^^^

I know that the responses here are well meaning, intended to be constructive, and come from the heart. So please take what I'm about to say with a grain of salt and think about it in detail before responding:

For Westerners like most of us here (with some exceptions of course - this is an int'l forum) it is part and parcel of our culture to try to address problems in a logical and analytical fashion. We look at the situation from various angles and then engage in constructive debate and analysis to hopefully settle on a commonly acceptable solution. This is how most democratic issues used to be addressed and sometimes even solved until a few years ago. This mental programming and approach to life in general in fact is a very Western trade although it is also quite dominant across some parts of Asia (in particular Korea or Japan).

So I fully understand that everyone contributing in the European Invasion thread as well as in threads like this one may feel compelled to analyze each aspect of the exponential growth of Islam in the West in order to arrive at either mitigating measures or outright solutions in search of the proverbial light at the end of the tunnel.

Unfortunately you are utterly and completely wasting your time for one main reason: There will be a civil war in some parts of Europe in some parts of Europe and most of Europe by the year 2025. The point of no return was reached in 2015 and as such it doesn't matter what we think or what we do or who we vote for. Even if Le Pen becomes president in May (doubtful) and Merkel's CDU gets handed a crushing defeat (very doubtful) a few months later it would most likely only accelerate the course we are destined to follow over the coming decade.

The time for peaceful democratic solutions has long come and gone. There is simply no changing the inversely correlated demographic curves that will slowly shift Europe from a previously Christian to an Islamic dominated continent. Unless every European woman starts giving birth sometimes this year and the next and the next and the next and the next .... etc... the systematic replacement of the respective host populations in Europe will continue at full force. Even IF a miracle occurred tomorrow and the EU would immediately lock off the entire Schengen area, refusing not a single 'migrant' moving forward, it would only delay the loss of demographic battle by a few years.

And we all know that this will not happen as all leading politicians in Europe are actively colluding against their own indigenous populations. We have been marked for hard as well as soft genocide, the former being via war and the latter via 'multi-culturism'.

I have said this on the European Invasion thread several times before I stopped contributing there: The best thing you can do for yourself and your family at this stage is to formulate an exit plan. The U.S. will experience a lot of turbulence but it will be safer there especially if you seek out relatively homogenous communities. Eastern Europe (e.g. Poland and Hungary) is a safe choice for the next decade although Russia has its own problems with the growth of Islam. Asia, e.g. China, Korea, and Japan are safe countries if you manage to attain a long term visa. South America will be relatively safe in regards to Islam but of course it has its own problems with terrorism and gang violence. As always your mileage may vary.

I also strongly recommend that you seek out an instructor verse in combat or street fighting. Forget martial arts classes as they are useless if you are facing five enrichers with knives sticks and broken glass bottles. You need to learn how to inflict as much damage as possible and not only survive but escape a group attack. Instead of Krav Maga or BJJ you may want to look around for someone who has worked as a bouncer for a few years or if you're really lucky someone with a military background.

I know we are talking Europe but if you can try to get your hands on a hand gun and practice as much as possible. You will also want to get yourself a few knives and become comfortable using them as well as facing them. For that you will need to identify a few trusted individuals with whom you can train on a regular basis (at least once per week). Most importantly acquire some First Aid skills - you will need them. Field dressings are your best friend - there are very few street fights without serious injuries.

That's it - I will now recede back into lurking status. Ignore my warnings and advice at your own peril. Feel free to criticize and to ridicule but I will not respond as I am busy doing all these things I proposed to you above.

Quote: (03-26-2017 07:38 PM)TheOllam Wrote:  

Masood's daughter. Maybe seeing her go western rather than Islam affected him? From The Sun:

"WESTMINSTER killer Khalid Masood’s teenage daughter defied his orders to wear a burqa — and headed to a school prom night in a ­revealing backless dress.

Unlike her older sister, student Teegan Harvey, 18, refused to bow to ressure from fanatical Masood and convert to Islam."

Race mixing gone right - only took 2 generations of white women since the terrorist already had a white mother, then later a second black step-dad.

I have a half-black Norwegian friend who now pops out similar-looking kids.

Either way - frankly the only sound policy towards Islam is the one by Geert Wilders which I personally once thought to be extreme - banning Islam, closing mosques, closing all schools, taking away their right to exist publicly as a religion.

