Quote: (04-14-2016 02:21 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  

White men having sex with white women will be categorized as rape with life sentence.

That's already called "marriage"

The end goal is to confuse everyone and then transition to asexuality- it will be a relief to all at that point(I truly believe things will go as far as you can imagine, no need to spell it out). Once asexuality is the norm and breeding is controlled they have won.

Inspired (if you can call it that) in part by this thread about a book for kids which promotes the idea of a cross-dressing boy as normal, and some of the comments there about how this sort of thing is paving the way toward the acceptance of pedophilia, allow me to make a few predictions....

We have recently seen an effort to change the way pedophiles are perceived: to show that they are not all bad people; that in fact many "ethical pedophiles" exist, who feel sexual attraction for children but do not act on it.

We've also seen efforts made to alter the perception of pedophilia, attempting to reclassify it from a perversion to a kind of sexual orientation. (Much like homosexuality.)

Eventually, someone is bound to explore the other side of this coin — namely: Are sexual relationships between children and adults necessarily always harmful? Might there be evidence that such relationships can in fact be beneficial?

Some researcher/expert will manage to find people who say they had sexual experiences with adults when they were kids, and have not only not experienced any trauma or other negative repercussions as a result, but they found their experiences to enjoyable and enriching, contributing positively overall to their lives.

We will see the attempt to draw a line between sexual abuse — where a child is subjected unwillingly to sexual activity, often accompanied by terror, threats, and other kinds of physical harm — and a loving, gentle sexual relationship, where children can safely engage in sex play with trusted grownups.

It is the former, we will be told, which is destructive and hurtful to children.

Then some forward-thinking genius will postulate: If pedophiles were provided with a safe, supervised outlet for their desires, it could do a lot to reduce or even eliminate so-called "child molestation" and child sex abuse. It would have a beneficent impact not only on the lives of individual pedos and kids, but for society as a whole.

Happily, I don't think things will progress too far beyond that point. Articles will be written, efforts will be made, and certain individuals will devote a great deal of time and energy toward the cause, but I don't think we will ever see widespread acceptance of pedophilia and adult-child sex — for the simple reason that any society that were to accept this as normal, or even as remotely acceptable, would be a society so far gone morally and intellectually, it would be virtually (if not literally) collapsing in ruins.

Deity identity disorder

I am Jesus trapped in a mortal's body - worship me and send me all of your money and virgin daughters, or else you're just bigoted against divine avatars and deserve to be arrested for hate crimes

Homo AIDS roulette is a thing now in Barcelona

http://metro.co.uk/2016/05/16/people-are...v-5885625/

Western society is on suicide watch.

Most bestiality is legal, declares Canada's Supreme Court

Quote:Quote:

Sex acts with animals are legal in Canada, so long as there is no penetration involved, according to a surprise ruling issued by the Supreme Court.


The determination stemmed from a case involving a British Columbia man convicted of 13 counts sexually assaulting his stepdaughters - including one count of bestiality. But the man, identified only as "DLW", was acquitted of the bestiality count with the new ruling.

DLW's attorneys argued that bestiality linked to "buggery" - or sodomy - with animals beginning with an 1892 criminal code. Bestiality was first used in a 1955 code, but still was not defined to encompass every sex act with animals.

"Although bestiality was often subsumed in terms such as sodomy or buggery, penetration was the essence - 'the defining act' - of the offence," the court said.

Thus, the court ruled by a 7–1 majority that bestiality required penetration.

“There is no hint in any of the parliamentary record that any substantive change to the elements of the offence of bestiality was intended,” the ruling reads.

According to court record DLW smeared peanut butter on the genitals of his victims and had the family dog lick it off while he videotaped the act.

Court documents disclose that DLW attempted to have the dog perform intercourse on the stepdaughter, but that ultimately failed.

DLW is serving a 16 year prison sentence. He brought the bestitality conviction to the court on appeal.

Justice Rosalie Abella was the lone dissenter, and had suggested that the court deny the appeal.

“Acts with animals that have a sexual purpose are inherently exploitative whether or not penetration occurs,” she wrote.

Representatives for Animal Justice, who brought the case to the Supreme Court, said the ruling should encourage Parliament to act on changing "outdated" laws that fail to protect the country's animals.

"As of today, Canadian law gives animal abusers license to use animals for their own sexual gratification," executive director of Animal Justice Camille Labchuk told The Independent via emailed statement. "This is completely unacceptable, contrary to societal expectations, and cannot be allowed to continue."

Animal Justice implored Parliament to pass the Modernizing Animal Protections Act.

"This much-needed bill updates the animal offences in the Criminal Code," Ms Labchuk added, "and closes this dangerous loophole to make it crystal clear that all forms of sexual activity between a person and an animal are unacceptable."

^^^^

Perhaps PETA can finally be used to do something good for the planet?

