Does anyone else find it sad that we may have a Clinton vs. Bush election? Not because of the quality of the candidates (which is less than desirable), but the fact that they are related to previous heads of states. It should really get people second guessing democracy although we know that will never happen.

My preferred candidate for 2016 will be Rand Paul. He is not perfect by any means, but in my opinion he is by far the best candidate not just for his political views, but because to me he is not a cookie cutter, corrupt politician. He is a man of principles, value and integrity unlike most presidents in recent decades. It is likely that the media will somehow portray him as a racist, nutjob and cream their panties over Hillary.

Also, what's up with this "Ready for Hillary" bullshit? I mean really! People are already abandoning Barack Obama for Hillary who they believe will somehow be the savior of the country, despite the fact that her and Obama are nearly identical.

Hillary doesn't have a chance. She's chronically unlikeable, uncharismatic, and worn out. She's the favorite until she gets up against guys who are young, energetic, and charismatic.

A lot of people try to say that Obama won the nomination because he was black. That's a gross oversimplification. Obama won the nomination because he was everything Hillary wasn't: young, likeable, and energetic. They saw him as someone they'd want to sit down and drink a beer with. They saw Hillary as the HR director or boss lecturing you about something you said.

Democrats will win, doesn't matter who their candidate is

Jim Webb for President.

Quote: (06-09-2014 12:02 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

Jim Webb for President.

http://www.rooshv.com/player-or-poseur-3

Quote: (06-08-2014 11:48 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Democrats will win, doesn't matter who their candidate is

I'm gonna echo this. The republican party is irrelevant at this point. Their supporters are finally cottoning onto the fact that they're essentially no different from the democrats at this point. They may speak otherwise, but Americans know nothing important will change under either party, the same people own all of the candidates, and a viable third party without puppet masters may never emerge if the much feared collapse happens within the next 20 years like everyone is predicting.

That pessimism aside, I can't wait to see the meme's that come out of the election race. Jeb and Hillary should provide enough lols for a solid month.

Firstly, I think Vacancier Permanent is correct. Make money and get the hell out. Exit over voice. For those who absolutely must stay, stock up on guns and ammo, plus other prepping supplies, land, maybe some precious metals. Build strong networks with like-minded people. Get ready for the apocalypse.

That said, as far as the politics goes, I'm going to go with a counter-intuitive approach. As a neo-reactionary/someone on the far right, I want Hillary to win in 2016. I want a homosexual or some other freak to win in 2024. I want the Democrats to sweep both the House and the Senate also, and get to appoint Supreme Court Judges. Why?

What exactly have the conservatives conserved? Think about it. Gun rights might be the only issue. The rest of the culture has gone to shit and so has the economy, especially the national debt. At best, conservatives have been enablers, at worst, they've been complicit. For America, and by extension, the West, to reverse the course it is on it needs one of several things to happen, and all of them ugly. I'm talking about full-blown economic collapse, war, etc. or a very near miss. What America needs is shock therapy, not this frog in a pot bullshit that's been happening for decades now. As long as the Republicans exist, they will continue to act as enablers. Whilst we can hope/pretend that young men will, en masse, take up the red pill, the growth of the blue pill on average throughout society is outpacing this and the only real hope is for things to get so bad that people are literally slapped out of their stupor and see what's going on.

As long as the Republicans exist, then any failure of the Democrats can be blamed on the existence of the Republicans and them stopping the Democrats from implementing their "Utopia". All opposition needs to go away from the Democrats and they need to be given a free hand. They need to be able to turn America into Detroit and they need to own that. That needs to occur rapidly, so people can see that and wake up to it. If it takes another generation or two (the frog in a boiling pot scenario), then America is truly beyond hope because the culture will have completely changed. If things come to a head somewhat soon then there might be some hope.

Maybe this sounds like a crazy approach, but frankly, the right almost everywhere across the world have been trying the same approach since the 60s. At best, they've temporarily halted the decline, but the trend has still been in one direction: debasement of both the culture and the economy. Didn't Einstein describe insanity as doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result?

Intelligent and eloquent, I would vote for Jon Huntsman for president:






He is far too smart and moderate to ever make though...

Quote: (06-09-2014 12:06 AM)xpatplayer Wrote:  

Quote: (06-09-2014 12:02 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

Jim Webb for President.

http://www.rooshv.com/player-or-poseur-3

Exactly. He would fit in here.

