[Layercake]

Read this (& weep) article from 2002 - still relevant however.

"Natural Blondes to Die Out in 200." - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2284783.stm

[MiXX]

(12-10-2011 12:28 PM)Layercake Wrote:  

it's obvious from this photo she had just dyed her hair dark.

Ha! If a natural blonde in South America were to dye her hair black, I think the legal penalty is to be stoned until death occurs by the entire local male community. seriously!

Not sure I understand why a natural blonde girl would want her hair black, that's just fucking crazy! Regardless of $$$

Mixx

[Derek]

(12-10-2011 12:28 PM)Layercake Wrote:  

Hi Mixx

Great slating thanks. - but I think it's obvious from this photo she had just dyed her hair dark. Probably sick of being typecast as blonde. She is a natural blonde however. She just dyed it dark for a photo-shoot with a photographer.

In reference to blonde v brunette, I'm love them all! Even ridiculously hot redheads would "get it"

These days all girls dye their hair! Even dudes!

The only really natural blondes come from Northern Sweden & Norway.

It's a dying gene sadly.

Pure bullshit, blondest people in europe are frisians, wether they are from the dutch or german area. The bad part they are all like 190 cm/6'3, thus you need to be really tall to have fun there, And southern Sweden/Norway are probably slighty blonder than the north due to lesser uralic/lappid influences in south, in fact the blondest scandinavian country overall is Denmark, not Norway or Sweden. The blonde to brunette ratio there is unbelievable:

for example:

You wont come to such blonde crowds anywhere in eastern europe..

[MiXX]

Holy shit!!! I would just die if I were in the middle of that sea of blonde women!!! Daaaaaammmm!!


Mixx

[Layercake]

(12-10-2011 12:38 PM)Derek Wrote:  

(12-10-2011 12:13 PM)MiXX Wrote:  

I consider myself a South America expert, and being Latin, I can tell you that girl like/similar the one posted above would have a hard time getting male attention in South America for a few main reasons:

1. She has NO ass (this is a huge attraction factor in S.A.)
2. Her face is not that great compared to your average Venezuelan/Colombian/Argie girls face.
3. She is not even blonde! Black hair is about as common as being white in Latvia, so no point there either as Latin men typically go crazy for blondes. I'm one of them....

In conclusion, if that is an example of Romanian women, then I guess my tropical, Latino ass will not be going to Romania, and instead head straight to Poland for blue-eyed blondes

So, if you come to South America, and that is your style of girls don't come to look for girls like her; 'cuz simply put...you'll have better options.


Mixx

SO you mean Poland is a better option for blonde-blue eyes type of women than latvia? How is black hair common in latvia?

Its just out of curiosity because despite being that north most of Baltic people I've seen are either mousy brown/ratt colored hair or deep dark brunette, full natural blondes (above 20 years old) are not particularly common there, but I could be wrong its based on my experience with meeting baltic people abroad.

Poland neither is that blond, most of the fair poles have more like ratt color hair, yellow/golden/light natural blondes are far commoner in germanic countries than in slavic ones. I think the places where more blondes are together would be Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands and Northern germany, of course all those places outside touristic areas. Iceland is slighty less naturally blond than those previously mentioned countries due to Irish influences, and Irish/Brits are way more brown/dark haired than blonde, in fact you have to struggle to find a full grown natural blond(not dishwaterish/light brown color)in places like southern england or wales.

Hi Derek

Natural Blonde is a Gene and very few people carry it and it is decreasing even more. You are right about Finland, Northern Sweden & Norway having some natural blondes. Most countries do, however the ratios are less. Very few in Poland, where I am right now.

That's why companies like L'Oreal is killing it with blonde hair dye! The hair dye market is worth over $1 billion per year in the U.S alone.

[Layercake]

(12-10-2011 12:43 PM)Derek Wrote:  

(12-10-2011 12:28 PM)Layercake Wrote:  

Hi Mixx

Great slating thanks. - but I think it's obvious from this photo she had just dyed her hair dark. Probably sick of being typecast as blonde. She is a natural blonde however. She just dyed it dark for a photo-shoot with a photographer.

In reference to blonde v brunette, I'm love them all! Even ridiculously hot redheads would "get it"

These days all girls dye their hair! Even dudes!

The only really natural blondes come from Northern Sweden & Norway.

It's a dying gene sadly.

