Quote: (04-23-2015 09:37 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

Here is the complaint. Let's dig into this:

https://kcjohnson.files.wordpress.com/20...plaint.pdf

This complaint is absolutely devastating.

I encourage everyone to read it.

Emma's behavior is infuriating. She is Jackie Coakley II.

What I don't understand is, why is Emma not being sued personally?

That's what they teach at Ivy League schools these days. Bad spelling and taking it up the ass, then crying rape.

Quote: (04-23-2015 09:45 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

from the complaint:

Quote:Quote:

16. While they were still freshmen and before any physical relationship had begun, Emma broached the topic of anal sex with Paul by private Facehook messenger as follows:


Emma: fuck me in the butt

Holy shit. Read the complaint. Emma is a total slut and bat shit crazy. She was fucking everyone and enjoyed taking it up the ass. LOL

Every woman I've ever met or encountered who goes this direct this early is either bipolar or mentally ill in some other way.

With him being so young, there probably was no way he could have known this. Experience is usually the only way to learn, unless you're part of a forum like this.

A good way to avoid crazy women going crazy is to sidestep overtly rejecting them. Say you have mono, or your pet died, or a family member is sick. "I want to see other women" is like throwing gasoline on a fire.

Because when women are this intense in one direction, expect them to be equally as intense in the other. In other words, her lust (or desire for control on the sexual playing field) is just as powerful as her hate (also a desire for control, as we've learned).

The saying "If it sounds too good to be true it probably is" applies here.

Dusty, the problem is that many people think -- or at least profess to think -- exactly in the way I wrote in that post; and the even bigger problem is that these people have great and growing power.

Since that way of thinking is as monstrous as it could possibly be -- I mean that literally -- it follows that we have something of a problem on our hands.

I hope Paul's lawsuit is successful beyond all expectations.

Quote: (04-23-2015 10:27 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

What I don't understand is, why is Emma not being sued personally?

Why would you sue an individual with no money when you can sue a school with lots of money instead?

There's nothing to be achieved by suing her and given the constant white-knighting in society, suing her would just be bad press.

If he wants to sue her, I'd be best to focus on this lawsuit first and following up with a lawsuit against her if successful in suing the school.

However, odds are they will just settle, which generally precludes admission of guilt.

You have no idea how happy this makes me

I'm happy that Paul is going to get justice, but he set himself up here with awful game.

He was engaging in "platonic sleepovers", letting her talk to him about how she was fucking other dudes, and engaging her sexually while knowing that she was mentally unstable -- as evidenced by her prior behavior which he was well aware of, he even continued to fuck her after she told him she contracted an STD from letting multiple dudes raw-dog her, I mean, come. the. fuck. on.

He didn't deserve all of this mental heartache and anguish, but, no chick's pussy is worth anything that he has gone through.

I've said it before, game isn't just being able to get girls, it's also knowing which girls to not fuck with.

This dude better learn, if he hasn't already.

Quote:Quote:

Columbia Professor Kessler also guided Emma in developing the Mattress
Project, knowing that her piece was targeted at a fellow Columbia student. Columbia Professor
Kessler stated:

The impulse was there for her to carry the bed around, and she didn’t necessarily
have the information as to how that would fit into the context or the history of
performance art. So this summer we got involved in phone conversations about
the nature of endurance art, talking about pieces by Tehching Hsieh and Marina
and Ulay and Chris Burden.

But what struck me from the get-go . . . is that, more than any of those people,
Emma’s work comes from something which is so much more personal and so
much deeper and so much less of a programmatic idea about what to do, but really
about working something out cathartically and also making an enormous
statement for change And that’s what makes it so powerful

To these people its not even an issue of the truth, its an issue of the feelings.

Quote: (04-23-2015 11:55 PM)jariel Wrote:  

I'm happy that Paul is going to get justice, but he set himself up here with awful game.

He was engaging in "platonic sleepovers", letting her talk to him about how she was fucking other dudes, and engaging her sexually while knowing that she was mentally unstable -- as evidenced by her prior behavior which he was well aware of, he even continued to fuck her after she told him she contracted an STD from letting multiple dudes raw-dog her, I mean, come. the. fuck. on.

He didn't deserve all of this mental heartache and anguish, but, no chick's pussy is worth anything that he has gone through.

I've said it before, game isn't just being able to get girls, it's also knowing which girls to not fuck with.

This dude better learn, if he hasn't already.

So, in conclusion, she gets raped in high school, gang-banged in college, gets an STD, and then publicly shames the one guy who listened to her and acted as a friend.