Quote: (06-09-2014 12:25 AM)All or Nothing Wrote:  

Intelligent and eloquent, I would vote for Jon Huntsman for president:

Quote:Wikipedia Wrote:

Huntsman was brought up as a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS), and stated in a May 2011 interview with George Stephanopoulos of ABC News, "I believe in God. I'm a good Christian. I'm very proud of my Mormon heritage. I am Mormon."

2/10 Would Note Vote.

Quote: (06-09-2014 12:20 AM)Feisbook Control Wrote:  

Firstly, I think Vacancier Permanent is correct. Make money and get the hell out. Exit over voice. For those who absolutely must stay, stock up on guns and ammo, plus other prepping supplies, land, maybe some precious metals. Build strong networks with like-minded people. Get ready for the apocalypse.

That said, as far as the politics goes, I'm going to go with a counter-intuitive approach. As a neo-reactionary/someone on the far right, I want Hillary to win in 2016. I want a homosexual or some other freak to win in 2024. I want the Democrats to sweep both the House and the Senate also, and get to appoint Supreme Court Judges. Why?

What exactly have the conservatives conserved? Think about it. Gun rights might be the only issue. The rest of the culture has gone to shit and so has the economy, especially the national debt. At best, conservatives have been enablers, at worst, they've been complicit. For America, and by extension, the West, to reverse the course it is on it needs one of several things to happen, and all of them ugly. I'm talking about full-blown economic collapse, war, etc. or a very near miss. What America needs is shock therapy, not this frog in a pot bullshit that's been happening for decades now. As long as the Republicans exist, they will continue to act as enablers. Whilst we can hope/pretend that young men will, en masse, take up the red pill, the growth of the blue pill on average throughout society is outpacing this and the only real hope is for things to get so bad that people are literally slapped out of their stupor and see what's going on.

As long as the Republicans exist, then any failure of the Democrats can be blamed on the existence of the Republicans and them stopping the Democrats from implementing their "Utopia". All opposition needs to go away from the Democrats and they need to be given a free hand. They need to be able to turn America into Detroit and they need to own that. That needs to occur rapidly, so people can see that and wake up to it. If it takes another generation or two (the frog in a boiling pot scenario), then America is truly beyond hope because the culture will have completely changed. If things come to a head somewhat soon then there might be some hope.

Maybe this sounds like a crazy approach, but frankly, the right almost everywhere across the world have been trying the same approach since the 60s. At best, they've temporarily halted the decline, but the trend has still been in one direction: debasement of both the culture and the economy. Didn't Einstein describe insanity as doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result?

Agreed. Worse is better, unfortunately. At this point, only violence and war can solve things. This sucks, because war is chaotic and unpredictable, and the outcome uncertain, but it's the only chance for an American revival.

Owning a gun will be a necessity again in America.

Quote: (06-09-2014 01:56 AM)svenski7 Wrote:  

Quote: (06-09-2014 12:25 AM)All or Nothing Wrote:  

Intelligent and eloquent, I would vote for Jon Huntsman for president:

Quote:Wikipedia Wrote:

Huntsman was brought up as a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS), and stated in a May 2011 interview with George Stephanopoulos of ABC News, "I believe in God. I'm a good Christian. I'm very proud of my Mormon heritage. I am Mormon."

2/10 Would Note Vote.

Should have read the rest of the section:

Quote:Quote:

However, he told Newsweek in December 2010 that the LDS Church doesn't have a monopoly on his spiritual life.[132] In an interview with Time magazine, he stated that he is more spiritual than religious and that his membership in the LDS Church is "tough to define".[133][134] Although still Mormon, Huntsman has said that he and his wife draw from an array of sources for inspiration, stating: "Today, there are 13 million Mormons. It's a very diverse and heterogeneous cross-section of people. And you're going to find a lot of different attitudes and a lot of different opinions in that 13 million. I was raised a Mormon, Mary Kaye was raised Episcopalian, our kids have gone to Catholic school, I went to a Lutheran school growing up in Los Angeles. So you kind of bind all this together." [135]

Huntsman rejects the notion that faith and evolution are mutually exclusive. In 2011, in response to a statement by Rick Perry that global warming was unproven and that evolution remains only a theory, Huntsman tweeted, "To be clear. I believe in evolution and trust scientists on global warming. Call me crazy."[136] He said, "The minute that the Republican Party becomes... the anti-science party, we have a huge problem. We lose a whole lot of people who would otherwise allow us to win the election in 2012."[137]

He stated that he was a Mormon in support of his religious heritage and the community that he came from and still is a part of today, not because he was a mindless follower of Mormonism.