But the globalists want this to happen, so we can all holler and muse what to do. Better focus on banging girls like that and dancing on the Titanic, then taking a lifeboat to Asia or Argentina and continue dancing there.

Also there was some serious shit going with the conversion of the older daughter - she literally had to be almost killed by a bus in order to convert. She waers a full Burka or Niqab now. Women seldom are told the truth about Islam. I heard stories of women converting afater reading Rumi's poems. Only later when they read the Koran and Hadiths were they shocked that the religion had nothing of Rumi in it.

Such dangerous hostile ideologies that are hostile towards everyone non-Muslim must be banned!

Quote:Quote:

Lawrence said Andi was involved in a serious accident when she left her house with headphones on and got hit by a van in 2008.

“She was seriously hurt and was in a wheelchair for a while. It left her traumatized and she was never quite the same afterward,” he said.

That may have led to the forming of a closer bond with her father, who sat at her bedside for hours praying for her.

“She wears a full face veil and I think she has changed her name. It was her father who had helped convert her,” a friend of Jane Harvey said.

“He wanted the younger daughter to convert but Jane was against it and there was quite a family struggle.

“I know Jane was very upset and wanted her to stay at home and continue her studies.”

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/03/27/l...cky-463995

For civil war there needs to be some opposition and I see very little anger over these attacks. If losing one's fiance like that French man with the Bataclan attack can't even spark any anger in people then who knows what will. I was overseas in Thailand when 2005 happened, and I expected to come back to the UK to find real tensions, but there was nothing. Rather than civil war, I expect a situation closer to what Northern Ireland was like before the peace agreement, although I wouldn't rule it out further down the line.

Quote: (03-27-2017 02:09 PM)Kieran Wrote:  

For civil war there needs to be some opposition and I see very little anger over these attacks. If losing one's fiance like that French man with the Bataclan attack can't even spark any anger in people then who knows what will. I was overseas in Thailand when 2005 happened, and I expected to come back to the UK to find real tensions, but there was nothing. Rather than civil war, I expect a situation closer to what Northern Ireland was like before the peace agreement, although I wouldn't rule it out further down the line.

Civil War does not appear until bankruptcy hits. Think Venezuela, which is a lot closer for these mass immigration societies than most here realize.

When the money runs out, you will see how quickly the claws and knives come out. The true nature of people are revealed and it is SHOCKING if you've never seen it before.

Nothing turns people evil as quickly as fight for money does.

Quote: (03-27-2017 08:35 AM)IronShark Wrote:  

For how long more this madness should continue? This is so fucking stupid. These guys kill us every day. And actually then, they become the victim. Few Muslim women along with some ultra left SJWs (with "white guilt" mental issue) gathered yesterday on Westminster Bridge to so-called condemn the attack! How sweet they are. They say "there's no place in Islam for terrorism". Yes, but in every part of terrorism you look, you'll find a bit a Islam!

These bitches are not actually condemning the attack. They're condemning the photo of the Headscarfed Look Up Bitch. That was a narcissistic injury, because they saw themselves in that photo, and this is their way of trying to dissociate from the truth it holds for them.

I'd be more impressed if a long chain of Muslim men or, in particular, imams made a chain across London bridge, because it would demonstrate people that count in the religion were appalled by what was happening. The lack of men, and imams, in the "protest" is quite telling.

Quote: (03-27-2017 02:30 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote: (03-27-2017 02:09 PM)Kieran Wrote:  

For civil war there needs to be some opposition and I see very little anger over these attacks. If losing one's fiance like that French man with the Bataclan attack can't even spark any anger in people then who knows what will. I was overseas in Thailand when 2005 happened, and I expected to come back to the UK to find real tensions, but there was nothing. Rather than civil war, I expect a situation closer to what Northern Ireland was like before the peace agreement, although I wouldn't rule it out further down the line.

Civil War does not appear until bankruptcy hits. Think Venezuela, which is a lot closer for these mass immigration societies than most here realize.

When the money runs out, you will see how quickly the claws and knives come out. The true nature of people are revealed and it is SHOCKING if you've never seen it before.

Nothing turns people evil as quickly as fight for money does.

This will be the catalyst for war, no doubt.

Its one thing if your kids are fed and healthy, to turn a blind eye to the giant sucking sounds of the welfare state. But when suddenly money, and by extension food, become scarce then we will see fathers do what they have always done; Fight.

