[The_CEO]

(02-15-2012 05:23 PM)Brian Wrote:  

(02-15-2012 05:20 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

(02-15-2012 02:03 PM)Brian Wrote:  

(02-15-2012 01:12 PM)durangotang Wrote:  

Do you really think there is a difference, besides skin color, between Romney and Obama?

Take a look at their career paths. One had a lot of success in the private sector. Obama has written that during his very brief sojourn in the private sector he felt like “a spy behind enemy lines.” So yeah, there's a difference.

Romney made his money as a real life Gordon Gekko.

Most people have no idea how leveraged buy outs work.

If they did, they would either: a) hate Romney or b) work for someone like him. (Or both.)

I just LOL when guys who don't work on Wall Street slob the nobs of guys who do.

I spent 10 years in Banking, so I actually know what I'm talking about. Not sure if you do though.

Shocking. The 77th time that you resort to self-proclaiming your expertise while insinuating that the other guy has no clue.

[MikeCF]

(02-15-2012 06:39 PM)The_CEO Wrote:  

Shocking. The 77th time that you resort to self-proclaiming your expertise while insinuating that the other guy has no clue.

That's just how they are.

Bankers aren't used to being challenged. They live in a bubble where people throw around terms like market maker, adding liquidity, free markets, etc., as if those terms mean anything.

Ask them to defend themselves...They can't without resorting to buzz words.

When it comes to arrogance, bankers put college professors and lawyers to shame.

But it's a lot of bark and no bite.

Get them outside of their narcissistic social circle jerk, and they fold.

[The_CEO]

(02-15-2012 05:37 PM)Brian Wrote:  

(02-15-2012 05:26 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

(02-15-2012 05:23 PM)Brian Wrote:  

(02-15-2012 05:20 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

(02-15-2012 02:03 PM)Brian Wrote:  

Take a look at their career paths. One had a lot of success in the private sector. Obama has written that during his very brief sojourn in the private sector he felt like “a spy behind enemy lines.” So yeah, there's a difference.

Romney made his money as a real life Gordon Gekko.

Most people have no idea how leveraged buy outs work.

If they did, they would either: a) hate Romney or b) work for someone like him. (Or both.)

I just LOL when guys who don't work on Wall Street slob the nobs of guys who do.

I spent 10 years in Banking, so I actually know what I'm talking about. Not sure if you do though.

In other words, you're a guy with an agenda.

Just embrace amoralism. You ripped people off for years to enrich yourself.

Oh well.

Survival of the fittest and all that.

as usual, you're proving your ignorance on the subject matter

Lest we forget, here's a refresher course on the talking points to memorize from the list that you've got guarded under your pillow:

1. he's a socialist.
2. his only experience was a "community organizer" (read: socialist)
or to be really clever, change "organizer" to "agitator"
3. history started in 2008. Anything that happened prior to that date had no negative impact on the economy or doubt.
4. spends like a drunken sailor! (after 2008 of course. Anything before that does not count.)
5. something has to be done about this debt! (after 2008 naturally)
6. he hates stocks! (ignore the Dow)
7. Did i forget to mention... He's a socialist!
8. If all else fails, insinuate that the other guy is stupid and blame the liberal media.
9. Cry.
10. Watch Fox & get cheered back up!
11. Repeat as needed.

[JayMillz]

(02-15-2012 06:50 PM)The_CEO Wrote:  

Lest we forget, here's a refresher course on the talking points to memorize from the list that you've got guarded under your pillow:

1. he's a socialist.
2. his only experience was a "community organizer" (read: socialist)
or to be really clever, change "organizer" to "agitator"
3. history started in 2008. Anything that happened prior to that date had no negative impact on the economy or doubt.
4. spends like a drunken sailor! (after 2008 of course. Anything before that does not count.)
5. something has to be done about this debt! (after 2008 naturally)
6. he hates stocks! (ignore the Dow)
7. Did i forget to mention... He's a socialist!
8. If all else fails, insinuate that the other guy is stupid and blame the liberal media.
9. Cry.
10. Watch Fox & get cheered back up!
11. Repeat as needed.