The fact that his kids are raised Catholic is a sign that he has become disillusioned with Mormonism and the Mormon community at some point in his life.

Also, if you continue reading about his views on religion he actually addresses a key issue with the Republican party today. To state it quite clearly, many members from the Republican party reject science.

In addition to this, if you watch the video in my post, he also addresses another area that the Republicans are completely flailing in. Demographics. The Republican party excludes almost anyone who is not a Christian European and the fact is that the demographics have changed. Unless the party begins to open its doors to previously excluded communities, it will continue on its death spiral.

I still have a modicum of faith in American people that they won't elect another Clinton. Serbia barely survived the first one, don't make me go through that hell again.

Quote: (06-09-2014 02:44 AM)All or Nothing Wrote:  

In addition to this, if you watch the video in my post, he also addresses another area that the Republicans are completely flailing in. Demographics. The Republican party excludes almost anyone who is not a Christian European and the fact is that the demographics have changed. Unless the party begins to open its doors to previously excluded communities, it will continue on its death spiral.

A lot of Republicans know what the demographic problem is but they are in no way, shape, or form capable of changing their party rhetoric to do anything about this. Bush's response was to go super lenient on latino illegals (to win votes) and it backfired on him big time once the border became a flood of illegals who interpreted that as a get out of jail free card. The other method is to put in minority trojan horse candidates like Bobby Jindal or that black guy who shills for the right..Herman Cain. However guys like this draw suspicion on both sides of the party line and will never win popular support.

The Democrat party will get stronger over time and to be honest both parties are equally bad. They are bad in the same ways so it ultimately doesn't matter which party is in office..they are controlled by the new aristocratic elite who use party platforms to push lobbyists into office who use it to further enrich themselves.

That inequality gap will eventually plunge America into third world style politics where the rich control all politics and enact policies which are just used to deeply root their multi-generational family dynasties. The U.S. is almost there but just wait until the middle class is so crushed that people's living standards are severely impacted too. That's when the real discontent and decline will begin.

I dont think Hillary will run. She has been thru this already with her and Bill, and will be a 68 year old bag in 2016. She wants it, but I think she accepts that it will not happen. Without her, the Democrats have no one with a name. Cuomo and Warren are the top picks, but I think Cuomo is too Italian to be accepted by the voters.

The Republicans have a stronger field than its made out to be. The same people who said the Democrats would win 70 Senate seats in 2010 are now saying the Republicans have no hope. Many voters are starting to learn that moderate stiffs like McCain and Romney cant win. Christie is too fat to be president, and he likes being governor. Jeb Bush is a good contender. Huckabee could try. Cruz is too off the handle and not a natural born citizen. I like him, but he says stupid shit. Rubio could build himself up. There has to be a decent lesser known governor somewhere. And finally, Rand Paul would win 4 of the first 5 states and is the only one with broad appeal. Republicans will vote for him no matter what, and he appeals to many on the left. Everyone thinks he cant beat Hillary, but young, upstart senators have thrashed her before.

Yeah, Im biased.

I don't know who the Republicans will run. I would hope someone like Rand Paul. But most likely they will fuck this up and run Jeb Bush and have no chance at all.

IMO, Hillary will be very tough to beat. She is a disaster, but so was Obama in 2012. But she, like Obama, will have...

- The main stream media in her back pocket. Covering only stories that make her look good, and bury any story that makes her look bad. The main stream media spent more time in just 10 days covering the "bridge gate" story in New Jersey than the VA disaster. The main stream media has largely not covered Benghazi or the IRS disaster.

- The amount of women out there who literally live off the govt. has exploded under Obama. All you men here who work in a job in the USA are having part of your income being stolen to pay for women who sit on their asses and do nothing. And these women will come out in droves and vote in Hillary to keep this happening for them.

If Obama could do that badly his first four years, and have Benghazi happen right in the middle of his campaign and still win. I don't see how Hillary can be beaten.

But this whole economy is about to collapse. Not Mad Max style, but like Greece. Obama has simply wasted WAY too much money. He has pushed the Debt to GDP ratio beyond any way to recover. We will never recover from Obama's waste. Hillary will be a continuation of this wasteful spending and idiotic ideas. And soon all the govt. workers who think they are entitled to giant salaries and giant pensions will have the govt. come in and take it all away, just like in Greece, because we can no longer borrow a Trillion dollars a year from the bankers to pay for it all.

