[CMan0928]

(11-23-2012 05:14 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(11-22-2012 01:36 PM)CMan0928 Wrote:  

(11-22-2012 01:33 PM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

(11-22-2012 01:31 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Guy got caught:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-20441939

Interesting tidbit that gives credence to the_skeeze's theory:

"Police believe the suspect had followed the victim from her home, but they did not know each other."

There'll be a very small article in a year that he got about 6 months jail for that brutal, life-threatening assault. Insane.

All joking aside, I agree. He won't do much time, especially if he has no priors. He should do several years for that assault. He fucked up her teeth and everything. He should be forced to pay any and all damages as well.

Assaulting a minor is a major offense. In America, he'd go to jail.

Definitely.

[Samseau]

I don't know why people are jumping on skeeze's back. He presented a perfectly reasonable explanation why this guy acted like a wild animal.

Skeeze never said what the guy did was right, but instead offered to explain what the guy might have been feeling before he committed the crime.

This is similar to the George Sodini case or Columbine shootings - social rejection followed by violence. Pretty common.

[lush1]

(11-23-2012 05:16 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

I don't know why people are jumping on skeeze's back. He presented a perfectly reasonable explanation why this guy acted like a wild animal.

Skeeze never said what the guy did was right, but instead offered to explain what the guy might have been feeling before he committed the crime.

This is similar to the George Sodini case or Columbine shootings - social rejection followed by violence. Pretty common.

I can understand Skeezes post. When I saw the video I started wondering if she'd cheated on him or rejected him in some way. The reason I thought this is because I find it hard to understand why anyone would do that just for the hell of it, no motive.

[Cincinnatus]

(11-23-2012 06:03 AM)thebassist Wrote:  

In Rome, pieces of shit like this would be thrown into the coliseums to fight to the death against other similarly disgusting members of society.

How times have changed.

I wish such spectacles were still to be seen. Shit would be a mega hit every Friday night on Pay Per View.

[teh_skeeze]

(11-23-2012 05:25 PM)MSW2007 Wrote:  

(11-23-2012 06:03 AM)thebassist Wrote:  

In Rome, pieces of shit like this would be thrown into the coliseums to fight to the death against other similarly disgusting members of society.

How times have changed.

I wish such spectacles were still to be seen. Shit would be a mega hit every Friday night on Pay Per View.

Proof the Romans were better. Roman citizens got into the Coliseum for free. I propose that it gets prime time on network TV during sweeps. Sounds like a good show for FOX.

[Beyond Borders]

(11-23-2012 05:21 PM)lush1 Wrote:  

I can understand Skeezes post. When I saw the video I started wondering if she'd cheated on him or rejected him in some way. The reason I thought this is because I find it hard to understand why anyone would do that just for the hell of it, no motive.

Interesting - my first impression was a random act of violence. People do violent shit all the time for just the hell of it. These days there's a lot of this going on.

Here are some other reasons you could flirt with given the little info given.

1. Socioeconomic Differences
2. Psychotic Behavior
3. Racism
4. Drug-or Alcohol-fueled behavior
5. Hired "Gun" - for who the hell knows what personal reason.
6. Peer pressure
7. Had the worst day of his life and taking it out on the nearest person.
8. Anger at the overall female sex - Maybe even a frustrated Roosher convinced that women are evil. lol

Here are his own words: "'didn't have a friendly face', that he was 'intimidated by her' and that she 'made me feel like a pauper with her facial gestures'. "

To me it indeed reeks of being more socioeconomic in nature. He didn't like the look on her face. It could have been there because he made her uncomfortable, because she was shy, because she was having a shitty day herself, or because, yeah, she thought she was better than him (semi-attractive girl complex or whatever you wanna call it). Whatever it was, he took her look as a feeling of superiority on her part.

And that's his own problem if he thinks anyone that look like her and gives him "that look" is insulting him. Never mind the fact that he would react so violently to it.

His lawyer's story: 'He said he admitted to doing it, it was a misunderstanding on his part. He had had too much to drink and smoke that day.'

'He said he was going about his business and was intimidated by her look, she looked like she wanted a fight. She looked about 19 or 20. He did not approve of the way she looked so he went back and punched her....He said "Nah, that hurt, I can’t go further in my day taking an insult from a little person like that".'

This guy is such a coward and socio-pathic piece of shit it beggars belief. The fact that this was a woman, and a small one at that, and he still didn't have the balls to let her know he was coming just makes it worse.

Maybe she did reject him and the lawyer knows telling the truth would get the guy even further crucified. Or maybe she looked at him weird because she was intimidated by him - I have no doubt he was the one with an intimidating look on his face when she passed by him given how paranoid (and dangerous) he is.

Point is none of us know. To me, it just seems telling of a person's point of view and current life focus that their gut reaction would be that she must have rejected the guy in a bitchy way. Something to think about.

[soup]

lame