I just came across some ads about the upcoming release of the documentary film called Divorce Corp.

[/quote]Here is a synopsis from IMDB
More money flows through the family courts, and into the hands of courthouse insiders, than in all other court systems in America combined - over $50 billion a year and growing. Through extensive research and interviews with the nation's top divorce lawyers, mediators, judges, politicians, litigants and journalists, this documentary uncovers how children are torn from their homes, unlicensed custody evaluators extort money, and abusive judges play god with people's lives while enriching their friends. This explosive documentary reveals the family courts as unregulated, extra-constitutional fiefdoms. Rather than assist victims of domestic crimes, these courts often precipitate them. And rather than help parents and children move on, as they are mandated to do, these courts - and their associates - drag out cases for years, sometimes decades, ultimately resulting in a rash of social ills, including home foreclosure, bankruptcy, suicide and violence. Solutions to the crisis are sought out in countries where divorce is handled in a more holistic manner.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2636456/[/quote]

So I did a little more looking around and found more stuff at A Voice For Men.

Quote:Quote:

Divorce Corp, a documentary due to be released in January 2014 is causing quite a stir between mother’s rights / “women’s rights” and groups of men and women who support equally-shared parenting. In calling for a boycott of the movie, so-called mother’s rights groups are quite upset that Divorce Corp advocates for more fair and balanced divorce and family court process, something that apparently irks those who for years have enjoyed courts centered around them. As shared-parenting is being advanced across the world, it appears that many in the “mother’s rights” arena are calling for a boycott of Divorce Corp in an effort to maintain their position of total control.

It should be noted that you can not find one father’s rights group that advocates for family courts that are centered around fathers having primary physical custody and control–but you can find hundreds of mother’s rights group that advocate for that. These women are at the front for the equality movement?

Mother’s rights groups are particularity upset with (and boycotting the documentary) Divorce Corp over the fact that the producers of the movie advocate for an equal system that puts mothers and children “within reach of abusers” (in their scare-language) as if men are the only abusers and domestic violence offenders, or child neglect and abuse perpetrators.

Another fascinating concept I see put forth by mother’s rights group in calling for a boycott on Divorce Corp is that 60% of women who have children in the world have a son. And these women are calling for a family court system that makes sure their own sons are marginalized when they become adults? Where are these mother’s rights groups going to be when they, as a paternal grandmothers, have very little access to their grandchildren because she helped lay the foundation for biased courts?

Also, there is a lot of talk about protestors who will be boycotting the documentary and harassing those that go to see the movie, and attempting to harass movie theaters that host Divorce Corp. Are we sure that men are the only humans on earth that harass and use aggression to forward an agenda?

Where are the many thousands of women in paternal families who have for the past 80 years watched as their sons are systematically marginalized by feminist-controlled family courts? Courts that have no problem with seeing all of your sons as potential abusers? Have any of the mothers witnessed abuse by women on their sons? If so, why are you not standing up to these radical mother’s “rights” groups who are calling for your inability to love and help raise your children and grandchildren equally?

In some ways I am happy to see “mother’s rights” groups boycotting Divorce Corp as I think it will allow the shared parenting movement to finally show that mothers like this have no desire for equality unless it benefits them personally, and will allow our movement to draw in more resources from women in paternal families who realistically make up the largest segment of father’s rights groups.

Lastly, it should be known that we think a vitally important part of getting the equal-parenting and shared-parenting movement to a national consciousness is for there to be a group of women that does not allow men in their ranks; men have their own movement and groups on this and we support them. But we think there should be women-only groups, women who are tired of watching feminism and mother’s rights groups advocate for a system that harms children and the relationship with their fathers. So boyycott away ladies! Boycott Divorce Corp so that we can use your advocacy to draw in more women into our movement for equality.

If you are a woman in a paternal family who is concerned about your son, husband, brother, or nephew’s ability to have a equal relationship with his children, and radical groups attempts to call your loved one’s abusers, then we would love for you to use the comment section below to leave your thoughts. And, please do not forget to share this post on Facebook, Google+, and Twitter so that others can join in the conversation.
The Proposed Boycott of Divorce Corp Should Teach Women a Few Things About Equality

If the proposed boycott of Divorce Corp and calls for protestors to disrupt and harass those going to see the movie teaches us anything, it is that there are very well entrenched groups who benefit from the family courts, and for women in paternal families, it certainly is not you.

Our organization tries regularly to get women to see that malicious mother’s groups and officers of the courts, who have for a century labeled your sons as only abusers who should pay money to the system, has kept you from having a normal life with your grandchildren, step-children, and nieces and nephews–and maybe even your own father.

