[ElFlaco]

(10-04-2017 10:08 PM)Cortez Wrote:  

Hell yeah! Mexican girls are the best. Here's a convo of one I've been messing with down there. For those of you who know Spanish.

pena ajena

[Road_Less_Taken]

(10-04-2017 04:44 PM)ElFlaco Wrote:  

(10-04-2017 10:22 AM)Road_Less_Taken Wrote:  

Weird question, is it normal to have two girls holding hands walking down the street holding hands in Mexico City? Just got the number of one of them who was attractive..not sure if they were lesbians or not though.

They could be just friends (or relatives). That's common. Or they could be lesbians.

In smaller town in other parts of the country, young men/boys sometimes walk around with their arms slung around each other's shoulders. It doesn't mean they're in a gay relationship. In Mexico City, however, the default interpretation is that they're a gay couple.

Yeah it seemed like it though I was surprised as usually lesbians are ugly haha, well got her number even though it was super awkward the whole way through.

Seems she was more amused over anything at the situation.

[germanico]

(10-04-2017 10:08 PM)Cortez Wrote:  

Hell yeah! Mexican girls are the best. Here's a convo of one I've been messing with down there. For those of you who know Spanish.

Really dude?

Really?

[scrambled]

Can someone compare the quality/ease of Mexico City with Lima, Peru? I've not been to Mexico before. The conventional wisdom is Peru is low quality, but Mexico City is very spotty with some potential but too many fatties. Are both locations similar in value? I find Peru to be far better than the USA. Colombia is on my list but I wouldn't mind trying Mexico as it is cheaper and closer a plane ride.

Also, is Oaxaca worth going for game? Or is the sprawl of Mexico City better if only because of numbers?

Is Guadalajara superior (game wise) because of more European admixture in the women, or for other reasons?

Is staying in (near) the Historical District (Colonia Centro) a good idea for a first trip?

[Merengues]

(10-12-2017 01:19 PM)scrambled Wrote:  

Can someone compare the quality/ease of Mexico City with Lima, Peru? I've not been to Mexico before. The conventional wisdom is Peru is low quality, but Mexico City is very spotty with some potential but too many fatties. Are both locations similar in value? I find Peru to be far better than the USA. Colombia is on my list but I wouldn't mind trying Mexico as it is cheaper and closer a plane ride.

Also, is Oaxaca worth going for game? Or is the sprawl of Mexico City better if only because of numbers?

Is Guadalajara superior (game wise) because of more European admixture in the women, or for other reasons?

Is staying in (near) the Historical District (Colonia Centro) a good idea for a first trip?

I would say both quality and ease of two cities are similar. Mexico City was slightly harder for me.

Oaxaca is an awesome place to go but more for touristy stuff. Nightgame might be good, I remember some nice girls in a big club with roof terrace, I don't remember the name though.

Guadalajara has definitely better quality then CDMX, yet CDMX has unlimited quantity. It has a bit warmer weather, less things to do. Both cities have good day trip options.

Don't stay in Centro, the place is rather dump. Check Condesa or Roma.

[scrambled]

is the Polanco neighborhood I keep hearing about worth staying in?

Is Tinder still usable in "DF" and Mexico?

[Merengues]

Polanco is the most posh district but doesn't have nightlife as far as I remember, might be good for daygame though.

Quantity-wise is probably still very good. However, I found quality better in Monterrey but haven't been in Mexico for more than a year so someone else should answer.

[Jagnum]

@scrambled

I put up a huge Mexico City data sheet earlier this year that should answer some of your questions on CDMX v Guadalajara, and where to stay:

thread-62363.html

Hope that helps.

I'll add one thing. Guadalajara is superior if you have blue eyes. I've never been anywhere in the world where I got so many compliments on my eyes. If you have blond hair as well (I don't) you're treated like royalty in Guadalajara.

[scrambled]

^ Wouldn't depigmented features work better in the more south part of Mexico? There must be fewer superman coloring (fair skin, dark hair, blue/green eyes) in Oaxaca than Guadalajara, right?