She's like an amplified version of every nightmare we've all had about American woman: giving a break to the bad boys and destroying the nice guy. Alpha fux; Beta bux has apparently been downgraded into Alpha fux; Beta jail.

But don't get upset just yet. To paraphrase an ancient Bob Dylan song, now ain't the time for your tears. When she's teaching your kids, hosting a talk show, or writing a newspaper column, then will be the time to truly break down.

PS: That legal filing is extremely long and time-consuming to digest. Here's hoping someone like Richard Bradley or Steve Sailor will take the time and do an analysis or two of it on their blogs, which are both read by media people (even if they don't admit it).

Quote: (04-24-2015 12:26 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

PS: That legal filing is extremely long and time-consuming to digest. Here's hoping someone like Richard Bradley or Steve Sailor will take the time and do an analysis or two of it on their blogs, which are both read by media people (even if they don't admit it).

Trust me, it's worth it.

I've always enjoyed reading legal documents, as they're obsession with detail always leads to fun descriptions that you just won't read anywhere else.

This filing in particular, is absolutely hilarious to digest.

Quote:Quote:

As a result of the foregoing, Paul is entitled to damages in an amount to be
determined at trial, plus prejudgment interest, attorneys’ fees, expenses, costs and disbursements.

I hoped that he would do it. Germany is not a very litigation happy country, but he must have been contacted by lawyers who told him that he is sitting on a potential gold-mine aside from the fact that he can clear his name once and for all.



There are so many facts surrounding that case that they would likely prefer to settle before trial.

Also the lawyer is not some kind of Better-Call-Saul:

Quote:Quote:

Andrew T. Miltenberg is the managing member of the litigation practice at the New York City law firm of Nesenoff & Miltenberg, LLP. He is a graduate of Emory University and Brooklyn Law School, and regularly appears before the Courts of the State of New York, as well as the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. He often appears pro hac vice in numerous other state and federal courts.

Looks like Columbia and mattress girl are double-fucked.

Yeah - the legal document is fun to read, because it includes so many mindless transgressions - if Columbia were a company they would try to settle even before the law suit is filed.

Also Dusty - Emma is not sued personally because she is not someone who gets xxx mio. $ in federal funding like Columbia.

I can't see them doing anything but settling before trial. Sulkowicz isn't on trial, so she has no incentive at all to cooperate with the university, and it's not like Columbia can say "Testify on our behalf or you'll never graduate" - they would not risk that in a million years. And she'd be an absolute loose cannon on the stand.

For those who don't have the time to read the entire complaint (or more specifically, those who don't want to, because who doesn't have a free hour once in a while), the main take away is this:

From page 52:

Quote:Quote:

AS AND FOR THE EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)

180. Paul repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation hereinabove as if fully set forth herein.

181. Based on the foregoing facts and circumstances, Columbia intentionally discriminated against Paul on the basis of his male sex by condoning a hostile educational environment due to knowingly permitting Columbia student Emma and Columbia Professor Kessler to engage in prolonged gender based harassment of and gender based misconduct as to Paul based on what Columbia had determined after investigation were untrue allegations and permitting that gender based harassment and gender based misconduct in the school’s programs or activities with actual knowledge of, a deliberate indifference to and an apparent approval of said gender based harassment and gender based misconduct, with the consequence that Paul has been effectively denied equal access to Columbia’s resources and opportunities, thereby undermining and detracting from Paul’s educational experience.

I hope this lawsuit isn't settled, because it has the makings of a landmark case.

I can't promise that it's never happened before, but alleging discrimination because one is male, has got to be a rare argument to make.

That being said, the facts of the case as stated in the first 50% of the complaint filing, make for a very strong argument that negligence occurred.

Intentional discrimination is harder to prove without insider witness testimony, so it would come down to the standard of evidence imposed by the judge responsible for the case.

It goes without saying that this will be very interesting to watch (if it doesn't settle out of court).

If this comes out the way we want it to, it will set the groundwork for future legal arguments that universities are intentionally anti-male environments.

Quote: (04-24-2015 12:46 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (04-24-2015 12:26 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

PS: That legal filing is extremely long and time-consuming to digest. Here's hoping someone like Richard Bradley or Steve Sailor will take the time and do an analysis or two of it on their blogs, which are both read by media people (even if they don't admit it).

Trust me, it's worth it.

I've always enjoyed reading legal documents, as they're obsession with detail always leads to fun descriptions that you just won't read anywhere else.

This filing in particular, is absolutely hilarious to digest.

