My guess:
The next time it will be Tuth trolling the forum, and everyone who posts in the thread will get banned.

What happened here is exactly what Rollo predicts in Preventive Medicine:

Quote:Quote:

When you assert yourself as a Red Pill Man, you are asserting your disconnection from that feminine-primary frame. This begins on a personal level for a woman, and then extrapolates into a social affront for all women.

The initial shock (and indignation) is one of interrupting her comfortable, predictable expectations of men in the feminine defined reality she experiences for herself. As even the most rookie of Red Pill Men will attest, the legitimate female experience rejects this assertion, most times with an amount of hostility.

Men are met with socially reinforced, prepared responses designed to defend against attempts to question the legitimacy of the feminine experience as the primary one – shaming is often the first recourse, even most passive challenges warrant shaming, but character assassination and disqualifications based upon a feminine primary perspective are the go-to weapons of the solipsistic nature of the feminine mindset (even when men are the ones subscribing to it).

The next weapon in the feminine psychological arsenal is histrionics.

In the same vein as a Woman’s Prerogative (women reserve the rightness of changing their minds) and the Feminine Mystique, female histrionics are a legitimized and socially excusable tactic with the latent purpose of protecting a woman’s solipsistic experience. She’s an emotional creature and your challenge to her ego only brings out the hysteric in her – it’s men’s fault that they don’t get it, and it’s men’s fault for bringing it out in her by challenging her solipsism. And thus is she excused from her protective histrionics at men’s cost.

It’s important for Red Pill Men to understand what their presence, much less their assertions, mean to the feminine; their very existence, just their questioning, represents a challenge to individual, ego-invested feminine solipsism.

What happened here is that a young woman's solipsism suffered a harsh blow; a real-life man was not putting her first. As a woman she needs to be put first all the time. How dare he! This girl's a gorgeous, brilliant, beautiful person, inside and out, she sets up dates with handsome lawyers and cancer researchers all the time; but this guy wasn't putting her first! Wtf is wrong with him??

So she, a 5, came to the belly of the beast, threw a histrionic fit about a guy whose mental point of origin was himself and not her and sure enough, "Red Pill" guys were back to make sure to tell her; don't worry baby, you and your feelings are still the most important things in the world.

What better proof is there that the Feminine Imperative is real?

She feels the same way men feel when they lurke gold digger forums.

She doesnt understand why men place such high value on sex with beautiful women. And thinks game is all about being an asshole, dark triad psychopaths, lying, cheating, pumping and dumping and beating up women.

Game is make up for men.

I don't remember seeing or meeting the girl after the DC lecture. The banned member she dated (Divorco) is a troublemaker who I'm sure is a feminist sympathizer. He came to the DC lecture to troll the Q&A. He failed. Then he hopped on a bus one week later to New York City. He was at the hotel but didn't come into the conference room, deciding to interrupt conversations during the happy hour instead. I received complaints about him afterwards.

I'm very shocked that the girl he chooses to date turns out to be as unbalanced as he is, and that he actually thought it would be a good idea to invite her to the DC lecture happy hour. If there ever was a just ban on a former member, it's for this guy. His obsession for the forum (and me) is still strong, so I'm sure he'll try to pop up again.

^ I bet Divorco printed out that post, framed it on his wall and is smiling.

This thread is like a male attention whore winning grand slam for him, bottom of the 9th in the World Series.

He is going to take it with him to have you sign it at some point.

Reading this thread felt like watching a drama.

[quote='Travesty'
This thread is like a male attention whore winning grand slam for him, bottom of the 9th in the World Series.
[/quote]

best quote on the thread

Quote: (07-30-2015 03:14 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

His obsession for the forum (and me) is still strong, so I'm sure he'll try to pop up again.

Have you thought about getting a restraining order? He's threatening to dress up as a woman at the next D.C. meetup so no one recognizes him.

Quote: (07-30-2015 09:45 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 09:38 AM)PainPositive Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 09:22 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:48 AM)studmuffin52 Wrote:  

Agreed, more white knightism on here than I thought.

I always liked standing up for the underdog, whatever sex, race, species.

Mouse against cat? Go you little sucker.

What coherent definition do you have for "White Knighting?" It's another jingoistic term for those who don't want to stop, and THINK and WORK to clearly express specific ideas, actions and positions.

The term is well known. Sticking up for the underdog is not what these guys were doing.

So are "conservative" and "liberal", and they mean close to nothing.

Go ahead, show me an something like an objective definition. "Everyone knows" says nothing.

