Quote: (12-12-2017 10:58 PM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote:  

Quote: (12-12-2017 10:52 PM)Only8sandup Wrote:  

Quote: (12-12-2017 10:50 PM)Higgs Bosun Wrote:  

Quote: (12-12-2017 10:28 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

You need 50 internet points to shitpost here, McConnell.

Reported. Hopefully the troll will amuse us with lots of shitposting before the banhammer arrives though

eh, like I said before, will gladly take the ban if free speech isn't a thing here. (Since I haven't broken any rules)

Definitely has a female writing style. Also it's typical female thinking to say you haven't broken any rules, even when the list of rules says you have.

Show your tits, or gtfo. It's in the rules.

I doubt this person is a woman. Mangina/white faggot, maybe. Homosexual, absolutely because most woman are not be tactical enough to hang around and have around 40+ posts. If a woman sees something she doesn't like, she would give the typical "that's nerdy/stupid/racist/anti-Semitic, you are all a bunch of losers and need to get laid spiel".

Quote:Quote:

A landmark study published last Thursday in the Australian Journal of Science, Medicine, and Arachnology, proves once and for all, that OP is indeed a faggot. The results of the six month long study, while having only been released a few days ago, have already gained widespread acceptance among the scientific community. According to researchers, the study went into great depths and utilized a wide variety of research methods. "We did everything from genetic analysis, to behavioral analysis, to even interviewing the OP's family and friends. All of our collected data points to the same conclusion. That OP is a phaggot." said Professor Big (Handsome Creepy Eel) Cockenstein. "In one particular experiment, we sneaked into the OP's home and replaced the hotdogs in his fridge with dildos. Upon returning home, OP proceeded to put the dildos between his buns. And I don't mean hotdog buns."

Even though the study has been proclaimed by the scientific community to be one of the greatest studies of the 21st century, not all members of the public have a positive opinion of it. One man which we interviewed yesterday, said the following: "Why are these kunts wasting money to study something like this? Everyone already knew the answer. You might as well have a study to prove that the sky is blue and that the grass is green." Others were much more happy to see the study completed. "I'm a psychology major and have been following the study for the last 2 months, waiting for the results to be published. I am really happy to see the research back up my own personal observations regarding the OP."

However, no matter what one's opinion of the study may be, one thing is for certain:
The OP is a faggot.

In the words of Professor Big Cockenstein: "It is scientific fact."

OP does actually have somewhat of a point, blue wave is coming in 2018 if Republicans can't recruit top tier candidates with broad appeal. OP is still a sucktard and should probably learn to read the forum rules when she inevitably makes another account to troll yet again in the future.

I give this troll 4/10.

Next election for this seat is in two years. The midterm elections will be very tight to say the least, we will see a LOT of sexual misconduct reports

Quote: (12-12-2017 10:26 PM)Only8sandup Wrote:  

Child molester should've dropped out. Any other normal Republican would've won the red state.

I'm not entirely sure I believe the accusers. I mean they had 40 fucking years to come forward and accuse him while he was running for judge positions. "Luckily" for Democrats they waited until he was just 2 months away from a key senatorial election. It's just too convenient to believe.

Lucky for Democrats they fucking own the media and very few Republicans even today have the balls to stand up to their propaganda and bullshit.

If I was Trump... the first thing I would do is pass an executive order making Conservatives a "protected class" right along with race and religion. Then I would fucking go at every college and university with the power and fury of a category 10 hurricane claiming they make a hostile environment for conservative students and forcing them to balance their professorships 50% liberal 50% conservative within 2 years or lose all federal funding... plus open them up to billion dollar lawsuits from conservative students. I would also push Congress and Senate to back legislation making this shit permanent.

Roy Moore, accused of "inappropriate sexual or social conduct" What the hell is "social conduct" supposed to mean. When they raise the age of consent to 21 years old, everyone who has dated a fun 19 yo chick will be the new pedophile pervert Faggots like OP looking to judge based on today's gynocentric world to a different time when the age of consent was different.

I don't know if this is a defeat for the Red Team. It is definitely a defeat for evangelical Christians in the Red Team. Their influence on politics is waning. Moore is a theocrat, and the theocrat lost.