Emma did ass to mouth, had sex with two guys at once, and got the clap all before her junior year. She did ass to mouth, for fun not profit, before she was out of her teens. She had done anal multiple times with multiple people, accused multiple people of sexual assault and only turned on Paul when he declined to enter a relationship with her. He knew she did ass to mouth, she did ass to mouth with him, she told him she got the clap, she told him she banged two guys at once, and that she slept with all of her last boyfriends friends- Then she got mad when he just wanted to be friends-then she cried rape a year after their last sexual encounter. The day before she cried rape, she messaged him that she loved him.

I just wrote that out to give you guys a clear understanding of how shit played out so you could take it all in. Unlike her he has digital proof of her doing all of this in her own words. This is not hearsay, this is what she wrote to him about in private messages. Here is the kicker, I do not think Emma is a rarity, I think a lot more girls are fucked up enough to do this to men who don't play by the rules they set in their own head. By the way I did not even mention the women who made fake claims at Emma's behest.

This is why I do not believe Bill Cosby's accusers, even if their are 100 of them. This hysteria, blame game , shame game, court of public opinion, move the goal posts, change the meaning of words bullshit is par for the course with women.

Take the time and read the filing, Emma has gaping (teen anal gaping) holes in her story.

Quote: (04-24-2015 02:15 AM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  

Emma did ass to mouth, had sex with two guys at once, and got the clap all before her junior year. She did ass to mouth, for fun not profit, before she was out of her teens. She had done anal multiple times with multiple people, accused multiple people of sexual assault and only turned on Paul when he declined to enter a relationship with her. He knew she did ass to mouth, she did ass to mouth with him, she told him she got the clap, she told him she banged two guys at once, and that she slept with all of her last boyfriends friends- Then she got mad when he just wanted to be friends-then she cried rape a year after their last sexual encounter. The day before she cried rape, she messaged him that she loved him.
...

This is why I do not believe Bill Cosby's accusers, even if their are 100 of them. This hysteria, blame game , shame game, court of public opinion, move the goal posts, change the meaning of words bullshit is par for the course with women.

Take the time and read the filing, Emma has gaping (teen anal gaping) holes in her story.

That's some heavy stuff. I think that times have changed at least on the legal arena.

A case like Mike Tyson only worked in the early 1990s, because the frame was totally anti-Red Pill then. Nowadays it would become public knowledge that Mike's fake victim had previously accused another ex boyfriend of rape (a white dude), she had a strict father and that she came out of the bathroom at the night without her panties on. Tyson would walk free now and Cosby would do so too. They will never go to court with their 2 dozen regret-rape-fame-gold-digging rape stories.

Quote: (04-24-2015 02:38 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Quote: (04-24-2015 02:15 AM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  

Emma did ass to mouth, had sex with two guys at once, and got the clap all before her junior year. She did ass to mouth, for fun not profit, before she was out of her teens. She had done anal multiple times with multiple people, accused multiple people of sexual assault and only turned on Paul when he declined to enter a relationship with her. He knew she did ass to mouth, she did ass to mouth with him, she told him she got the clap, she told him she banged two guys at once, and that she slept with all of her last boyfriends friends- Then she got mad when he just wanted to be friends-then she cried rape a year after their last sexual encounter. The day before she cried rape, she messaged him that she loved him.
...

This is why I do not believe Bill Cosby's accusers, even if their are 100 of them. This hysteria, blame game , shame game, court of public opinion, move the goal posts, change the meaning of words bullshit is par for the course with women.

Take the time and read the filing, Emma has gaping (teen anal gaping) holes in her story.

That's some heavy stuff. I think that times have changed at least on the legal arena.

A case like Mike Tyson only worked in the early 1990s, because the frame was totally anti-Red Pill then. Nowadays it would become public knowledge that Mike's fake victim had previously accused another ex boyfriend of rape (a white dude), she had a strict father and that she came out of the bathroom at the night without her panties on. Tyson would walk free now and Cosby would do so too. They will never go to court with their 2 dozen regret-rape-fame-gold-digging rape stories.

Rape shield laws are bullshit you cannot get away with in any other area of law. Contracts for example, If I accuse you of breach of contract the court looks at our behaviour before and after the contract, how did I behave in similar contracts, did my behaviour look like someone who believed a contract was established? Basic shit really.
With rape shield laws a womans prior sexual history is out of bounds, her name is protected, and the entire investigation is slanted in her favor. Kobe, Mike Tyson, Duke LAX, Mattress girl Emma, UVA, Brian Banks, and Tupac are the just the recent cases of woman lying obviously. When behavior is incentivised do not be surprised when that behavior becomes frequently observable. Being able to unilaterally accuse someone of a crime to no detriment to yourself will always lead to abuse.

