Quote: (10-27-2015 11:43 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:
^^^
Brilliant, AB. I'm going to tweet that out right now. It needs to be seen.
I'm not sure anything
needs to be anything, QC. Things just
are.
Obviously, NAWALT. There are two types of women in my eyes: Princesses and Queens. Queens are the ones who have emotionally-matured past a high school mindset, or have driven minds that work hard to achieve their goals, or whom have built emotional resilience through hardship. They've usually earned their stripes by being forced to accept hard realities. They're the ones whose behaviour frequently-surprises me – they’re far more genuine to be around and far less prone to High School Drama. I think of them as Queens because they possess genuine wisdom and their outlook tends to be community and family-orientated.
Princesses, though? Their outlook is entirely-self focused. Thoughts of community are simply ways to elevate themselves through Social / Moral Crusading. Thoughts of family, when they even exist, are that parents are a financial and emotional resource to be exploited to achieve their own goals, and that children are simply extensions of themselves, without their own desires and dreams.
Unfortunately, this is now the vast majority of modern women as cultivated by Feminism and Academia.
Here's another example:
Rule 1. I deserve attention.
Rule 2. I lack genuine talent or beauty to gain attention, so I'll tweet a picture of myself naked.
Rule 3. ...Despite the fact I'm ugly and obese and people are disgusted.
Rule 4. Obese bodies are beautiful, and your disgust is just fat-shaming.
or
Rule 1. I deserve to be taken seriously as an academic critic of video games from a Feminist Mental Environmentalist perspective.
Rule 2. I could create a series of honest criticisms of video games, and whilst I might have some valid points, others might be false, so I could potentially improve by listening to feedback. Still, I could slowly build an audience with an understanding that my perspective is just one of many... but I'm lazy. Look, I'm being harassed! I won't debate my points! Give me money and media attention!
Rule 3. As an agent of change, I need to encourage diversity to create the necessary conflict required to steer the culture to the outcome I've predetermined, so If I need to bend the truth, demonise opponents, lie by omission and exaggerate the danger I'm in, well, the ends justify the means.
Rule 4. All criticism is just harassment by misogynists! Women never lie! Listen and believe.
or
Rule 1. I deserve the boy I'm romantically interested in.
Rule 2. He seems disinterested, so I could either try to genuinely-connect with him, or face up to reality and move on to find another man, but I'm lazy, so I'm sure he'll want to protect me if I look like I need rescuing and then he'll deeply-love me.
Rule 3. "There's this guy called George Glass Haven Monahan. You wouldn't know him - he's Canadian, but he and his friends violently-raped me for hours in a UVA Frat House."
Rule 4.
EVERYONE INVOLVED DID RULE 4 FOR HER! The police, the university representatives, Rolling Stone, her friends: no-one dared call an obvious liar an obvious liar.