Didn't some guy in Seattle die of having his colon perforated after he got a horse to fuck him?

I'd like to think his last words were "My kingdom for a horse!"

I thought this picture more or less sums up this thread in a nutshell:

Allens Croft School introduces 'gender-neutral' uniform policy allowing boys to wear skirts

Quote:Quote:

17:05, 12 Jun 2016
Updated 17:05, 12 Jun 2016
By Anuji Varma

Kings Heath primary is among 80 nationwide to relax formal rules on what boys and girls must wear

A Birmingham primary school has become one of the first in the country to introduce gender-neutral uniforms.

Allens Croft School’s uniform list does not differentiate between options for boys and girls.

Its website simply tells parents of acceptable items, such as a grey or black skirt or trousers and a pale blue dress.


Allens Croft School's uniform policy.

The move is part of a government-funded drive to make uniform polices more sensitive to transgender children.

The Kings Heath school’s policy states: “At Allens Croft we aim to promote each child’s right to express their gender and personality in whichever way feels right for them

“To support this aim, our uniform policy is gender neutral.


Allens Croft headteacher Paula Weaver.

“This means that, while we expect all our children to wear school uniform, the rules for boys and girls are the same and we do not insist they wear specific items of clothing.’

The school previously taught pupils about equal rights for all by using a book written by a boy of five who wore dresses .

The Sunday Times reported that 80 state schools, including 40 primaries, now operated a gender-neutral stance towards uniform.

Diversity campaigners argued that traditional school policies risked alienating lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender children.

Earlier this year, the independent Brighton College announced it was breaking with tradition by giving pupils the option of wearing a skirt and blouse or trousers and shirt.

Headmaster Richard Cairns announced in January that uniform codes going back 170 years would be replaced by a ‘trouser uniform’ and a ‘skirt uniform’ for all pupils up to the age of 16.

Transgender pupils will be able to wear a full Tweed blazer, tie and trousers, or a skirt, bolero jacket and open-neck Revere blouse.

Mr Cairns said: “If some boys and girls are happier identifying with a different gender from that in which they were born, then my job is to make sure we accommodate that.

“I hate the idea of anyone being in my school who is miserable because they’re being asked to dress in a way they are uncomfortable with.

“Brighton College has instead decided to abolish the notion of boys’ and girl’ schools altogether.”

New Gender-Neutral Uniform Policy Gives U.K. Students A Choice Between Pants & Skirts

Quote:Quote:

Jun 13, 2016 3:30 PM
Nellie Eden

A new government-backed policy will allow students of any gender at 80 state schools in the U.K. to choose whether they wear a skirt or pants as part of their uniform, the Telegraph reports. The move comes after continued lobbying from LGBTQ communities and marks an increasing spotlight on gender equality and acceptance of diversity in schools, both in Britain and abroad.

As part of this new gender-neutral decree, the uniform policies of participating schools (institutions that are government-funded) have gotten rid of gendered language altogether. Out of the 80 state institutions that have adopted the change, 40 are elementary schools (called primary schools in the U.K.), according to The Independent. The gender-neutral uniform stems from a grant aimed at making government-funded schools more LGBTQ-inclusive, a spokesperson for the U.K. Department of Education told Mashable. Specifically, the money goes to "target[ing] homophobic and transphobic bullying in schools," in order for students to develop to their full potential in an education environment.

Allens Croft School, an elementary school, was the first to adopt this new policy, though it wasn't all that recently: The school's principal, Paula Weaver, told the Guardian that the rule took effect "more than a year ago." So far, the feedback has been positive — and the intention is to offer options as to how students can dress, instead of limiting them, as Weaver told the publication: "We’re not insisting on anyone doing anything. It’s not about influencing children. It’s about giving them choice."

A shift toward more progressive uniform policies has been in the public conversation for some time now. In the U.K., a private boarding school in Brighton axed its 170-year-old dress code in January. Of the groundbreaking decision, the school's headmaster, Richard Cairns, explained at the time that "if some boys and girls are happier identifying with a different gender from that in which they were born, then my job is to make sure that we accommodate that," according to the BBC. Back in October, public school students in Puerto Rico were given the choice of wearing either pants or skirts as part of their uniform — based on whichever garment students felt best aligned with their gender identity.

Across the pond, more inclusive visions of what uniform policies should (and can) look like might soon roll out all over the country. Julia Neal, chair of the U.K.-based teaching union ATL's equality and diversity committee, explained the urgent need for more inclusive attitudes in schools. "It's about senior management teams and governing bodies understanding that there are a lot of facilities in schools that are separated — changing rooms and toilets and uniforms are very gender-specific," she told the Independent. Neal, who has also been petitioning for gender-neutral toilets in British schools, added that administrators need to understand the importance of respecting students' preferred pronouns and gender expressions (as any uniform conversations or changes ought to take into account).