It should also teach women that there are radical groups who have hijacked the idea of equality, whose purpose is to demoralize and malign your sons for an agenda. This is not what feminism was supposed to be about. Or was it? You should really be asking these mother’s rights groups about their idea of equality because the family courts is a major red herring that stands in the way of equality.

We encourage women in paternal families to make more of an effort to get in touch with your activism as it relates to family law, and hope you will view Divorce Corp and tell us your experiences with any groups that were boycotting.

Again, the ONLY argument these malicious women have against family court reform is that all your sons are domestic offenders and that there are no false accusations. It is time for women in paternal families to stand up to these malicious protestors and stop their false narrative.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/fem...fathers-2/

I heard about it a while back, I will watch it when it comes out on torrent, looks interesting.

Interesting movie/documentary. If this rolls up to something even mildly popular like 'zeitgiest' or any other cult netflix documentary it could do alot for roosh's red pill mainstream predictions. Its not that it is going to say anything 'new' its just going to make those facts more accessible.

It could really gain traction if a group like feminists rants against it. If it could get a level of Duck Dynasty or even just 'eating disorder' hate the press would be good to popularize it and scare alot of young men out of getting married.

I hope it comes out by me with a group outside boycotting it or harassing, it will be so much fun to troll! But I doubt it, Chicago is gonna have some record breaking cold and I don't see some lazy self entitled womyn bundling up. Then again you can't stop crazy.

http://www.boycottdivorcecorp.com/

something about equal parenting rights is bad.. or something.

I skimmed the site. The problem is, they admit to making site in a rush, they claim that equal parenting is bad with no proof as to why, and the laughable Trojan horse they are painting it as.

By the looks of it they seem to be really nervous about being outed. Now looks like they are struggling for damage control.

Now, I'm for sure going to see it this Friday when it opens since feminists are calling for a boycott.

So the feminists don't want equal rights for men? Surprise, surprise.

Judging by the experience of family members, the woman automatically gets full custody, she can move where ever and when ever she wants, and daddy just has to live with it.

I recommend that we all support the filmmakers by watching it in the theater or paying for a download.

They aren't worried about equal parenting. They want the child support to continue to run freely.

A lot of these women don't give a shit about their kids -- they just want the $$$$$$$.

See my thread about the guy who was put in jail for overpaying child support and spending to much time with his son

This is fucked! I can't wait to watch it.

I tweeted about it. Looks amazing.

Narrated by Dr. Drew, who produced it after being involved in a bitter divorce and paying a fortune in court fees.

Might be worth actually going to the theatre for this one. If it's as redpill as it sounds, it will have earned loud applause from me at the end.

Gonna go see it. If it's red pill we need to help by promoting the film.

Quote: (01-08-2014 07:00 PM)houston Wrote:  

See my thread about the guy who was put in jail for overpaying child support and spending to much time with his son

Link? If that's true, that's certainly a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation.

I can vouch for the opening statements about how many false accusations make it to court.

I live in Maryland. We have an online "case search" state-run Web site where you can look up court cases. I like to look up women before I get involved.

I kept coming across divorced women who tried to get restraining orders but were rebuffed by the courts. A few off-the-record convos with lawyer friends revealed getting women to do this standard among sleazy attorneys.

In what other realm of life would this be tolerated, much less accepted as par the course?

Quote: (01-09-2014 12:39 AM)runsonmagic Wrote:  

I tweeted about it. Looks amazing.

Narrated by Dr. Drew, who produced it after being involved in a bitter divorce and paying a fortune in court fees.

Do you have a source for this? As far as I know he's still happily married.

Quote:Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:

I kept coming across divorced women who tried to get restraining orders but were rebuffed by the courts. A few off-the-record convos with lawyer friends revealed getting women to do this standard among sleazy attorneys.

[hamster]But those women needed to protect themselves from abusive husbands who threatened their live(hood)s! Who are you to judge them? Everyone knows that women never divorce or call the police without a good reason![/hamster]

Just saw it in the theater. Highly recommended.

No impregnation or matrimony in the USSA for this boy!

I don't know why the feminazis don't like this - it shows women who have been screwed by the family court racket.

I guess they don't like the part about the real equal rights for men and women in these matters in Scandinavia. Scandinavian women don't believe they are entitled to a man's money.

Let's support these guys. They are very brave to make this film.

Buja can you give us a breakdown of it?

Eel, look at my threads in the EE section. I posted it this week.
http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-31819.html

Quote: (01-09-2014 08:29 AM)Ensam Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2014 12:39 AM)runsonmagic Wrote:  

I tweeted about it. Looks amazing.

Narrated by Dr. Drew, who produced it after being involved in a bitter divorce and paying a fortune in court fees.

Do you have a source for this? As far as I know he's still happily married.

From his twitter:
https://twitter.com/drdrew/status/420252347231903744

I like Dr Drew.