Here are some other fun ones floating around out there:

He's a muslim
He and his wife hate the USA and want to destroy it
He raised taxes
He wasn't born in the USA
His regulations are causing businesses to go overseas
Healthcare costs are increasing because of Obamacare
Businesses aren't hiring because of Obamacare
The concept of "discouraged workers" started under Obama
Obama likes other countries more than the USA
Obama apologizes too much
Obama bows down to foreign dictators
The USA lost its AAA credit rating because of Obama
Obama chooses environmentalists over job creators

[kosko]

If things ran fairly I believe Ron Paul would secure the convention. Romney can blow all the cash he wan'ts but if delegates are on the floor voting he does not stand a chance. But of course this won't happen. It will be a contentious convention as the floor is uncontrolled, even though every other aspect is a tightly controlled production for television. it will be interesting to see the floor respond differently to what is going on stage and on TV.

Of course Ron Paul has no damn chance to win the nod in this game because he does not have the money. But you have to give the man credit for running a shoe strings campaign compared to the others and simply just going on and getting the word out and being strategic with his resources he is still showing up well in these primaries.

[Brian]

So if I'm not in banking then i dont know what I'm talking about and I dont know how Private Equity works, but if I was in banking and actually know what I'm talking about I belong to a narcissistic social circle.

Repeat after me, you'll feel better when you accept reality: "I was foolish enough to believe all of the bullshit Obama spewed on the campaign trail, in hindsight having someone w/no managerial experience or financial background run an entity w/major financial problems probably wasnt a good idea, but I realize I was wrong and am ready to move on." Or just keep blaming Bush.

[The_CEO]

(02-15-2012 07:23 PM)Brian Wrote:  

So if I'm not in banking then i dont know what I'm talking about and I dont know how Private Equity works, but if I was in banking and actually know what I'm talking about I belong to a narcissistic social circle.

Repeat after me, you'll feel better when you accept reality: "I was foolish enough to believe all of the bullshit Obama spewed on the campaign trail, in hindsight having someone w/no managerial experience or financial background run an entity w/major financial problems probably wasnt a good idea, but I realize I was wrong and am ready to move on." Or just keep blaming Bush.

OMG, You voted for Hillary!

[JayMillz]

[kosko]

(02-15-2012 07:23 PM)Brian Wrote:  

So if I'm not in banking then i dont know what I'm talking about and I dont know how Private Equity works, but if I was in banking and actually know what I'm talking about I belong to a narcissistic social circle.

Repeat after me, you'll feel better when you accept reality: "I was foolish enough to believe all of the bullshit Obama spewed on the campaign trail, in hindsight having someone w/no managerial experience or financial background run an entity w/major financial problems probably wasnt a good idea, but I realize I was wrong and am ready to move on." Or just keep blaming Bush.

I'm laughing you think Obama is actually calling the shots. There is a reason him and Romneys policies mirror each other. The top heads in finance are calling the shots here. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan have more influence on USA monetary policy then Obama does.

Both are sheep, and will say anything there contributors will tell them.

Hillary actually would of probably been way more bad ass then Obama. Women in positions of power seek validation hard (obviously) and usually always push some kind of war footing. Thatcher had zero cred until she rushed the Falklands, Evita aided the Nazis... Hillary would of damn started WWIII.

Obama started something like 6-8 direct or proxy wars in his 4 years... Hillary would of probably doubled that with explicit moves on Pakistan and Iran.

(02-15-2012 07:31 PM)JayMillz Wrote:  

If this was Obama they would of burned him at the stake as a socialist lol. I am *crying* at how this would of been spun so bad against Obama so hard now. Poor Bush, just reading that script... look how much damage this along with a few other polices did to the USA. Gore would of done the same tho, same with Obama, and same with Romney. The banks pushed for this to give them a flood of cash to play with.

Thanks for posting this.

[Brian]

yep, its all Bush's fault..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTbIb75Jd...re=related

[JayMillz]

(02-15-2012 07:41 PM)Brian Wrote:  

yep, its all Bush's fault..