And the freak show continues unabated. Good lord, these people are so out and proud of their degeneracy, it revolts me.

Mothers actively inspiring the Oedipus Complex

Keep in mind that some of these are hard to predict. Notice that a lot of new pushes pop up every time they feel they've won something.

What's happening is that they're floating new ideas waiting to see which one strikes a nerve. When they find it they pile on, we go though the same predictable cycle of mounting SJW, outrage, token push back, and then the government steps in to "protect everyone's rights". Rinse wash repeat.

More and more feminist males will brag about being so "open minded" that they let
very often their girlfriends and wives get fucked anally by other random men they met in bars

^Basically already happened: http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/07/what-ope...inism.html

Paul Joseph Watson rips into the guy here:




Time moves fast. Next degeneracy: News reports reveal that migrant refugees keep a harem of european men as sex slaves. These men backwards rationalize this as multiculturalism!

Additional: refugees given free reign to shoplift. Their items of choice? Preferably sexual paraphernalia, but a mannequin will do:

Before hiring an employee, the company must rank all applicants based on merit and demographic criteria. These all add up to a point score and the position must be offered to the highest scoring one:

Age +10 points per year over the age of 40
Experience in a similar role +10 points per year
Degree in a related subject +40 points
Degree in an unrelated subject +15 points
Minority gender within company +25 points
Minority ethnicity within company +25 points
Minority ethnicity within local country +20 points
Disability +25 points
Unemployed more than 2 years +10 points

I can see this happening in Europe

Yeah but for Polygamy it's kinda like gayhabitation. It may be practiced but soon it will be discrimination that they can't get benefits too... And racist against Muslims.

In case you missed it, the video I posted was a TEDx talk about pedophilia being normal. TED pulled the video (censored) after a shitstorm in the comments, but people have been reposting it.

To find it, search for “TEDx Pedophilia is a natural sexual orientation.”

Quote: (06-22-2018 08:38 PM)RexImperator Wrote:  

In case you missed it, the video I posted was a TEDx talk about pedophilia being normal. TED pulled the video (censored) after a shitstorm in the comments, but people have been reposting it.

To find it, search for “TEDx Pedophilia is a natural sexual orientation.”

Pretty sure I would never be inclined to plug that into my internet browser... lol

Quote:Breitbart Wrote:

On May 5, medical student Mirjam Heine spoke at an independently organized TEDx Talk event at the University of Würzburg in Germany. In a description of the event, the TED Talk website explained that Heine’s would focus on her belief that pedophilia is a natural, unchangeable sexual orientation.

Ms. Heine “believes that no one is responsible for their sexual orientation, for their feelings, but that everyone is responsible for acting upon this sexual orientation,” the website reads. “She also inquires how all of us can gain if we distinguish clearly between our feelings and our actions. Since pedophiles can’t change their sexual desires, they must learn to control them to not act upon them.”
“Let me be clear here, abusing children is wrong without any doubt. But a pedophile who does not abuse children has not done anything wrong,” Heine said in her lecture.

Heine’s lecture suffers from her own confusion on the topic. “Scientific studies indicate that one of the strongest indicators of child sex abuse committed pedophiles is social isolation. People who can’t tell anyone that they are pedophiles can’t get any help,” she states. “For example, they can’t tell their friends that they can’t go the beach because children will be there as well.”

The TED Talk organization immediately took down the video in response to a massive online backlash against the talk.

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/06/22...a-lecture/

Video games will include gay porn simulations, first as optional side quests or unlockable achievements, then eventually as the main objective of games. Boss battles will involve VR helmets hooked up to bluetooth dildos--the harder and deeper the gamer takes it, the more points they get

Quote: (06-12-2016 04:47 PM)EDantes Wrote:  

I thought this picture more or less sums up this thread in a nutshell:

This picture is proof that reality exceeds imagination. Notice in this picture:

- absence of children
- people are rather attractive no self mutilation, no piercings, tats, only few fat people
- no racial mixing
- no state soldier enforcing participation in the degeneracy everyone seems to be in it willingly


Reality has potential to get much worse.

Bump:

I'm starting to notice a LOT of left-media articles about "sex workers". Generally these articles paint the sex workers as industrious, noble women victimized by a corrupt patriarchial law enforcement complex that abuses them.

This would be a very good next degeneracy. I imagine that the "clique" has made the following calculation. They blame the rise of the right largely on losers not being able to get laid. Therefore, if they legalize prostitution a lot of them will just get hookers and will go back to being complacent instead of being angry. The problem goes away, they get to normalize more degeneracy, and they get the split the right by pitting religious types against libertarian types.

I suspect that it will be the revival of ancient Greek-style pederasty as a social rite of passage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederasty_...ent_Greece