Muslims are going to be in trouble, of that there is no question. Its hard to think of what the 'best case scenario' is for them as weak western leadership, coupled with invasion numbers of dangerous and hungry tools, will likely mean violence. Or, at the very least a siege type of environment where logistics to Islamic ghettos are reduced to trickles.

It is already happening in Paris. The police there have already abandoned the idea that they must uphold the sanctity of civilized law. They are desperate and scared, fighting an enemy that will stop at nothing to bring the city down to their level of animism. When the police suddenly have to act this way in order to stay safe, then will they also try and stop groups of local men from also protecting their neighborhoods? I doubt it.

Not even 200 years ago, cities raged war on one another while 500km away peaceful villages napped under the orchard trees in bliss. I think we will see more and more of this as capital European cities decline into tension and people (and capital) find a safer place.

I unfortunately think that police have shown through history to be on the side of the powers that be. It's more likely with a military coup than wide scale police action.

I think the police at best will start turning a blind eye to any perceived anti-government activity and in rare cases allow for certain materials and information to "fall off the back of a truck".

Widescale police defection would simply give a pretence to declare martial law before the military is ready to take a side. It would likely end disastrously.

Besides, if you were a cop why would you toss your career and possibly your freedom or life away for a citizenry that do little more than bitch and moan. "Lesser" peoples routinely rally in the millions to voice their grievances. Apparently welcoming home a champion sports team is the only thing that will get a million plus westerners onto the streets.

Quote: (03-27-2017 11:10 PM)Laner Wrote:  

Quote: (03-27-2017 02:30 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote: (03-27-2017 02:09 PM)Kieran Wrote:  

For civil war there needs to be some opposition and I see very little anger over these attacks. If losing one's fiance like that French man with the Bataclan attack can't even spark any anger in people then who knows what will. I was overseas in Thailand when 2005 happened, and I expected to come back to the UK to find real tensions, but there was nothing. Rather than civil war, I expect a situation closer to what Northern Ireland was like before the peace agreement, although I wouldn't rule it out further down the line.

Civil War does not appear until bankruptcy hits. Think Venezuela, which is a lot closer for these mass immigration societies than most here realize.

When the money runs out, you will see how quickly the claws and knives come out. The true nature of people are revealed and it is SHOCKING if you've never seen it before.

Nothing turns people evil as quickly as fight for money does.

This will be the catalyst for war, no doubt.

Its one thing if your kids are fed and healthy, to turn a blind eye to the giant sucking sounds of the welfare state. But when suddenly money, and by extension food, become scarce then we will see fathers do what they have always done; Fight.

Muslims are going to be in trouble, of that there is no question. Its hard to think of what the 'best case scenario' is for them as weak western leadership, coupled with invasion numbers of dangerous and hungry tools, will likely mean violence. Or, at the very least a siege type of environment where logistics to Islamic ghettos are reduced to trickles.

It is already happening in Paris. The police there have already abandoned the idea that they must uphold the sanctity of civilized law. They are desperate and scared, fighting an enemy that will stop at nothing to bring the city down to their level of animism. When the police suddenly have to act this way in order to stay safe, then will they also try and stop groups of local men from also protecting their neighborhoods? I doubt it.

Not even 200 years ago, cities raged war on one another while 500km away peaceful villages napped under the orchard trees in bliss. I think we will see more and more of this as capital European cities decline into tension and people (and capital) find a safer place.

The reason Venezuela doesn't have civil war is that the government has complete control over the food supply which they distribute to loyal Chavistas and have a disarmed populace that they rule over.

British Indian here...My suggestion on dealing with radical Islam in the UK:

• Ban welfare to all Muslims - just about all radical Muslims are on welfare. These bastards are anti UK, and at the same time living off UK government money. If welfare is banned, then they will have to either get jobs and become more productive members of society, or they can leave the country and go somewhere where there's better welfare.
• Ban cousin marriage - causes issues with illiterate mothers coming in from Pakistan, inbreeding and genetic illnesses.
• Ban the niqab (where you can only see the eyes) due to security concerns.
• Ban pro-Islam stories on the BBC. Every fucking time they have a Muslim celebrity on they bring up their religion - who cares?
• Shut down all government funded religious schools from the last 20 years - especially Islamic school. This should include Hindu and Sikh schools as well. This was introduced by that motherfucker Tony Blair. "Legacy" Christian and Jewish schools, which are over 30 years old should be allowed to stay open.
• Ban group prayers and socialising between Muslim inmates in prison. Put them in solitary confinement. If solitary confinement makes them insane so be it. Fuck them. If they were well behaved citizens then they would never have been inside in the first place.
• All Muslim prisoners convicted of terrorism related should be electronically tagged and tracked once released. Their passport will be taken away and they will be subject to travel bans.
• All preachers in mosques will be liable to government vetting of their sermons. Any preachers supporting terrorism will be liable for prosecution under anti-terrorism laws.
• Ban all preachers from high risk countries such as Saudi Arabia entering UK.
• Ban halal meat in prison. A lot of non-Muslim prisoners convert just to get better food. Vegetarian food should be served only. If they want halal meat, they can eat it when they get released.
• The death penalty for treason should be brought back, and any British citizens caught plotting against the UK government will be subject to the death penalty.
• Any British citizen found in a foreign country fighting for Islamic groups will be killed on site. No ifs or buts. If they claim they are doing "charity work" they can go fuck themselves.
  

-----------------------------------------------------------
The reason why a lot of British Pakistani youth become radicalised is because most of them do not understand Arabic. When they read the Quran', most of them have no idea what the words actually mean. There's also a generational gap between the parents and the younger generation. The parents generation is more concerned with politics at their local mosque and tend to be more into Sufi or Barelvi Islam, which is less strict than Saudi style Wahabbi or Salafi Islam. The younger generation do not listen to them, but they are open to listening to charismatic Arab radicals.

Pakistanis have massive inferiority complex when it comes to Arabs, and they try to "out Arab" the Arabs by getting deep into Islam. They also have a massive level of self hatred. Try to get a Pakistani to admit that his ancestors were Hindu or Buddhist. Most won't admit it, despite it being obvious - they will try to claim Arab or Persian ancestry.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I think you guys are pedestalising Japan way too much when it comes to food. I've been told by multiple Chinese people that the Chinese food there isn't particularly good. Thai people have told me the food isn't as good as Thailand. The fish chips wasn't as good as UK and the Indian food there is tasteless.

Michelin stars are Eurocentric and only recently have they considered Asia as a possible food destination. Where's Thailand on the list? Malaysia? India? Indonesia? They are all have great cuisines.

Quote: (03-28-2017 03:02 AM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

British Indian here...My suggestion on dealing with radical Islam in the UK:

• Ban pro-Islam stories on the BBC. Every fucking time they have a Muslim celebrity on they bring up their religion - who cares?
  

/ This /\n

Quote: (03-28-2017 03:02 AM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

-----------------------------------------------------------
I think you guys are pedestalising Japan way too much when it comes to food. I've been told by multiple Chinese people that the Chinese food there isn't particularly good. Thai people have told me the food isn't as good as Thailand. The fish chips wasn't as good as UK and the Indian food there is tasteless.

Michelin stars are Eurocentric and only recently have they considered Asia as a possible food destination. Where's Thailand on the list? Malaysia? India? Indonesia? They are all have great cuisines.

All those measure don't go nearly enough, but we won't get even 1% of what you are proposing.

---

As for food - I doubt that any country can compete with Japan in aggregate.

A country's cooking depends on a multitude of factors similar to how civilization is being built or technology developed or not.

+ hygiene level of a people
+ basic education and veneration for cooking - many countries lack even a formal education or it's crap
+ general IQ of a people
+ wealth of a country
+ appreciation for new astonishing cuisine (not every country likes always new)
+ the affluent of a country willing to spend top dollar for food

It is not even enough to throw money at and you get the best. Otherwise the gulf states would have the best restaurants in the world - and they don't.

The Japanese have the best mix of all the factors combined - discipline, hygiene, education, pride and appreciation of cooking, wealthy supporting high-end restaurants, Japanese loving novelty cooking.

France also has a deep appreciation for that. Italy has as many high-end restaurants as Germany despite being poorer - but Italians appreciate it more. Eastern Europe generally has lower standards across the board with Hungary being the only place sticking out because they have the old Austrian basica education system.

The US and UK have more well-off folk living there, but there are basic minuses on multiple fronts there in terms of cooking. Don't get me started with SEA. Even when you have Asian owners in Europe there is a massive gap between the heritage of the owners from best to worst: Japanese, Chinese, Thai, Vietnamese etc. With each nationality descending in all areas starting with hygiene and ending with serving you rotten meat.