Quote: (12-13-2017 01:38 AM)eljeffster Wrote:  

Roy Moore, accused of "inappropriate sexual or social conduct" What the hell is "social conduct" supposed to mean. When they raise the age of consent to 21 years old, everyone who has dated a fun 19 yo chick will be the new pedophile pervert Faggots like OP looking to judge based on today's gynocentric world to a different time when the age of consent was different.

One of the allegations involved a woman who claimed she would have been 13 at the time.

I don't know about you, but if I would not be impressed by any group or society that condoned men in their 20's or older pursuing girls that young. Given that it's almost certainly ethically preferable that modern societies draw a legal line somewhere (while I can give a pass to pre-modern societies where sex with 13 year old was considered normal) I think good enough arguments could be made that in modern times, 16 years old is a very reasonable line to draw.

As far as the allegations themselves, I'm hesitant to believe anything with such incredibly convenient timing, but I also wouldn't assume that they aren't true based on that alone.

The truth is that if we judged everyone by the worst skeletons in their closet, most people would look pretty bad.

The take-away here is not that we should forgive people who have had bad judgment in the past and give them authority that they may abuse, but that rather we need to begin to process of recentering society around smaller communities with enough self-sufficiency to prosper despite events on a global scale while still having enough connectivity to the world to contribute to a rising tide that lifts all ships to higher heights of human achievement.

If our hope is in being able to elect infallible politicians, we are already doomed.

This sets a precedent now for Democrats to use sexual assault allegations vs Republicns now matter how true or false they are.

Seems like Harvey Weinstein was sacrificed to forge the blade that struck down Moore and will be used against right wing politicians from now on.

If this was indeed the plan all along, that's quite an impressive strategic move.

It’s real simple. Would you allow Roy Moore to give your 13/14 year old daughter a ride somewhere? The answer is no. No decent parent would. A decent parent looks at those allegations and says “why take that chance?”

Quote: (12-13-2017 01:52 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (12-13-2017 01:38 AM)eljeffster Wrote:  

Roy Moore, accused of "inappropriate sexual or social conduct" What the hell is "social conduct" supposed to mean. When they raise the age of consent to 21 years old, everyone who has dated a fun 19 yo chick will be the new pedophile pervert Faggots like OP looking to judge based on today's gynocentric world to a different time when the age of consent was different.

One of the allegations involved a woman who claimed she would have been 13 at the time.

I don't know about you, but if I would not be impressed by any group or society that condoned men in their 20's or older pursuing girls that young. Given that it's almost certainly ethically preferable that modern societies draw a legal line somewhere (while I can give a pass to pre-modern societies where sex with 13 year old was considered normal) I think good enough arguments could be made that in modern times, 16 years old is a very reasonable line to draw.

As far as the allegations themselves, I'm hesitant to believe anything with such incredibly convenient timing, but I also wouldn't assume that they aren't true based on that alone.

The truth is that if we judged everyone by the worst skeletons in their closet, most people would look pretty bad.

The take-away here is not that we should forgive people who have had bad judgment in the past and give them authority that they may abuse, but that rather we need to begin to process of recentering society around smaller communities with enough self-sufficiency to prosper despite events on a global scale while still having enough connectivity to the world to contribute to a rising tide that lifts all ships to higher heights of human achievement.

If our hope is in being able to elect infallible politicians, we are already doomed.

Maybe he wanted to marry her!

I've been laughing at this witch-hunt on Moore, recalling what I learned after scratching the surface of a discussion in another thread.

Don't these fuckers doing the screaming in Alabama know that their state actually licences pedophilia marriage.

How can your laws be so fucked up between legal consent and legal marriage age? It beats me.

These laws are still present (& used) in many states. Incredibly.

Never, have I  heard a word of protest over these. Are people aware of the actual laws?

Fucked up culture indeed. Centuries old colonial common law, designed pre-magna carta, still frequently used in 21st century US of A.

Over 200,000, what are considered minors, have been married off in the US between 2000 and 2016.

Never hear a peep about it.

Moore's state Alabama itself still marries off 13 yr olds. However. Across the state line in Tennessee......WTF??



NSFW

Quote:Quote:

The youngest children to marry were three 10-year-old girls in Tennessee in 2001, who were married to men ages 24, 25 and 31, according to state data. The youngest groom was an 11-year-old boy, also in Tennessee, who married a 27-year-old woman in 2006.

