Quote: (06-29-2017 07:43 AM)zatara Wrote:
Tinder has made real life game easier, if anything. It provides a crutch for a lot of guys to rely on to get laid. I see far fewer guys approaching, and approaching well, in night life venues every year as more and more of them become reliant on online game. This is definitely improving the opportunities for someone with good approach game in real life. There are huge numbers of girls out there who either don't use Tinder, or who are far more impressed by being approached in person than online.
The looks bar for men has been raised in general though, but not by Tinder. Its been raised by:
a) General improvements in sports science, and an increased level of physical fitness amongst the young male population in the last 20 years in most Western countries and
b) The internet providing a ready style guide for any guy who wants it, meaning its much easier to be fashionable and dress well now than it was 20 years ago.
A 25 year old male on average now dresses better, is fitter, eats healthier and drinks less alcohol than a similar 25 year male did ten, fifteen, twenty or longer years ago. This is the key reason the looks bar is higher, not Tinder.
The solution to this is not to give up and go on angry, bitter rants about how society is destroying itself ala Skank_Hunt. Instead just accept the game has moved on, engage in some self improvement, and get out there and stuck in.
Who says I have given up? On the Anglosphere, perhaps; it doesn't offer a good enough ROI for me, nor does it for countless other men who choose to relocate. That's not giving up; it's smart. If you get a 10x better ROI on your efforts to improve yourself in another place/places, then it makes sense to seek to travel to those places. If I can't stand entitled social media addicted 49ers, fatties, and average girls, and there are places which provide the opposite, it makes sense to go there. Past a certain point, if you go out too many times, you can definitely become jaded, and even if you get a "notch" going out becomes a form of self-flagellation. If you find my writing a bit too much, check out some of Roosh's most popular articles. I am definitely pissed off about a lot of things from social media addiction to general political and social changes that have caused such rapid decline in quantity and quality of women in the US. I understand the perspective of "adapt", but again, past a certain point even the best and most innovative adaptations still produce poor ROI. You may go out in the Anglosphere and have a blast - more power to you. I personally don't find it enjoyable.
Your reasons for male improvement are not wrong: men are more into fitness and style than they used to be today than a few decades ago. You can dispute the reasons as to why that is, but one of them is the "arms race", where in real life (not online) men improve themselves even further to compete with the other men chasing even more scarce pleasant, attractive girls. Inflated attitudes due to social media aside, obesity itself essentially eliminates the large part of the eligible pool of young women, before you even begin to do anything to improve yourself as a man.
As for the "alternative" perspective of social media and dating apps making things "easier", that is simply not true. Attention whoring and inflated egos etc. and their effects are things that no longer need to be explained on here. I understand what you are trying to say but it just does not mesh with reality at this time. Men are overly reliant on online dating, but thirst in general has increased exponentially. Whether in real life or online, women will be approached. Add to this the fact that once women bang male model looking guys, and get repeatedly pumped and dumped by them (the top <1% of the guys on these apps), women will be more used, more jaded, and more expectant of similar quality at a club or bar. By the time the average guy approaches her, she has already been fucked by a number of male "9s" from Tinder, so what are you going to do? "Adapt" when she sees you are nowhere near a "9"? How do you adapt to "No" girls? In most cases, you just can't. No amount of game will change an unwaveringly unreceptive girl's demeanor.
So you "self-improve": you go to the gym and spend huge amounts of time, money and effort to get absolutely shredded, but your genetics have a limit; still only a small fraction of men can become "9". Your time, money and effort would have been better spent working hard, getting your shit in order, and living in places outside the Anglosphere where increasingly your average 6 demands a male 9 as a BF because she managed to get fucked by a few of them on Tinder. Doing this instead of entertaining the low quality women in the Anglosphere is an "adaptation" that can actually provide good ROI. If you want to stay put then no one else can convince you otherwise, but to say that it's become "easier" to approach and get with more and better quality girls as a result of Tinder/social media etc. is laughable and worse, it can mislead members who happen to read your post and actually believe it.