply by the rest of the world, so they think far more women are gay than they really are. They seek to create classes of women that are desirable to them. They hide behind feminism in order to further their desire to create women they would want to fuck. They could give a damn if men find women desirable - they only care if they find her desirable.
I have noticed the discrepancy between lesbian narcissism and gay male narcissism - notice there is a specific term for gay women and not gay men. Lesbians have a strong, strong aversion to male sexuality that gay men do not present. Historical recountings of the gay rights always feature lesbians educating gay men on misogyny, but no commensurate response from gay men. Part of that is the system not caring about misandry simply because the system needs women conforming, but also because lesbians simply are just self-absorbed haters.
The mere existence of a different approach to sexuality is abhorrent to them. Porn websites directed at lesbians will always have prominent disclaimers about the lack of male presence and the lack of men presented in any video. Women are far more exclusionary than men when to comes to life and this shows up in lesbian porn. Further, the self-possession of the modern woman shows up in lesbian porn. Everybody needs a vagina - the director, writer, actors, etc. Whatever - is your sexuality so guarded you need to be assured everybody involved your expression meets your standards? Sounds like somebody has a very uncomfortable relationship with their sexuality.
Politically & in media, gay people don't help their cause at all, but it doesn't matter in the superficial world of the media, as nobody can question them. They often whine about true tolerance and acceptance, but the reality of the movement belies what they truly desire -worship over acceptance.