I am talking here about aggregate eating experiences starting from high-end places and ending to your humble shack on the side of the road. A country's regulations also have an impact on the general quality - the lax they are the worse it gets.

The funny thing is that I remember the UK having such bad restaurants that the safest bets for quality were the Indian ones. The local cuisine even is not that important - there are delicious dishes across the board in each country. However what matters more is how the population can actually implement that and for the high-end ones - go way beyond into new territories with the well-off part of the population being willing to support it.

And of course - as with all things in life - exceptions only prove the rule. The best cook in the world may be Nigerian or Spanish - does not mean that those countries will be the top in the world ever.

Quote: (03-28-2017 01:46 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

I think the police at best will start turning a blind eye to any perceived anti-government activity and in rare cases allow for certain materials and information to "fall off the back of a truck".

Widescale police defection would simply give a pretence to declare martial law before the military is ready to take a side. It would likely end disastrously.

Besides, if you were a cop why would you toss your career and possibly your freedom or life away for a citizenry that do little more than bitch and moan. "Lesser" peoples routinely rally in the millions to voice their grievances. Apparently welcoming home a champion sports team is the only thing that will get a million plus westerners onto the streets.

I always suspected that the whole 'policing by consent' model implemented in the U.K and even how the establishment was adamant on not giving normal officers firearms. Is a way to minimise the risk of a coup, or something happening similar to Chavez in Venezuela.

For anyone doubting that it would possible to deport Islamic culture from the UK:

180,000 Jews have left Egypt, only 18 remain*

*Trying to find the article.

Quote: (03-28-2017 03:02 AM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

The reason why a lot of British Pakistani youth become radicalised is because most of them do not understand Arabic. When they read the Quran', most of them have no idea what the words actually mean. There's also a generational gap between the parents and the younger generation. The parents generation is more concerned with politics at their local mosque and tend to be more into Sufi or Barelvi Islam, which is less strict than Saudi style Wahabbi or Salafi Islam. The younger generation do not listen to them, but they are open to listening to charismatic Arab radicals.

Will confirm this 100% - I had no idea what the fuck I was reciting when reading the Quran. It was just memorization and repetitive bullshit.

I read alot of books back then, and not knowing what the fuck I was reciting made me realize it was pointless and idiotic.

I stopped going to an "aunt" of my mom to learn and recite. Apparently I had "mental problems" because I was rejecting Islam - ironically she's the one who has mental issues.

Quote:Quote:

Pakistanis have massive inferiority complex when it comes to Arabs, and they try to "out Arab" the Arabs by getting deep into Islam. They also have a massive level of self hatred. Try to get a Pakistani to admit that his ancestors were Hindu or Buddhist. Most won't admit it, despite it being obvious - they will try to claim Arab or Persian ancestry.

While I never had much interaction with arabs (coming from a Paki/Indian family) I think there's alot of pride riding on them.

I honestly don't know what my ancestors were, I'd be stoked to know.

Yeah claiming that is a far stretch and trying to "out Muslim" other races in Islam is a joke.

The religion is truly a farce, I went through an atheist phase of my life, now, honestly I just don't have time nor care for religion.

Quote: (03-28-2017 11:29 AM)kaotic Wrote:  

Quote: (03-28-2017 03:02 AM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

The reason why a lot of British Pakistani youth become radicalised is because most of them do not understand Arabic. When they read the Quran', most of them have no idea what the words actually mean. There's also a generational gap between the parents and the younger generation. The parents generation is more concerned with politics at their local mosque and tend to be more into Sufi or Barelvi Islam, which is less strict than Saudi style Wahabbi or Salafi Islam. The younger generation do not listen to them, but they are open to listening to charismatic Arab radicals.

Will confirm this 100% - I had no idea what the fuck I was reciting when reading the Quran. It was just memorization and repetitive bullshit.

I read alot of books back then, and not knowing what the fuck I was reciting made me realize it was pointless and idiotic.

I stopped going to an "aunt" of my mom to learn and recite. Apparently I had "mental problems" because I was rejecting Islam - ironically she's the one who has mental issues.

That is what they used to say during the Soviet communist system - you had to be mad for not seeing Communism as the best thing in the world:



There is one sure way on how to deal with ideologies and mental engrams that hold us back:

As for the food debate, I do not trust Chinese-American establishments. I don't think they give a shit about sanitation or hygiene very much. And the cookie cutter kung pao chicken menus they all serve I doubt they actually eat themselves, that shit is greasy beyond belief.