I remember Doug Stanhope attacking him in a stand-up routine since he thought celebrity rehab (which Dr Drew is often involved in) is bullshit. Since it essentially amounts to a doctor telling a celebrity alcoholic to 'find God' in order to overcome their demons.

But the reason I like him is because he used to co-host 'Loveline' with Adam Carolla. And that was a red pill dating advice radio show which was very interesting and very funny. And Adam Carolla is red pill as fuck - so you know Dr Drew is inbibiing influences different to most of the stiffs working in TV land.

As for the documentary above. It looks brilliant - really well produced and ticks every box. I am so pleased to see it released.

Personally - there is a large part of me that experiences schadenfraude when guys go through messy divorces. Since I think you must be a fucking idiot to get married. But it is unfair of me to think that way - since if you want to have kids (which I don't - but I respect those who do), you can easily find yourself entangled with the family court process.

The shit surrounding divorce law makes me angry. And women don't give a shit. I refuse to be bothered about the injustices surrounding women's injustices - until they start being more vocal surrounding the injustices facing men.

But the problem is that women cannot use reason and principles when considering such issues. instead they just focus on Team Women and only try and come up with reasons why Team Women is always right. Fuck 'em.

And even now - the only change you will see to do with divorce laws is ultimately going to be driven by the large number of women who cannot stand having to post a cheque to their husband's ex-wife each month. There are alot of fucked up issues surrounding divorce laws - but this is the only one that women really hate. They despise having to share their husband's income with his ex-wife. It was actually one of the examples given in the clip above. And you can be sure that it is only shit like this which carries emotional weight for any women watching.

So - it will be interesting to see what the futre holds. But it is depressing that even in such a clear case of injustice towards men as can be seen by this issue. Any change in this area will still only be driven by the selfish interests of women who are more concerned about cutting a cheque to an ex-wife than they are about the principles of justice and fairness towards men.

The moment you try and reason with a woman. You have already lost. You just don't know it yet.

Quote: (01-10-2014 10:33 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2014 08:29 AM)Ensam Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2014 12:39 AM)runsonmagic Wrote:  

I tweeted about it. Looks amazing.

Narrated by Dr. Drew, who produced it after being involved in a bitter divorce and paying a fortune in court fees.

Do you have a source for this? As far as I know he's still happily married.

From his twitter:
https://twitter.com/drdrew/status/420252347231903744

I don't understand Twitter. Can somebody translate the tweet above? Since the way I read it is that Dr Drew is re-tweeting a tweet from somebody else. As opposed to tweeting about something that happened to him.

Is that right?

Quote: (01-10-2014 09:27 PM)houston Wrote:  

Buja can you give us a breakdown of it?

It starts off with parents (both men and women) who were screwed out seeing their kids because of the collusion of lawyers and judges.

It describes how the "family law" lawyers and judges and court-appointed 'experts' are in bed with each other and how they game the system and screw us while blatantly violating laws and they still get away with it.

A guy gets put in jail for 5 years for criticizing a judge on his blog. One guy describes his ex as the scum she really is on Facebook and a judge threatens him with 60 days in jail if the doesn't post an apology. He doesn't. The judge backs down.

It touches on alimony. Then there are extensive interviews with divorcees in Iceland and Sweden. We learn that there is no concept of court battles, lawyers, or forcing men to pay money to see their kids in Scandinavian divorces.

A family law judge is captured on video by his daughter. He was beating her repeatedly with a belt and cussing at her for playing video games. The video is released - no punishment of course of the bureau-rat.

One interesting segment has a woman who is a lawyer telling how she can make a man look like a bad parent in court.

true story from my health club about 10 days ago:

I was standing between two post-wall women on a treadmill in the health club. They were talking about a divorce and it was funny because they were on either side of me talking to each other past me.

The surface tone was light, humorous and smug, focused on play-acting preaching to the non-present man who was going to lose a lot of money in the divorce.

Te undertone was vicious and fearful-- reflecting the knowledge that women much more than men cannot defend against old age and the loss of sexual power.

One of them summarized the situation of someone they knew with grim satisfaction:

"You're a doctor, married 30 years with three kids and you cheated with your nurse. Yeah, you're going to pay!"

They made some more comments, but this was the succinct summary.

They were aware of the awkwardness of discussing this around a man in the middle of them.

"Don't get married." One of them said jokingly.
"Or STAY married," said the other.

"Not in the United States," I replied calmly as I
moved off from the treadmill to the weight machines.

There were a few moments of stunned silence. I think they hadn't really thought of there being alternative to The Divorce Corporation, and were additionally surprised that a man had thought about it and had a ready answer for the situation.

An answer that didn't include them in any form.

Thanks Buja. So I'm guessing this whole system is a mess because of $$$?