[Nomadic Sack]

I lived in Mexico for some time, I would say color is not important really in a city like Guadalajara. Mexican girls can be into black, white and asian guys equally- they are generally very open to foreigners and it just depends on the girls tastes. Mexico is not similar to Peru in this respect. Also having lived in Guadalajara I would say it makes little difference having blonde hair there. Most the guys that were doing well with the Tapatias were Italian or French and could have passed for the for their light skinned Tapatio counterparts. Its not the hardest place to pull by any means but you need to be good looking and have game. Also the local girls in Guadalajara are not slutty at all compared to DF. Jagnum touched on this and I totally agree with his assessment. I would recommend DF over Guadalajara however; yes Guadalajara has some very pretty girls but DF is not as conservative as Gdl and has a much less provincial vibe- girls in DF are more sexually liberal and its a much more interesting city to spend time in (if you can deal with the fast pace and dirty air). The only thing I really liked more about Gdl was the weather.

[Nomadic Sack]

And I wouldn`t recommend going to Oaxaca to game girls. I would recommend Mazatlan and other places in the north like Saltillo and Chihuahua. I think you will find these girls are more open to foreigners than girls in the south of mexico and better looking too.

[Mikestar]

Planning to hit CDMX next year to visit a good friend in la condesa, my first trip to the Americas. What is the main demographic there, are there many teenage girls in clubs/bars or generally older?

[germanico]

(10-12-2017 03:11 PM)scrambled Wrote:  

is the Polanco neighborhood I keep hearing about worth staying in?

Is Tinder still usable in "DF" and Mexico?

No and no.

Stay in Roma or Condesa. Use Tinder but dont expect to get anything out of it. Read the threads dude, all your issues have been issued before.

[LatinoHeat]

(10-16-2017 04:11 PM)germanico Wrote:  

(10-12-2017 03:11 PM)scrambled Wrote:  

is the Polanco neighborhood I keep hearing about worth staying in?

Is Tinder still usable in "DF" and Mexico?

No and no.

Stay in Roma or Condesa. Use Tinder but dont expect to get anything out of it. Read the threads dude, all your issues have been issued before.

I respectfully disagree, Tinder is def usable here me and my friends constantly pull pretty cute girls from Tinder. You just have to screen super super hard and give no benefit of the doubt. For example if her arms are covered in all pictures = fat (look near the armpit gives you biggest clue). If she seems too eager to meet up = fat. If she doesn't have at least one photo that shows her belly = fat. (trust me in DF if a girl is not fat probably every single tinder photo is of her midriff) If one of her photos if against an angled mirror = def fat. Fat until proven innocent.

I combine super hard screening combined with learning many different tricks to dox their facebook from their pics or whatsapp to find their social, and I almost never get cat fished anymore.

Its def not as easy as Thailand or whatever, but in my opinion if you are an average looking guy Tinder is much easier then nightlife. If you look latino and are not tall, nightlife in CDMX can be somewhat frustrating.

If you have blond features or are an american black dude (basically anything except latino) you will have better luck in nightlife esp if you are tall, but its really black and white here in CDMX. (you either killin it in nightlife or don't pull 9/10 times, there is no in between it seems)

Besides I don't think the average girl at a Condesa nightclub is that much better then the average chick you could pull on Tinder. The super hotties are in Polanco or Santa Fe and they are not easy to crack.

As everything YMMV, but to say Tinder is dead in CDMX is crazy. For a dude like me that works from home and doesn't have time to chase girls out in nightlife every day Tinder in CDMX is a god send.

Really there are plenty of 6s and 7s to go around but 8s+ your best bet is daygame, which of course takes balls.

Either way, tinder, nightgame, daygame, its all pretty easy here in CDMX. And beyond girls the city is beautiful an feels much more first world then anywhere you could go in Peru. Not taking food, climate, culture, ease of living without a visa, friendliness of locals, walkability, flight connections, housing stock quality, and many other factors when moving to a city (or even visiting) is foolish. CDMX may not be SE asia easy, but it is still easy and has enough cute girls to keep an average guy satisfied.

[globetrotta]

Tinder is such a perplexing platform as different people seem to have wildly differing experiences. I do way better in person than on Tinder in Mexico. I'm above average in looks, but I'm black. The average Mexican chick may have some curiosity about fucking with us, but from my experience they're more responsive in person than on Tinder. This is generally my experience in Latin America.