Outside of sushi, Japanese food does nothing for me. Italian is the shit.

Quote: (03-28-2017 03:02 AM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

I think you guys are pedestalising Japan way too much when it comes to food. I've been told by multiple Chinese people that the Chinese food there isn't particularly good. Thai people have told me the food isn't as good as Thailand. The fish chips wasn't as good as UK and the Indian food there is tasteless.

Michelin stars are Eurocentric and only recently have they considered Asia as a possible food destination. Where's Thailand on the list? Malaysia? India? Indonesia? They are all have great cuisines.

Nah, you're just taking my comments out of context.

First of all, I cited Michelin stars because it's a factual, quantifiable way to shoot down fake foodie leftists' retarded "multicultural" claims, not because it's the end all, be all to whether food is good or not.

And secondly, no shit Thai food is better in Thailand and Indian food is better in India.

That's the whole point. You don't get great cultural traditions, like food, by jamming a bunch of different cultures into London or New York and telling them to play nice.

They come from a specific group of people cultivating a specific type of culture in a specific region over a period of centuries.

Even the US, which is more ancestrally diverse than most places, is known for being very culturally insular, at least until recently.

Quote: (03-28-2017 10:40 AM)Laner Wrote:  

For anyone doubting that it would possible to deport Islamic culture from the UK:

180,000 Jews have left Egypt, only 18 remain*

*Trying to find the article.

Jews leaving Israel is nothing like trying to getting Muslims to leave UK. Most of the Egyptian Jews went to Israel, which borders Egypt...it's not like they had far to go.

---------------------
Another thing, a lot of Black converts to Islam in UK are unaware how blacks have been treated by Islamic cultures over the years. Imparting knowledge to them can slow conversions.

I used to work with a British Ghanaian guy, and he mentioned to me that he was thinking of converting to Islam because he had heard a lot of good things about it. I said to him, "Why don't you find out what the Muslims did in Ghana?"...I ran into him a couple of weeks later and he said "fuck these guys, there's no way I'm converting".

There is a community of Africans in India and Pakistan descended from slaves which were brought into there from Africa. Who brought them over...? Here's a clue - it wasn't Hindus, Sikhs or Buddhists...

Quote: (03-28-2017 02:36 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

Quote: (03-28-2017 10:40 AM)Laner Wrote:  

For anyone doubting that it would possible to deport Islamic culture from the UK:

180,000 Jews have left Egypt, only 18 remain*

*Trying to find the article.

Jews leaving Israel is nothing like trying to getting Muslims to leave UK. Most of the Egyptian Jews went to Israel, which borders Egypt...it's not like they had far to go.

---------------------
Another thing, a lot of Black converts to Islam in UK are unaware how blacks have been treated by Islamic cultures over the years. Imparting knowledge to them can slow conversions.

I used to work with a British Ghanaian guy, and he mentioned to me that he was thinking of converting to Islam because he had heard a lot of good things about it. I said to him, "Why don't you find out what the Muslims did in Ghana?"...I ran into him a couple of weeks later and he said "fuck these guys, there's no way I'm converting".

There is a community of Africans in India and Pakistan descended from slaves which were brought into there from Africa. Who brought them over...? Here's a clue - it wasn't Hindus, Sikhs or Buddhists...

That's what I am always thinking - the group the least mind-bogglingly dumbfounded to ever convert to Islam are blacks.

But there is something very helpful in Islam about it - just tell them everything they wanna hear, tell them only the good things, never the bad stuff, tell them about the peaceful period of Mohammed in the beginning where he grew from 1 to 140 in 12 years with great success, tell him how peaceful Mohammed was when everyone criticized him, but then avoid telling what he did in the next 10 years when his flock grew from 140 to 70.000 as Mohammed at first raided caravans, then amassed armies, bought support, killed all the people who had previously scorned him - better not tell them that. Never mind the black slavery part where Abed is an Arabic word for black as well as for slave. I wonder how well it would go if Americans still called blacks slaves. "Hey slave! Wanna convert to my religion?"

Back in the 1970s they could do it because there were no translations of the Quran. Nowadays US black converts can read up, they don't have to listen to Imams cherry-picking verses and twisting history.