[kosko]

(02-15-2012 07:41 PM)Brian Wrote:  

yep, its all Bush's fault..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTbIb75Jd...re=related

Hey didn't the [R] control both houses at that time? I don't think it really matters does it? Both sides are crooks it does not matter if its Left or Right. I can see the Dems jumping on this as its a chance to grab minority votes...knowing full well their Republican bredren would support it.

I remember two republicans proposed the repeal bill of Glass-Steegal.. Clinton still made it law. Partisanship does not exist in America.

[JayMillz]

[thegmanifesto]

Evidence is mounting that Mitt Romney's 194-vote victory over Ron Paul was prematurely announced, if not totally wrong. Washington County canceled their caucus on Saturday on account of three inches of snow (hardly a blizzard by Maine standards), and other towns that scheduled their caucuses for this week have been left out of the vote count. Now, it looks like caucuses that did take place before Feb. 11 have also been left out of final tally.

As the full extent of the chaos unfolds, sources close to the Paul campaign tell Business Insider that it is looking increasingly like Romney's team might have a hand in denying Paul votes, noting that Romney has some admirably ruthless operatives on his side and a powerful incentive to avoid a fifth caucus loss this month.

According to the Paul campaign, the Maine Republican Party is severely under-reporting Paul's results — and Romney isn't getting the same treatment. For example, nearly all the towns in Waldo County — a Ron Paul stronghold – held their caucuses on Feb. 4, but the state GOP reported no results for those towns. In Waterville, a college town in Central Maine, results were reported but not included in the party vote count. Paul beat Romney 21-5 there, according to the Kennebec County GOP.


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/ron-paul-...z1mVDHiGnO

[Brian]

I'd love to see Paul win Maine just to see if he can get a little momentum going heading into Texas. I still dont think he's done yet.

[durangotang]

It would be great to see Paul win Maine and have vote fraud exposed.

[tenderman100]

(02-15-2012 12:39 PM)defguy Wrote:  

@Tenderman do you have your facts right? Gore wanted those counties to do a re-count because someone was bilking the system and many people stepped forward to testify to that. Gore actually IN FACT won those counties which means he would have won Florida. That means the 2000 election was a sham. Whether it was by the government or by some random guy, who knows, but it was a sham. Period.

More fucking stinkin' horseshit.

That's right, let's count the counties where GORE might pick up votes, but not the counties where BUSH might pick up votes.

That's fucking fair. Let's do that.

By the way, how can anybody be a Gamer and be shitty pansy leftist? The answer?

You can't be. Because leftists are fucking pussies.

[tenderman100]

(02-15-2012 05:24 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

(02-15-2012 12:03 PM)tenderman100 Wrote:  

And when the Supreme Court decided to overturn the Florida Supreme Court ruling they did so on the absolutely rock-solid constitutional grounds.

So "rock solid" that it was a 5-4 opinion?

So "rock solid" that the Court said it wouldn't have precedential value?

So "rock solid" that people who studied election law for their entire lives collectively shaked their heads?

If you like the result, cool. But constitutional law scholars do not take the court's reasoning seriously.

Really? How about these constitutional scholars?

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonkno...ViODg4NjE=

Really, watch this and THEN get back to me.

[Cincinnatus]

(02-16-2012 12:03 AM)tenderman100 Wrote:  

By the way, how can anybody be a Gamer and be shitty pansy leftist? The answer?

You can't be. Because leftists are fucking pussies.

Yet by self-admission you rank yourself as a Beginner when it comes to game level. What do you know about the game, Master? Or the personalities that dwell in the field?

Hilarious.

Keep drinkin' the Fox News Kool-Aid, Bubba, you'll be fine...

Didn't momma ever tell you curse-words was for people who didn't know no better?

[tenderman100]

(02-16-2012 12:11 AM)MSW2007 Wrote:  

(02-16-2012 12:03 AM)tenderman100 Wrote:  

By the way, how can anybody be a Gamer and be shitty pansy leftist? The answer?

You can't be. Because leftists are fucking pussies.

