Quote: (10-28-2015 04:38 AM)Sooth Wrote:
Quote: (10-27-2015 09:59 PM)talvesh Wrote:
Quote: (10-27-2015 11:52 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
Every sexual morality has to go.
Also I might add - the social planners work in cycles testing the water for blowback. If they see that too many people resist pedophilia (inter-generational sex as they call it now), then they put it on hold for a few years or even a decade, then they start again after the new generation has been brainwashed better and families are more destroyed. I guess the Muslim population brought into the West will change the dynamic too in that respect as pedophilia and bestiality are no biggies for some of them. (Of course for everyone except their daughters.)
Do you have evidence to back up these specific claims? I see a lot of claims like this and they are never verifiable.
Go verify them yourself with your own understanding.
Don't be the guy chucking a spanner in the works of conversation because you don't agree with it but have insufficient understanding to explain why.
People who know about a subject talk in generalisations and stereotypes because they already know the data and therefore it's efficient to do so.
Check out the Rogan Milo podcast where Milo coins Rogan as the "Dreary Nitpicker" for doing exactly this - trying to halut conversation by any means because he knows he's losing.
The problem with nitpicking and "prove it all" arguments is that of course none of us has seen top elite plans of for example feminism, where they state clearly why they support it:
1. destruction of family unit
2. taxation of females - pushing them into the work force
3. lowering of wages due to internal female competition
4. destruction of social morals - female fake empowerment ans sexual liberation
There may be some documents out there, but usually there are just statements, books, some minor white papers and the realization that it indeed works that way. The closest we have is the Reece commission on foundations, but even there was the fact that the lawyer permitted entry into the Ford foundation archives could not make copies or take papers outside.
But when you have a smoking gun and a body in front of it, then we don't have to see bullet flying and have it on film and 10 witnesses to make the conclusion.
Everyone has to make up his mind based on the information out there. And there is plenty of data which support our statements. Those demands of proof usually are not raised when a university speaks about feminism, gender crap or the media and politicians repeat one lie after another. As soon as you have the cash and the mainstream behind it, then you can make up any lie you want, because you have the official authority backing it. Infinite money does not equate infinite truth though.