[Road_Less_Taken]

(10-17-2017 07:06 PM)globetrotta Wrote:  

Tinder is such a perplexing platform as different people seem to have wildly differing experiences. I do way better in person than on Tinder in Mexico. I'm above average in looks, but I'm black. The average Mexican chick may have some curiosity about fucking with us, but from my experience they're more responsive in person than on Tinder. This is generally my experience in Latin America.

I don't think anyone does better on Tinder than in person if they have strong abilities to talk to girls. I have finally realized I'd rather go somewhere and make the effort to meet girls that I actually like even if I end up alone as oppose to swiping around and sleeping with a bunch of average girls. That being said its kinda like quitting porn its hard to fully get rid of it.

[Mentavious]

I'll be in CDMX this weekend if anyone wants to grab a beer or go out. It's been a year since I've visited the city so I'm looking forward to it.

[germanico]

I still dont see the point in taking a plane, flying 1000 miles, and then "gaming" from within the confines of the hotel wi-fi. Use Tinder but dont expect to get anything out of it.

Im in Monterrey at the time Mentavious, buy ill buy you a beer next time you stop by.

[Heightcel]

Hey guys,

Currently in Leon, Guanajuato for my internship, Im thinking of staying 1 month in mexico city at the end of october, is it doable staying in an Airbnb for a decent price? Also how many of u guys are there currently and would do some dg / ng

[scrambled]

(10-19-2017 12:58 AM)germanico Wrote:  

I still dont see the point in taking a plane, flying 1000 miles, and then "gaming" from within the confines of the hotel wi-fi.

I don't think that is what people are talking about. The tinder is mostly in the pipelining beforehand, to take advantage of limited time.

[Road_Less_Taken]

Tinder reminds me of riding a bike with training wheels. You can get around all right but you wont be doing anything cool. Using it when you are already comfortable meeting girls in person is like putting training wheels back on your bike you already know how to ride one.

I just get killed by the shitty dates on tinder, I can't stand meeting a girl to find her unattractive or boring. If I met her in person then I would know in 5 mins whether I'm into her.

[globetrotta]

Im in CDMX for another week and a half

[germanico]

Thing is, on CDMX you could pipeline on Tinder for months before you arrive to only get flakes and SIFs. Dont put your hopes on Tinder.

[Road_Less_Taken]

(10-20-2017 04:22 PM)germanico Wrote:  

Thing is, on CDMX you could pipeline on Tinder for months before you arrive to only get flakes and SIFs. Dont put your hopes on Tinder.

Exactly! Go there to enjoy yourself not because of some girls you 'met' online. I think Mexico is vastly underrated of a lot of guys. Especially if you like going out drinking cheap liquor and eating Mexican food.

[arsenal2000]

(10-12-2017 01:19 PM)scrambled Wrote:  

Can someone compare the quality/ease of Mexico City with Lima, Peru? I've not been to Mexico before. The conventional wisdom is Peru is low quality, but Mexico City is very spotty with some potential but too many fatties. Are both locations similar in value? I find Peru to be far better than the USA. Colombia is on my list but I wouldn't mind trying Mexico as it is cheaper and closer a plane ride.

Also, is Oaxaca worth going for game? Or is the sprawl of Mexico City better if only because of numbers?

Is Guadalajara superior (game wise) because of more European admixture in the women, or for other reasons?

Is staying in (near) the Historical District (Colonia Centro) a good idea for a first trip?

Hi Lima for me was more easier than Mexico city . I did find some quality in Lima. mexico has more variety of woman compared to Peru.

I feel all three places polanco , Condesa or Roma are good places to stay . Personally I like the quality of women in Polanco and tend to hang around in this area. At times it may be hard to get into the clubs in Polanco. Joy(my preference) , La Santa , Joules basement bar are the night spots in Polanco. Polanco also has museums and plazas to run day game. Roma/Condesa has much more variety to offer for night life places like are Janis, Pata Negra , Rhodesia, cafe paraiso . You can research and find one that suits your taste .

Gudalajara has good looking women but Mexico city is bigger and easier in my opinion. I liked the night life in Colonia americana . It is a smaller city and limits options.

Oaxaca is not worth for gaming . The quality is better in either Mexico City or Gudalajara . It is known for food, drinks and historical sites .

Colonia centro has some good hotels . But other places would be better for walking around in the nights and for night life .