I'm using underdog, to me it means someone or something that is a battle where it is clearly overmatched, usually with connotations that the weak combatant's position is at least morally valid as the more powerful's.

You may use whatever definition you like for underdog, white knight, liberal, or conservative you like. I'm not a dictionary so I won't be defining anything. You know what I'm referring to when I say white night. At least a loose definition. I don't need to define white knight to know that "standing up for the underdog" is not what the guys PMing her and entertaining this cunt's little tantrum were doing.

The thirst on this thread was disgusting for many reasons, most of which were already stated. What I can't understand is why you are defending this obvious rolling over of fellow forum members. As a senior member you should be condemning thirsty/ white knighting behavior because of it's affects on men and women alike.

Not to mention the fact that this bitch came in here trying to fuck someone over because of her emotional instability. You want to defend that? By your definition she falls under the category of underdog? How?

Quote:iknowexactly Wrote:  

...usually with connotations that the weak combatant's position is at least morally valid as the more powerful's.

Her position (according to you) as a backstabbing, insulting, vengeful, attention whoring, trifling, disrespectful, arrogant, hamster-head little twat is one of moral validity and equal morally? No says I.

Definition of White Knight? Sticking up for this silly bitch and then trying to pep talk and support her through PM.

Quote: (07-30-2015 07:27 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 03:14 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

His obsession for the forum (and me) is still strong, so I'm sure he'll try to pop up again.

Have you thought about getting a restraining order? He's threatening to dress up as a woman at the next D.C. meetup so no one recognizes him.

Does he go to every RVF function in the D.C. area? I've only been to one event and it was in D.C. The only guy over fifty who I remember was that "fecal accident" guy who nobody besides me seems to have met. Before I was thinking that I met Divorco there, but I didn't realize he was over fifty. I think the guy who I thought was Divorco was really Chad Daring, who is a really young guy.

Quote: (07-30-2015 07:27 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 03:14 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

His obsession for the forum (and me) is still strong, so I'm sure he'll try to pop up again.

Have you thought about getting a restraining order? He's threatening to dress up as a woman at the next D.C. meetup so no one recognizes him.

You can Aliblahba to it while your getting one Roosh, save yourself the time for getting it later

Quote: (07-30-2015 07:54 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 07:27 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 03:14 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

His obsession for the forum (and me) is still strong, so I'm sure he'll try to pop up again.

Have you thought about getting a restraining order? He's threatening to dress up as a woman at the next D.C. meetup so no one recognizes him.

Does he go to every RVF function in the D.C. area? I've only been to one event and it was in D.C. The only guy over fifty who I remember was that "fecal accident" guy who nobody besides me seems to have met. Before I was thinking that I met Divorco there, but I didn't realize he was over fifty. I think the guy who I thought was Divorco was really Chad Daring, who is a really young guy.

In case anyone is wondering....

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:13 PM)Suits Wrote:  

In case anyone is wondering....

^What the fuck did I just read?!

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:13 PM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 07:54 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 07:27 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 03:14 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

His obsession for the forum (and me) is still strong, so I'm sure he'll try to pop up again.

Have you thought about getting a restraining order? He's threatening to dress up as a woman at the next D.C. meetup so no one recognizes him.

Does he go to every RVF function in the D.C. area? I've only been to one event and it was in D.C. The only guy over fifty who I remember was that "fecal accident" guy who nobody besides me seems to have met. Before I was thinking that I met Divorco there, but I didn't realize he was over fifty. I think the guy who I thought was Divorco was really Chad Daring, who is a really young guy.

In case anyone is wondering....

Yeah, that's the guy. He showed up at the D.C. meetup literally hours after he was banned from the forum and he started talking to me almost immediately after I walked in.

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:21 PM)Aquiles_Baesta_Parada Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:13 PM)Suits Wrote:  

In case anyone is wondering....

^What the fuck did I just read?!

It gets even worse

   

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:30 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:13 PM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 07:54 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 07:27 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 03:14 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

His obsession for the forum (and me) is still strong, so I'm sure he'll try to pop up again.

Have you thought about getting a restraining order? He's threatening to dress up as a woman at the next D.C. meetup so no one recognizes him.

Does he go to every RVF function in the D.C. area? I've only been to one event and it was in D.C. The only guy over fifty who I remember was that "fecal accident" guy who nobody besides me seems to have met. Before I was thinking that I met Divorco there, but I didn't realize he was over fifty. I think the guy who I thought was Divorco was really Chad Daring, who is a really young guy.

In case anyone is wondering....

Yeah, that's the guy. He showed up at the D.C. meetup literally hours after he was banned from the forum and he started talking to me almost immediately after I walked in.