Bookmarking that pdf.

I can't wait until the next person posts something about that cunt and her mattress on my facebook. Just going to link to the pdf.

from the pdf

Quote:Quote:

Columbia Removes Students’ Right to Confidentiality in its 2014 Policy
130.
In a comparison of the 2013 and 2014 versions of Columbia’s Gender Based Misconduct Policies, it is evident that Columbia deleted any references with regard to the privacy of the respondent. This deletion occurred after Emma had begun a campaign against Paul, spreading confidential information to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, as well as to the press.
Regardless of Columbia’s accommodation of Emma’s practices, what remained in the 201Gender Based Misconduct Policy should have still protected Paul from the abuse and harassment that he has faced and continues to face to this day.

Those text messages in the complaint really reveal the character of this crazy bitch.

How do these people manage to get into ivy league schools with that kind of demeanor? I don't get it.

Why any male would consciously choose to attend Columbia is beyond me at this point.

The university has proven wholeheartedly that it doesn't give two fucks about male students.

This particular episode could happen to any male student, and the university will traipse over its own policies and students rights -- as they pertain to the male(s) involved -- to protect feminist propaganda and its enablers.

The bitch involved should be in jail, not attending the State of the Union as some sort of honored guest like she has accomplished something.

As far as game goes in this situation, I'm a thinker of the game. Mixed breeds inherently tend to have a number of mental issues usually surrounding their self-identity, tread lightly until she's clearly established that she's mentally and emotionally healthy -- this one had an "Avoid At All Costs" label stamped on her forehead.

In this case, we have a Japanese-JAP who's the daughter of psychiatrists, and we're shocked she's nutso and this shit ended badly?

When you're blinded by the pussy, mistakes will be made, some of them will be more costly than others, like finding yourself having some psychotic bitch going to the ends of the Earth to destroy your life, and for what?

The lulz.

I'm 7 pages in, it's astonishing reading.

It confirms strongly, many game and red pill ideas.

Quote: (04-24-2015 03:37 AM)Laurifer Wrote:  

Those text messages in the complaint really reveal the character of this crazy bitch.

How do these people manage to get into ivy league schools with that kind of demeanor? I don't get it.

I have banged a few Ivy League girls and I will be the first to tell you they were all nuts with a victim complex and drug abusers. All of them had bullshit majors, all of them did drugs to excess, all of them did everything(I mean everything!!!) freaky as hell in bed, and all of them were very proud of where they went to school even though they were bad in their chosen profession. They were all lawyers from top ten law schools, and none of them were above a 7 in attractiveness, also all were late 20's early 30's when I was dealing with them and they all wanted a relationship with me even though I treated them like shit and used them for money and drugs. All of them except one, ended up burning out of the legal profession and doing something else with their JD or going back into academia to teach. No bullshit, only Ivy women end up like this in the legal profession- all the dudes I know from the Ivy league schools bust ass professionally and are successful to some degree.

I never dated an Ivy Leaguer while they were young and in college, but Emma seems like the younger version of what I have dealt with as an adult.

Quote: (04-24-2015 03:48 AM)Lizard King Wrote:  

I'm 7 pages in, it's astonishing reading.

It confirms strongly, many game and red pill ideas.

Wait till you get to the drug abuse and group sex, that shit is gold. The real Red Fucking Pill portion is when he gets a girl he likes(who did not fuck the entire campus, and stood by him through this whole ordeal) and begins to get serious with her and Emma's whole frame just crumbles. Textbook crazy girl, vindictive, and unable to see anything but what she wants and fuck who gets hurt. Paul is the only victim here, he is a brilliant architectural student, hard working, in love with New York and all the career potential the city has to offer someone with his talent- only to be derailed by an ass to mouth slut who cannot except he does not want her. Paul was able to attend an Ivy League school on full scholarship, english is not even his first language, make excellent grades in a difficult major and it is all derailed by the ass to mouth mattress girl. I hope he gets serious money out of Columbia, he deserves it.

Take heart that Paul will prevail. This lesson will harden him and hopefully keep him from making further mistakes with women (SUP PAUL, for whenever you find RVF), and overall he seems to have a very good head on his shoulders.

Where-as Emma Sulkowicz's end will probably be suicide after driving away anyone that cares about her.

Put it this way, holding onto text messages is likely to save his ass on this. Without them he'd have had nothing but he said/she said.

I hereby promulgate the creation of a new, more powerful form of condom: the textom. Wear one always, gentlemen, before and after.