Yet by self-admission you rank yourself as a Beginner when it comes to game level. What do you know about the game, Master? Or the personalities that dwell in the field?

Hilarious.

Keep drinkin' the Fox News Kool-Aid, Bubba, you'll be fine...

Didn't momma ever tell you curse-words was for people who didn't know no better?

Really? I can rank myself? Didn't know that. In my user profile it seems unchangeable.

Here's the logic.

Anybody who expects government to solve their problems are pussies.

Leftists expect government to solve problems.

Ergo, leftists are pussies.

[All or Nothing]

(02-16-2012 12:20 AM)tenderman100 Wrote:  

(02-16-2012 12:11 AM)MSW2007 Wrote:  

(02-16-2012 12:03 AM)tenderman100 Wrote:  

By the way, how can anybody be a Gamer and be shitty pansy leftist? The answer?

You can't be. Because leftists are fucking pussies.

Yet by self-admission you rank yourself as a Beginner when it comes to game level. What do you know about the game, Master? Or the personalities that dwell in the field?

Hilarious.

Keep drinkin' the Fox News Kool-Aid, Bubba, you'll be fine...

Didn't momma ever tell you curse-words was for people who didn't know no better?

Really? I can rank myself? Didn't know that. In my user profile it seems unchangeable.

Here's the logic.

Anybody who expects government to solve their problems are pussies.

Leftists expect government to solve problems.

Ergo, leftists are pussies.

So my desire to have police protect me, firemen to save me, lawyers to defend me, the roads to be well paved, free education, and a hell of a lot of other things makes me a pussy?

[Smitty]

(02-16-2012 02:31 AM)All or Nothing Wrote:  

So my desire to have police protect me, firemen to save me, lawyers to defend me, the roads to be well paved, free education, and a hell of a lot of other things makes me a pussy?

Problem is, the government is going deeper into debt (dangerous levels) and you're receiving fewer and fewer of those services. And btw, most of those services are provided by the state, not the federal government.

Nearly $2trillion of your tax money in the U.S. every year is spent just on defense, senior citizens and poor people. Good luck getting free education or health care. The government simply cannot afford to pay for all those things you want.

I believe it would shock people if they actually did the simple math of the federal government: tax revenues collected - spending = ??? and then look at the future deficit and debt projections. There is simply no way the U.S. does not collapse under the weight of it's own debt in the next decade. This spending is unsustainable and U.S. citizens are arguably getting less bang for the government buck today than ever before.

Go look a the numbers.

This threat is very real.

[The_CEO]

(02-16-2012 12:03 AM)tenderman100 Wrote:  

(02-15-2012 12:39 PM)defguy Wrote:  

@Tenderman do you have your facts right? Gore wanted those counties to do a re-count because someone was bilking the system and many people stepped forward to testify to that. Gore actually IN FACT won those counties which means he would have won Florida. That means the 2000 election was a sham. Whether it was by the government or by some random guy, who knows, but it was a sham. Period.

More fucking stinkin' horseshit.

That's right, let's count the counties where GORE might pick up votes, but not the counties where BUSH might pick up votes.

That's fucking fair. Let's do that.

By the way, how can anybody be a Gamer and be shitty pansy leftist? The answer?

You can't be. Because leftists are fucking pussies.

True colors... angry, violent bluster from behind a keyboard.

Nothing more attractive than an angry, ultra-conservative, 50+ year old man. With Game that must be an unstoppable combination!

[thegmanifesto]

(02-16-2012 12:03 AM)tenderman100 Wrote:  

By the way, how can anybody be a Gamer and be shitty pansy leftist? The answer?

You can't be. Because leftists are fucking pussies.

Maybe.

But right wingers are dorks and pussies.

Notice above the use of the word "Gamer".

So you are a dork.

And you constantly act like a pussy on here.

So you are pretty much a great example of that.

[ccurtis189]

(02-16-2012 12:20 AM)tenderman100 Wrote:  

Here's the logic.

Anybody who expects government to solve their problems are pussies.

Leftists expect government to solve problems.

Ergo, leftists are pussies.

Oh my, that was one of the worst examples of logic I've ever seen.