I think it just depends on the girl quite honestly.
Don't give them what they expect, and you'll get from them what you never expected.
Quote: (04-05-2012 12:50 PM)Chapped3rdEye Wrote:
Quote: (04-05-2012 12:41 PM)calex Wrote:
Since T levels were much higher 50 or more years ago
Eh? Link plz. Not saying you're wrong, just curious.
Quote: (04-05-2012 05:19 PM)All or Nothing Wrote:I don't get it. Is Tom Cruise supposed to look threatening there? He looks like an angry pretty boy model
Quote: (04-05-2012 08:53 AM)Parlay44 Wrote:
Handsome man
http://www.moviespad.com/photos/tom-crui...-7dfb9.jpg
The problem with this picture is that it has Tom Cruise in some gay ass pose, while Danny Trejo has a fierce look on his face. I'd say this would be a better comparison of the two.
Quote: (04-10-2016 01:36 AM)wilberforceeggmont Wrote:
That "pretty boy/clean cut" bloke you see with the Justin Bieberish hair who looks a lot younger than he is, has probably never stepped in to a gym and looks like he doesn't need to shave, is slaying 8s all day long. Women love it. You all know it.
Seen it a million times.
Quote: (04-12-2016 09:03 PM)PeanutoftheNight Wrote:
It seems to me that many of the men considered to be attractive to women, such as those appearing as male models, hot girls' boy-toys, 'dreamy' actors, etc. always have subtle feminine features. You inspect their face for more than a glance and start noticing feminine-esque structures, eye colors and stuff like that. The 'manly' men don't have these features, women are very often attracted to them, but aren't considered to be attractive. Shows that men are much more attracted to and dependent on physical features for arousal/sexual interest than women.