Pure bullshit, blondest people in europe are frisians, wether they are from the dutch or german area. The bad part they are all like 190 cm/6'3, thus you need to be really tall to have fun there, And southern Sweden/Norway are probably slighty blonder than the north due to lesser uralic/lappid influences in south, in fact the blondest scandinavian country overall is Denmark, not Norway or Sweden. The blonde to brunette ratio there is unbelievable:

for example:

You wont come to such blonde crowds anywhere in eastern europe only in the places I've mentioned earlier.

Derek it isn't bullshit, I read it. I'm talking about natural blondes. How many natural blondes in that video? Not dyed blondes. Truth is, it's impossible to check, unless you want to do a pubic hair check.

[MiXX]

Honestly, I don't think I care if she is dyed or natural, what is the ultimate decision is that her blue/green-eyes compliment her dyed or natural blonde hair.

If she has black/brown eyes and blonde hair (dyed or natural)...I'll pass!!


Mixx

[Derek]

(12-10-2011 12:48 PM)Layercake Wrote:  

(12-10-2011 12:38 PM)Derek Wrote:  

(12-10-2011 12:13 PM)MiXX Wrote:  

I consider myself a South America expert, and being Latin, I can tell you that girl like/similar the one posted above would have a hard time getting male attention in South America for a few main reasons:

1. She has NO ass (this is a huge attraction factor in S.A.)
2. Her face is not that great compared to your average Venezuelan/Colombian/Argie girls face.
3. She is not even blonde! Black hair is about as common as being white in Latvia, so no point there either as Latin men typically go crazy for blondes. I'm one of them....

In conclusion, if that is an example of Romanian women, then I guess my tropical, Latino ass will not be going to Romania, and instead head straight to Poland for blue-eyed blondes

So, if you come to South America, and that is your style of girls don't come to look for girls like her; 'cuz simply put...you'll have better options.


Mixx

SO you mean Poland is a better option for blonde-blue eyes type of women than latvia? How is black hair common in latvia?

Its just out of curiosity because despite being that north most of Baltic people I've seen are either mousy brown/ratt colored hair or deep dark brunette, full natural blondes (above 20 years old) are not particularly common there, but I could be wrong its based on my experience with meeting baltic people abroad.

Poland neither is that blond, most of the fair poles have more like ratt color hair, yellow/golden/light natural blondes are far commoner in germanic countries than in slavic ones. I think the places where more blondes are together would be Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands and Northern germany, of course all those places outside touristic areas. Iceland is slighty less naturally blond than those previously mentioned countries due to Irish influences, and Irish/Brits are way more brown/dark haired than blonde, in fact you have to struggle to find a full grown natural blond(not dishwaterish/light brown color)in places like southern england or wales.

Hi Derek

Natural Blonde is a Gene and very few people carry it and it is decreasing even more. You are right about Finland, Northern Sweden & Norway having some natural blondes. Most countries do, however the ratios are less. Very few in Poland, where I am right now.

That's why companies like L'Oreal is killing it with blonde hair dye! The hair dye market is worth over $1 billion per year in the U.S alone.

And ? I can easily tell apart fake blondes from naturla ones, and Its pretty easy to know that nearly every us blond woman comes from a bottle ( except in upper midwest where u find people like utah mormons who can be very blond) but most of other whites lay more in the brown haired medium height range.

Us because they are mostly descended of Brits/irish (mostly mousy brown haired people) and then pallantine germans who are the darkest haired germans overall, not to mention southern italians and other darker people, thats way outside upper midwest (with very scando/nordic blood) being a genuine blond is not that common in the US... ancestry.. just ancestry..

I have felt like a wog when traveling across scandinavia, northern germany and holland, I have been in many places, specially rural areas where being brown haired (not even black haired) make you feel like a very strange alien across all the blondies, and I dont mean only women but men. a lot of carsten ramelow/dennis bergkamp types everywhere.

[Layercake]

Ha! If a natural blonde in South America were to dye her hair black, I think the legal penalty is to be stoned until death occurs by the entire local male community. seriously!

Mixx
[/quote]

Thank God you aren't the President!

[Layercake]

Hi Derek

Natural Blonde is a Gene and very few people carry it and it is decreasing even more. You are right about Finland, Northern Sweden & Norway having some natural blondes. Most countries do, however the ratios are less. Very few in Poland, where I am right now.