Children as young as 12 were granted marriage licenses in Alaska, Louisiana, South Carolina and Tennessee.

Thirteen-year-olds were given the green light to marry in Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Washington.

http://apps.frontline.org/child-marriage...e-numbers/






Trying to remember my 11yr old self.

^^^Yes, it just speaks to the whole silliness of the whole thing. While I'm not sure if I'd want Moore as my representative, there's no question that it's a witch hunt. We've entered a period of time in history where the power of the Internet has met mob hypocrisy in an unprecedented combination.

To keep things in perspective, however, it wasn't that long ago that men were getting lynched without a trial due to unproven accusations of sexual impropriety. This is a problem, but the USA (and our world as a whole) has seen worse times.

I still can't help but feel the tide turning in our favour.

The enemy of sanity in this world is having to pull out increasingly dirty tricks and spend more and more millions by the day just to scrape a win in.

Besides, never lose sight of the fact that this will almost inevitably come down to a bloody, physical war at some stage. The enemies of sanity are only resorting to non-violent skulduggery at this point because their hand has not been fully forced. But when they are on the precipice of annihilation you can be certain that they will not hesitate to flip the table and draw down on us.

Alternately if they manage to import enough moochers then democracy will cease to be a viable recourse and anyone who refuses to live in a globalist gulag state will either have to flee or flip the table themselves.

Believe me. There will inevitably come a time in the next couple of decades where you will look back and think of 2017/18 as "the good old days".

Quote: (12-13-2017 02:54 AM)porscheguy Wrote:  

It’s real simple. Would you allow Roy Moore to give your 13/14 year old daughter a ride somewhere? The answer is no. No decent parent would. A decent parent looks at those allegations and says “why take that chance?”

Oh yes and Doug Jones is so much more trustworthy? That guy has a pedo face if I've ever seen one.

All the concerned parents who voted against Roy Moore will soon have much more to worry about when there are hordes of illegals and Muslims running around raping their daughters instead. Real threat vs. Fake threat.

Quote: (12-13-2017 03:53 AM)Renton1875 Wrote:  

Quote: (12-13-2017 01:52 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (12-13-2017 01:38 AM)eljeffster Wrote:  

Roy Moore, accused of "inappropriate sexual or social conduct" What the hell is "social conduct" supposed to mean. When they raise the age of consent to 21 years old, everyone who has dated a fun 19 yo chick will be the new pedophile pervert Faggots like OP looking to judge based on today's gynocentric world to a different time when the age of consent was different.

One of the allegations involved a woman who claimed she would have been 13 at the time.

I don't know about you, but if I would not be impressed by any group or society that condoned men in their 20's or older pursuing girls that young. Given that it's almost certainly ethically preferable that modern societies draw a legal line somewhere (while I can give a pass to pre-modern societies where sex with 13 year old was considered normal) I think good enough arguments could be made that in modern times, 16 years old is a very reasonable line to draw.

As far as the allegations themselves, I'm hesitant to believe anything with such incredibly convenient timing, but I also wouldn't assume that they aren't true based on that alone.

The truth is that if we judged everyone by the worst skeletons in their closet, most people would look pretty bad.

The take-away here is not that we should forgive people who have had bad judgment in the past and give them authority that they may abuse, but that rather we need to begin to process of recentering society around smaller communities with enough self-sufficiency to prosper despite events on a global scale while still having enough connectivity to the world to contribute to a rising tide that lifts all ships to higher heights of human achievement.

If our hope is in being able to elect infallible politicians, we are already doomed.

Maybe he wanted to marry her!

I've been laughing at this witch-hunt on Moore, recalling what I learned after scratching the surface of a discussion in another thread.

Don't these fuckers doing the screaming in Alabama know that their state actually licences pedophilia marriage.

How can your laws be so fucked up between legal consent and legal marriage age? It beats me.

These laws are still present (& used) in many states. Incredibly.

Never, have I  heard a word of protest over these. Are people aware of the actual laws?

Fucked up culture indeed. Centuries old colonial common law, designed pre-magna carta, still frequently used in 21st century US of A.

Over 200,000, what are considered minors, have been married off in the US between 2000 and 2016.

Never hear a peep about it.

