[StackGsMan]

(02-23-2017 05:18 AM)Naughty By Nature Wrote:  

(02-23-2017 01:15 AM)StackGsMan Wrote:  

(02-22-2017 07:34 PM)Naughty By Nature Wrote:  

Dudes, I just watched Expedia's YouTube features on The Big D and Houston. Wow, Dallas looked completely dead and empty. It did look visually nice, though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt7lpqdbNgA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9jWxwpXMPM

Alpone, I had no idea it was supposed to be that pretentious. That's not good, especially given how entitled the women in LA can be. I did hear Dallas is the home of 30k millionaires. Houston has its downsides, too. LA-esque logistics (extreme sprawl and traffic) and gooch sweat-inducing heat and humidity.

Anyone have any intel on Charlotte?

Man, I really think you are barking up the wrong tree with your focus on the South. In terms of having a good romantic/sex life the South in general (with some very big exceptions) can be as soul crushing as LA, but for different reasons.

Women in this part of the country are more sexually conservative than places you have been like Chicago and NYC. I'm not saying it is as bad as Pakistan, but most women are trying to get a ring on their finger.

Also you mentioned elsewhere that you seem to prefer day game and don't drink alcohol. The South is shit for day game compared to where you've been. For the most part you will probably have to go to a mall if you want a decent number of girls in one spot, and I personally hate malls.

The only good thing about women in this part of the country is they are more polite than in other areas, so if you approach reasonably you will not get blown out as much, although rejections are still high %.

If all you care about is finding an affordable city, then sure the South is fine, but if you care about your sex life I don't recommend it.

FAWCK!

Thanks bro. I'm the highest on Chicago but I figured I'd have some back-ups. I like Atlanta for its big booty bitches but it, too, has some horrid logistics. The Windy City, in my estimation, has the best blend of bad babes, excellent logistics, and affordability.

I've heard great things about Chicago. A friend of mine that used to live in Houston has family up there and visits a lot. His lay rate in Chicago, even though all he is doing is visiting temporarily, is like 3x or 4x higher than in Houston.

[puckerman]

Dallas is cooler and less humid than Houston. Based on my experience of both, traffic in the DFW area is also better. Both have better traffic than Austin.

I have heard that DFW cost of living is getting to be almost as bad as Austin. But the jobs in DFW pay more. I suspect DFW has more of a California problem than Houston does.