That's why companies like L'Oreal is killing it with blonde hair dye! The hair dye market is worth over $1 billion per year in the U.S alone.

[/quote]

Us because they are mostly descended of Brits/irish (mostly mousy brown haired people) and pallantine germans who are the darkest haired germans overall, not to mention southern italians and other darker people, thats way outside upper midwest (with very scando/nordic blood) being a genuine tall blond is not that common in the US... ancestry.. just ancestry..

.......yes...and your point is Derek?

[Layercake]

Honestly, I don't think I care if she is dyed or natural, what is the ultimate decision is that her blue/green-eyes compliment her dyed or natural blonde hair.

If she has black/brown eyes and blonde hair (dyed or natural)...I'll pass!!


Mixx
[/quote]

Hahaha just promise me bro, that you won't "stone her"...

Also saying she is unattractive is a LITTLE harsh don't you think?

You'd f**k her!

I have f***ed her!

[Derek]

(12-10-2011 12:59 PM)Layercake Wrote:  

.......yes...and your point is Derek?

My point is there are relatively few blond people in the world not because the gene is that recessive but because it was not that widespread worlwide unlike some people wants to believe.. the predominant blonde countries have all small populations!!. Neithern France, Spain, Italy or UK are particularly blond (out of the most populated euro countries) , and GErmany only in the North is very blond approaching Scandinavian/Dutch standards of blondness. The problem is the americas were settled by unblonde populations like spaniards/portuguese/italians and then The english/french in north america (who are more brown haired than blond, Imagine if the americas would get populated by scandinavians and dutch/north germans, there would be by far way more natural blonde people in the world than nowadays.

[Derek]

(12-10-2011 12:54 PM)MiXX Wrote:  

Honestly, I don't think I care if she is dyed or natural, what is the ultimate decision is that her blue/green-eyes compliment her dyed or natural blonde hair.

If she has black/brown eyes and blonde hair (dyed or natural)...I'll pass!!


Mixx

There is a world of difference between natural and fake blondes, At least to people like me who can tell easily whether they dye their hair blonde or not.

I've never liked fake blondes, Although some women with dark blond haire highlighting it isnt bad.

[Derek]

(12-10-2011 12:38 PM)Layercake Wrote:  

Read this (& weep) article from 2002 - still relevant however.

"Natural Blondes to Die Out in 200." - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2284783.stm

It was proven to be a hoax. There have been many times across human history where blonde extinction has been predicted. The first time was in beggining of 19 century.

[Layercake]

(12-10-2011 01:06 PM)Derek Wrote:  

(12-10-2011 12:59 PM)Layercake Wrote:  

.......yes...and your point is Derek?

My point is there are relatively few blond people in the world not because the gene is that recessive but because it was not that widespread worlwide unlike some people wants to believe.. the predominant blonde countries have all small populations!!. Neithern France, Spain, Italy or UK are particularly blond (out of the most populated euro countries) , and GErmany only in the North is very blond approaching Scandinavian/Dutch standards of blondness. The problem is the americas were settled by unblonde populations like spaniards/portuguese/italians and then The english/french in north america (who are more brown haired than blond, Imagine if the americas would get populated by scandinavians and dutch/north germans, there would be by far way more natural blonde people in the world than nowadays.

Hi Derek

To be honest this is pointless discussion. I don't base my points on a "what if" scenario like "Imagine if the americas would get populated by scandinavians and dutch/north germans..blah blah" - I base it on facts.

You are right about one thing, small populations don't help. But the gene is dying so says this BBC article.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2284783.stm

Over & Out because frankly I'm bored to tears now.

[Layercake]

There is a world of difference between natural and fake blondes, At least to people like me who can tell easily whether they dye their hair blonde or not.

[/quote]

Sorry I disagree. Only if they are Peroxide Blondes then obviously it is easy to spot. However for normal blonde dyes, cosmetics companies spending millions on R&D for these products to look as natural as possible.

If you think you are a genius at telling the difference then I suggest you go back to that festival - http://roskilde-festival.dk/ - with your clipboard and pen and conduct some market research, then come back here with the FACTS (not "what if's") on how many more natural blondes you found over non-natural blondes. Present it with pretty pie charts & then I'll believe you and write to the BBC telling them, their article is factually incorrect and some bloke called Derek is the new World's Expert on the subject matter.

