Quote: (05-11-2017 06:59 PM)ThrustMaster Wrote:
Of course, written by a woman. It's amazing that people continue to write this crap to try to get it to be acceptable, or perhaps in hopes of being able to rate a younger guy.
Any highly desireable male of any age will not pair with an older women unless there's a plan. Why do they continue to write this shit?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/05/05/st...cebook.com
A thirsty guy who hasn't hit his SMV peak yet, and can't pull any chicks his own age, might out of desperation go for a post-wall chick. Paradoxically, it could make him seem like he has above-par game, given that he doesn't have a lot of beta bucks to offer her yet. Society teaches that a woman with maturity, money, and status is superior (just as a man with maturity, money, and status is superior), and some guys probably buy into that and think they've landed a great catch.
There ends up being a role reversal where she's the one wining and dining him and buying him presents because she's the one who can afford it, which can make a guy feel alpha, even though it is somewhat of an illusion. Besides, a lot of guys these days are momma's boys who had weak or absent (i.e. non-custodial) fathers, and maybe they're looking for a mommy figure because they never had a role model who could've taught them how to be a man.
From her perspective, there might be a lot of advantages. Cougars with money can be in control of the relationship (and therefore can more easily get away with banging more than one guy), and when he hits his SMV peak, she can reap the benefits in her old age. It's much like investing in a small company that hits the Fortune 500. Men who have never banged a 18-year-old probably don't even know what they're missing.
I've sometimes played around with the idea that maybe there could be a society where, when a girl hits, say, 20, she marries a 40-year-old guy and has kids with him; and then after the kids are grown, when she hits 40, she leaves him to marry a thirsty 20-year-old guy, and spends the next 20 years with him while pursuing her own career, till he turns 40 and trades up to a fresh new 20-year-old. It's kind of like how young men today get stuck driving used cars because it's all they can afford; and then when they get older, they trade up to a newer and nicer car. It would solve the problem of youthful thirst while also dealing with the problem of the
SMV crossover in which men who hit a certain age decide, "I sure would like to get some younger pussy for a change." It's the only solution I know of that doesn't involve polygyny.
If you figure, one of the main causes of marital discord is lack of money, it really doesn't make a lot of sense for 20-year-olds to be marrying 20-year-olds. It makes a lot more sense for one of them to be in their 30s or 40s and far enough along in their career to be making some bank. Historically, it would be the man who was older, but now that's considered predatory and aesthetically disgusting, so I guess it has to be the woman instead. It's just part of a larger trend we're seeing these days where there are good-looking guys everywhere with a fat, busted, and nowadays older, woman on their arm.
This will, of course, tend to lead to demographic collapse and the fall of western civilization, but hey, maybe a new and better civilization will rise from the ashes after a period of dominion by barbarian overlords. The question is, will they understand that feminism caused the old civilization's collapse, or will they speculate endlessly and blame it on other factors?