[GlobalMan]

It's not an either/or thing. Both can be effective.

It depends on:

-You
-The location
-The local culture
-The circumstances
-The girl

and various other factors

If direct is a better fit for your personality as you say then stick with that where appropriate. Though, considering the factors above, you will have to change it up sometimes if you want to be the most effective in various situations.

Also, read these:

http://www.rooshv.com/direct-game-vs-indirect-game

http://www.rooshv.com/direct-day-game-for-beginners

http://www.returnofkings.com/81808/indir...tiful-girl

Related threads:

thread-33933.html

thread-29399.html


Good advice (follow the links as well):

(12-23-2012 03:48 AM)Giovonny Wrote:  

Guys should experiment with both styles and find a method that works for them. Like most of these "debates", there is no "right or "wrong" answer.

I have used both methods alot and I think there is a time to use each of them. It all depends on the type of girl and the type of situation. The art form is knowing when to use each style. Some environments are better for indirect, some are better for direct. Some girls react better to direct, some indirect. After a while, you sort of get a sense for it. You look at the girl, her look, her vibe, her clothes, and then you try to present the style of game that you think she will best react to.

Newbies should practice both styles. Direct is really not that difficult.

"Excuse me, I thought you were cute and had to meet you"

Whats the worst that can happen? She says--"thanks but i have a boyfriend".

Beginners should do this just as an inner game boosting exercise.

Getting laid is not about direct vs indirect. Getting laid is about everything you do after the opener.

Check these threads:

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-14130-...#pid267823

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-9001-p...#pid133419

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-14130-...#pid264032