What did he talk to you about? Your bowel movements?

Quote: (07-30-2015 09:22 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:30 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:13 PM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 07:54 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 07:27 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  

Have you thought about getting a restraining order? He's threatening to dress up as a woman at the next D.C. meetup so no one recognizes him.

Does he go to every RVF function in the D.C. area? I've only been to one event and it was in D.C. The only guy over fifty who I remember was that "fecal accident" guy who nobody besides me seems to have met. Before I was thinking that I met Divorco there, but I didn't realize he was over fifty. I think the guy who I thought was Divorco was really Chad Daring, who is a really young guy.

In case anyone is wondering....

Yeah, that's the guy. He showed up at the D.C. meetup literally hours after he was banned from the forum and he started talking to me almost immediately after I walked in.

What did he talk to you about? Your bowel movements?

No, but he did start talking about the fecal accident thread and him being banned from the forum. For obvious reasons, I kept moving in order to meet other forum members.

Quote: (07-30-2015 09:19 PM)birthday cat Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:21 PM)Aquiles_Baesta_Parada Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:13 PM)Suits Wrote:  

In case anyone is wondering....

^What the fuck did I just read?!

It gets even worse

Yeah, I also didn't realize that gay stuff until after the meetup when I went to see what else he had posted. I knew about the fecal accident thread, because there were new posts on it I believe the same day as the meetup.

Quote: (07-30-2015 09:19 PM)birthday cat Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:21 PM)Aquiles_Baesta_Parada Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:13 PM)Suits Wrote:  

In case anyone is wondering....

^What the fuck did I just read?!

It gets even worse

Damn you Birthday Cat!
and damn me for clicking and reading!!!!

Quote: (07-30-2015 09:22 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

I always liked standing up for the underdog, whatever sex, race, species.

Mouse against cat? Go you little sucker.

What coherent definition do you have for "White Knighting?" It's another jingoistic term for those who don't want to stop, and THINK and WORK to clearly express specific ideas, actions and positions.

Did standing up for the underdog this time involve messaging this girl privately?

Quote: (07-30-2015 03:14 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

I don't remember seeing or meeting the girl after the DC lecture. The banned member she dated (Divorco) is a troublemaker who I'm sure is a feminist sympathizer. He came to the DC lecture to troll the Q&A. He failed. Then he hopped on a bus one week later to New York City. He was at the hotel but didn't come into the conference room, deciding to interrupt conversations during the happy hour instead. I received complaints about him afterwards.

I, for one, think bans from the forum should extend to all aspects of the Roosh Franchise. You can't post on the RVF, you can't comment on ROK, you can't get tickets to Roosh Lectures, and you can't eat at Rooshinoya Pussy-Beef Bowl locations.

Since you guys like forum drama, I'll manufacture some for your continued amusement. I'll target one of the forum's biggest drama hounds:

I think Mechanico should have to explain himself on the Divorco matter. He repeatedly endorsed him on the forum, pleading on his behalf and asking me--on more than one occasion--that I not ban him. He always supported the case with the argument that he was a cool guy in person. Now, this seems to suggest that Divorco might be as autistic and feminist in person as he was on the forum.

If we think about, this whole drama happened because of Mechanico. If Mechanico never grabs my hand as I'm about to hit the ban button on Divorco years before he was finally banned, he never becomes a "PUA," this poor defenseless girl never gets victimized, and she never joins the forum and trolls us--forcing secretly heroic members to waste precious time having to write her supportive walls of text through private message.

Quote: (07-30-2015 09:36 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 09:22 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:30 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 08:13 PM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (07-30-2015 07:54 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

Does he go to every RVF function in the D.C. area? I've only been to one event and it was in D.C. The only guy over fifty who I remember was that "fecal accident" guy who nobody besides me seems to have met. Before I was thinking that I met Divorco there, but I didn't realize he was over fifty. I think the guy who I thought was Divorco was really Chad Daring, who is a really young guy.

In case anyone is wondering....

Yeah, that's the guy. He showed up at the D.C. meetup literally hours after he was banned from the forum and he started talking to me almost immediately after I walked in.

What did he talk to you about? Your bowel movements?

No, but he did start talking about the fecal accident thread and him being banned from the forum. For obvious reasons, I kept moving in order to meet other forum members.

I read this thread in its entirety last night. I came back for a second helping of knighting just to be greeted with the tale of a gay man whose anus has an unpredictable shutter speed. . .

This thread is like four seasons of Prison Break. I can't keep up with all the twists and turns.