Moore's state Alabama itself still marries off 13 yr olds. However. Across the state line in Tennessee......WTF??



NSFW

Quote:Quote:

The youngest children to marry were three 10-year-old girls in Tennessee in 2001, who were married to men ages 24, 25 and 31, according to state data. The youngest groom was an 11-year-old boy, also in Tennessee, who married a 27-year-old woman in 2006.

Children as young as 12 were granted marriage licenses in Alaska, Louisiana, South Carolina and Tennessee.

Thirteen-year-olds were given the green light to marry in Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Washington.

http://apps.frontline.org/child-marriage...e-numbers/



Trying to remember my 11yr old self.

The idea that marriages with age differences cannot work is nothing more than sinful, degenerate dogma.

People have been getting married with large age differences for all of recorded human history, which means it's probably been happening for millions of years.

I know my great-grandmother married at 14. She went on to have a 50 year marriage, with 6 children, and 15+ grandchildren. You're telling me this is bad? Only dumb and evil feminists could think such a thing.

Of course, parental consent was always involved for young ages.

The world we live in is unnatural, has negative birth rates, and causes mass unhappiness. It's obviously doomed. The world of marriages with young women will return, one way or the other.

Quote: (12-13-2017 06:11 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote: (12-13-2017 03:53 AM)Renton1875 Wrote:  

Quote: (12-13-2017 01:52 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (12-13-2017 01:38 AM)eljeffster Wrote:  

Roy Moore, accused of "inappropriate sexual or social conduct" What the hell is "social conduct" supposed to mean. When they raise the age of consent to 21 years old, everyone who has dated a fun 19 yo chick will be the new pedophile pervert Faggots like OP looking to judge based on today's gynocentric world to a different time when the age of consent was different.

One of the allegations involved a woman who claimed she would have been 13 at the time.

I don't know about you, but if I would not be impressed by any group or society that condoned men in their 20's or older pursuing girls that young. Given that it's almost certainly ethically preferable that modern societies draw a legal line somewhere (while I can give a pass to pre-modern societies where sex with 13 year old was considered normal) I think good enough arguments could be made that in modern times, 16 years old is a very reasonable line to draw.

As far as the allegations themselves, I'm hesitant to believe anything with such incredibly convenient timing, but I also wouldn't assume that they aren't true based on that alone.

The truth is that if we judged everyone by the worst skeletons in their closet, most people would look pretty bad.

The take-away here is not that we should forgive people who have had bad judgment in the past and give them authority that they may abuse, but that rather we need to begin to process of recentering society around smaller communities with enough self-sufficiency to prosper despite events on a global scale while still having enough connectivity to the world to contribute to a rising tide that lifts all ships to higher heights of human achievement.

If our hope is in being able to elect infallible politicians, we are already doomed.

Maybe he wanted to marry her!

I've been laughing at this witch-hunt on Moore, recalling what I learned after scratching the surface of a discussion in another thread.

Don't these fuckers doing the screaming in Alabama know that their state actually licences pedophilia marriage.

How can your laws be so fucked up between legal consent and legal marriage age? It beats me.

These laws are still present (& used) in many states. Incredibly.

Never, have I  heard a word of protest over these. Are people aware of the actual laws?

Fucked up culture indeed. Centuries old colonial common law, designed pre-magna carta, still frequently used in 21st century US of A.

Over 200,000, what are considered minors, have been married off in the US between 2000 and 2016.

Never hear a peep about it.

Moore's state Alabama itself still marries off 13 yr olds. However. Across the state line in Tennessee......WTF??



NSFW

Quote:Quote:

The youngest children to marry were three 10-year-old girls in Tennessee in 2001, who were married to men ages 24, 25 and 31, according to state data. The youngest groom was an 11-year-old boy, also in Tennessee, who married a 27-year-old woman in 2006.

Children as young as 12 were granted marriage licenses in Alaska, Louisiana, South Carolina and Tennessee.

Thirteen-year-olds were given the green light to marry in Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Washington.

http://apps.frontline.org/child-marriage...e-numbers/



Trying to remember my 11yr old self.

The idea that marriages with age differences cannot work is nothing more than sinful, degenerate dogma.

People have been getting married with large age differences for all of recorded human history, which means it's probably been happening for millions of years.