Also 80% of Muslim converts leave Islam within 5 years in our times. The psychopaths stay though and why wonder - it is the perfect religion for them.

What some people don't seem to get is that the lower classes have a higher standard of living in Europe than US, many who would be lower classes in US are middle class in Europe due to make believe jobs in the public sector. In addition, consumption is high due to inflated property prices which have allowed consumer loans in mortgages for years. Most Europeans have enough money and safe enough lives to not be bothered by immigrants except the odd assault in nightlife. Europeans simply still prefer their consumerist lifestyle over their dimished safety. Their ill earned consumer spending, still outweights the increased crime. I predict this will only change once the boomers die off and their overpriced properties will crash once the boomer lobbies can't make politicians prop up their property prices. That will be the final nail in the coffins of the European welfare states who will no longer be able to afford debt based spending.

I have some optimism because of Trump, because Trump's demands to pay for NATO is simply impossible within welfare budgets. HUGE cuts will be made, which essentially means either getting rid of shitloads of government employees and/or doing something about the immigrant burden. However, the traiterous politicians of course won't do this, they will instead find the money by decreasing welfare services, which are already subpar and strained and that will make the rabbit people squeal and send them running to national-socialists like Marine Le Pen.

Quote:Quote:

I also strongly recommend that you seek out an instructor verse in combat or street fighting. Forget martial arts classes as they are useless if you are facing five enrichers with knives sticks and broken glass bottles. You need to learn how to inflict as much damage as possible and not only survive but escape a group attack. Instead of Krav Maga or BJJ you may want to look around for someone who has worked as a bouncer for a few years or if you're really lucky someone with a military background

Do boxing. There's a lot to be said for being able to start a fight by throwing a couple fast, effective, punches....plus a number of the guys shown in those "one man army" videos are obviously boxers judging by their technique.

Good and informative vid by David Wood:






It's funny that after the Rotherham scandal the politicians commissioned a study examining whether race had something to do with the rising number of rape gangs. Of course it was found to had nothing to do with race, but they did not check whether it might have something to do with the ideology of Islam.

This crap will intensify as Muslims are told to be superior to unbelievers, to be much greater while meeting head-on with the reality of their military and countries being much worse and also their positions among the unbelievers consisting of the underclass - either unemployed or most in very humble jobs like cab driver or kebab .

Also this is relevant:

Quote: (03-28-2017 12:04 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

As for the food debate, I do not trust Chinese-American establishments. I don't think they give a shit about sanitation or hygiene very much. And the cookie cutter kung pao chicken menus they all serve I doubt they actually eat themselves, that shit is greasy beyond belief.

They don't.
In places with a reasonably large Chinese diaspora, the restaurants often have a separate menu in Chinese with more authentic dishes.

Quote: (03-28-2017 12:06 PM)Enigma Wrote:  

And secondly, no shit Thai food is better in Thailand and Indian food is better in India.

Indian food is actually better outside of India, due to circumstances Zel mentioned.
Indian cuisine in itself is fantastic though.

Quote: (03-26-2017 08:00 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  

The most amazing tasting and best quality (non Japanese) foreign food I ever ate was in restaurants run by Japanese in Japan.
They know how to make foreign food even better than the native countries they are copying.
No immigrants needed.

I once ended up in a swanky Italian restaurant in Tokyo, all Japanese kitchen staff.
Mindblowing!
And I've been to Italy about a dozen times.

Quote: (03-26-2017 07:38 PM)TheOllam Wrote:  

Unlike her older sister, student Teegan Harvey, 18, refused to bow to ressure from fanatical Masood and convert to Islam."[/i]

Would bang and raise racially ambiguous crusaders with.

Interesting how the media turned the Westminster attack into a 'positive story.

Since the attack has happened, well actually on the very same day. There have been daily stories on how money has been raised for the slain PC. Muslim women have been holding hands on the bridge in solidarity. A rather ecstatic looking restaurant owner who has been given a prize a day after the attack for giving emergency service workers free meals. And of course the members of parliament congratulating each other for 'staying calm' during the attack.

By doing this the media has been able to spin this round into a positive. No outrage or anger just carry on as normal. Trying to equate this to being on the same lines as the 'stoic' spirit which Londoners had during the second world war. Even though modern day culture mostly rejects that spirit as being regressive and old fashioned, because it is not politically correct.

Either way we'll look back in history and marvel at the splendour which is today's narrative.