[Derek]

(12-10-2011 01:34 PM)Layercake Wrote:  

Sorry I disagree. Only if they are Peroxide Blondes then obviously it is easy to spot. However for normal blonde dyes, cosmetics companies spending millions on R&D for these products to look as natural as possible.

If you think you are a genius at telling the difference then I suggest you go back to that festival - http://roskilde-festival.dk/ - with your clipboard and pen and conduct some market research, then come back here with the FACTS (not "what if's") on how many more natural blondes you found over non-natural blondes. Present it with pretty pie charts & then I'll believe you and write to the BBC telling them, their article is factually incorrect and some bloke called Derek is the new World's Expert on the subject matter.

Not reallym you can study anthropology and see what human types come more often with natural blonde hair and which ones do not, Im able to tell with exactitude when a girl dyes her hair, the only harder part is when a natural dark blonde girl add highlights and turns blonder.. but not when people with brown or black hair does, because I can easily point those eastern european typical faces that go naturally with brunette hair suddenly appearing blonde, or those typical atlantic/Western faces (seen often in parts of france or UK) with obviously bleached hair.

But you can easily see oliver kahn type of faces going often with natural blonde hair because those anthropological/racial types belong to natural blonde hair.

[Layercake]

(12-10-2011 01:45 PM)Derek Wrote:  

(12-10-2011 01:34 PM)Layercake Wrote:  

Sorry I disagree. Only if they are Peroxide Blondes then obviously it is easy to spot. However for normal blonde dyes, cosmetics companies spending millions on R&D for these products to look as natural as possible.

If you think you are a genius at telling the difference then I suggest you go back to that festival - http://roskilde-festival.dk/ - with your clipboard and pen and conduct some market research, then come back here with the FACTS (not "what if's") on how many more natural blondes you found over non-natural blondes. Present it with pretty pie charts & then I'll believe you and write to the BBC telling them, their article is factually incorrect and some bloke called Derek is the new World's Expert on the subject matter.

Not reallym you can study anthropology and see what human types come more often with natural blonde hair and which ones do not, Im able to tell with exactitude when a girl dyes her hair, the only harder part is when a natural dark blonde girl add highlights and turns blonder.. but not when people with brown or black hair does, because I can easily point those eastern european typical faces that go naturally with brunette hair suddenly appearing blonde, or those typical atlantic/Western faces (seen often in parts of france or UK) with obviously bleached hair.

But you can easily see oliver kahn type of faces going often with natural blonde hair because those anthropological/racial types belong to natural blonde hair.

Derek - That is not even English. Just Drivel...and Dull.

[MiXX]

Let's get back to fucking blondes. Dyed or natural who gives a shit? So long as her eyes are natural blue/green (not contact lenses) abd the pussylips are rosy pink...yummie!

There is also a scientific belief that the Y chromosome will be killed by X in another 150 years. Too bad none of us will be around to see it.


Mixx

[Layercake]

Dyed or natural who gives a shit?

Mixx
[/quote]

Dude

I agree. It is hard to tell the difference anyway...oh unless your Derek of course.

[KingofScotland]

Are people really saying that the girl this guys been posting photos of is unattractive?

[Layercake]

(12-10-2011 05:56 PM)KingofScotland Wrote:  

Are people really saying that the girl this guys been posting photos of is unattractive?

Yes they have! She's amazing. All natural too.

[BigAlexBoss]

Do you guys mind keeping this a Latvia data thread for those considering sarging there, instead of a blondes thread.

Cheers.

[Layercake]

(12-11-2011 01:25 PM)BigAlexBoss Wrote:  

Do you guys mind keeping this a Latvia data thread for those considering sarging there, instead of a blondes thread.

Cheers.

Dude
That conversation was ended a while ago.
You can thank Derek for that.
He is now banned.

[Roosh]

I'm going to have soften my initial harshness about Latvian girls. Yes, there is a bit of an obesity problem here but by and large the quality is solid. There are some afternoons I walk around and I'm seeing one stunner after the other. At night it's more hit or miss, and the problem is that in latvia day game during the winter is not very fruitful.

Overall, Polish girls have better bodies (thinner, bigger breasts), but Latvian girls have better faces (though a lot of Latvian girls have great bodies too). If you're coming from a Western country, you will be pleased with Latvian quality.

The major problem is that sex tourists have fucked things up. If you don't have a local wingman, she will think you're a sex tourist.