I know my great-grandmother married at 14. She went on to have a 50 year marriage, with 6 children, and 15+ grandchildren. You're telling me this is bad? Only dumb and evil feminists could think such a thing.

Of course, parental consent was always involved for young ages.

The world we live in is unnatural, has negative birth rates, and causes mass unhappiness. It's obviously doomed. The world of marriages with young women will return, one way or the other.

Modern feminists would consider your great-grandmother a victim of a child marriage to a pedophile.

Notice how those charged words are able to change the opinion of college educated women so easily.

Jones is a doctrinaire liberal, any good vote he casts will be "catch and release", I don't think he has a fucking prayer of winning against a normal candidate in a Presidential year.

A lot of RATS elected in 2006 and 2008 in Republican seats were only partial fuckheads but it didn't save any of them in 2010 after Obamacare (mandate probably stays now, YAY!!!); they all paid the fucking price, even the ones that voted “No.”.

Looking at the bright side, Jones will be the Democrat version of Scott Brown. We all know what that means: TEMPORARY.

Old Scottie ain't nothing but a faded memory now and this libtard Jones will be joining him.

In 2018 the Democrats will have 23 seats to defend. The GOP will have 8. Chances are the GOP majority will grow in 2018.

But does it matter if most of the GOP Senators are Democrats-lite?

Quote: (12-13-2017 02:54 AM)porscheguy Wrote:  

It’s real simple. Would you allow Roy Moore to give your 13/14 year old daughter a ride somewhere? The answer is no. No decent parent would. A decent parent looks at those allegations and says “why take that chance?”

I think that's the difference right there: a conservative parent will say "why take that chance?", and a progressive parent will say, "he's going to be Senator, you're getting in that car with him."

Liberals will sacrifice anything to their ideology.

We don't have to be cucked by harpy femininsts into marrying 50 year old hags, nor do we have to swing full-retard to the other end of the spectrum and start defending 30 year old guys hanging around junior high schools.

The age of consent is what it is, and any man would be a moron to turn down an impressionable, healthy, hot woman fresh off the ranks if he can get her and keep her.

It's in your best interests AND hers as well.

Quote: (12-13-2017 07:23 AM)ed pluribus unum Wrote:  

Quote: (12-13-2017 02:54 AM)porscheguy Wrote:  

It’s real simple. Would you allow Roy Moore to give your 13/14 year old daughter a ride somewhere? The answer is no. No decent parent would. A decent parent looks at those allegations and says “why take that chance?”

I think that's the difference right there: a conservative parent will say "why take that chance?", and a progressive parent will say, "he's going to be Senator, you're getting in that car with him."

Liberals will sacrifice anything to their ideology.

Powerlust is their defining characteristic. Bolsheviks who won Russia is one of the examples of such a characteristic.

Quote: (12-13-2017 07:23 AM)ed pluribus unum Wrote:  

I think that's the difference right there: a conservative parent will say "why take that chance?", and a progressive parent will say, "he's going to be Senator, you're getting in that car with him."

Liberals will sacrifice anything to their ideology.

You can also see this kind of thinking with the accusations against Hollywood actors and directors.

Often its: "The parents didnt want their child to walk off the film so the 'A lister' paid them to shut up. Then the abuse continued."

Quote: (12-13-2017 06:05 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote: (12-13-2017 02:54 AM)porscheguy Wrote:  

It’s real simple. Would you allow Roy Moore to give your 13/14 year old daughter a ride somewhere? The answer is no. No decent parent would. A decent parent looks at those allegations and says “why take that chance?”

Oh yes and Doug Jones is so much more trustworthy? That guy has a pedo face if I've ever seen one.

All the concerned parents who voted against Roy Moore will soon have much more to worry about when there are hordes of illegals and Muslims running around raping their daughters instead. Real threat vs. Fake threat.

So much this. When I first heard the allegations, I saw a picture of Jones (thinking he was Moore) and thought to myself "Yeah...I can definitely see that".

This guy doesn’t leave any meat on the bone:

“The Democrats got 92 percent of their 2016 turnout./The Republicans got 50 percent of their 2016 turnout.”

“You guys are like Wahhabists. All it took to get you to stay home was UNFOUNDED ACCUSATIONS.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/ThomasWictor/...0414027776

The number of write-in votes made the difference in the vote count, if I understand correctly.