Hillary 2016! Because I want Merica to get the government it wants and the collapse it deserves. Then maybe the people that are left will become strong individuals.

It's probably going to be between Hillary Clinton on the Democrat ticket. The GOP ticket is less clear. The front-runners there are Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul or Chris Christie. I would prefer Paul or Cruz.

I can see it now over at /r/mensrights: MRAs for Hillary 2016!

The United States has been doomed since Nixon took the dollar off the gold standard. The money currently in circulation is worth as much as we perceive it to be worth. If everyone were to believe that one dollar is worth 10 cents, then the value would likely begin to reflect that.

A lot of "experts" on this thread.

A lot of "experts" said UKIP and Front National could never win...they both won.

A lot of "experts" said Reagan's policies were stupid and that the Soviet Union would never buckle under pressure. They were wrong. Whether it was Reagan's policies, oil prices, or a combination of the two, the fact is, the experts were still wrong.

A lot of "experts" said Rand Paul would lose in his primary and then when he won that, they said, he would get trounced in the general election. They were wrong. He is now a US Senator.

A lot of "experts" said there was no economic or housing crisis in 2007. They were wrong.

A lot of "experts" on this thread say that Democrats will win for sure.
Maybe they will. But these RVF political experts are simply repeating what they've been told to think. It's a psychological tactic to demoralize you're opposition.

While I agree that Republican (establishment) politicians have been dreadful, it is precisely because they buck the ideas and platform of their supporters, who, have grown somewhat aware of this bait and switch.


Personally, I don't think Rand will win. The kitchen sink will be thrown to make sure of it. And while he won in Kentucky, a national election is more difficult considering face to face campaigning is less important and the media's ability to shape the narrative and spin the issues, still has some power, even though this ability has been declining.

I recognize that Rand, or even some obscure Democrat may win though. In the European elections that UKIP recently won, the 30 days leading up to the election saw every major newspaper run negative stories every day, and every television station was highly critical of UKIP. Yet, their support grew.

We are entering into Black Swan territory and the RVF "experts" are charlatans. You are viewing history as linear rather than cyclical.

Sure, the Republican party is basically the white party and white people are a lower percentage of the population. But as politics become more identity driven and less ideologically based whites may flock to the Republican party in droves, outnumbering the gain Democrats pick up from recent immigrants who tend to vote for who their told to vote for.

Another factor Republicans have going for them is that democrat voters might simply stay home. This happened in France, when Front National won. The Socialists simply stayed home. Obamacare, is unpopular, the economy could tank even worse, and the currency could undergo serious deflation or inflation.


In Summary:
For those "experts" on the thread who have made proclamations of "This person can't win" or "The Democrats will win and the Republican Party is finished" you may be correct. But then again, you may not be.

^ Democrats are going to promise amnesty and get the Hispanics. Democrats have the blacks. Democrats have most of the single women, and 30% of the white men and at least 30% of the married women.

It's their election to lose.

Paul Ryan might run in 2016.

I'd love for Dennis Kucinich to run again for the Democrats, but it will probably be hillary.

Sure, but a lot can happen in two years though. Also, I'm not so sure Hillary will win the primary.

It'll depend on the economy. It is unlikely to improve drastically. We will likely see the economy to continue to barely stay afloat. Another economic catastrophe is possible.

Also, it will depend if establishment GOP decides to put a nail in their own coffin with amnesty for illegals.

We can assume that the media will provide defense for Hillary's shortcomings i.e. Benghazi (What difference does it make!?!). She's mentally unfit to be president if she behaves like that during a Congressional hearing.

Of course, just like Obama rode the wave of excitement of being our first black president, Hillary can probably expect the same for potentially being our first female president. To vote against Hillary will be misogynist.

GOP just needs a candidate who can inspire people to vote for him. If Mitt Romney had the votes that McCain had + Tea Party folks, he would've won. Fielding moderates is not a winning strategy.

Ted Cruz was born in Canada to an American mother and a Cuban father.

He is apparently running for the Republican nomination.

I assume no "citizenship" nonsense will be brought up by Republicans about him.

Really strange how often this happens. McCain was born in Panama, George Romney was born in Mexico... No one really minded.